<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tips: Fix Windows Explorer, Be Happy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:02:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JN</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-871421</link>
		<dc:creator>JN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-871421</guid>
		<description>RRAAARRRGGGGHHH!

ANGERRRRRRRRRRRRR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RRAAARRRGGGGHHH!</p>
<p>ANGERRRRRRRRRRRRR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bob Campbell</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-822343</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bob Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-822343</guid>
		<description>To be fair, I haven&#039;t seen any unsolicited comments about the Mac here. The comments are mostly specific to things like the Mac&#039;s Finder. Something most Mac users I know would agree with.

The first comment on this blog article was an idiotic Mac zealot one, Peter&#039;s response was correct.

I standby my &#039;so much for the media infrastructure&#039; comment. The Mac has a great driver model, Core Audio. There&#039;s nothing else about it that makes working with audio superior other than that a typical Mac Pro is a higher specced &#039;PC&#039; than an off the shelf Dell. But people build Mac-like PC&#039;s specific to audio work, and then the comparison is reduced to which audio software you want to use.

I still don&#039;t know why you have to be so defensive Fred, I&#039;ve praised the Mac here for what it&#039;s good for, and criticised it for what it&#039;s not so good for, something you&#039;d have found if you spend an equal amount of time with both Windows and OSX. As a user of both platforms I&#039;m tired of one sided arguments based on brand loyalty rather than empirical evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, I haven&#8217;t seen any unsolicited comments about the Mac here. The comments are mostly specific to things like the Mac&#8217;s Finder. Something most Mac users I know would agree with.</p>
<p>The first comment on this blog article was an idiotic Mac zealot one, Peter&#8217;s response was correct.</p>
<p>I standby my &#8217;so much for the media infrastructure&#8217; comment. The Mac has a great driver model, Core Audio. There&#8217;s nothing else about it that makes working with audio superior other than that a typical Mac Pro is a higher specced &#8216;PC&#8217; than an off the shelf Dell. But people build Mac-like PC&#8217;s specific to audio work, and then the comparison is reduced to which audio software you want to use.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t know why you have to be so defensive Fred, I&#8217;ve praised the Mac here for what it&#8217;s good for, and criticised it for what it&#8217;s not so good for, something you&#8217;d have found if you spend an equal amount of time with both Windows and OSX. As a user of both platforms I&#8217;m tired of one sided arguments based on brand loyalty rather than empirical evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-821481</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-821481</guid>
		<description>Okay, folks, I&#039;m saying this way too late, but now and for all time:

Don&#039;t feed the trolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, folks, I&#8217;m saying this way too late, but now and for all time:</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t feed the trolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michel</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-821448</link>
		<dc:creator>michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-821448</guid>
		<description>how about avg free for anti virus? simple, lightweight and does the job for me.

btw: i remember reading a test where they connected a pc without av or firewall to the internet. in only 5 minutes there were files coming from the net on the pc. not every file is harmful of course, but i just don&#039;t believe that &#039;safe surfing&#039; stops intrusion.

nice pac/mac discussion you got there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about avg free for anti virus? simple, lightweight and does the job for me.</p>
<p>btw: i remember reading a test where they connected a pc without av or firewall to the internet. in only 5 minutes there were files coming from the net on the pc. not every file is harmful of course, but i just don&#8217;t believe that &#8217;safe surfing&#8217; stops intrusion.</p>
<p>nice pac/mac discussion you got there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salamanderanagram</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-820684</link>
		<dc:creator>salamanderanagram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-820684</guid>
		<description>&quot;the fact that the Apple OS &amp; the hardware it runs on are so tightly integrated is so dumb!&quot;

does that in some way change the fact that it costs $500 extra for the same hardware? or did you have some actual point you were trying to make in your idiotic, hysterical rants that make utterly no sense?

some of us are trying to talk windows here. it is not a conversation to dis OS X, which i use regularly. so smarten up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the fact that the Apple OS &amp; the hardware it runs on are so tightly integrated is so dumb!&#8221;</p>
<p>does that in some way change the fact that it costs $500 extra for the same hardware? or did you have some actual point you were trying to make in your idiotic, hysterical rants that make utterly no sense?</p>
<p>some of us are trying to talk windows here. it is not a conversation to dis OS X, which i use regularly. so smarten up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salamanderanagram</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-820302</link>
		<dc:creator>salamanderanagram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-820302</guid>
		<description>my favorite part about mac OS X is that it only runs on computers that cost $500 more than other computers with equivalent specs. 

windows XP, that you denigrate so much, will run on just about any computer made in the last ten years. go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my favorite part about mac OS X is that it only runs on computers that cost $500 more than other computers with equivalent specs. </p>
<p>windows XP, that you denigrate so much, will run on just about any computer made in the last ten years. go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbsr</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-819985</link>
		<dc:creator>gbsr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-819985</guid>
		<description>just curious. you people keep saying that you are running without antivir and that you havent had any viruses but.. how do you know that? windows is jampacked with security holes and considering that you can embed trojans in a jpg these days, youd be crazy to think that your computer is safe. the only only safe computer is a computer without an ethernet interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just curious. you people keep saying that you are running without antivir and that you havent had any viruses but.. how do you know that? windows is jampacked with security holes and considering that you can embed trojans in a jpg these days, youd be crazy to think that your computer is safe. the only only safe computer is a computer without an ethernet interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bob Campbell</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-818882</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bob Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-818882</guid>
		<description>That should&#039;ve read Softpointer, not Softpoint.

http://www.softpointer.com/AudioShell.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should&#8217;ve read Softpointer, not Softpoint.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.softpointer.com/AudioShell.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.softpointer.com/AudioShell.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bob Campbell</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-818880</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bob Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-818880</guid>
		<description>As a user with a foot planted in each OS, mac and pc, and no axe to grind I would firmly state that the OSX Finder is excruciating to use for audio. The addition of Audiofinder helps a lot, but the basic tools in the mac finder are weak for audio files. You may have a lot of power in Spotlight searches, but it&#039;s completely wasted because the search results cannot be ordered by any file attributes related to audio (let alone ordered by size FFS! what were they thinking)

Comparatively Windows Explorer is still way more usable for audio files (I&#039;m talking XP here, not Vista with the 30 different buttons and file menu locations and icons that look like kids threw some blocks and paint at a screen)

But, regardless, the best shell extension I have is made by Softpoint who also make Tag N Rename, the tagging app. It&#039;s called Audioshell and basically adds some great functionality to inspect audio files, plus it adds a few more &#039;sort by&#039; options to your standard windows.

It&#039;s very useful being able to instantly see samplerate, bitrate, number of channels, compression bitrates, duration of audio files..etc etc These are functions already built into the Windows explorer but audioshell gives you more like all tag info, editable, embedded images and comments. I find the comments padded tag very useful for typing little reminders next to pretty much any audio file, that you can see just browsing audio folders.

At the very least, people should right click on the grey bar just at the top of any explorer window where size/type etc are, and enable the built in options of samplerate/bitrate/duration. So much for the mac having the superior media infrastructure....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a user with a foot planted in each OS, mac and pc, and no axe to grind I would firmly state that the OSX Finder is excruciating to use for audio. The addition of Audiofinder helps a lot, but the basic tools in the mac finder are weak for audio files. You may have a lot of power in Spotlight searches, but it&#8217;s completely wasted because the search results cannot be ordered by any file attributes related to audio (let alone ordered by size FFS! what were they thinking)</p>
<p>Comparatively Windows Explorer is still way more usable for audio files (I&#8217;m talking XP here, not Vista with the 30 different buttons and file menu locations and icons that look like kids threw some blocks and paint at a screen)</p>
<p>But, regardless, the best shell extension I have is made by Softpoint who also make Tag N Rename, the tagging app. It&#8217;s called Audioshell and basically adds some great functionality to inspect audio files, plus it adds a few more &#8217;sort by&#8217; options to your standard windows.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very useful being able to instantly see samplerate, bitrate, number of channels, compression bitrates, duration of audio files..etc etc These are functions already built into the Windows explorer but audioshell gives you more like all tag info, editable, embedded images and comments. I find the comments padded tag very useful for typing little reminders next to pretty much any audio file, that you can see just browsing audio folders.</p>
<p>At the very least, people should right click on the grey bar just at the top of any explorer window where size/type etc are, and enable the built in options of samplerate/bitrate/duration. So much for the mac having the superior media infrastructure&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foosnark</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/05/tips-fix-windows-explorer-be-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-818659</link>
		<dc:creator>foosnark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4933#comment-818659</guid>
		<description>I run with no antivirus, with no problems.  I think the last time I actually saw a virus was in 1992 (on a work machine, with who-knows-who running who-knows-what on it).

A shell extension that&#039;s very much worth using is Filebox Extender -- I set up my various samples, presets, and renders folders as favorites, and I can jump straight to them in almost every plugin and app.  (I just wish Alchemy used a standard file browser instead of its crippled custom thing.)

I suppose one could do a similar thing with subst, but it wouldn&#039;t be as elegant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run with no antivirus, with no problems.  I think the last time I actually saw a virus was in 1992 (on a work machine, with who-knows-who running who-knows-what on it).</p>
<p>A shell extension that&#8217;s very much worth using is Filebox Extender &#8212; I set up my various samples, presets, and renders folders as favorites, and I can jump straight to them in almost every plugin and app.  (I just wish Alchemy used a standard file browser instead of its crippled custom thing.)</p>
<p>I suppose one could do a similar thing with subst, but it wouldn&#8217;t be as elegant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
