<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look Out, Pro Tools: New High-end Apple + Apogee Audio Pairing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: seo updates</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-518518</link>
		<dc:creator>seo updates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-518518</guid>
		<description>Good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donnacha costello</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-89305</link>
		<dc:creator>donnacha costello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-89305</guid>
		<description>Nice news for logic users. However, I can't stand to use logic or sonar or cubase or performer etc etc. The only DAW I ever liked is PT so it doesn't really matter to me what hardware developments there are if I have to change DAW to take advantage. I got my digi converter as part of an upgrade path earlier this year but I realise by now I should have gone for apogee and I'm going to switch. I was previously using digi 888&#124;24s with my PT mix system and perhaps it's just me but I think they sounded better at 48k than my digi 96i I/O does at 96k. Apparently many mastering engineers feel that wordlength is more important than sampling frequency and in this case I would agree. Anyhow, regardless of hardware, I'll be sticking with PT due to the software and plugins, it's the only way for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice news for logic users. However, I can&#8217;t stand to use logic or sonar or cubase or performer etc etc. The only DAW I ever liked is PT so it doesn&#8217;t really matter to me what hardware developments there are if I have to change DAW to take advantage. I got my digi converter as part of an upgrade path earlier this year but I realise by now I should have gone for apogee and I&#8217;m going to switch. I was previously using digi 888|24s with my PT mix system and perhaps it&#8217;s just me but I think they sounded better at 48k than my digi 96i I/O does at 96k. Apparently many mastering engineers feel that wordlength is more important than sampling frequency and in this case I would agree. Anyhow, regardless of hardware, I&#8217;ll be sticking with PT due to the software and plugins, it&#8217;s the only way for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trotz</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>trotz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;All good points about Nuendo; it wasn't dislike at all -- I just failed to fully contextualize this as I got a bit carried away.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Don't we all do that? :)

&lt;blockquote&gt;I will take issue, however, with a computer card disqualifying something as "high-end," as there are plenty of situations where sub-1 ms latency isn't a deal-breaker.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I understand your words. Maybe my point was more to place Yamaha/Nuendo as &lt;strong&gt;also&lt;/strong&gt; being hi-end rather than dismissing every other soundcard only solution. 

I'd like to add that Cubase SX and Nuendo share the same code maybe more than 95%. Everything I said about Nuendo is also applicable to SX, which is a widely available &lt;em&gt;high end&lt;/em&gt; ;) solution.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>All good points about Nuendo; it wasn&#8217;t dislike at all &#8212; I just failed to fully contextualize this as I got a bit carried away.  </p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t we all do that? :)</p>
<blockquote><p>I will take issue, however, with a computer card disqualifying something as &#8220;high-end,&#8221; as there are plenty of situations where sub-1 ms latency isn&#8217;t a deal-breaker.  </p></blockquote>
<p>I understand your words. Maybe my point was more to place Yamaha/Nuendo as <strong>also</strong> being hi-end rather than dismissing every other soundcard only solution. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to add that Cubase SX and Nuendo share the same code maybe more than 95%. Everything I said about Nuendo is also applicable to SX, which is a widely available <em>high end</em> ;) solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>All good points about Nuendo; it wasn't dislike at all -- I just failed to fully contextualize this as I got a bit carried away. I do think the Nuendo/Yamaha hardware integration is important, for the same reason as I think the Apogee solution is: there are a lot of potential customers, in a lot of different lines of work with different needs, who have at least perceived that their only choice is Pro Tools. Ironically, for some of these people, that means they avoid the computer route altogether -- they're afraid of making the investment. So I'm not even "slamming" Pro Tools here; I think in the long run additional competition is a sign of maturity in the market and could be good for everyone, Digidesign included. (Looking on the video side, for instance, Final Cut Pro hasn't fully supplanted Avid in pro video editing -- it's broadened the market.)

And I think you're spot on in terms of why Nuendo + Yamaha is so cool. In fact, it proves the point: Nuendo 2 and Nuendo 3 have been steadily gaining ground in studios, and will continue to. (I'll be interested to see what the buzz level is over at their booth . . .)

Anyway, I'm not a Nuendo user, and haven't reviewed Nuendo (nor am I likely to, as it's not my major area of expertise, as I indicated here).

I probably should be more careful of the term "high-end," too, except I have no other way of distinguishing the person who's creating some loops on their laptop from the person who does this 5 days a week in a multimillion-dollar studio!

I will take issue, however, with a computer card disqualifying something as "high-end," as there are plenty of situations where sub-1 ms latency isn't a deal-breaker. But this only goes to show, again, the term doesn't mean anything: you either need something, or you don't. And once you've seen the facts (plus non-factual evidence, like whether you *enjoy* working in Nuendo or Logic more, which shouldn't be discounted, either), you ought to be able to make that call.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good points about Nuendo; it wasn&#8217;t dislike at all &#8212; I just failed to fully contextualize this as I got a bit carried away. I do think the Nuendo/Yamaha hardware integration is important, for the same reason as I think the Apogee solution is: there are a lot of potential customers, in a lot of different lines of work with different needs, who have at least perceived that their only choice is Pro Tools. Ironically, for some of these people, that means they avoid the computer route altogether &#8212; they&#8217;re afraid of making the investment. So I&#8217;m not even &#8220;slamming&#8221; Pro Tools here; I think in the long run additional competition is a sign of maturity in the market and could be good for everyone, Digidesign included. (Looking on the video side, for instance, Final Cut Pro hasn&#8217;t fully supplanted Avid in pro video editing &#8212; it&#8217;s broadened the market.)</p>
<p>And I think you&#8217;re spot on in terms of why Nuendo + Yamaha is so cool. In fact, it proves the point: Nuendo 2 and Nuendo 3 have been steadily gaining ground in studios, and will continue to. (I&#8217;ll be interested to see what the buzz level is over at their booth . . .)</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m not a Nuendo user, and haven&#8217;t reviewed Nuendo (nor am I likely to, as it&#8217;s not my major area of expertise, as I indicated here).</p>
<p>I probably should be more careful of the term &#8220;high-end,&#8221; too, except I have no other way of distinguishing the person who&#8217;s creating some loops on their laptop from the person who does this 5 days a week in a multimillion-dollar studio!</p>
<p>I will take issue, however, with a computer card disqualifying something as &#8220;high-end,&#8221; as there are plenty of situations where sub-1 ms latency isn&#8217;t a deal-breaker. But this only goes to show, again, the term doesn&#8217;t mean anything: you either need something, or you don&#8217;t. And once you&#8217;ve seen the facts (plus non-factual evidence, like whether you *enjoy* working in Nuendo or Logic more, which shouldn&#8217;t be discounted, either), you ought to be able to make that call.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trotz</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>trotz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>but it can not qualify as being the only "turn-key, high-end hardware solution". High end digital mixer Yamaha DM-2000 shows tight integration with Nuendo offering the same number of channels with RME Audio cards (bundled with Nuendo).

I think one should know Nuendo's possibilities such as:

[LIST] external FX integration that lets you use DM2000's internal FX as latency compensated send/returns inside Nuendo's mixer
[LIST]Studio Manager integration that allows total recall of every mixer parameter "per project"
[LIST]Control surface with LED strips, 25 automated faders and rotary encoders and "selected channel" extra controllers
[LIST]expandable analog modelled DSP FX, etc...

I hardly fail to see this as  a high-end hardware solution and it has been available for quite a long time for everybody to know about it. Try to do different cue mixes with eq, compressor and fx loops at less than 1ms. latency by using &lt;strong&gt;only a computer and a soundcard&lt;/strong&gt; and I will tell you how easy that doesn't qualify as a high-end solution.

Your dislike for Nuendo-Yamaha or maybe simply lack of knowledge (as I have found in the DAW reviews failing to acknowledge the latest Nuendo 3.x achievements) shouldn't hide other simpler, well-stated facts.

BTW I also love Apogee's products, just happen to know Yamaha's product line also.  :roll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but it can not qualify as being the only &#8220;turn-key, high-end hardware solution&#8221;. High end digital mixer Yamaha DM-2000 shows tight integration with Nuendo offering the same number of channels with RME Audio cards (bundled with Nuendo).</p>
<p>I think one should know Nuendo&#8217;s possibilities such as:</p>
<p>[LIST] external FX integration that lets you use DM2000&#8217;s internal FX as latency compensated send/returns inside Nuendo&#8217;s mixer<br />
[LIST]Studio Manager integration that allows total recall of every mixer parameter &#8220;per project&#8221;<br />
[LIST]Control surface with LED strips, 25 automated faders and rotary encoders and &#8220;selected channel&#8221; extra controllers<br />
[LIST]expandable analog modelled DSP FX, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>I hardly fail to see this as  a high-end hardware solution and it has been available for quite a long time for everybody to know about it. Try to do different cue mixes with eq, compressor and fx loops at less than 1ms. latency by using <strong>only a computer and a soundcard</strong> and I will tell you how easy that doesn&#8217;t qualify as a high-end solution.</p>
<p>Your dislike for Nuendo-Yamaha or maybe simply lack of knowledge (as I have found in the DAW reviews failing to acknowledge the latest Nuendo 3.x achievements) shouldn&#8217;t hide other simpler, well-stated facts.</p>
<p>BTW I also love Apogee&#8217;s products, just happen to know Yamaha&#8217;s product line also.  :roll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ticcthesoulrebel</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2125</link>
		<dc:creator>ticcthesoulrebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2125</guid>
		<description>This is Big really big .Before this if you wanted high end sound for Logic you really only had two choices ,Motu or Digidesign. Most accounts say that they are close in quality(hint:same coverters) but most hi-end studios had Logic as a front end for Pro-tools HD.
 I think Apogee can change that when ever i go to mix a song, every high-end studio has apogee converters to go into and out of the pro-tools rig. Now you just have to get one interface this is great why do you need pro-tools Hardware   :p 
This is Big</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Big really big .Before this if you wanted high end sound for Logic you really only had two choices ,Motu or Digidesign. Most accounts say that they are close in quality(hint:same coverters) but most hi-end studios had Logic as a front end for Pro-tools HD.<br />
 I think Apogee can change that when ever i go to mix a song, every high-end studio has apogee converters to go into and out of the pro-tools rig. Now you just have to get one interface this is great why do you need pro-tools Hardware   :p<br />
This is Big</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ticcthesoulrebel</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2124</link>
		<dc:creator>ticcthesoulrebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/01/18/look-out-pro-tools-new-high-end-apple-apogee-audio-pairing/#comment-2124</guid>
		<description>This is Big really big .Before this if you wanted high end sound for Logic you really only had two choices ,Motu or Digidesign. Most accounts say that they are close in quality(hint:same coverters) but most hi-end studios had Logic as a front end for Pro-tools HD.
 I think Apogee can change that when ever i go to mix a song, every high-end studio has apogee converters to go into and out of the pro-tools rig. Now you just have to get one interface this is great why do you need pro-tools Hardware   :p 
This is Big</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Big really big .Before this if you wanted high end sound for Logic you really only had two choices ,Motu or Digidesign. Most accounts say that they are close in quality(hint:same coverters) but most hi-end studios had Logic as a front end for Pro-tools HD.<br />
 I think Apogee can change that when ever i go to mix a song, every high-end studio has apogee converters to go into and out of the pro-tools rig. Now you just have to get one interface this is great why do you need pro-tools Hardware   :p<br />
This is Big</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
