<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google AdSense Fails on Relevancy, Control, Policy, and Google Says Nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:22:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MaxvaX &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update: Google AdSense Responds to Political Concerns, Sort of</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-779433</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxvaX &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update: Google AdSense Responds to Political Concerns, Sort of</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-779433</guid>
		<description>[...] Google AdSense Fails on Relevancy, Control, Policy, and Google Says Nothing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google AdSense Fails on Relevancy, Control, Policy, and Google Says Nothing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Create Digital Music &#187; Update: Google AdSense Responds to Political Concerns, Sort of</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-686514</link>
		<dc:creator>Create Digital Music &#187; Update: Google AdSense Responds to Political Concerns, Sort of</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-686514</guid>
		<description>[...] Google AdSense Fails on Relevancy, Control, Policy, and Google Says Nothing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google AdSense Fails on Relevancy, Control, Policy, and Google Says Nothing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flip</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-685772</link>
		<dc:creator>Flip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-685772</guid>
		<description>@Claude Ravel:  No, that is false.  Separation of church and state is not a one way street.  No one religion should dictate the law, plain and simple.  I think you need to brush up on your civics.  

Furthermore, Do you want to know what&#039;s &quot;fucked up the ass&quot;?  A society which in which one of the most natural acts in the world is taboo in education.  If you feel strongly about making sure your kids are uneducated about human sexuality, send them to a private school.  Plus, I don&#039;t know about you, but I wasn&#039;t in a sex education class till I was 13 years old.  I highly doubt any public schools are showing first graders how to put on condoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Claude Ravel:  No, that is false.  Separation of church and state is not a one way street.  No one religion should dictate the law, plain and simple.  I think you need to brush up on your civics.  </p>
<p>Furthermore, Do you want to know what&#8217;s &#8220;fucked up the ass&#8221;?  A society which in which one of the most natural acts in the world is taboo in education.  If you feel strongly about making sure your kids are uneducated about human sexuality, send them to a private school.  Plus, I don&#8217;t know about you, but I wasn&#8217;t in a sex education class till I was 13 years old.  I highly doubt any public schools are showing first graders how to put on condoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-685630</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 21:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-685630</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Peter, for the detailed thought and description around this issue. Your response and stand against institutionalized discrimination is appreciated.

This is not over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Peter, for the detailed thought and description around this issue. Your response and stand against institutionalized discrimination is appreciated.</p>
<p>This is not over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deirdre Saoirse Moen</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-684136</link>
		<dc:creator>Deirdre Saoirse Moen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-684136</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really incensed at Google, in part because several Google execs put money on the No vote. They could have opted not to take the pro-8 money, but they did.

Then they placed the ads not just here, but all over the place. I saw it on creditboards.com, for example. They don&#039;t allow any political content unless it&#039;s directly about credit reporting or debt collection.

Anyhow, I think that this issue -- and others -- may hurt Google in the long run, but I will never forgive them for helping push the vote the other direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really incensed at Google, in part because several Google execs put money on the No vote. They could have opted not to take the pro-8 money, but they did.</p>
<p>Then they placed the ads not just here, but all over the place. I saw it on creditboards.com, for example. They don&#8217;t allow any political content unless it&#8217;s directly about credit reporting or debt collection.</p>
<p>Anyhow, I think that this issue &#8212; and others &#8212; may hurt Google in the long run, but I will never forgive them for helping push the vote the other direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aWi</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-684070</link>
		<dc:creator>aWi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-684070</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a new blog post on the adsense blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://adsense.blogspot.com/2008/11/political-ads-on-adsense-sites.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; political ads on adsense sites &lt;/a&gt;.  It looks like they will be adding to the Ads Review Center the ability to block categories of ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a new blog post on the adsense blog: <a href="http://adsense.blogspot.com/2008/11/political-ads-on-adsense-sites.html" rel="nofollow"> political ads on adsense sites </a>.  It looks like they will be adding to the Ads Review Center the ability to block categories of ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swami Digital</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-683723</link>
		<dc:creator>Swami Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-683723</guid>
		<description>A concise description of the issues.  Thanks for posting the whole story.  It&#039;s really disappointing that Google is behaving this way.  Their opaque method of dealing with this clearly makes them come across like a corporate giant not in touch with their customers or community, which is something they claim to strive not to be.

-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A concise description of the issues.  Thanks for posting the whole story.  It&#8217;s really disappointing that Google is behaving this way.  Their opaque method of dealing with this clearly makes them come across like a corporate giant not in touch with their customers or community, which is something they claim to strive not to be.</p>
<p>-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Threw</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-683704</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Threw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-683704</guid>
		<description>The amount of backwards arguments trying to justify opposition to gay marriage are breathtaking.

It is a civil rights issue, period. Give people their rights. If you don&#039;t want to be gay, then don&#039;t be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amount of backwards arguments trying to justify opposition to gay marriage are breathtaking.</p>
<p>It is a civil rights issue, period. Give people their rights. If you don&#8217;t want to be gay, then don&#8217;t be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StefÃ¡n</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-683455</link>
		<dc:creator>StefÃ¡n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-683455</guid>
		<description>@Edmond:

&lt;i&gt;Education Code section 51933 specifies that schools that teach â€œcomprehensive sex educationâ€ have to teach â€œrespect for marriage and committed relationshipsâ€. This is something no school district can get around.&lt;/i&gt;

So why didn&#039;t Proposition 8 supporters just write a proposition to amend the education code?  Obviously because &quot;think of the children&quot; is a wedge tactic -- as it usually is -- to bypass voters&#039; rational faculties so they&#039;ll support odious legislation.

Even if it weren&#039;t supporting codified bigotry, the ad would still be insulting to the audience&#039;s intelligence with the &quot;protect your children&quot; angle.  I think most bloggers would rather carry ads that respect their readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Edmond:</p>
<p><i>Education Code section 51933 specifies that schools that teach â€œcomprehensive sex educationâ€ have to teach â€œrespect for marriage and committed relationshipsâ€. This is something no school district can get around.</i></p>
<p>So why didn&#8217;t Proposition 8 supporters just write a proposition to amend the education code?  Obviously because &#8220;think of the children&#8221; is a wedge tactic &#8212; as it usually is &#8212; to bypass voters&#8217; rational faculties so they&#8217;ll support odious legislation.</p>
<p>Even if it weren&#8217;t supporting codified bigotry, the ad would still be insulting to the audience&#8217;s intelligence with the &#8220;protect your children&#8221; angle.  I think most bloggers would rather carry ads that respect their readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-683449</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/06/google-adsense-fails-on-relevancy-control-policy-and-google-says-nothing/#comment-683449</guid>
		<description>@AnotherReader: Okay, this is getting old.

The ads were not relevant to this site.
They violated Google&#039;s own policy for advertising.
They advocated against a group of people in a way that many readers and I felt was inappropriate on the site. 

The sweatshop example has nothing to do with advertising or Proposition 8. I&#039;m sensitive to that issue; that&#039;s why we&#039;ve done discussion with the Monome creators about sustainable parts and (where possible) domestic development, prototyping, and assembly. But you&#039;ve just changed the subject entirely, which suggests to me you didn&#039;t really read my argument, which has to do with how Google administers their ad service -- not just for this one ad, but in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AnotherReader: Okay, this is getting old.</p>
<p>The ads were not relevant to this site.<br />
They violated Google&#8217;s own policy for advertising.<br />
They advocated against a group of people in a way that many readers and I felt was inappropriate on the site. </p>
<p>The sweatshop example has nothing to do with advertising or Proposition 8. I&#8217;m sensitive to that issue; that&#8217;s why we&#8217;ve done discussion with the Monome creators about sustainable parts and (where possible) domestic development, prototyping, and assembly. But you&#8217;ve just changed the subject entirely, which suggests to me you didn&#8217;t really read my argument, which has to do with how Google administers their ad service &#8212; not just for this one ad, but in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
