<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virus TI: The Synth That Thinks It&#8217;s Software, Finally Shipping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/comment-page-1/#comment-1559</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/#comment-1559</guid>
		<description>I was surprised by the midi/audio integration, I&#039;s like what on earth is that ! I&#039;m gonna buy that, no matter what! Not because Access added all these new features,  I&#039;d definitly take advantage of what&#039;s new, don&#039;t get me wrong...but i rather get this one instead of a virus b or c. Now who wouldn&#039;t ? I know I could get a much better deal for a 2nd hand virus c...but I know that I&#039;d regret the fact that I missed this opportunity. It looks good and sounds even better ! In all, I think the guys behind this beast are very much like us musicians, making our lives easier using the equipment, using midi/audio integration, what a blast ! I know now that I won&#039;t be bugged about thinking to plug in&#039;out midi cables... midi interface, bad syncing...Virus TI and me...makes one for faster creations and better results I say ! 
Virtual mixing...infinit possibilities...Who cares who can afford what and what not...if you want it, GO GET IT !
and be happy :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was surprised by the midi/audio integration, I&#8217;s like what on earth is that ! I&#8217;m gonna buy that, no matter what! Not because Access added all these new features,  I&#8217;d definitly take advantage of what&#8217;s new, don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8230;but i rather get this one instead of a virus b or c. Now who wouldn&#8217;t ? I know I could get a much better deal for a 2nd hand virus c&#8230;but I know that I&#8217;d regret the fact that I missed this opportunity. It looks good and sounds even better ! In all, I think the guys behind this beast are very much like us musicians, making our lives easier using the equipment, using midi/audio integration, what a blast ! I know now that I won&#8217;t be bugged about thinking to plug in&#8217;out midi cables&#8230; midi interface, bad syncing&#8230;Virus TI and me&#8230;makes one for faster creations and better results I say !<br />
Virtual mixing&#8230;infinit possibilities&#8230;Who cares who can afford what and what not&#8230;if you want it, GO GET IT !<br />
and be happy :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbiotic</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbiotic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>Yes - it uses the hardware DSP in VST/AU mode.  Only one instance is possible at a time, though it does have a full-multi mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; it uses the hardware DSP in VST/AU mode.  Only one instance is possible at a time, though it does have a full-multi mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/comment-page-1/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>Does the TI use it&#039;s hardware DSP chips when it&#039;s in VST mode - and if so, can you run more than one instance of the plugin at a time...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the TI use it&#8217;s hardware DSP chips when it&#8217;s in VST mode &#8211; and if so, can you run more than one instance of the plugin at a time&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reflex</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>reflex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 01:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>On one hand, I&#039;d love a Virus TI in my studio. On the other, I&#039;m currently dating the much more affordable PowerCore&#124;Virus. The only thing it&#039;s missing is a nice, knobby interface. And real wood. Besides, my wife would banish me to the garden shed if another synth snuck into the house. Sadly, I suspect many people these days think like I do. I wish Access continued good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On one hand, I&#8217;d love a Virus TI in my studio. On the other, I&#8217;m currently dating the much more affordable PowerCore|Virus. The only thing it&#8217;s missing is a nice, knobby interface. And real wood. Besides, my wife would banish me to the garden shed if another synth snuck into the house. Sadly, I suspect many people these days think like I do. I wish Access continued good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbiotic</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/comment-page-1/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbiotic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>The only reason other synths couldn&#039;t have this level of integration would be cost - both of components and development.  But I agree that for &#039;flagship&#039; systems, this is bridging the gap between host-based vs. dsp-based vs. hardware systems.

But for me, inspiration comes from interface and capabilities.  The other night I sat down on the couch with my Machinedrum and was immediately reminded of why it is such a great instrument - immediate, intuitive, inspiring.  Quite simply, it is well designed, and designed to be a tool of creation.  I&#039;ve never found the Virus interface to be &#039;intuitive&#039; the way that Machinedrum is, or the way a DSI PEK is...

Other than the software-interface, there isn&#039;t much new with the TI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason other synths couldn&#8217;t have this level of integration would be cost &#8211; both of components and development.  But I agree that for &#8216;flagship&#8217; systems, this is bridging the gap between host-based vs. dsp-based vs. hardware systems.</p>
<p>But for me, inspiration comes from interface and capabilities.  The other night I sat down on the couch with my Machinedrum and was immediately reminded of why it is such a great instrument &#8211; immediate, intuitive, inspiring.  Quite simply, it is well designed, and designed to be a tool of creation.  I&#8217;ve never found the Virus interface to be &#8216;intuitive&#8217; the way that Machinedrum is, or the way a DSI PEK is&#8230;</p>
<p>Other than the software-interface, there isn&#8217;t much new with the TI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/comment-page-1/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>I think quite simply the problem is economics. Look at the Korg OASYS -- building multi-functional digital synths is expensive. The good news is, it won&#039;t stay that way; circuitry prices continue to come down.

I agree about synthesis types. I think people are MORE than ready for new sounds, and while the virtual analog market is big, there&#039;s a limit to how many instruments you need doing the same things.

But I do hope the TI is an indication of software integration to come. There&#039;s no reason other synths couldn&#039;t have this rich level of integration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think quite simply the problem is economics. Look at the Korg OASYS &#8212; building multi-functional digital synths is expensive. The good news is, it won&#8217;t stay that way; circuitry prices continue to come down.</p>
<p>I agree about synthesis types. I think people are MORE than ready for new sounds, and while the virtual analog market is big, there&#8217;s a limit to how many instruments you need doing the same things.</p>
<p>But I do hope the TI is an indication of software integration to come. There&#8217;s no reason other synths couldn&#8217;t have this rich level of integration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbiotic</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbiotic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/09/28/virus-ti-the-synth-that-thinks-its-software-finally-shipping/#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>I know that the TI is the creme de la creme of Virtual Analogs.  And I know that the VA market is still bigger than most other types of synths and samplers.

But it is really hard for me to get excited about ANY VA&#039;s these days.  It all seems to be &#039;more of the same&#039; (but with obviously increasing levels of sophistication).  

I&#039;d really love to see more ingenuity along the lines of some of the boutique manufacturers (DSI PolyEvolver, for example).  New synthesis types, new interfaces, etc.

I know not all manufacturers could survive in that market, but give me something NEW to play with - something different.

I&#039;m sure this is an awesome synth, and I&#039;d love to have one.  But in all honesty, it is the synths that push the envelope (not simply better define it) that interest me.  Roland V-Synth, Hartmann Neuron, etc...

As the old saying goes: subvert the dominant paradigm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that the TI is the creme de la creme of Virtual Analogs.  And I know that the VA market is still bigger than most other types of synths and samplers.</p>
<p>But it is really hard for me to get excited about ANY VA&#8217;s these days.  It all seems to be &#8216;more of the same&#8217; (but with obviously increasing levels of sophistication).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d really love to see more ingenuity along the lines of some of the boutique manufacturers (DSI PolyEvolver, for example).  New synthesis types, new interfaces, etc.</p>
<p>I know not all manufacturers could survive in that market, but give me something NEW to play with &#8211; something different.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure this is an awesome synth, and I&#8217;d love to have one.  But in all honesty, it is the synths that push the envelope (not simply better define it) that interest me.  Roland V-Synth, Hartmann Neuron, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>As the old saying goes: subvert the dominant paradigm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
