teenage_op1

Photo by Teenage Engineering. Check out their full photo gallery.

Teenage Engineering’s OP-1 is something unique in music hardware. It’s got a form factor inspired by the Casio VL-Tone series – you know, those cute little 80s-vintage synths. It’s a sampler. It’s a synth. It has an FM radio. It will have a variety of sequencers. It has, we’ve just learned, a multi-track tape mode that lets you do beat-synced virtual splicing as a performance technique. It is expected to integrate and interoperate with a design lifestyle including, if you like, a luxury-priced, meticulously-machined desk lamp, and according to one rumor I heard, perhaps even a specially-designed electric bicycle. (Seriously.)

I got to spend some hands-on time with the current prototype of the OP-1, and hanging out with the guys from Teenage Engineering. I do mean “the guys” – I had expected to go out to dinner with the CEO and found myself with almost the entire team of 9. (One was sleeping off Sweden-to-California jetlag.) The company has a pedigree in sound engineering, including the legendary drum maker Elektron, but also in marketing, advertising, industrial and product design.

The OP-1 is real, it’s coming, and it’s far enough along in the prototyping phase that I think we’ll see real details on getting one soon. Pricing will be under US$1000 – perhaps a goodly amount under, depending on the final details of manufacturing. There’s no availability date, but progress appears to be accelerating. I poked fun when the OP-1 was introduced, only because it seems like something too cool to be real. I am surprised, though, that people are now complaining that the OP-1 is taking a long time – I think some people don’t realize how time-consuming hardware development really is, and we only just saw an under-glass prototype last spring. The fact that the OP-1 does integrate hardware and onboard software tightly and does do things in new ways is a testament to having a single, small team that works on the whole product.

Teenage Engineering – OP-1 @ NAMM 2010 from Neil Bufkin on Vimeo.

Reporting for CDM, Neil Bufkin shot this discussion with more details on what to expect from the OP-1. Via our namm blog.

In the din of the NAMM hall, some people didn’t seem to “get” the OP-1. The prototypes available aren’t entirely refined in regards to the sound engine, so it’s too soon to judge sound quality, and some functionality was missing from the units on display. And it’d be easy to see this its collection of synthesis and sampling tricks as nothing new. (In fact, I get the sense that some people dialed up essentially an init preset and judged the sound quality based on that.) But look closer, and even prior to the finished product, there’s real design genius here. Some of the little touches I was able to glean:

You can record backwards, an idea so simple in sampling, but also powerful, it’s a wonder it’s not widespread. Go crazy with this, and you can prove some pretty out-there results. It’s not hard to imagine putting an OP-1 alongside a computer, and using it alternatively as a hardware synth and a tool for resampling the output of a live computer mix.

It’s a four-track virtual tape recorder, complete with virtual splicing. The craft of early electronic music was deeply connected to the process of recording to tape, then splicing, into a finished product as a collage. The OP-1 is the most convincing adaptation of that idea I’ve ever seen. A simple, iconic on-screen representation of a reel-to-reel shows you your recording in real-time, with even some light physics simulation so it behaves like tape when you stop the transport. But you can also cut the virtual tape – split, lift and join features are quick key shortcuts away. Just like on tape, you can change the speed during recording, not just during playback. And, so as not to be too caught in the past, the tape deck itself can be beat-synced. Let’s just reflect on that for a second: you can sample the instrument or an external source, and then speed and slow the recording like tape synced to beat, all on hardware. Sampling features are nothing new, but the implementation here really is something special.

Whereas clunky hardware designs from mainstream manufacturers have typically treated tape recording as something you do to record an arrangement, the OP-1′s tape recorder is one you can play as an instrument. (See our video of one of the Teenage Engineers jamming with this feature, which I smuggled off one of their Mac laptops.)

And it’s finally a sampling feature that functions on recording like tape, not just on playback. That sound you heard all around NAMM was the sound of developers and engineers collectively saying to themselves, “why didn’t I do this myself, first?” (Okay, knowing this site, I’m sure we’ll get someone on comments who has done this first, so do speak up.)

Watch it in action in this video of a live jam, shot by Teenage Engineering and smuggled off one of their computers for CDM:

The screen isn’t just beautiful: it fits perfectly. To me, the greatest accomplishment of the OP-1 is making a small screen seem integral to a hardware design, rather than a concession to practicality. Since computers became commonplace in the 80s, the primitive screens on music hardware have seemed an anachronism, a compromise. I remember synth shopping for the first time around 1990 and being frustrated by that, and things aren’t much different now. The design of the OP-1′s interface is so minimal, however, that the onboard screen seems perfect. The display itself seems like part of the hardware and the instrument, rather than being a menu system or a tacked-on indicator.

It’s finally a small screen that seems ideal for its purpose – maybe even better than looking at a computer-sized screen. And that’s not just because it’s pretty; it’s because it’s functional. For a look at some of these beautiful design ideas in motion, here’s a video from a hands-on (more with sound yet to come):

Above, quick video shot on the screen, showing how physical interactions map to iconic, graphic feedback — all appearing in high-density, 60 fps glory on the OP-1′s screen.

The synth and sampler are friendly – toy-like in the best way. In keeping with some of the most fun instruments of all time, the OP-1 is something people will want to play. Color-coded knobs and extensive graphical feedback make a reasonably sophisticated set of synthesis, envelope, and sampling options accessible. There’s nothing revolutionary in the synth or sampler; it just takes the 90% of sound-making techniques most people use and makes them more immediate.

All of these things are wonderful, and clearly it’s a gorgeous little device. And it’s impossible, as always, to judge a design that isn’t finished. I have a suspicion, however, that some of the most important magic of the OP-1 lies in what the impishly-secretive Teenage Engineers aren’t saying:

  • What are the sequencers? I don’t know what braincell-killing spirit the Swedes prefer, but I’m going to need a lot of it if I want to find out what the deal is with the OP-1′s internal sequencers. That’s sequencers – plural. Teenage says they’ll have multiple ways of sequencing the instrument, and they won’t say what any of them are. I saw a brief glimpse of a grid of dots that suggested a tracker-style sequencer of patterns, but I wasn’t able to conclude anything. And ask anyone from Teenage what this is all about, and they’ll hint that what we haven’t seen is what they think will make the hardware must-have.
  • We haven’t heard most of the synths yet. When it ships, the OP-1 promises the following models: “FM • String • DRW • Pulse • T10 • Cluster • PSE.” I did get to play with the pulse synthesizer engine, which you can see a little bit in the short video I saw, and was struck by how intuitive the display is – the OP-1 really makes it easy to visualize the harmonic content of your sound patch, and gives you immediate control over the sound. But I didn’t get to hear much, and some of the synth models I most want to play with weren’t ready yet. That means most people at NAMM missed out not only on the coming sequencers, but also on a lot of the sounds. I’m convinced enough by the interface that I think those synth models hold a lot of promise.
  • What other sonic recipes might make it onto the OP-1? Teenage prototypes their sound creations and interface in Python, wrapped around native code, before re-implementing them on the device. That means there are all sorts of potential software features that could still make the cut. By the way, if you’re wondering why hardware tends not to work this way, it’s because too many music hardware developers have huge gulfs between the people who engineer on the hardware/embedded/DSP side, and on the computer desktop software side. At Teenage, it’s really just one group of guys who know their way around both. They’re in one office, not separated by lots of time zones or a language barrier. (It makes a difference; trust me.)
  • Where do the bike and lamp come into this? This isn’t Roland or Yamaha, or even IKEA. Teenage have an immaculate studio, and have conceived and built an expensive work-lamp that’s machined out of medical-grade metal tooling. The lamp can be used to conveniently produce stop-motion animation, noted one of the Teenage staff. It’s not only a standalone lamp: it’s a modular system for all sorts of application. Oh, yeah, and they’re also working on an electric bike. TE are design-obsessed, and I get the sense that there could be a connection between these products. Already, it sounds like it’ll be possible to integrate the lamp and the OP-1 in your work setup. Could the electric bike and the OP-1′s synth have some connection in the future? TE weren’t saying. Will I be able to afford this luxury? No. Does it tickle my inner design geek? Yes. Oh, yes. Maybe for those of us who are poorer, I can publish some hack that lets you connect your OP-1 to the unicycle and cheap IKEA desk lamp you own.
  • There’s been no mention of MIDI in. Something a number of people seem to have missed: TE has promised MIDI output (so you can use the device as a controller for software), and even a USB storage device (for drag-and-drop sample interchange). But one thing they haven’t yet said is that you’ll be able to route MIDI into the OP-1. This could be a deal-breaker, of course, to some people. But I’m holding out hope for another solution, like finally having hardware you can sequence with OSC. (I’m going to be doing as much research as I can on USB OSC implementations and dumping them on the studio in Stockholm, just as a hint.) The problem with MIDI has been that it tends to impose certain design decisions in regards to timing, how musical events are represented, and even the size of devices (given the amount of hardware that still has onboard DIN connections). So, while this aspect of the OP-1 remains a mystery, I’m intrigued by where it could lead.

The OP-1 is definitely one I’ll be following; it’s at the top of my list for the year. And it’s about time we got some really significant new hardware. For more information…

MusicRadar got a hands-on with some sounds.

Teenage has a lovely set of photos on their blog – and yes, that’s me, by coincidence amidst a crew from Hispasonic:
NAMM Photo Bananza

Check out the full Teenage Engineering blog for loads of videos, including a few in the fabulous luxury of their Super 8 motel room:
http://www.teenageengineering.com/now/

And don’t miss the product page, which now has a lot of detail on it:
Teenage Engineering OP-1
Among the juicy specs: how about an onboard accelerometer, Li-Ion rechargeable battery, a 60-fps display, and a powerful (for this kind of gear) 400MHz processor core?

Just please, please, don’t judge the sound quality of a non-shipping synth based on YouTube videos. I’ll be sure to report back on final sound quality before you unload your hard-earned change.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all people you really realize what you're speaking approximately! Bookmarked. Kindly additionally talk over with my site =). We will have a link trade arrangement among us

If I was A schoolteacher who tought music Id get one for everyone of my students, and of course one for m,uaah;)

Nice. Prepare for a few more hits... Trent just tweeted this link:&nbsp ;http://twitter.com/#!/trent_reznor/status/40509353...

OP-1 stands for Over Priced One

soooooo sick i want one sooo bad

I don't care how much it costs. It looks nice and i'm having one

When I first saw this OP-1 I thought it doesn't really exsist. I saw it on the video of Swedish house mafia: One. Now I'm reeeeeeeeeeeeeally interested especially cause I'm a teen. =D

This is a cool instrument with a unique feature set and a fascinating user interface.

It's in a small case, but doing that makes it more expensive to manufacture, not less. The price they mention is very reasonable given the feature set, which is NOT found in $200 Casiotone keyboards. Those who think it would be the same for them should read the feature set more carefully, or just get a Casiotone and be happy. Obviously this is substantially more sophisticated inside than many other popular instruments in the $700 range.

Usability is worth a lot. You can have something with an impossible to figure out interface that is seldom used, and one with similar features with a gratifying and intuitive interface that you happily use every day. Which is worth more?

As far as the FM radio, it's a great idea as a noise source from non-stations, especially if it can be routed into the synths as a noise component. It would produce a much more interesting noise source than those in other instruments.

For me it all comes down to the sound of it and the funfactor! I't doesn't seem to sound that well to me, but i don't like the sound of monomachine either. To me the FM-radio is junk and waste of time/money, i'd rather like a better rec. plugs. Why white, looks like something from a hospital.

haha looks fun... that freestyle in the first demo vid up top is similar to something I did in Reaktor a few 3-4 years ago: I use a slightly bulkier IBK 10Control for knobs and buttons. OLD SKOOLE ya teens!

checkit on last.fm:

<a href="http://www.last.fm/music/Center+for+Audio-Visual+R...; title="You Too Can Care" rel="nofollow">

And as far as a cheap sampler... you can get the best hardware sampler made, the Akai s6000, for around $600 loaded on eBay, formerly 6Gs, and it is FUN! Detachable faceplate is the about the same size as the above toy, and packs a hell of a wollop.

2cents

Sure you can get a laptop with less money and a ton more functionality.

But it will never be a neat , ultra fun synth like this in just one small , optimised package. With a computer it will be a mess of cables, diffirent parts and highly uncomfortable interfaces.

Optimisation costs, but in the world of options, none should complain. None can prove that this is either over priced or a toy.

However I have to agree I would love to see a super cheap , even weak sampler. How come, none is making one ?

In the end OP-1 is going to appeal , having money to spare. But yes it will never be a high priority synth.

At taht price range I would prefer a Korg Radias.

beyond over priced at $700,...$400 is the max this is worth. Anyone bleeting on about what's inside should remember it's connectivity is limited to minijack in, minijack out and usb.

that's seriously lame - how do I connect it with all my studio gear, without using minijack-1/4" converters..that sucks. or connect it to my computer only with usb ? ... so to get the best out of this you need to use it with a computer at some point ? why not just use a computer...

etc etc

too pricey.

too, too, TOO, pricey.

sux.

I've thought of an analogy: it's like taking a bog standard car, sticking in a sports car engine and expecting it to perform like a sports car. The engine might be great but you are still held back by the suspension, transmission, brakes, etc.

Here whatever great internals you have you are held back by a tiny little non standard keyboard and tiny little buttons.

Totally agree with teej! only wish it'd be cheaper tho ;p

CONTENT:

I just want to say to those who see a problem in a small boutique company designing a portable Synthesizer, a Lamp and maybe even a Bike:

Multidisciplinary in 2010 is an old hat for me.

If you have great ideas, why not realize them, no matter in which area you have them?

It definitely doesn't have to mean a lack of focussing.

What a heated discussion and in the end it all boils down to the price tag.

I will get one if I can somehow painlessly (next personal valuation here, like for every single $) afford it once it's available. Right now that's not the case.

The biggest concern that I have is that it could be a toy that you play with for a while and then put it away.

It could really impact creativity in a good way, but it could also be that after some time you realize what you tend to make with it ends up all too similar.

This product, at the current price point, is playing on the insecurities of jazz-bearded, monome-fixated macbook users.

-

Do i know you?

Boutique Boutique Boutique.

Who cares. Boutique is for chin scratchers who probably never get around to writing any music.

This product, at the current price point, is playing on the insecurities of jazz-bearded, monome-fixated macbook users.

Smacking bin lids with wooden spoons FTW.

and provide a complimentary sonic pallet, both stored in the different machines, and broadcast over fm.

cooler idea -- make it possible for these to sync to a tempo over fm. you could have a party with multiple op-1s hooked up to different soundsystems all over the place, and let people just jam with them, all synced to the same tempo.

here's an idea for live performance -- make multiple low power fm transmitters and use them to broadcast different sound sources. these could outputs ableton if you wanted. you probably can't tune to more than one fm channel at a time, but this could be an interesting way to select and effect (resample?) different presequenced sound sources, in a live setting. plus, you'd look cool with this thing and all those fm transmitters.

.....anyway we want free entry to the festival, free dope, and all the money from the box office so we can distribute it amongst the people.....

its simple really things have different prices dig, somethings are free some things cost a lot, no doubt there will always be people willing to make something that appears to be similar at a cheaper price.

Lets wait until we hear what people do with it before wondering if will be legendary.

You wont ever hear the sound of a lemur but boy it looks great for making digital music , and you know what some people even use them too

The interesting thing to me was that at the NAMM booth these synths were all physically attached to their podiums.

I am concerned that there was a cord running through the bottom of the podium to the hardware for this thing, Is there one actually working in that form factor yet.

I smell vaporware.

peter don't be ridiculous! 9.99 ?

the right price would be more like $350

What makes OP-1 so neat is that its form is in elegant harmony with its function. The OP-1 is, beyond being an instrument, an idea.

I don't know enough about design to riff on about this, but as an amateur voyeur of digital gear, I see the OP-1 as something that speaks to my own need to navigate digital surf in a way that is equally fun and open, without being overwhelming.

The OP-1 doesn't take itself too seriously, and by achieving design balance, it seems to whisper to the imagination to play, play, play.

Expensive? It's relative. I bet that after a year it comes down to $400.

I think this is the Micron-killer I've been waiting for. I could care less about i-Phones: I want a standalone toy that takes me seriously enough to get lost in for days.

wow, a pissing match of Beat Thang proportions! love it.

do people react the same way to Elektron and it's instruments?

they are pricey, beautiful, Swedish and are part of the same "umbrella" mothership as Teenage Engineering, ACNE Design. Elektron also uses very stylized marketing, and even a little Japanese text! gasp!

they also happen to be extremely powerful instruments. i don't mind paying a premium for an emphasis on UI or industrial design, but i think people might be overlooking what is under the hood here as well.

i have a funny feeling that if this thing wasn't tiny, and at first glance, resembled a Casio VL-Tone that they might be singing a different tune. there's a decent amount of technology in that little thing! the screen alone is super impressive. and if the audio and DSP features are half as cool as they say then it could be a mighty device.

the fact that it's tiny, for me, is just icing on the cake.

i'd love to see what people thought of it were it larger, had less colorful components and no little built-in speaker. it might be taken more seriously. personally, i think it looks extremely promising as-is.

@joe: Okay, name your price. $9.99?

It's a powerful synth + sampler + sequencer engine running on a fairly high-end chip with an aluminum base and a very high-end, 60 fps, high-density display.

Meanwhile, you get some pretty crap-built hardware in this market for $2500, $3500 if you like, without that quality display and manufactured in mass quantities.

So, I'm confused, frankly. I don't know what people want. You keep going, man.

Oh, and to save up money, yes, I'm actually buying a new workspace on the dirt-cheap from IKEA. ;)

way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way, too expensive.

Ikea has some excellent products. If you're smart enough to buy the good stuff from their collection... Well designed, durable and affordable.

Unless this things sounds meaner than a virus ,trippy like a VCS and able to bash out beats like an mpc then i laugh at anyone and their hipster (un)coolness willing to fork out that kind of cash for a lil plastic keyboard with bad pastel knobs. Its so very very Ikea and the fact that somewhere down the track a lamp and bike come into play is laughable.

@gwenhwyfaer: making music while taking a shit is fun!

@littlepig: u r right. IMO f.e. the iphone is too small to have real fun with music apps. but did u try the OP-1? is it really that small? or is it just minimalistic and neat?

@Pierre: Well, I think there's plenty to learn from the OP-1 in terms of software design. So yeah, I hope that software designers and DIYers take this as a challenge.

I wanted to clarify my earlier point about the price/performance potential of the OP-1.

My interest has always been in inexpensive consumer electronics that transcend their limitations, or else are so focused that they do a couple of things very, very well. This is why I love the idea of cheap keyboards like the Casios and Yamahas that can still be used to make great music.

It's why I use a cheap netbook to create my own personal music, drawings and animations. It's why I try and make something out of the cheapest software I can find because it's all I can afford without going into serious debt, which I promise never to do again. I also know that the limitations imposed push me to find more creative solutions.

When first learning of the OP1, the untapped potential of such a device excited me. It was a portable synthesizer with tons of added functionality. I could imagine packing it in my travel bag and using it on trips. Unfortunately, the price just shoots that fantasy right out the window because of the reasons I have previously given. The OP-1 an extravagance in this age of frugality.

Having said all this, I greatly admire the great thought and care that went into the design and implementation of this device.

I've had a fantasy for a long time of developing a line of dedicated electronic devices that were cheap and portable, such as a cheap and portable electronic sketchpad or music making device. When I saw the OP-1, I thought that this is exactly what I would have designed, given the opportunity!

I guess that's why I ultimately feel bummed out that the price is so high!

@ra: Whatever possessed me to type Swiss instead of Swedish in the comment above, I've corrected that. And yes, I am in fact familiar with the difference between Sweden and Switzerland. ;)

Peter - great coverage as always. The OP-1 is truly lust-worthy.

I can't wait to play one!!!

The object looks like it was made with a lot of love. But to me it illustrates a certain tendency. I'm all for inspiring design, and I won't even consider using software that doesn't have a nice looking GUI. Design is most definitely important. But it's like we are getting a bit too Brian Eno, too obsessed with novel ways to find inspiration. Here we have a little fetish object that generates desire, a blogospherical wet dream. But what happened to the dream of exploring the depths of sound, pure sound?

PS - A Kim Cascone Linux update would be interesting. Does he still use Ubuntu? (given the criticism it got here recently)

@real_number: Some of the folks who read (and produce) this site themselves create tools, as well as musicians. Some are "designers" in the traditional sense of the word. So I think people are inspired by the design of the tool. If you're investing money in tools, period, you would hopefully be inspiring in design you care about. Now, of course, if you can't also produce your own inspiration, that's another issue, and I don't mean that everyone is going to love this particular object. But this is a design to which at least some people do respond, and while it is produced in "boutique" quantities, it's also cheaper than a lot of the mainstream music products - even those supposedly marketed to teenagers. I don't think that's gear lust. In fact, I'd hope gear occasionally inspires love.

The design looks very good, but the name Teenage Engineering doesn't fit. As noted, this object is way too expensive for most kids..

If, with all the current available software and hardware, one still dreams of a product that will 'finally inspire again' I'd suggest to take a break or try another hobby. Inspiration doesn't have to come from a tool. A true artist will always find a way. Then again, for some gearlust has replaced the rush of creation itself.

@Peter Kirn "This is a boutique Swiss instrument with an aluminum base that’s machined in Sweden."

That's Swedish, not Swiss, Switzerland's not Sweden... Both countries share a tradition of modernist design, high quality production and wealth, which all can be found in the OP-1.

It's obvious that this is about creating a product independently from the big industry, without any compromise in design, function, concept; Made by a group of people that obviously has a background in design - It's their style, not a marketing trick. I guess they're also dressed better than most other people behind NAMM booths...

cheers from Switzerland, ra

smartson: regarding point1

well, i think this is where tenori-on failed and perhaps op-1 will follow..

I do believe 25,000 would buy it - at the right price.

these are immediate devices, and I know the thought of referring to it as a toy is anathema to some readers, but really the tenori-on and op-1 seem perfect for the young as well as old. Priced accordingly, and marketed accordingly, I could see parents buying it for their kids, adults for their nieces & nephews... as well as us adults getting it for themselves...

what other electronic instruments are really thought provoking for kids out there... i can think of a couple nintendo ds games, like elektro plankton...

we'll never know if kids would love it or not because very few will have their altruistic parents/aunts/uncles buy one for them at these prices...

again, it's just something I feel from keeping an eye on these types of things and without having done the market research

as for point2, well, as the designed I'd do my best to retain as much control as possible, but my ultimate goal would be proliferation...

@smartson

I think potentially, a lot more than 25,000 people would want one if they knew it existed. We didn't know we needed ipods until they were marketed at us and if Apple can sell 100,000,000 ipods, i think selling one percent that amount should be possible.

Femo, thanks for switching to constructive criticism.

There's two reasons not to hand out the r+d :

1-Market-wise, this is not something 25 000 people want and the 2000-5000 people who want it have 1000$ to pay for it.

2-Design-wise, you want to keep the control over fabrication, so that it doesn't lose it essence.

I wouldn't be surprised if someone on the team scores a contract with one of the bigger companies after this, that in itself is a good reason to do it all themselves.

smartson "These people could be making more working for big firms doing less interested corporate work."

well, that's something i hinted towards earlier. but i used the analogy of a musician getting a PUBLISHING deal as opposed to signing to a label.

Basically the r&d is done, and they have something very real and very interesting to sell. At this stage I'd just get a big manufacturer to mass produce it for a reasonable cut while the T.E. team reserve creative control and royalties. I mean, I wouldn't just do that because it's less work and more profitable, I'd do it because I'd want my device to become legendary and have a lasting, rippling effect on future music... that's not really going to happen unless it's truly accessible, imo. Maybe because the unit has the potential to be widely cherished, they are more afraid of giving some of it away....

Everyone relax. Jeez. They should get Apple to manufacture the OP-1. They'd get to keep the lovely industrial design aspects and we'd all get to pay under 300 dollars.

Femo-

Seriously, relax. Why are you getting so angry about a not-even-available piece of gear. Don't buy it when it comes out. No biggie. Some people have money to burn, some people don't like using exclusively a computer and controller to make music. To each his own. But you're acting like Teenage Engineering is going around kicking puppies or something. They're making a device that you think costs too much. Get over it.Move on.

@salamanderanagram - Yamaha bought a controlling interest in the company in 1986 or 1987 (conflicting dates are floating around the internet). Korg founder Tsutomu Kato bought out Yamaha's share in 1993.

Confusing as hell.

femo for the internet win!

2010's loudest hater award...!!!

yay!

jesus christ guy.... i mean... i know this site is dedicated to the tender intricacies of music hardware production tactics and marketing research politics.. and i realize that you are the foremost authority in said area.... but how about you go make some music and give the people who aren't out to be the king of the comment thread hill, some quiet time.... ok buddy?

teenage engineering rules...

let em get sick with it!

who give a shit how they are available?

if you want it ... get it...

if not.. don't....

I'd like to add that the team who's creating this is probably doing out of love more than money, not that they won't make any if all goes well.

But again, the FACT is that 9 people are involved in this, in a part-time or contractual manner. These people could be making more working for big firms doing less interested corporate work.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] More info including hands-on video, with loads on the killer interface here. [...]

  2. [...] Create Digital Music posted this early peak of Teenage Engineering’s OP-1 at NAMM. I had seen pictures of the OP-1, but seeing a video of this thing is really tickling my gear spot. It’s a beautiful design, and the display is gorgeous. It looks like a blast to mess around with. There are only a few instruments in the last few years I have lusted for after only seeing them (the Moog Little Phatty being one), and this definitely falls into that category. [...]

  3. [...] Previously: Teenage Engineering’s OP-1 Instrument: Hands-on, Videos, Why it’s Different [...]