<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Reasons Live 5 Could Revolutionize Remixes and Mash-ups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:52:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you, Eric -- though I&#039;ve got you beat, just slightly; I was on the press list with Ableton before Live shipped and have used the program since 1.0. Remember when you HAD to warp audio? I was so relieved when they gave us a switch. Now things continue to get better; 1.0 was a niche tool for sure, 4.x a platinum hit. 5 could be the one that goes multi-platinum. Now for us hard-core users who are likely to be more critical (and find lots to do with the power users), I&#039;m anxious to put this under further scrutiny.

Peter
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you, Eric &#8212; though I&#8217;ve got you beat, just slightly; I was on the press list with Ableton before Live shipped and have used the program since 1.0. Remember when you HAD to warp audio? I was so relieved when they gave us a switch. Now things continue to get better; 1.0 was a niche tool for sure, 4.x a platinum hit. 5 could be the one that goes multi-platinum. Now for us hard-core users who are likely to be more critical (and find lots to do with the power users), I&#8217;m anxious to put this under further scrutiny.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EricRichmond</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>EricRichmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>Ever since I saw an ad for Live 1.5 I knew this *could* be the app to take DJing to the next level, I think with 5 they&#039;re going to fulfill that promise.

I&#039;ve been an enthusiast of Live since 1.5, an owner since 4.0, so I&#039;m happy to see whatever success they can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since I saw an ad for Live 1.5 I knew this *could* be the app to take DJing to the next level, I think with 5 they&#8217;re going to fulfill that promise.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been an enthusiast of Live since 1.5, an owner since 4.0, so I&#8217;m happy to see whatever success they can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 03:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll see if there&#039;s any word from the Abletons on this. But as has been discussed here before, it&#039;s not clear whether that&#039;s really the prime variable in Mac performance of Live. And, gee, maybe by July we&#039;ll have some new PowerBooks . . . wouldn&#039;t that be nice . . . a dude can dream, right?  8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll see if there&#8217;s any word from the Abletons on this. But as has been discussed here before, it&#8217;s not clear whether that&#8217;s really the prime variable in Mac performance of Live. And, gee, maybe by July we&#8217;ll have some new PowerBooks . . . wouldn&#8217;t that be nice . . . a dude can dream, right?  8)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cycle60</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>cycle60</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 03:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/06/01/3-reasons-live-5-could-revolutionize-remixes-and-mash-ups/#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>...but i didn&#039;t see any mention of optimization for altivec. other than that, it&#039;s looking mighty fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but i didn&#8217;t see any mention of optimization for altivec. other than that, it&#8217;s looking mighty fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
