<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cakewalk&#8217;s $35 Music Creation Software for Windows Gets Major Polishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:13:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/comment-page-1/#comment-874429</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/#comment-874429</guid>
		<description>Actually, GarageBand recently added a video timeline preview - presumably motivated to do so by the fact that GB is part of the iLife suite along with iMovie.

But there are things you don&#039;t get in GarageBand: a proper mixer, for one, the preset playback features with pre-mapped knobs, the more sophisticated notation features (with printing!), the web publishing stuff, and some of the content.

There wasn&#039;t *that* much to say about GB this year in CDM terms -- but that was before it got this as a rival. Maybe a comparison is in order, if folks are interested. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, GarageBand recently added a video timeline preview &#8211; presumably motivated to do so by the fact that GB is part of the iLife suite along with iMovie.</p>
<p>But there are things you don&#8217;t get in GarageBand: a proper mixer, for one, the preset playback features with pre-mapped knobs, the more sophisticated notation features (with printing!), the web publishing stuff, and some of the content.</p>
<p>There wasn&#8217;t *that* much to say about GB this year in CDM terms &#8212; but that was before it got this as a rival. Maybe a comparison is in order, if folks are interested. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeyOfGrey</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/comment-page-1/#comment-874416</link>
		<dc:creator>KeyOfGrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/#comment-874416</guid>
		<description>This looks like a great Cakewalk product. I remember using Cakewalk in the early 90&#039;s and it&#039;s definitely come a long way. One thing I see in Music Creator that I don&#039;t see in Garageband (although I&#039;m not a power user of it), is the ability to put a video along the timeline. This allows you to score music to video and set correct timing cues. That&#039;s pretty neat stuff for a 40 dollar program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a great Cakewalk product. I remember using Cakewalk in the early 90&#8217;s and it&#8217;s definitely come a long way. One thing I see in Music Creator that I don&#8217;t see in Garageband (although I&#8217;m not a power user of it), is the ability to put a video along the timeline. This allows you to score music to video and set correct timing cues. That&#8217;s pretty neat stuff for a 40 dollar program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/comment-page-1/#comment-874027</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/#comment-874027</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes, but remember, that interface didn&#039;t originally show up in GarageBand. GB looks a whole lot like the original version of Acid. And, let&#039;s face it, most multitrack audio software looks like most other multitrack audio software -- the basic interface metaphors go all the way back to the Mac and Atari ST software from the late 80s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, but remember, that interface didn&#8217;t originally show up in GarageBand. GB looks a whole lot like the original version of Acid. And, let&#8217;s face it, most multitrack audio software looks like most other multitrack audio software &#8212; the basic interface metaphors go all the way back to the Mac and Atari ST software from the late 80s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiceofreason</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/comment-page-1/#comment-874020</link>
		<dc:creator>voiceofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/#comment-874020</guid>
		<description>yup…and the new version looks even more like the complete rip-off of garageband that it is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup…and the new version looks even more like the complete rip-off of garageband that it is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/comment-page-1/#comment-873906</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/#comment-873906</guid>
		<description>Yeah, actually, I agree -- for the beginner, I&#039;d probably recommend Cakewalk Music Creator over Reaper just because of the added included content and a slightly friendlier interface.

I actually think either is a little better balanced than GarageBand, certainly than Steinberg Sequel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, actually, I agree &#8212; for the beginner, I&#8217;d probably recommend Cakewalk Music Creator over Reaper just because of the added included content and a slightly friendlier interface.</p>
<p>I actually think either is a little better balanced than GarageBand, certainly than Steinberg Sequel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puffer</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/comment-page-1/#comment-873901</link>
		<dc:creator>Puffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/#comment-873901</guid>
		<description>I recommended Reaper at first, too, &#039;cause the price-point is great for the entry-level. And then I remembered how baffled *I* was trying to get up to speed on Reaper. Now, sure, I&#039;m a little dense sometimes, but I have enough experience working with digital audio that I know, more or less, what I&#039;m doing. In my experience, admittedly limited, Reaper did not strike me as &#039;new user&#039; friendly, any more than Sonar, Logic, Live or Insert-DAW-Here is. 

If I want to give my 12 year-old nephew something to use on his family computer to learn and have fun with digital audio, this looks perfect.

I&#039;m not saying this is a revolutionary product or even that there aren&#039;t alternatives. But I totally get the point of it. And the price-point is pretty spot on for what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommended Reaper at first, too, &#8217;cause the price-point is great for the entry-level. And then I remembered how baffled *I* was trying to get up to speed on Reaper. Now, sure, I&#8217;m a little dense sometimes, but I have enough experience working with digital audio that I know, more or less, what I&#8217;m doing. In my experience, admittedly limited, Reaper did not strike me as &#8216;new user&#8217; friendly, any more than Sonar, Logic, Live or Insert-DAW-Here is. </p>
<p>If I want to give my 12 year-old nephew something to use on his family computer to learn and have fun with digital audio, this looks perfect.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying this is a revolutionary product or even that there aren&#8217;t alternatives. But I totally get the point of it. And the price-point is pretty spot on for what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/comment-page-1/#comment-873795</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/#comment-873795</guid>
		<description>@Puffer: Yes, absolutely. I have a lot of respect for Apple, their audio team, and the Mac, but I can&#039;t see buying a Mac for the sole purpose of getting GarageBand, certainly. 

Cakewalk also makes the Cakewalk Power Studio which comes with an audio interface. I would recommend getting a dedicated audio box that has decent drivers on either platform, regardless. And this package would absolutely be high on my list, along with Reaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Puffer: Yes, absolutely. I have a lot of respect for Apple, their audio team, and the Mac, but I can&#8217;t see buying a Mac for the sole purpose of getting GarageBand, certainly. </p>
<p>Cakewalk also makes the Cakewalk Power Studio which comes with an audio interface. I would recommend getting a dedicated audio box that has decent drivers on either platform, regardless. And this package would absolutely be high on my list, along with Reaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puffer</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/comment-page-1/#comment-873782</link>
		<dc:creator>Puffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/04/21/cakewalks-35-music-creation-software-for-windows-gets-major-polishing/#comment-873782</guid>
		<description>Not to be all Cakewalk fan-boy here, but last week I was out at a local performance and some young wannabe singer was asking me questions when she heard I had a home studio. Specifically, she wondered what software she could use to make demo tracks. What would I recommend, that wouldn&#039;t cost too much money? Did she really need to get a Mac so she could get Garageband? And everything that I could think of was way overkill for someone like this. This person isn&#039;t worrying about gain-staging and routing matrix flexibility and low-latency drivers.

As much as we &#039;in the know&#039; folks may scoff at products like this, I think it&#039;s good to have simple, well-designed music apps that give the punters legal access to home production.

Home production is the new Top 10!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be all Cakewalk fan-boy here, but last week I was out at a local performance and some young wannabe singer was asking me questions when she heard I had a home studio. Specifically, she wondered what software she could use to make demo tracks. What would I recommend, that wouldn&#8217;t cost too much money? Did she really need to get a Mac so she could get Garageband? And everything that I could think of was way overkill for someone like this. This person isn&#8217;t worrying about gain-staging and routing matrix flexibility and low-latency drivers.</p>
<p>As much as we &#8216;in the know&#8217; folks may scoff at products like this, I think it&#8217;s good to have simple, well-designed music apps that give the punters legal access to home production.</p>
<p>Home production is the new Top 10!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
