Comments on: AutoTune 5: Graphical Input, Microtonal Tunings, Pen Tablet Input, Beat Sync http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/ The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:20:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: donald haveson http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-41299 donald haveson Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:21:59 +0000 http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-41299 I saw this at AES, the humanize function alone blows every other pitch correction unit out there... very natural, easy to use. also, the graphical mode is no longer a pain. I saw this at AES, the humanize function alone blows every other pitch correction unit out there… very natural, easy to use. also, the graphical mode is no longer a pain.

]]> By: dave ahl http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-37058 dave ahl Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:19:28 +0000 http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-37058 does anyone have any comments on AutoTune vs. the pitch correction built into DP4.6? it seems that autotune offers much more in the way of tweakability.. does anyone have any comments on AutoTune vs. the pitch correction built into DP4.6? it seems that autotune offers much more in the way of tweakability..

]]> By: Peter Kirn http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-36902 Peter Kirn Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:51:04 +0000 http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-36902 Usability, yes, which is a big deal -- but features? I generally choose usability *over* features, but what does V-Vocal have that AutoTune doesn't? (Seriously, I'd like to know -- especially as the new SONAR just arrived and I want to get playing with it!) Usability, yes, which is a big deal — but features? I generally choose usability *over* features, but what does V-Vocal have that AutoTune doesn’t? (Seriously, I’d like to know — especially as the new SONAR just arrived and I want to get playing with it!)

]]> By: matman http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-36878 matman Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:33:38 +0000 http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-36878 Yah, looks like they are almost caught up to Roland V-Vocal in features and usability, which incidentally is free with Sonar Producer. Antares made this popular, but they lost the race. Yah, looks like they are almost caught up to Roland V-Vocal in features and usability, which incidentally is free with Sonar Producer.

Antares made this popular, but they lost the race.

]]> By: gse http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-36712 gse Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:16:30 +0000 http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/10/03/autotune-5-graphical-input-microtonal-tunings-pen-tablet-input-beat-sync/#comment-36712 I hope they improved the core UI. Autotune 3 and 4's graphical mode was incredibly painful to use, especially for anything more than a single quick fix. I hope they improved the core UI. Autotune 3 and 4’s graphical mode was incredibly painful to use, especially for anything more than a single quick fix.

]]>