<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside the Performance Rights Act, And Deciding Who Gets Paid on the Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:10:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-981715</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-981715</guid>
		<description>Ms. Hirschman leaves out one important detail: while this Act may make sense for commercial radio, it does not exempt public radio.  It does require public stations to pay a lower, annual fee, but many college radio stations have already stated that the fee would be beyond their budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Hirschman leaves out one important detail: while this Act may make sense for commercial radio, it does not exempt public radio.  It does require public stations to pay a lower, annual fee, but many college radio stations have already stated that the fee would be beyond their budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: detroit what</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-866940</link>
		<dc:creator>detroit what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-866940</guid>
		<description>woah peter listens to jimmy edger awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woah peter listens to jimmy edger awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: box</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-866617</link>
		<dc:creator>box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-866617</guid>
		<description>This is whacky...

The old model is fine, songwriters get paid when their compositions are played on the radio.

Performers get paid when they sell tickets and tour.

Now the performers want the songwriters&#039; shares?     no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is whacky&#8230;</p>
<p>The old model is fine, songwriters get paid when their compositions are played on the radio.</p>
<p>Performers get paid when they sell tickets and tour.</p>
<p>Now the performers want the songwriters&#8217; shares?     no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-863046</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-863046</guid>
		<description>Irving Azoff, manager of the Smashing Pumpkins and CEO of Ticketmaster, is one of the forces behind musicFIRST coalition.  This has nothing to do with musician rights, and everything to do with funneling money to profiteers.  http://techdirt.com/articles/20090312/1725054102.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irving Azoff, manager of the Smashing Pumpkins and CEO of Ticketmaster, is one of the forces behind musicFIRST coalition.  This has nothing to do with musician rights, and everything to do with funneling money to profiteers.  <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090312/1725054102.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/articles/20090312/1725054102.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtual Turntable</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-862430</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual Turntable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-862430</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Radio, Fees and Old Flames...&lt;/strong&gt;

	CDM has got yet another discussion going about the proposed bill to pay performing musicians for radio play (currently only composers are supposed to get paid for radio plays.)
	That discussion is focused on what&#8217;s &#8220;fair&#8221; between the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Radio, Fees and Old Flames&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	CDM has got yet another discussion going about the proposed bill to pay performing musicians for radio play (currently only composers are supposed to get paid for radio plays.)<br />
	That discussion is focused on what&#8217;s &#8220;fair&#8221; between the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Robert Frank</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-862148</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Robert Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-862148</guid>
		<description>The problem with this idea is that it opens a gigantic can of worms. It could absolutely murder sampling.

It doesn&#039;t surprise me that Jay-Z is in favor of this idea... this is more money for him that he doesn&#039;t have to share with the co-writers of the track. Then you have the issue of who the &quot;performer&quot; is in sampled music... if someone samples a James Brown record, do the performers in that sample receive performance royalties? How are these performance royalties split? 

I&#039;m guessing this would be negotiated just as the co-writing credit is negotiated as far as how to split revenues from writing. Yet, this is another huge headache that gets in the way of making music and releasing it. I can see sampled artists who have heavy weight demanding all of the performance royalty, and getting it. Likewise in a band like the current &quot;Smashing Pumpkins&quot;, Billy Corgan is going to take the vast majority of the performance royalty. 

Don&#039;t think that this means that everyone in the band is going to get an equal share. It&#039;s not going to work that way. Kurt Cobain split his writing equally with the other members of Nirvana until the songs started making money, then he had everything rewritten so that he got 80-90%. Performance royalties would work exactly the same way.

I have to agree with the notion that performers getting paid should be something negotiated on the front end. It keeps things much less messy. There are already R&amp;B stations in Atlanta who spend +80% of the time talking and less than 20% of the time playing music. Doubtless this would further skew towards talk if this were implemented. It just makes more financial sense for the corporations. It should be obvious by now that artistic motivations are largely not being regarded by these radio stations anymore.

As for artists who don&#039;t get paid for performing cover songs on the radio... well, they knew this when they recorded the song!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this idea is that it opens a gigantic can of worms. It could absolutely murder sampling.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t surprise me that Jay-Z is in favor of this idea&#8230; this is more money for him that he doesn&#8217;t have to share with the co-writers of the track. Then you have the issue of who the &#8220;performer&#8221; is in sampled music&#8230; if someone samples a James Brown record, do the performers in that sample receive performance royalties? How are these performance royalties split? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing this would be negotiated just as the co-writing credit is negotiated as far as how to split revenues from writing. Yet, this is another huge headache that gets in the way of making music and releasing it. I can see sampled artists who have heavy weight demanding all of the performance royalty, and getting it. Likewise in a band like the current &#8220;Smashing Pumpkins&#8221;, Billy Corgan is going to take the vast majority of the performance royalty. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think that this means that everyone in the band is going to get an equal share. It&#8217;s not going to work that way. Kurt Cobain split his writing equally with the other members of Nirvana until the songs started making money, then he had everything rewritten so that he got 80-90%. Performance royalties would work exactly the same way.</p>
<p>I have to agree with the notion that performers getting paid should be something negotiated on the front end. It keeps things much less messy. There are already R&amp;B stations in Atlanta who spend +80% of the time talking and less than 20% of the time playing music. Doubtless this would further skew towards talk if this were implemented. It just makes more financial sense for the corporations. It should be obvious by now that artistic motivations are largely not being regarded by these radio stations anymore.</p>
<p>As for artists who don&#8217;t get paid for performing cover songs on the radio&#8230; well, they knew this when they recorded the song!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommi raivio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Could This Be A Hit On The Radio?</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-861701</link>
		<dc:creator>tommi raivio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Could This Be A Hit On The Radio?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-861701</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Music posted a nifty piece on the performance rights policies in the US . For one thing, I hadn&#8217;t realized that in the States the performers of a particular record [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Music posted a nifty piece on the performance rights policies in the US . For one thing, I hadn&#8217;t realized that in the States the performers of a particular record [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uhhuh</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-861575</link>
		<dc:creator>uhhuh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-861575</guid>
		<description>If CEO&#039;s expect millions of dollars for telling people how to run a business, failing and then taking a multi-million dollar golden hushpuppy handshake gift, then why wouldn&#039;t it make sense to pay the musician for his work done, be it a part in an orchestra or a single producer what they are worth? We aren&#039;t asking for millions; only what is right. Furthermore if the adults of our communities can&#039;t work out a system that does pay us, then maybe they should step aside because there are plenty of people around who do know!!! OMG...all this carry on about what&#039;s right and what&#039;s not...it&#039;s obvious to most people already...sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If CEO&#8217;s expect millions of dollars for telling people how to run a business, failing and then taking a multi-million dollar golden hushpuppy handshake gift, then why wouldn&#8217;t it make sense to pay the musician for his work done, be it a part in an orchestra or a single producer what they are worth? We aren&#8217;t asking for millions; only what is right. Furthermore if the adults of our communities can&#8217;t work out a system that does pay us, then maybe they should step aside because there are plenty of people around who do know!!! OMG&#8230;all this carry on about what&#8217;s right and what&#8217;s not&#8230;it&#8217;s obvious to most people already&#8230;sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a reader writes</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-861150</link>
		<dc:creator>a reader writes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 03:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-861150</guid>
		<description>If this were to pass, it would simply mean the end of music programming, such as it is, on commercial radio. So if you like AM radio now, get ready for the future of FM. 

Station groups are not going to pay additional royalties just to broadcast music when they can buy syndicated talk shows for less money--and bonus points for an excuse to trim what is left of the local programming staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this were to pass, it would simply mean the end of music programming, such as it is, on commercial radio. So if you like AM radio now, get ready for the future of FM. </p>
<p>Station groups are not going to pay additional royalties just to broadcast music when they can buy syndicated talk shows for less money&#8211;and bonus points for an excuse to trim what is left of the local programming staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuqtpiet</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-860979</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuqtpiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/07/inside-the-performance-rights-act-and-deciding-who-gets-paid-on-the-radio/#comment-860979</guid>
		<description>haha. session gong player</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha. session gong player</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
