<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Do You Get from a Free SoundCloud Account? Co-Founder Explains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:22:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Create Digital Motion &#187; Pay for Play (or Upload): Will You Use Vimeo Plus for $60/Year?</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-665944</link>
		<dc:creator>Create Digital Motion &#187; Pay for Play (or Upload): Will You Use Vimeo Plus for $60/Year?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-665944</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s the season for subscription web offerings. Last week Peter documented the launch and premium packages offered by SoundCloud. Now CDMo&#8217;s favourite web video service Vimeo has just introduced a for-pay tier to their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s the season for subscription web offerings. Last week Peter documented the launch and premium packages offered by SoundCloud. Now CDMo&#8217;s favourite web video service Vimeo has just introduced a for-pay tier to their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterainbow</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-661191</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterainbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-661191</guid>
		<description>the features on soundcloud are totally amazing and i could see myself really putting some good use into it, for hosting unfinished tracks, remixs, collaborations, etc. seems so rad. but i can&#039;t afford any sort of monthly fee, so i am really bummed. i make a lot of music and work on a lot of different projects at once with a lot of different people, so i was excited when i found out about this site. i have a free beta pro account, but even still, limiting to 15 tracks a month is going to hamper my style as far as using it for like, an easy way to get masters approved by a client, or sending lots of versions back and forth. and getting a deeper pro account is just WAY out of my price range. i really don&#039;t know what type of musician would have that kind of cash. and if they did, why wouldn&#039;t they just get/use some private server space?

my call is:
amazing site, but too expensive to net users who are used to almost everything being free. yearly fee is more mellow, like flickr, like everyone already said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the features on soundcloud are totally amazing and i could see myself really putting some good use into it, for hosting unfinished tracks, remixs, collaborations, etc. seems so rad. but i can&#8217;t afford any sort of monthly fee, so i am really bummed. i make a lot of music and work on a lot of different projects at once with a lot of different people, so i was excited when i found out about this site. i have a free beta pro account, but even still, limiting to 15 tracks a month is going to hamper my style as far as using it for like, an easy way to get masters approved by a client, or sending lots of versions back and forth. and getting a deeper pro account is just WAY out of my price range. i really don&#8217;t know what type of musician would have that kind of cash. and if they did, why wouldn&#8217;t they just get/use some private server space?</p>
<p>my call is:<br />
amazing site, but too expensive to net users who are used to almost everything being free. yearly fee is more mellow, like flickr, like everyone already said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavroche</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-660972</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavroche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-660972</guid>
		<description>Soundcloud seems to be an excellent tool for musicians, and I&#039;m excited to check it out! Although it sux to be limited to 5 tracks, I think that&#039;s fair. One thing I would love to see as part of the offering is some kind of audio editing tool that promotes collaboration online. This, if simple enough,  seemingly would allow fans to get involved in the music making, which would turn the service into a way for artists to engage fans. 

So, I&#039;m not sure about SC being a facebook for musicians, as that would require bringing together not only creators but other &quot;voyeurs&quot; who engage with the content created.

This is something we&#039;re working on at MixMatchMusic.com. We have aggregated musicians and fans in a social network to allow everybody to get involved in the collaboration. Musicians who contribute content can even make some money when non-contributors use it their mixes. 

Whether its our service, SC, or somebody else, it&#039;s clear that online tools need to be applied to help musicians create music together over the web. That&#039;s evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soundcloud seems to be an excellent tool for musicians, and I&#8217;m excited to check it out! Although it sux to be limited to 5 tracks, I think that&#8217;s fair. One thing I would love to see as part of the offering is some kind of audio editing tool that promotes collaboration online. This, if simple enough,  seemingly would allow fans to get involved in the music making, which would turn the service into a way for artists to engage fans. </p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m not sure about SC being a facebook for musicians, as that would require bringing together not only creators but other &#8220;voyeurs&#8221; who engage with the content created.</p>
<p>This is something we&#8217;re working on at MixMatchMusic.com. We have aggregated musicians and fans in a social network to allow everybody to get involved in the collaboration. Musicians who contribute content can even make some money when non-contributors use it their mixes. </p>
<p>Whether its our service, SC, or somebody else, it&#8217;s clear that online tools need to be applied to help musicians create music together over the web. That&#8217;s evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaymis Loveday</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-660468</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaymis Loveday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-660468</guid>
		<description>Hah! Mambots. I&#039;d forgotten about those things. Good riddance. Template overrides is a nice touch too, but for me it&#039;s a more basic, idealogical thing: Joomla and I weren&#039;t destined to be together, and I won&#039;t work with it ever again if I can avoid it.

Sadness aside - we&#039;re actually very close to having a new version of the CDM template released, which will clean up our code a lot, and finally make CDM XHTML compliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah! Mambots. I&#8217;d forgotten about those things. Good riddance. Template overrides is a nice touch too, but for me it&#8217;s a more basic, idealogical thing: Joomla and I weren&#8217;t destined to be together, and I won&#8217;t work with it ever again if I can avoid it.</p>
<p>Sadness aside &#8211; we&#8217;re actually very close to having a new version of the CDM template released, which will clean up our code a lot, and finally make CDM XHTML compliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puffer</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-660308</link>
		<dc:creator>Puffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-660308</guid>
		<description>Jaymis, Thanks, man. I love me some WordPress, especially since skinning it is elegant, and the code is still manages to have a surprisingly small footprint. joomla still has a lot of sloppy code, and it&#039;s pretty bulky, but the improvements are good: template over-rides, so you no longer have to hack at the core files, is especially useful. And mambots are about to go away for good. Anyway, I&#039;ll definitely check out ModX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaymis, Thanks, man. I love me some WordPress, especially since skinning it is elegant, and the code is still manages to have a surprisingly small footprint. joomla still has a lot of sloppy code, and it&#8217;s pretty bulky, but the improvements are good: template over-rides, so you no longer have to hack at the core files, is especially useful. And mambots are about to go away for good. Anyway, I&#8217;ll definitely check out ModX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaymis Loveday</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-660222</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaymis Loveday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-660222</guid>
		<description>@Puffer: I&#039;ve done most of the CMS development on CDM, starting with the migration away from Mambo in 2005-6. I also spent a year working for a web development company which worked almost entirely in Mambo, I left the company just as Joomla 1.0 was being released.

I&#039;m sure Joomla has made loads of progress since, but the fact remains that the core of the program is created in a way which isn&#039;t compatible with how we work, and our aims to have full control over our code, and have the site looking and working precisely as we envision it. Joomla is great for getting a site up with loads of functionality, but if you want full control of your code it&#039;s a struggle, and unfortunately a lot of the extensions are extremely sloppy. I think because the developers are in the Joomla headspace of &quot;it doesn&#039;t matter, as long as it works&quot;.

That&#039;s not to say that Wordpress is a perfect CMS or that there aren&#039;t bad Wordpress extensions out there, but creating a site with the precise code you want is much more intuitive and less painful for us with WP.

As to the future: ModX doesn&#039;t have as many extensions as these more mature (decrepit?) projects, but it&#039;s built from the ground up with standards-compliance and accessibility in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Puffer: I&#8217;ve done most of the CMS development on CDM, starting with the migration away from Mambo in 2005-6. I also spent a year working for a web development company which worked almost entirely in Mambo, I left the company just as Joomla 1.0 was being released.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Joomla has made loads of progress since, but the fact remains that the core of the program is created in a way which isn&#8217;t compatible with how we work, and our aims to have full control over our code, and have the site looking and working precisely as we envision it. Joomla is great for getting a site up with loads of functionality, but if you want full control of your code it&#8217;s a struggle, and unfortunately a lot of the extensions are extremely sloppy. I think because the developers are in the Joomla headspace of &#8220;it doesn&#8217;t matter, as long as it works&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that Wordpress is a perfect CMS or that there aren&#8217;t bad Wordpress extensions out there, but creating a site with the precise code you want is much more intuitive and less painful for us with WP.</p>
<p>As to the future: ModX doesn&#8217;t have as many extensions as these more mature (decrepit?) projects, but it&#8217;s built from the ground up with standards-compliance and accessibility in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puffer</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-659988</link>
		<dc:creator>Puffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-659988</guid>
		<description>Peter,
Just to be clear, my joomla example was just in relation to another poster saying you could build a similar app with an open-source CMS. Obviously, SoundCloud is a serious web venture with a lot of development hours. I can see it&#039;s not even close to a $10,000 project. I was merely pointing out that there are huge costs to running a site that has even a fraction of what SoundCloud is offering, over and above what it costs to develop.

On an inside baseball note: I&#039;d be interested to hear why you hate joomla so much. The latest releases have cleaned up a lot of the mambo slop and tightened up code. But, is there something else, besides WP, that you think is a viable CMS development platform? I&#039;m not being a fanboi, as I know there&#039;s many good reasons to dislike joomla. But is there another mature CMS that has as many extensions? Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,<br />
Just to be clear, my joomla example was just in relation to another poster saying you could build a similar app with an open-source CMS. Obviously, SoundCloud is a serious web venture with a lot of development hours. I can see it&#8217;s not even close to a $10,000 project. I was merely pointing out that there are huge costs to running a site that has even a fraction of what SoundCloud is offering, over and above what it costs to develop.</p>
<p>On an inside baseball note: I&#8217;d be interested to hear why you hate joomla so much. The latest releases have cleaned up a lot of the mambo slop and tightened up code. But, is there something else, besides WP, that you think is a viable CMS development platform? I&#8217;m not being a fanboi, as I know there&#8217;s many good reasons to dislike joomla. But is there another mature CMS that has as many extensions? Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogrim</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-659862</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-659862</guid>
		<description>I want to use this site as a social platform for sharing self-made beats and loops with my pals. Seems like the perfect platform where we can share, create and discuss! We are all students, and live in different cities, therefore we need a platform to communicate. I&#039;m thinking to use SC like a group conversation in msn, or like a password protected facebook group. I am going to share short clips, like beats that only are a few bars long. I will not use much bandwith or space, but there will be several files. The LIGHT edition will not give me enought files to share, but the STANDARD is totally overkill. They have failed very hard with the pricing, that will be their downfall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to use this site as a social platform for sharing self-made beats and loops with my pals. Seems like the perfect platform where we can share, create and discuss! We are all students, and live in different cities, therefore we need a platform to communicate. I&#8217;m thinking to use SC like a group conversation in msn, or like a password protected facebook group. I am going to share short clips, like beats that only are a few bars long. I will not use much bandwith or space, but there will be several files. The LIGHT edition will not give me enought files to share, but the STANDARD is totally overkill. They have failed very hard with the pricing, that will be their downfall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dplex</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-659796</link>
		<dc:creator>dplex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-659796</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t begrudge SoundCloud&#039;s right to make money off of their hard work, but does there really need to be &lt;em&gt;three&lt;/em&gt; (four if you count free) pricing levels? It just feels too complex and fussy.

The real test will be to see how SoundCloud grows now that the beta has ended. The collaborative/social features are its differentiator, and the quality of its membership will have a significant effect on the quality of the service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t begrudge SoundCloud&#8217;s right to make money off of their hard work, but does there really need to be <em>three</em> (four if you count free) pricing levels? It just feels too complex and fussy.</p>
<p>The real test will be to see how SoundCloud grows now that the beta has ended. The collaborative/social features are its differentiator, and the quality of its membership will have a significant effect on the quality of the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/comment-page-1/#comment-659510</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/09/what-do-you-get-from-a-free-soundcloud-account-founders-explain/#comment-659510</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s interesting that everyone gravitates back to what Flickr Pro pricing is ... that should tell you something. Flickr found a really great sweet spot.

I hear what you&#039;re saying, but I will defend SoundCloud on the development side, Puffer. First, that looks like more than $10,000 of dev work. Second, you don&#039;t want to use Joomla -- trust me. I know, it&#039;s an example, but ... sorry, I have a special, dark place in my heart for how much I hate Joomla. ;) Third, it&#039;s really more than a dev project. I think content is where it&#039;s at in social networks, even those that have been successful in the past. Facebook grew out of specific communities on campuses. MySpace got an injection from the social scene in LA and other music towns. I expect if you looked really closely at their early history, you&#039;d see some serious leg work getting real people onboard. And likewise, SoundCloud seems to have carved out a niche among some key electronic folks and labels -- it also helps that they&#039;re in Berlin.

But I do welcome this frankness. You guys are the customers, potential or otherwise. And it&#039;s interesting to hear the positive and negative alike.

Meanwhile, CDM really needs to do a prize fight between SoundCloud and Bandcamp. :) Any other tips?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s interesting that everyone gravitates back to what Flickr Pro pricing is &#8230; that should tell you something. Flickr found a really great sweet spot.</p>
<p>I hear what you&#8217;re saying, but I will defend SoundCloud on the development side, Puffer. First, that looks like more than $10,000 of dev work. Second, you don&#8217;t want to use Joomla &#8212; trust me. I know, it&#8217;s an example, but &#8230; sorry, I have a special, dark place in my heart for how much I hate Joomla. ;) Third, it&#8217;s really more than a dev project. I think content is where it&#8217;s at in social networks, even those that have been successful in the past. Facebook grew out of specific communities on campuses. MySpace got an injection from the social scene in LA and other music towns. I expect if you looked really closely at their early history, you&#8217;d see some serious leg work getting real people onboard. And likewise, SoundCloud seems to have carved out a niche among some key electronic folks and labels &#8212; it also helps that they&#8217;re in Berlin.</p>
<p>But I do welcome this frankness. You guys are the customers, potential or otherwise. And it&#8217;s interesting to hear the positive and negative alike.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, CDM really needs to do a prize fight between SoundCloud and Bandcamp. :) Any other tips?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
