<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Numark iDJ Reviewed by &#8220;Playlist&#8221;, Twice; Does Vinyl Beat `Pod?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-118510</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-118510</guid>
		<description>is it real ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it real ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>Universally reviled -- sure. Based on something that was only on paper. Now I've actually gotten to handle the object of hatred and find out how it works objectively. Which was, admittedly, what everyone predicted. But I think it's worth seeing concrete, solid evidence.

Anyway, we shouldn't be hear talking about this -- we should be watching that awesome film strip again. ;-)

Peter
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Universally reviled &#8212; sure. Based on something that was only on paper. Now I&#8217;ve actually gotten to handle the object of hatred and find out how it works objectively. Which was, admittedly, what everyone predicted. But I think it&#8217;s worth seeing concrete, solid evidence.</p>
<p>Anyway, we shouldn&#8217;t be hear talking about this &#8212; we should be watching that awesome film strip again. ;-)</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rigel</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>rigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>why do you insist on still posting blog entries about what has been universally reviled here in previous posts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do you insist on still posting blog entries about what has been universally reviled here in previous posts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>Sorry that wasn't clear. The iPod is absolutely the device with something to prove, and as I observe, DJing with iPods just isn't much fun. DJing with vinyl might be trickier for amateurs, but even novices enjoy that challenge right away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that wasn&#8217;t clear. The iPod is absolutely the device with something to prove, and as I observe, DJing with iPods just isn&#8217;t much fun. DJing with vinyl might be trickier for amateurs, but even novices enjoy that challenge right away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1858</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 06:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1858</guid>
		<description>I found myself a little confused at the title of this post. Since when was it Vinyl's job to beat out the iPod? Maybe I'm confused as to what the current standard of DJ'ing media is right now, but I'm pretty sure it's not the iPod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found myself a little confused at the title of this post. Since when was it Vinyl&#8217;s job to beat out the iPod? Maybe I&#8217;m confused as to what the current standard of DJ&#8217;ing media is right now, but I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s not the iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1857</guid>
		<description>Numark's just making a little quick cash off the Apple crazies. These gullible trust-fund kids will buy any white plastic piece of junk you set in front of them.  I chuckled when I read, "with a little practice advanced users will be able to mix two tunes together beatmatching by ear".  I donâ€™t know anyone "advanced" enough to beat-match without pitch control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Numark&#8217;s just making a little quick cash off the Apple crazies. These gullible trust-fund kids will buy any white plastic piece of junk you set in front of them.  I chuckled when I read, &#8220;with a little practice advanced users will be able to mix two tunes together beatmatching by ear&#8221;.  I donâ€™t know anyone &#8220;advanced&#8221; enough to beat-match without pitch control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>I observe both the complete lack of pitch control and poor cueing -- among many, many other problems.

There are free DJ apps for Mac and Windows that are more fun to DJ with. Hook up a piece of cross-fader hardware for about $100 and invite your friends over.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I observe both the complete lack of pitch control and poor cueing &#8212; among many, many other problems.</p>
<p>There are free DJ apps for Mac and Windows that are more fun to DJ with. Hook up a piece of cross-fader hardware for about $100 and invite your friends over.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2005/10/31/numark-idj-reviewed-by-playlist-twice-does-vinyl-beat-pod/#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>I still don't understand what the point of this thing is without pitch control?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t understand what the point of this thing is without pitch control?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
