<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macworld: Will Apple Keep its iPhone Closed? Multi-Touch Patents?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/macworld-will-apple-keep-its-iphone-closed-multi-touch-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/macworld-will-apple-keep-its-iphone-closed-multi-touch-patents/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LifeParticles.com &#187; Iphone-Killer starts shipping</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/macworld-will-apple-keep-its-iphone-closed-multi-touch-patents/#comment-212241</link>
		<dc:creator>LifeParticles.com &#187; Iphone-Killer starts shipping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/macworld-will-apple-keep-its-iphone-closed-multi-touch-patents/#comment-212241</guid>
		<description>[...] German Geek website reports that the The Iphone-Killer (the Iphone for geeks), OpenMoko, starts shipphing July. Unlike Apples Iphone, OpenMoke is not closed platform. The German Website reports further that OpenMokos 2nd hardware revision will provide WiFi, 3D acceleration and 256 MB Flash (shipping starts October 2007). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] German Geek website reports that the The Iphone-Killer (the Iphone for geeks), OpenMoko, starts shipphing July. Unlike Apples Iphone, OpenMoke is not closed platform. The German Website reports further that OpenMokos 2nd hardware revision will provide WiFi, 3D acceleration and 256 MB Flash (shipping starts October 2007). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carson mehl</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/macworld-will-apple-keep-its-iphone-closed-multi-touch-patents/#comment-106217</link>
		<dc:creator>carson mehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/macworld-will-apple-keep-its-iphone-closed-multi-touch-patents/#comment-106217</guid>
		<description>WTF? The iPhone could go from great to way greater if it allowed the developer community to make some kick ass widgets.  What a shame...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF? The iPhone could go from great to way greater if it allowed the developer community to make some kick ass widgets.  What a shame&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaymis Loveday</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/macworld-will-apple-keep-its-iphone-closed-multi-touch-patents/#comment-105064</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaymis Loveday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/macworld-will-apple-keep-its-iphone-closed-multi-touch-patents/#comment-105064</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, YouTube—of course. But you don’t need to have Flash to show YouTube. All you need to do is deal with YouTube. And plus, we could get ‘em to up their video resolution at the same time, by using h.264 instead of the old codec&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The arrogance on that guy is astounding! "We'll make youtube change their site because we can't be bothered developing a robust solution.. Actually making a useful device is a lot of effort, we'll just get youtube to reencode 10 million videos"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yeah, YouTube—of course. But you don’t need to have Flash to show YouTube. All you need to do is deal with YouTube. And plus, we could get ‘em to up their video resolution at the same time, by using h.264 instead of the old codec</p></blockquote>
<p>The arrogance on that guy is astounding! &#8220;We&#8217;ll make youtube change their site because we can&#8217;t be bothered developing a robust solution.. Actually making a useful device is a lot of effort, we&#8217;ll just get youtube to reencode 10 million videos&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
