<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SONAR 5: Windows Audio App Adds Synths, Reverb, Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/08/sonar-5-windows-audio-app-adds-synths-reverb-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/08/sonar-5-windows-audio-app-adds-synths-reverb-features/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/08/sonar-5-windows-audio-app-adds-synths-reverb-features/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/08/sonar-5-windows-audio-app-adds-synths-reverb-features/#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>I have been a loyal user of Sonar Ver. 1 since it came out and have nothing bad to say for it.  Finally I am considering an upgrade.  The only thing that jars me is I wish they'd spend less on the synths.  All I do and all I will do in the future is record real instruments.  If Cakewalk would produce a program pakced to the gills with stickly digital audio features I would be extremely happy.  However I will be upgrading to 5. :) 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a loyal user of Sonar Ver. 1 since it came out and have nothing bad to say for it.  Finally I am considering an upgrade.  The only thing that jars me is I wish they&#8217;d spend less on the synths.  All I do and all I will do in the future is record real instruments.  If Cakewalk would produce a program pakced to the gills with stickly digital audio features I would be extremely happy.  However I will be upgrading to 5. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbiotic</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/08/sonar-5-windows-audio-app-adds-synths-reverb-features/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbiotic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/08/sonar-5-windows-audio-app-adds-synths-reverb-features/#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Gotta say, if I was looking for an all-in-one DAW for the PC, Sonar would be at the top of my list.  This is the first release of a PC-based DAW that approximates the 'total' solution that Logic has become for the Mac...At least in terms of 'classic' DAWs - versus something like Live, which uses a somewhat different paradigm than Sonar or Logic.

That said, I'm still very happy with Logic Pro on my Mac, and if I'm going to run something to compliment that on my PC, it will in all likelihood be Live.  Sonar customers will be very pleased with this release I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta say, if I was looking for an all-in-one DAW for the PC, Sonar would be at the top of my list.  This is the first release of a PC-based DAW that approximates the &#8216;total&#8217; solution that Logic has become for the Mac&#8230;At least in terms of &#8216;classic&#8217; DAWs - versus something like Live, which uses a somewhat different paradigm than Sonar or Logic.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m still very happy with Logic Pro on my Mac, and if I&#8217;m going to run something to compliment that on my PC, it will in all likelihood be Live.  Sonar customers will be very pleased with this release I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
