<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life After Giga: SONiVOX Now Doing Their Own Development, Among Others</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/comment-page-1/#comment-528027</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/#comment-528027</guid>
		<description>@carmen: that sounds like a great idea -- and I agree, text description, not binary, please!

I&#039;m equally skeptical of claims of &quot;universal&quot;; that seems to translate these days as &quot;it makes sound.&quot; (Sound is ... well ... sort of universal, I suppose.) But in this case, I&#039;m just not sure what I mean.

Vive SampleXML (sXML, pronounced &quot;sex em el). No, that doesn&#039;t exist; I just made it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@carmen: that sounds like a great idea &#8212; and I agree, text description, not binary, please!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m equally skeptical of claims of &#8220;universal&#8221;; that seems to translate these days as &#8220;it makes sound.&#8221; (Sound is &#8230; well &#8230; sort of universal, I suppose.) But in this case, I&#8217;m just not sure what I mean.</p>
<p>Vive SampleXML (sXML, pronounced &#8220;sex em el). No, that doesn&#8217;t exist; I just made it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carmen</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/comment-page-1/#comment-528008</link>
		<dc:creator>carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/#comment-528008</guid>
		<description>Universally Compatible is a pretty large claim.

does this mean Hruska and her crew are going to support open standards? maybe the MMA is going to come up with some new sampler format?

i wouldnt mind something like that.. XML based instrument description format based around &#039;bundles&#039; of the associated sample data (basic dirs on disk, nothing crazy with binary)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Universally Compatible is a pretty large claim.</p>
<p>does this mean Hruska and her crew are going to support open standards? maybe the MMA is going to come up with some new sampler format?</p>
<p>i wouldnt mind something like that.. XML based instrument description format based around &#8216;bundles&#8217; of the associated sample data (basic dirs on disk, nothing crazy with binary)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/comment-page-1/#comment-527658</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/#comment-527658</guid>
		<description>They claim in the press release that it is &quot;Initially supporting SONiVOX and 3rd party partner products.&quot; So it sounds as though they do tend to license it. The question is how aggressively -- or whether, increasingly, other soundware houses will be building their own tools. Obviously, I understand the business equation here, which is that you wouldn&#039;t want to license your player so cheaply that your competitor winds up making more money than you do. That&#039;s always the issue with these things, because all the player makers (including NI with Kore) are also soundware makers, hence competing with the folks they&#039;re licensing the tool to, at least on some level.

But, yes, Sonivox has effectively &quot;announced&quot; it, whether they deliver on it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They claim in the press release that it is &#8220;Initially supporting SONiVOX and 3rd party partner products.&#8221; So it sounds as though they do tend to license it. The question is how aggressively &#8212; or whether, increasingly, other soundware houses will be building their own tools. Obviously, I understand the business equation here, which is that you wouldn&#8217;t want to license your player so cheaply that your competitor winds up making more money than you do. That&#8217;s always the issue with these things, because all the player makers (including NI with Kore) are also soundware makers, hence competing with the folks they&#8217;re licensing the tool to, at least on some level.</p>
<p>But, yes, Sonivox has effectively &#8220;announced&#8221; it, whether they deliver on it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Alexander</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/comment-page-1/#comment-527650</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/23/life-after-giga-soundware-house-sonivox-now-doing-their-own-development-among-others/#comment-527650</guid>
		<description>Hi, Peter. Thank you for the credit. Regarding SONiVOX, my understanding is that their virtual instrument is for them only, and that they won&#039;t be licensing it to other developers. That is a possibility, of course, but we have no annoucements to that effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Peter. Thank you for the credit. Regarding SONiVOX, my understanding is that their virtual instrument is for them only, and that they won&#8217;t be licensing it to other developers. That is a possibility, of course, but we have no annoucements to that effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
