<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vintage Gone Soft: Arturia ARP2600 V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2004/12/16/vintage-gone-soft-arturia-arp2600-v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2004/12/16/vintage-gone-soft-arturia-arp2600-v/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jrubfv</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2004/12/16/vintage-gone-soft-arturia-arp2600-v/#comment-95249</link>
		<dc:creator>jrubfv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2004/12/16/vintage-gone-soft-arturia-arp2600-v/#comment-95249</guid>
		<description>http://20six.co.uk/ritas/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://20six.co.uk/ritas/" rel="nofollow">http://20six.co.uk/ritas/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2004/12/16/vintage-gone-soft-arturia-arp2600-v/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2004/12/16/vintage-gone-soft-arturia-arp2600-v/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>. . . is indeed cool. But if you can afford GBP1995, why not both? The Macbeth is only a loose interpretation of the 2600 (I've used the original 2600 a bit, quite different), whereas the Arturia is pretty faithful -- which some digital goodies not possible with the first, of course.

Er, by 'afford' I mean we can 'fantasize' about having both and unlimited time to play with them.

Peter
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>. . . is indeed cool. But if you can afford GBP1995, why not both? The Macbeth is only a loose interpretation of the 2600 (I&#8217;ve used the original 2600 a bit, quite different), whereas the Arturia is pretty faithful &#8212; which some digital goodies not possible with the first, of course.</p>
<p>Er, by &#8216;afford&#8217; I mean we can &#8216;fantasize&#8217; about having both and unlimited time to play with them.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2004/12/16/vintage-gone-soft-arturia-arp2600-v/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2004/12/16/vintage-gone-soft-arturia-arp2600-v/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Forget all that software nonsense. It's all about the Macbeth M5 - a reinvented, modernised, fully-analog, slider-covered recreation of the 2600 for Â£1995
http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2004/12/new-macbeth-m5-yes-theyre-going-to-put.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget all that software nonsense. It&#8217;s all about the Macbeth M5 - a reinvented, modernised, fully-analog, slider-covered recreation of the 2600 for Â£1995<br />
<a href="http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2004/12/new-macbeth-m5-yes-theyre-going-to-put.html" rel="nofollow">http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2004/12/new-macbeth-m5-yes-theyre-going-to-put.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
