Rumor Busted: Celemony’s Magical Melodyne Direct Note Access Still Real, Coming Soon

Ah, Internet rumors: so adorable, so not actually true. But this one does demonstrate that people eagerly await the ability to edit audio with more flexibility. Something about Melodyne fires up the imagination.

Celemony caused a big stir last year with a video demonstrating Melodyne DNA technology – Direct Note Access. The YouTube video itself went semi-viral, demonstrating a kind of holy grail in computer audio: the ability to seamlessly edit audio note-by-note, even in a polyphonic texture, as easily as you can MIDI patterns.

Then, this month, a rumor started spreading through the forums that Celmony was “in a panic.” An alleged copy of a magazine I’ve never heard of, “Real Music,” claimed the mad scientist behind the technology had failed. The copy:

Celemony in trouble over DNA promise
"The technology demoed in Celemony’s upcoming Melodyne Editor used prefabricated loops and edits to illustrate a ‘what if’ scenario.
An insider told us: Everyone’s panicing behind the scenes at Celemony. Peter used a mock-up of proposed technology for live demos. In reality, producing a fully working version is proving to be impossible. When he produces a mini demo for one sampled phrase the whole thing breaks for other phrases. He’s panicing because very soon he expects Celemony to retract the promise of the holy grail DNA feature and apologize to the userbase. Peter has taken a month off work after a row with Editor’s project manager over his persistent failure to make the feature a reality."

Now, I find this all strangely alluring: Peter Neubaecker, the mad genius behind Melodyne, locked in a basement cursing his audio algorithms, perhaps with a computer hooked up to a giant lightning rod. His elongated beard only helps him fit this role. Betrayed by his assistant, Melodyne DNA becomes an utter failure. (“Are you saying that I put an abnormal brain into a seven and a half foot long, fifty-four inch wide GORILLA?”) You know, something like this:

Strangely alluring – just not terribly plausible, and, according to Melodyne, entirely made up. A representative for Celemony points me to this quote from forum host and site webmaster Claudio d’Allere, who tries to dispel the speculation:

Nobody is panicking at Celemony. We know we are late, and that may have raised some speculations. However, DNA still works as intended, and we are happy to invite you to our public beta test that we expect to start in late May or early June. Feel free to try this beta with your own audio files and not just "prefabricated loops"."

So, yes, the story – sit down for this one – is that the software is late. Let me explain something: late is much, much, much better than early. Early means that someone has shipped software before it’s entirely baked. I know this comes as a shock, of course. Just as we know it’s utterly unheard of that software or other technology be delayed (the horror!), we certainly have a hard time imagining anyone shipping any music technology with some features missing or lingering bugs or anything like that. Jeez.

Anyway, all my sources say Melodyne DNA is very much on track, and still looks fantastic to me. I’m sure, as with any audio algorithm, you’ll find audio that doesn’t work perfectly, but that’s true even of simple things like a Compressor.

The good news is, if you don’t have enough to do or have extra time on your hands, you can use the affordable Melodyne Uno to have fun right now, by recreating the spooky voice of the GLaDOS computer from the video game Portal. Behold:

Lately, I’ve had a number of conversations with audio and music tech industry figures in which they complained about the untamed wilderness of the Internet. These chats didn’t necessarily start with “You crazy kids and your…,” though I suspect that may have been implied. I’m sure that odd twists like this rumor were what they had in mind.

The Web does indeed give the power to transmit inaccurate information quickly – but it’s equally quick at correcting it. And it does gives us things like this awesome GLaDOS tutorial, so to me, it all balances out.

I am a crazy kid, though. Guilty as charged.

Stay tuned for that beta.

Comment Icon

15 Comments

Leave a Comment
Comment Icon

Jez

I can’t tell you how glad I am to have read this before actually seeing those rumors. I think I made a dozen friends sit through that YouTube demo last year, excitedly explaining to the non-musicians why this is the “holy grail.” I hadn’t been that excited since I discovered you can buy Cadbury Cream Eggs by the case.

And I probably won’t even use Melodyne DNA when it’s released — it isn’t really what I do these days… I’m just excited for it from an academic perspective.

What will be the next holy grail?

April 15, 2009 @ 7:04 am
Comment Icon

Peter Kirn

I guess we may have to go after THE Holy Grail now. ;)

April 15, 2009 @ 7:07 am
Comment Icon

Bjorn

I call dibs on searching the castle with the maidens!

April 15, 2009 @ 7:18 am
Comment Icon

bliss

Coincidence? I checked the Celemony website early this morning to see if DNA was still on its way. Hadn’t heard any rumors. Anyway, glad it’s still coming.

April 15, 2009 @ 8:26 am
Comment Icon

Rutger

A polyphonic note editor has already been released!

http://www.improvisator.de/en/vvoxpoly.htm

25 euro’s for the beta that is out now. 99 for the full version soon.

Haven’t tested it yet…

April 15, 2009 @ 8:43 am
Comment Icon

Peter Kirn

@Rutger:
Yes, as covered here previously:
http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/02/05/visualvox-polyphonic-tone-manipulation-the-indie-eur25-celemony/

And at EUR25, looks well worth a look. It just doesn’t appear to have the level of sophistication Celemony does, though that’s not a big surprise. I do like competition – and maybe you’ll get some different results out of the improvisator thing.

April 15, 2009 @ 8:50 am
Comment Icon

adamj

Although I am really excited for this technology because it’s awesome, I wasn’t expecting to buy Melodyne products because I don’t want to make music that sounds like Cher or Kyane West.

But that GLaDOS tutorial is really cool! I was wondering how they did those vocal effects when I played Portal. This vid sounds very close to the actual game. I wonder if Valve used Melodyne?

Hmm, maybe I will need to play with Melodyne after all. DNA will be a nice tool for reworking all those gigs of unused loops, and turning them into a unique creation of my own that I would actually use in a song.

April 15, 2009 @ 8:54 am
Comment Icon

Sureno

well i must admit i did post a couple threads with news of this, not endorsing it but just making it known the possibility of the rumour, im over the moon it is a hoax as i am eagerly awaiting my update and have posted a link to this site to all plus extra sites iv posted on

April 15, 2009 @ 11:02 am
Comment Icon

Emile van de Coevering

Can you imagine the quality of remixes that can be made with Melodyne?

April 15, 2009 @ 11:11 am
Comment Icon

Jordan314

Beta in June?? Rrgh, remember when it was due out in 2008?

April 15, 2009 @ 11:29 am
Comment Icon

gwenhwyfaer

Not, of course, that shipping late and shipping with a host of bugs and several MIA features are at all mutually exclusive… ;)

April 15, 2009 @ 12:09 pm
Comment Icon

Sharon

I’m glad someone caused this stir! Otherwise, Melodyne would have probably kept mum about their much-awaited product. :) Looking forward to the beta version…

April 20, 2009 @ 6:40 am
Comment Icon

Filippo Lo Meo

still waiting.. forever?

August 22, 2009 @ 12:39 pm
Comment Icon

Luke

Where was the June beta? It’s vaporware, end of story! Q: What is the best way to stop your competitors doing R&D on the holy grail of digital audio? A: Say you’ve already done it, and produce a bogus video to get everyone excited.

September 15, 2009 @ 7:24 am
Comment Icon

Create Digital Music » Melodyne Automagic Pitch-Changing Direct Note Access is Here, in Beta

[...] access to notes in polyphonic audio had failed to come to fruition turn out to be false. (I was skeptical about those rumors in April.) Melodyne DNA did take longer than expected to ship, but then, that isn’t exactly news in [...]

September 17, 2009 @ 5:51 pm
Comment Icon

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .
If you want a cool icon, get a Gravatar

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI