<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Processing 1.0: &#8220;We&#8217;re Out of Beta / We&#8217;re Releasing on Time&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:02:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-709949</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/#comment-709949</guid>
		<description>@Angstrom: I should, indeed -- the reason I haven&#039;t yet is I&#039;m waiting to get some of the MIDI stuff sorted(!) I most definitely don&#039;t recommend ProMIDI at this time. There are too many issues with it. I&#039;ve been using Rwmidi, but there&#039;s some other stuff to do there.
http://ruinwesen.com/support-files/rwmidi/documentation/RWMidi.html

On the upside, yes, it&#039;s great that Minim is there. But even then, I don&#039;t think Minim is likely to satisfy readers here, who will probably want to turn to Reaktor, SuperCollider and the like for sounds. So that means approaching the tutorial that way.

Stay tuned, as this is for sure a high priority for me in the next couple of months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Angstrom: I should, indeed &#8212; the reason I haven&#8217;t yet is I&#8217;m waiting to get some of the MIDI stuff sorted(!) I most definitely don&#8217;t recommend ProMIDI at this time. There are too many issues with it. I&#8217;ve been using Rwmidi, but there&#8217;s some other stuff to do there.<br />
<a href="http://ruinwesen.com/support-files/rwmidi/documentation/RWMidi.html" rel="nofollow">http://ruinwesen.com/support-files/rwmidi/documentation/RWMidi.html</a></p>
<p>On the upside, yes, it&#8217;s great that Minim is there. But even then, I don&#8217;t think Minim is likely to satisfy readers here, who will probably want to turn to Reaktor, SuperCollider and the like for sounds. So that means approaching the tutorial that way.</p>
<p>Stay tuned, as this is for sure a high priority for me in the next couple of months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angstrom</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-709926</link>
		<dc:creator>Angstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/#comment-709926</guid>
		<description>Hey Peter, you ought to do a wee tutorial on getting up and running with the musical tools in Processing, especially Promidi.  I&#039;ve drawn a blank with it myself, I&#039;ve never got it to output through midiyoke despite doing the obvious steps. 
I&#039;m sure many other people would like a basic introduction to using midi/audio in Processing too. Or at least point us at any half-decent tutorials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter, you ought to do a wee tutorial on getting up and running with the musical tools in Processing, especially Promidi.  I&#8217;ve drawn a blank with it myself, I&#8217;ve never got it to output through midiyoke despite doing the obvious steps.<br />
I&#8217;m sure many other people would like a basic introduction to using midi/audio in Processing too. Or at least point us at any half-decent tutorials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-709535</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/#comment-709535</guid>
		<description>@Mike: Check out the section on the CDMotion article with highlights on changes. One major change is that libraries are now stored with sketches instead of the app, which makes a lot more sense (that&#039;s how dev projects would normally work). So no more moving, in other words, even when they do release updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike: Check out the section on the CDMotion article with highlights on changes. One major change is that libraries are now stored with sketches instead of the app, which makes a lot more sense (that&#8217;s how dev projects would normally work). So no more moving, in other words, even when they do release updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-709530</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/#comment-709530</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m happy to see this finally get out of beta.  I&#039;m looking forward to not having to transfer my libraries between versions every week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m happy to see this finally get out of beta.  I&#8217;m looking forward to not having to transfer my libraries between versions every week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-709406</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/#comment-709406</guid>
		<description>Yep, and for sure, if you watch the changes made to the late beta cycle, this does mean more stability particularly in terms of how the renderers behave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, and for sure, if you watch the changes made to the late beta cycle, this does mean more stability particularly in terms of how the renderers behave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastien Orban</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-709083</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastien Orban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/#comment-709083</guid>
		<description>Nice! I like those improvement, even if I have not much time to work with it for now. I hope to get my hand dirty fast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! I like those improvement, even if I have not much time to work with it for now. I hope to get my hand dirty fast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nausea</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-709071</link>
		<dc:creator>nausea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/#comment-709071</guid>
		<description>absolutely agree. words are over. time to process  data streams into something beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely agree. words are over. time to process  data streams into something beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime Munarriz</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-709067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Munarriz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/25/processing-10-were-out-of-beta-were-releasing-on-time/#comment-709067</guid>
		<description>Wow!
it was nice to run on beta, but now we can enjoy the absolute stable and non-changing version...

p5 rules</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!<br />
it was nice to run on beta, but now we can enjoy the absolute stable and non-changing version&#8230;</p>
<p>p5 rules</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
