<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Propellerhead Record: Oft-Requested Reason Feature Will Be an Entirely New Tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:02:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Super Reason &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Smart iPhone Analogy Comment</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-971560</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Reason &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Smart iPhone Analogy Comment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-971560</guid>
		<description>[...] on this very old article when it was first announced that Record existed&#8230; Create Digital Music did an article about it. Well someone made a jack-ass comment (to be fair, it wasn&#8217;t clear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on this very old article when it was first announced that Record existed&#8230; Create Digital Music did an article about it. Well someone made a jack-ass comment (to be fair, it wasn&#8217;t clear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandar Khila</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-915994</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandar Khila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 06:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-915994</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using the Beta of Record for a few days, and I have to say it is absolutely mind-blowing, from what I&#039;ve seen so far.

There&#039;s a steep learning curve, even for someone such as myself who has been programming in Reason for years, there&#039;s nothing in Reason 4 I can&#039;t figure out, but the addition of the recording tracks within that rack has hugely complicated the process - but in a good way of course!

I&#039;ve been playing with the realtime vocoder, so you can dial up your carrier track from Maelstrom or Thor or whatever, then just do your Herbie Hancock impressions with a microphone.

It recognises all the Reason refills, as you would expect, and I&#039;ve had no problem with it instantly seeing my USB keyboard.

There&#039;s a disclaimer when you fire up the Beta that it is slower than the final product will be, but I&#039;ve noticed no sluggish action at all, no spinning pizza wheels here (I&#039;m on Apple OSX, Core 2 Duo, 4 GB RAM Macbook Pro).

As someone who started way back in &#039;88 working in Cubase on the Atari, I&#039;ve seen nothing that has excited me this much (in terms of audio sequencing and recording!) since.

Anyone using Reason already will love this.

The downside is that I hear they will be protecting their software via the use of a USB dongle - having been ripped off by the majority of Reason users over the years, you can&#039;t blame them.

I don&#039;t like having to waste a precious USB port on a copy protection system, but at a recent seminar in London, out of a room of 150 people or so, only myself and my colleague put our hands up when the question was put to the room &quot;how many people have a registered bought and paid for copy?&quot;

So all those Reason users who have up to now been freeloading it will now have to pay up, it seems!!

The inclusion of the Pod series of guitar amp modelling is a good one, and there is also an ID8 series of simplified instruments, can&#039;t see why yet, but it might just be a quick way of nailing ideas.

I&#039;ve a lot to learn from this software, and I&#039;m looking forward to getting properly stuck into it, but so far I can see very little to be critical of. 

Reason and Propellerhead have answered their critics and provided a direct audio input system, sure, if you&#039;re a Logic expert, or Cubase VST is your main sequencer, you may not want to make the switch, but for anyone who has been using the original solid state electronics for years - Reason/Record and the ability to go round the back and manually wire up weird and wonderful configurations just like the real thing - is for me unbeatable as a studio/sequencer.

pk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using the Beta of Record for a few days, and I have to say it is absolutely mind-blowing, from what I&#8217;ve seen so far.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a steep learning curve, even for someone such as myself who has been programming in Reason for years, there&#8217;s nothing in Reason 4 I can&#8217;t figure out, but the addition of the recording tracks within that rack has hugely complicated the process &#8211; but in a good way of course!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been playing with the realtime vocoder, so you can dial up your carrier track from Maelstrom or Thor or whatever, then just do your Herbie Hancock impressions with a microphone.</p>
<p>It recognises all the Reason refills, as you would expect, and I&#8217;ve had no problem with it instantly seeing my USB keyboard.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a disclaimer when you fire up the Beta that it is slower than the final product will be, but I&#8217;ve noticed no sluggish action at all, no spinning pizza wheels here (I&#8217;m on Apple OSX, Core 2 Duo, 4 GB RAM Macbook Pro).</p>
<p>As someone who started way back in &#8216;88 working in Cubase on the Atari, I&#8217;ve seen nothing that has excited me this much (in terms of audio sequencing and recording!) since.</p>
<p>Anyone using Reason already will love this.</p>
<p>The downside is that I hear they will be protecting their software via the use of a USB dongle &#8211; having been ripped off by the majority of Reason users over the years, you can&#8217;t blame them.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like having to waste a precious USB port on a copy protection system, but at a recent seminar in London, out of a room of 150 people or so, only myself and my colleague put our hands up when the question was put to the room &#8220;how many people have a registered bought and paid for copy?&#8221;</p>
<p>So all those Reason users who have up to now been freeloading it will now have to pay up, it seems!!</p>
<p>The inclusion of the Pod series of guitar amp modelling is a good one, and there is also an ID8 series of simplified instruments, can&#8217;t see why yet, but it might just be a quick way of nailing ideas.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve a lot to learn from this software, and I&#8217;m looking forward to getting properly stuck into it, but so far I can see very little to be critical of. </p>
<p>Reason and Propellerhead have answered their critics and provided a direct audio input system, sure, if you&#8217;re a Logic expert, or Cubase VST is your main sequencer, you may not want to make the switch, but for anyone who has been using the original solid state electronics for years &#8211; Reason/Record and the ability to go round the back and manually wire up weird and wonderful configurations just like the real thing &#8211; is for me unbeatable as a studio/sequencer.</p>
<p>pk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huddie</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-896277</link>
		<dc:creator>Huddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 10:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-896277</guid>
		<description>Well, hm, I&#039;ve been using Reason for years and allways been hoping they would add something like a harddiskrecorder device, or maybe simple audio clips, so you could get audio into reason. And I thought I understood why they never did: because they really wanted to keep the program really simple and fast to use.  I thought that was why there was no plug-in support either.

Then came version 4. They made the sequencer as advanced and complex as Cubase/Sonar/Logic and added an allround monster synth, instead of sticking with simple devices for specific purposes.

At last there is audio for Reason. But I guess it&#039;s to late and to expensive: Reason 449, - Record 299, - makes 748, -. With such a price it has to compete with all the other DAW&#039;s but I fail to see it&#039;s edge... Record better has some tricks up it&#039;s sleeve, but I found nothing special on the propellerheads website about it, yet...

Bottom line: this guy switched from Reaon to Logic because of Audio, but he certainely won&#039;t be switching back to Reason for Record!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, hm, I&#8217;ve been using Reason for years and allways been hoping they would add something like a harddiskrecorder device, or maybe simple audio clips, so you could get audio into reason. And I thought I understood why they never did: because they really wanted to keep the program really simple and fast to use.  I thought that was why there was no plug-in support either.</p>
<p>Then came version 4. They made the sequencer as advanced and complex as Cubase/Sonar/Logic and added an allround monster synth, instead of sticking with simple devices for specific purposes.</p>
<p>At last there is audio for Reason. But I guess it&#8217;s to late and to expensive: Reason 449, &#8211; Record 299, &#8211; makes 748, -. With such a price it has to compete with all the other DAW&#8217;s but I fail to see it&#8217;s edge&#8230; Record better has some tricks up it&#8217;s sleeve, but I found nothing special on the propellerheads website about it, yet&#8230;</p>
<p>Bottom line: this guy switched from Reaon to Logic because of Audio, but he certainely won&#8217;t be switching back to Reason for Record!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramin Streets</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-895722</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramin Streets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-895722</guid>
		<description>Practically all my songs have been initially built in Reason and I have always felt the process get disjointed by the fact that I couldn&#039;t seemlessly add my vocal or guitars. Live is great but it takes time to Rewire and by that time the mood is over. I&#039;ve told friends for years if Reason ever incorporated audio I&#039;m happy to stay exclusively in that environment and use Live for live performance and remixing. Now that is looks like this will come to pass I&#039;m ecstatic! Bottom line I think if you&#039;re not already a Reason user you&#039;re simply not going to understand the draw.

R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Practically all my songs have been initially built in Reason and I have always felt the process get disjointed by the fact that I couldn&#8217;t seemlessly add my vocal or guitars. Live is great but it takes time to Rewire and by that time the mood is over. I&#8217;ve told friends for years if Reason ever incorporated audio I&#8217;m happy to stay exclusively in that environment and use Live for live performance and remixing. Now that is looks like this will come to pass I&#8217;m ecstatic! Bottom line I think if you&#8217;re not already a Reason user you&#8217;re simply not going to understand the draw.</p>
<p>R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-894601</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-894601</guid>
		<description>Michael, what are you talking about?

This software supports both Mac and Windows. I&#039;m actually testing it on my Windows box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, what are you talking about?</p>
<p>This software supports both Mac and Windows. I&#8217;m actually testing it on my Windows box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaeltrudgeon</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-894583</link>
		<dc:creator>michaeltrudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-894583</guid>
		<description>i didnt write bustard...........hmmmm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didnt write bustard&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..hmmmm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaeltrudgeon</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-894582</link>
		<dc:creator>michaeltrudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-894582</guid>
		<description>Bout bloody time!
This has been a much needed upgrade for  reason users!
But what about the Mac only support?
Is propellerhead really going to ditch the pc user for this product?
I was only saying over the phone to a musician friend of mine how I’m bored with cubase, and am tired of having to rewire reason in to cubase, just to have a decent mixer.
But the truth is that reasons mixer is a bit of a turd! This is why time and time again I’m forced to rewire.  That conversation was what prompted my search for new propellerhead products, ultimately leading me here! 
Id rather shaves my balls and dip them in acid, than carry on the way i am.
 And from over the horizon rides propellerhead on their white horse. I think it’s about bloody time!! My saviours!!  And then the bustards ride straight past me to Mr Mac behind me!!
What the duce!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bout bloody time!<br />
This has been a much needed upgrade for  reason users!<br />
But what about the Mac only support?<br />
Is propellerhead really going to ditch the pc user for this product?<br />
I was only saying over the phone to a musician friend of mine how I’m bored with cubase, and am tired of having to rewire reason in to cubase, just to have a decent mixer.<br />
But the truth is that reasons mixer is a bit of a turd! This is why time and time again I’m forced to rewire.  That conversation was what prompted my search for new propellerhead products, ultimately leading me here!<br />
Id rather shaves my balls and dip them in acid, than carry on the way i am.<br />
 And from over the horizon rides propellerhead on their white horse. I think it’s about bloody time!! My saviours!!  And then the bustards ride straight past me to Mr Mac behind me!!<br />
What the duce!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musiqtechnique</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-893079</link>
		<dc:creator>Musiqtechnique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-893079</guid>
		<description>I am glad to see the newer mustang or the new version of the VW!!! It may still get you from point A to point B but it is the accoutrements such as seamless Recording conjoined with beautiful GUI without having to use a program like Cubase or Logic etc in tandem or addition. :) I am excited to see what we can do to test such a product as Record to assist in its fruition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad to see the newer mustang or the new version of the VW!!! It may still get you from point A to point B but it is the accoutrements such as seamless Recording conjoined with beautiful GUI without having to use a program like Cubase or Logic etc in tandem or addition. :) I am excited to see what we can do to test such a product as Record to assist in its fruition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QUAZ</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-892471</link>
		<dc:creator>QUAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-892471</guid>
		<description>If you use reason this software is great. True its not gonna beat cubase or protools. Its very cpu efficent........and if you already own reason its a way of adding audio. Reason provides a great way to produce tracks...but once you can add your own guitar...or bass line.. or perhaps you want to recod your self quickly without having to open another program?
Now you can. I think its great. And if you dont use reason it would be hard for you to understand this software in simplicity. I have produced some great music with reason. Now that i can add audio and stay in a reason like environment without the worry of my computer crashing. GREAT! I can use the fantom and reason semlessly....i can add a vocal and still work in reason. Trust me if you make music in reason this is great. For years you complain that you cant record in reason the propellerhead offers you record and all you do is complain! No its not cubase it aint meant to be. Its reason with the addition of audio like people been screaming for. Be a lil grateful and paitent people .....end of the day it aint the tools its the mechanic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use reason this software is great. True its not gonna beat cubase or protools. Its very cpu efficent&#8230;&#8230;..and if you already own reason its a way of adding audio. Reason provides a great way to produce tracks&#8230;but once you can add your own guitar&#8230;or bass line.. or perhaps you want to recod your self quickly without having to open another program?<br />
Now you can. I think its great. And if you dont use reason it would be hard for you to understand this software in simplicity. I have produced some great music with reason. Now that i can add audio and stay in a reason like environment without the worry of my computer crashing. GREAT! I can use the fantom and reason semlessly&#8230;.i can add a vocal and still work in reason. Trust me if you make music in reason this is great. For years you complain that you cant record in reason the propellerhead offers you record and all you do is complain! No its not cubase it aint meant to be. Its reason with the addition of audio like people been screaming for. Be a lil grateful and paitent people &#8230;..end of the day it aint the tools its the mechanic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/comment-page-3/#comment-892244</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 21:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/09/propellerhead-record-oft-requested-reason-feature-will-be-an-entirely-new-tool/#comment-892244</guid>
		<description>Franco, FutureMusic chose to reproduce comments from someone breaking an NDA or choosing to leak information. CDM was the first to produce information publicly, which meant I was able to communicate directly with Propellerhead&#039;s co-founder. To me, the ability to fact-check and make sure information is accurate (at least to the best of my ability - lord knows I make mistakes) is more important than speed. In fact, the couple of times I&#039;ve mentioned a rumor I have wound up regretting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franco, FutureMusic chose to reproduce comments from someone breaking an NDA or choosing to leak information. CDM was the first to produce information publicly, which meant I was able to communicate directly with Propellerhead&#8217;s co-founder. To me, the ability to fact-check and make sure information is accurate (at least to the best of my ability &#8211; lord knows I make mistakes) is more important than speed. In fact, the couple of times I&#8217;ve mentioned a rumor I have wound up regretting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
