<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richie Hawtin on his Live Traktor Setup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:31:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paulbailey.us (beta) » Bookmarks for June 2nd through June 3rd [del.icio.us]</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-921130</link>
		<dc:creator>paulbailey.us (beta) » Bookmarks for June 2nd through June 3rd [del.icio.us]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-921130</guid>
		<description>[...] Create Digital Music » Richie Hawtin on his Live Traktor Setup &#8211; interesting look at 4 deck turntablism using traktor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Create Digital Music » Richie Hawtin on his Live Traktor Setup &#8211; interesting look at 4 deck turntablism using traktor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz revision &#187; Richie Hawtin&#8217;s Live Traktor Setup</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-712655</link>
		<dc:creator>liz revision &#187; Richie Hawtin&#8217;s Live Traktor Setup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-712655</guid>
		<description>[...] picked up the story and it generated some discussion in the comments. Go and check it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] picked up the story and it generated some discussion in the comments. Go and check it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubble1</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-662324</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubble1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-662324</guid>
		<description>Hi ! 

For me it&#039;s all about including new technologies to your sets. And it&#039;s great.

I have an Xone 3D and I&#039;m actually testing both Traktor and Live, as an early vinyl dj.

I don&#039;t feel any trouble to play with all this differents things.

The main problem of Traktor is HEAVY Sync bugs due to its problem of detecting the tracks BPM with efficiency.

And also the incredible mistake that makes the decks sync by pair, A with B and C with. If you want to sync C with A, it bugging as hell...

SO, for me, the technology is not ready yet, and it&#039;s ridiculous to have these kind of, not 100% efficient tools. you still to make compromise, because there is no solid solution....a shame in 2008 imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ! </p>
<p>For me it&#8217;s all about including new technologies to your sets. And it&#8217;s great.</p>
<p>I have an Xone 3D and I&#8217;m actually testing both Traktor and Live, as an early vinyl dj.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel any trouble to play with all this differents things.</p>
<p>The main problem of Traktor is HEAVY Sync bugs due to its problem of detecting the tracks BPM with efficiency.</p>
<p>And also the incredible mistake that makes the decks sync by pair, A with B and C with. If you want to sync C with A, it bugging as hell&#8230;</p>
<p>SO, for me, the technology is not ready yet, and it&#8217;s ridiculous to have these kind of, not 100% efficient tools. you still to make compromise, because there is no solid solution&#8230;.a shame in 2008 imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buggy</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-661681</link>
		<dc:creator>buggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-661681</guid>
		<description>I think ableton possibilities are the new key. I heard hawtinÂ´s sessions with a lot of syncing mistakes (example: Hawtin with Adam Beyer@Mint), thatÂ´s really anoying when you are dancing. the problem with ableton: you canÂ´t see the four decks picture at the same time and the same problem is present with the efeects. Nobody thougt of that? Please answer me. I think four screens can be the solution or something like that. Or rebuilding ableton in any way (perhaps creating a new program for djing)

Thanks
Beware of drugs and techno, you can end up crazy as i did</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think ableton possibilities are the new key. I heard hawtinÂ´s sessions with a lot of syncing mistakes (example: Hawtin with Adam Beyer@Mint), thatÂ´s really anoying when you are dancing. the problem with ableton: you canÂ´t see the four decks picture at the same time and the same problem is present with the efeects. Nobody thougt of that? Please answer me. I think four screens can be the solution or something like that. Or rebuilding ableton in any way (perhaps creating a new program for djing)</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Beware of drugs and techno, you can end up crazy as i did</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-653480</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-653480</guid>
		<description>Well all those people who are apparently &#039;hating&#039; really should focus their energies on something else... This is not some communist dictator who has caused death and destruction to his peoples (although im sure these haters would contest otherwise). 

Hawtin is looking toward a more creative DJ future (and so he should), utilizing certain types of technology to his needs, and as a means to his &#039;end, whether complex or not (should this matter?). In a few years he may find something more exciting and innovative (innovative to him at the very least). 

After being a dj a few years back, i appreciate that he and (dj) others are approaching technology more conceptually and creatively. It hopefully will get ALOT of other dj&#039;s thinking outside the box, as there are plenty stuck in the box.

It might not be live coding or live &#039;electronics&#039; (electronics in the way that &#039;guys&#039; who are using language applications built in max/msp or supercollider combined with sensors/hacked toys/game controllers/3d visuals and other complex devices - does that make them any better?? more innovative you may say) but its all a means to a sonic &#039;end&#039;.... And it depends what sonic &#039;end&#039; your after, at that particular time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well all those people who are apparently &#8216;hating&#8217; really should focus their energies on something else&#8230; This is not some communist dictator who has caused death and destruction to his peoples (although im sure these haters would contest otherwise). </p>
<p>Hawtin is looking toward a more creative DJ future (and so he should), utilizing certain types of technology to his needs, and as a means to his &#8216;end, whether complex or not (should this matter?). In a few years he may find something more exciting and innovative (innovative to him at the very least). </p>
<p>After being a dj a few years back, i appreciate that he and (dj) others are approaching technology more conceptually and creatively. It hopefully will get ALOT of other dj&#8217;s thinking outside the box, as there are plenty stuck in the box.</p>
<p>It might not be live coding or live &#8216;electronics&#8217; (electronics in the way that &#8216;guys&#8217; who are using language applications built in max/msp or supercollider combined with sensors/hacked toys/game controllers/3d visuals and other complex devices &#8211; does that make them any better?? more innovative you may say) but its all a means to a sonic &#8216;end&#8217;&#8230;. And it depends what sonic &#8216;end&#8217; your after, at that particular time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyril</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-615873</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-615873</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think using four DJ decks can really be considered innovative any more, frankly â€” not with Ableton Live&quot;

I&#039;m not agree with you. 

You can&#039;t really compare Live and Traktor for DJing. Yes, you can DJ with Live but you have to make a lot of work before (create all the loop, sync all the track etc). In traktor you do that in real time, you don&#039;t have to think about that.

I&#039;m also very surprised about the &quot;sync push button&quot; reaction. I think people don&#039;t understand the real deal here. Syncing vinyls is not a big deal, it&#039;s a technical skill you can learn in 5 minutes. It&#039;s not the more important thing in a mix. The more important thing is playing with the sound, how and what you will combine in your set. It&#039;s the real talent !

4 deck mixing is a new edge. DJ are not any more DJ, but real time remixer/composer as well. It&#039;s no more about sync mixing, fade in, fade out, and all this kind of thing, it&#039;s creating new track live ! 

Carl Cox and Jeff Mills are well knowed 4 deck vinyls players. But when they do that, they are focused on keeping all the deck in sync. They can&#039;t really create repetition, loop, new track... 

Sync is a tool, combine sound/FX/track/loop is creativity. I don&#039;t care if a DJ use automatic sync, but he have to be good :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think using four DJ decks can really be considered innovative any more, frankly â€” not with Ableton Live&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not agree with you. </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t really compare Live and Traktor for DJing. Yes, you can DJ with Live but you have to make a lot of work before (create all the loop, sync all the track etc). In traktor you do that in real time, you don&#8217;t have to think about that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also very surprised about the &#8220;sync push button&#8221; reaction. I think people don&#8217;t understand the real deal here. Syncing vinyls is not a big deal, it&#8217;s a technical skill you can learn in 5 minutes. It&#8217;s not the more important thing in a mix. The more important thing is playing with the sound, how and what you will combine in your set. It&#8217;s the real talent !</p>
<p>4 deck mixing is a new edge. DJ are not any more DJ, but real time remixer/composer as well. It&#8217;s no more about sync mixing, fade in, fade out, and all this kind of thing, it&#8217;s creating new track live ! </p>
<p>Carl Cox and Jeff Mills are well knowed 4 deck vinyls players. But when they do that, they are focused on keeping all the deck in sync. They can&#8217;t really create repetition, loop, new track&#8230; </p>
<p>Sync is a tool, combine sound/FX/track/loop is creativity. I don&#8217;t care if a DJ use automatic sync, but he have to be good :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Exhibitionist &#171; Wechselwirkungen</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-615752</link>
		<dc:creator>The Exhibitionist &#171; Wechselwirkungen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-615752</guid>
		<description>[...] Der Ãœbergang jetzt zu Hawtin hÃ¤ngt zwar nicht gerade wie der Bierjunge eines Coleurstudenten, ist aber Notwendig. WÃ¤hrend Kitty recht einsam mit einem Plattenspieler wirkt und Fumiya und Mills gleich auf dreien ihre Skills demonstrieren, treibt Hawtin das Mixen auf die Spitze. Nicht weniger als ein eigens entwickeltes Mischpult und zwei Powerbooks mÃ¼ssen bei ihm herhalten. Wie er das bewerkstelligt und warum diese ganze Diskussion um digitales Mixen fÃ¼rn Arsch ist, weil die Ergebnisse einfach soviel besser sind - vorausgesetzt man nutzt die neuen MÃ¶glichkeiten auch - zeigt Mr. &#8220;Cubix&#8221; Hawtin persÃ¶nlich. In diesem Video. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Der Ãœbergang jetzt zu Hawtin hÃ¤ngt zwar nicht gerade wie der Bierjunge eines Coleurstudenten, ist aber Notwendig. WÃ¤hrend Kitty recht einsam mit einem Plattenspieler wirkt und Fumiya und Mills gleich auf dreien ihre Skills demonstrieren, treibt Hawtin das Mixen auf die Spitze. Nicht weniger als ein eigens entwickeltes Mischpult und zwei Powerbooks mÃ¼ssen bei ihm herhalten. Wie er das bewerkstelligt und warum diese ganze Diskussion um digitales Mixen fÃ¼rn Arsch ist, weil die Ergebnisse einfach soviel besser sind &#8211; vorausgesetzt man nutzt die neuen MÃ¶glichkeiten auch &#8211; zeigt Mr. &#8220;Cubix&#8221; Hawtin persÃ¶nlich. In diesem Video. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-610109</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-610109</guid>
		<description>&quot;ridiculous toupe-combover hairstyle&quot;

One person&#039;s poison is another person&#039;s wine. I think it&#039;s a hot-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ridiculous toupe-combover hairstyle&#8221;</p>
<p>One person&#8217;s poison is another person&#8217;s wine. I think it&#8217;s a hot-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-609504</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-609504</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but surely Juan and Derrick get credit, too, right? 

Here&#039;s my thing -- anyone I talk to, I&#039;m going to talk to as a musician. I&#039;m not really qualified to make grander sweeping judgments of the history of music or who invented what. I&#039;d rather talk to people as individuals independent of all that anyway. That&#039;s not to say it&#039;s not important -- I think it is. But if I talk to someone, I would hope to avoid any favoritism, and certainly I&#039;m just as interested in people who are completely obscure as those who&#039;ve made a name; I&#039;m not going to discriminate against either one. 

Now, maybe there is some nasty politics going on here; I could believe that. I just assure you, my own part is significantly random.

As for the computer technology, Richie and others had a hand in its development, so I don&#039;t think you can blame them for being attached to it. But then, that&#039;s the point -- you do have to distinguish between the technology and the music. Whereas the stated mission of this site is using the technology as a window into the music, I don&#039;t think tech is ever the whole picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but surely Juan and Derrick get credit, too, right? </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my thing &#8212; anyone I talk to, I&#8217;m going to talk to as a musician. I&#8217;m not really qualified to make grander sweeping judgments of the history of music or who invented what. I&#8217;d rather talk to people as individuals independent of all that anyway. That&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s not important &#8212; I think it is. But if I talk to someone, I would hope to avoid any favoritism, and certainly I&#8217;m just as interested in people who are completely obscure as those who&#8217;ve made a name; I&#8217;m not going to discriminate against either one. </p>
<p>Now, maybe there is some nasty politics going on here; I could believe that. I just assure you, my own part is significantly random.</p>
<p>As for the computer technology, Richie and others had a hand in its development, so I don&#8217;t think you can blame them for being attached to it. But then, that&#8217;s the point &#8212; you do have to distinguish between the technology and the music. Whereas the stated mission of this site is using the technology as a window into the music, I don&#8217;t think tech is ever the whole picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hungry Antelope</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/10/richie-hawtin-gives-mini-tutorials-on-explaining-his-live-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-609495</link>
		<dc:creator>Hungry Antelope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3992#comment-609495</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And then thereâ€™s the bit of bitterness that espouses that the Detroit cats received more fame and riches when in fact they ripped their ideas from the Chicago scene.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Totally false... The Detroit cats didn&#039;t rip their ideas from the Chicago scene, the Detroit cats where a part of the Chicago scene! Derrick May and Juan Atkins where living in Chicago and a part of the house scene from the very beginning. Juan Atkins sold Frankie Knuckles his first 909. Juan Atkins and Derrick may would be considered important figures in the early Chicago scene, except of course that they invented Techno and that overshadowed their significance to House music.

Saying that Detroit ripped of Chicago is kind of like saying New Order ripped off Joy Division.

Which is beside the point that Chicago House music was way more popular than Detroit Techno... if the Detroit guys made more money than the Chicago guys (I don&#039;t know if they did), it was because they where better businessmen. The Chicago guys and Detroit guys were black, so it isn&#039;t like there was racial favoritism like there is with Hawtin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And then thereâ€™s the bit of bitterness that espouses that the Detroit cats received more fame and riches when in fact they ripped their ideas from the Chicago scene.</p></blockquote>
<p>Totally false&#8230; The Detroit cats didn&#8217;t rip their ideas from the Chicago scene, the Detroit cats where a part of the Chicago scene! Derrick May and Juan Atkins where living in Chicago and a part of the house scene from the very beginning. Juan Atkins sold Frankie Knuckles his first 909. Juan Atkins and Derrick may would be considered important figures in the early Chicago scene, except of course that they invented Techno and that overshadowed their significance to House music.</p>
<p>Saying that Detroit ripped of Chicago is kind of like saying New Order ripped off Joy Division.</p>
<p>Which is beside the point that Chicago House music was way more popular than Detroit Techno&#8230; if the Detroit guys made more money than the Chicago guys (I don&#8217;t know if they did), it was because they where better businessmen. The Chicago guys and Detroit guys were black, so it isn&#8217;t like there was racial favoritism like there is with Hawtin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
