<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moogerfooger MF-104Z &#8220;Luxury&#8221; Analog Delay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/07/20/moogerfooger-mf-104z-luxury-analog-delay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/07/20/moogerfooger-mf-104z-luxury-analog-delay/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/07/20/moogerfooger-mf-104z-luxury-analog-delay/#comment-359204</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/07/20/moogerfooger-mf-104z-luxury-analog-delay/#comment-359204</guid>
		<description>ummm its expensive but nothing else sounds like it period.
       i mean in the future these will be one of the most wanted delays ever made.
 best analog delay for dub hands down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm its expensive but nothing else sounds like it period.<br />
       i mean in the future these will be one of the most wanted delays ever made.<br />
 best analog delay for dub hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/07/20/moogerfooger-mf-104z-luxury-analog-delay/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 05:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/07/20/moogerfooger-mf-104z-luxury-analog-delay/#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ridiculous!&lt;/strong&gt; Moog may be quality equipment, but their prices, as those of some other manufacturers, are more much a sign of our times, than anything worh considering...:x 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ridiculous!</strong> Moog may be quality equipment, but their prices, as those of some other manufacturers, are more much a sign of our times, than anything worh considering&#8230;:x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reflex</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/07/20/moogerfooger-mf-104z-luxury-analog-delay/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>reflex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/07/20/moogerfooger-mf-104z-luxury-analog-delay/#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>Rationally, there are better ways to spend this much money. So why do I still want one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rationally, there are better ways to spend this much money. So why do I still want one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
