<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Max 5 Available For Download Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452799</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452799</guid>
		<description>@Art: I can deal with the slower interface if it saves me time in workflow.  And it looks like that might happen, though I'll need a couple more weeks to decide.  [insert Win vs. Mac debate here]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Art: I can deal with the slower interface if it saves me time in workflow.  And it looks like that might happen, though I&#8217;ll need a couple more weeks to decide.  [insert Win vs. Mac debate here]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452586</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452586</guid>
		<description>argh! darn, they still use that horrid, horrid, third-party copy-protection. I want to use max, i really do but I refuse to install that rubbish on my computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>argh! darn, they still use that horrid, horrid, third-party copy-protection. I want to use max, i really do but I refuse to install that rubbish on my computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452547</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452547</guid>
		<description>@lost: It's definitely C74's work, not Ableton, so if there's an Ableton influence it's just inspirational. It's two ways, though, in that I understand Live's current video support includes input from the C74 world. As for what else the collaboration might yield, you'll have to wait and see.

@noou: Not sure where your CPU load issue might be; it's going to be difficult to assume anything based on one patch. But honestly, I'd say perhaps your best answer is to use Pd. I don't think Max is the right tool for everyone, or for every task. And people might benefit from what you're doing in an open source implementation. That's not a knock against Max; on the contrary, I think it's better for everyone when they're able to exercise their choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lost: It&#8217;s definitely C74&#8217;s work, not Ableton, so if there&#8217;s an Ableton influence it&#8217;s just inspirational. It&#8217;s two ways, though, in that I understand Live&#8217;s current video support includes input from the C74 world. As for what else the collaboration might yield, you&#8217;ll have to wait and see.</p>
<p>@noou: Not sure where your CPU load issue might be; it&#8217;s going to be difficult to assume anything based on one patch. But honestly, I&#8217;d say perhaps your best answer is to use Pd. I don&#8217;t think Max is the right tool for everyone, or for every task. And people might benefit from what you&#8217;re doing in an open source implementation. That&#8217;s not a knock against Max; on the contrary, I think it&#8217;s better for everyone when they&#8217;re able to exercise their choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452489</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452489</guid>
		<description>As for the first impression, I don`t like the new interface it is slower and looks like ugly java. Max lost it`s unique face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the first impression, I don`t like the new interface it is slower and looks like ugly java. Max lost it`s unique face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (noou)</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452426</link>
		<dc:creator>(noou)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452426</guid>
		<description>as for me, I'm not that impressed: I mostly use Max as a host for implementing physics-based sound synthesis algorithms. No differences here. The interface is still very music- (if not midi-) oriented compared to pd and the DSP engine is exactly the same, and it's very 90s. :(
Anyway, we waited until 2008 and now Max has multiple undo. Hurrah'! That's true innovation

Moreover, I just compared my "old" 1st generation Intel MacBook Pro (Core Duo 2,16GHz) running Max 4.6.3 with a brand new MacBook Pro (Core 2 Duo, 2,4 GHz) running Max 5: well, with the very same patch and identical configuration, the cpu load is  7/8% HIGHER on the new Mac!!?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as for me, I&#8217;m not that impressed: I mostly use Max as a host for implementing physics-based sound synthesis algorithms. No differences here. The interface is still very music- (if not midi-) oriented compared to pd and the DSP engine is exactly the same, and it&#8217;s very 90s. :(<br />
Anyway, we waited until 2008 and now Max has multiple undo. Hurrah&#8217;! That&#8217;s true innovation</p>
<p>Moreover, I just compared my &#8220;old&#8221; 1st generation Intel MacBook Pro (Core Duo 2,16GHz) running Max 4.6.3 with a brand new MacBook Pro (Core 2 Duo, 2,4 GHz) running Max 5: well, with the very same patch and identical configuration, the cpu load is  7/8% HIGHER on the new Mac!!?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Stone</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452267</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452267</guid>
		<description>They've bundled Jitter with it at a slightly more attractive price if you are into it for the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve bundled Jitter with it at a slightly more attractive price if you are into it for the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lost</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452265</link>
		<dc:creator>lost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452265</guid>
		<description>This is a massive overall....reeking of ableton....joint project not Max 5 eh? My ass. Quite impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a massive overall&#8230;.reeking of ableton&#8230;.joint project not Max 5 eh? My ass. Quite impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452247</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452247</guid>
		<description>Check out that new FM synth in the example section.  I really like the new gui.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out that new FM synth in the example section.  I really like the new gui.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452203</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452203</guid>
		<description>Wow, great upgrade. I'm in max bliss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great upgrade. I&#8217;m in max bliss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actuel</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452178</link>
		<dc:creator>actuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/22/max-5-available-for-download-now/#comment-452178</guid>
		<description>pow! made my night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pow! made my night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
