It’s not a monster combining everything in a giant, coffin-sized case. Instead, the Z2 focuses in on 2-channel mixing and controls, and integrates with Traktor. (MIDI and audio operation is possible with other tools, though – and we have the details on that.)

Native Instruments is continuing their hardware attack with a new device that combines three tools: controller, mixer, audio interface. Those knobs and faders control software, as an integrated controller for Traktor, but internally, the Kontrol Z2 is also a mixer and computer soundcard. It’s geared primarily for Traktor users, of course, but with pricing under a grand and support for MIDI and audio with any software, it’ll be interesting to see if this sort of all-in-one design appeals to users of other DJ and performance tools.

The Z2 is unique in that it’s a 2+2 mixer. It’s not the first combined mixer/soundcard/controller, but the 2+2 configuration, and resulting price and size, may be a bit easier for a range of users to accomodate.

You can also compare NI’s offerings with Serato’s own, also announced this week. Serato/Pioneer give you four channels instead of two, and more deck controls – but that means larger, pricier hardware. And unlike Serato DJ, Traktor Pro will still work even if you don’t connect special, compatible hardware. So, while NI invests in integrated hardware, they don’t force you to use it.

By being both a mixer and a controller, says NI, the Z2 hardware allows you to mix analog and digital DJ techniques. They describe it as a “hub.” Other sound cards and mixers would do the same, to be sure, but here you get one that’s fully integrated with Traktor. And that means it could be time to clear the dust off some old decks or CDJs, with Traktor and the integrated controller handling the fancier computer DJ capabilities.

The features of the Z2:

  • Aircraft-grade aluminum – which, by the way, is what we just saw in the DIY Apollo 13 controller yesterday
  • Traktor Pro software bundled (and integrated with the controller features).
  • Innofader-brand faders, “high-quality” knobs.
  • Multi-colored LED buttons, assigned to Remix Decks and cue points. (For those of you who hate the color disco-fication of NI’s hardware, sorry, there’s more.)
  • Two standalone mixer channels for external analog inputs – think Pioneer CDJs or turntables.
  • Two channels from the soundcard for independent control of the Traktor Remix Decks, cue points, and effects (and, for audio signal, anything you want to route from your computer).
  • Dedicated Remix Deck section, and Master section for Traktor file browsing, Sync and Quantize.
  • Macro FX, so that you can combine multiple effects on one control. (Also known as “Skrillexing.” Joke. Yes, you can also do classic breakdowns.)
  • 24-bit internal soundcard with – at last – XLR balanced outputs.
  • Separate booth output, separate mic input. (This is a DJ mixer, after all.)
  • Additional aux input, atop the turntable connections. (iPad, perhaps?)
  • HID controller implementation.
  • USB hub – now, this is interesting (and means the “hub” moniker is literal). There are USB ports on the controller so you don’t have to use up your laptop’s precious ports or lug a separate hub. NI of course hopes you’ll plug in more of their hardware (F1, X1), but that could include other gear, too (FaderFox? Launchpad? Ohm64?).

Here’s where the Z2 fits in, in NI’s view. Add your own USB hardware (NI shown here, but a hub and the software each support anything you like). And dust off a CDJ – or new CDJ2000 – for hybrid DJing. Images courtesy Native Instruments.

The channel layout is set up with dedicated three-band EQ, filter, and fader section, plus rotary volume knobs. I’ll defend the two-channel, rather than four-channel / four-deck configuration: it’s still what most DJs use, and even fairly advanced DJ setups can get by with two decks and two associated channels (or even four decks and two channels, if you must). It seems a logical compromise.

Unfortunately, what is missing that I would have liked to see is easy insert points for external hardware effects. You can run those out of the main output, but then, inserts can be a good reason to use a mixer in the first place. This is probably out of the realm of the Z2′s target audience, however, so take that criticism with a grain of salt.

Also, it’s worth saying that the audio interface “channels” on the Z2 aren’t actually independent channels. Outputs from your computer are fed in stereo only. When you’re controlling channel operations on the audio interface side of things, you’re actually manipulating the software only.

The audio business here: connect analog gear (including aux) and get dedicated cue/booth and main outs. In fact, you can use those same dedicated outs with other software, like Ableton Live.

MIDI and Audio Operation with Other Software

Clearly, the target market here is Traktor users. But a lot of Traktor users will do a “DJ” gig with Traktor on Saturday, then a “live” gig with Ableton Sunday.

NI confirms to CDM that both MIDI and audio operation will be possible even when you’re not running Traktor.

As with other NI controllers (such as Mashcine), the Z2 has a MIDI Mode; switch into that, and the controls send MIDI rather than Traktor-specific HID control signals. Generally speaking, this will mean controlling one or the other, not both at the same time, though with some elaborate mapping you could conceivably build a way to do both at once. (DJ Hack Day, anyone?)

For audio, the Z2 operates as a four-output USB audio interface. The first two outputs are fed to the main outs; 3+4 go to the headphone cue or booth output. That means, just as you can cue with Traktor, you can set cue outputs in Ableton Live and use those. In fact, if you’re on the Mac, you can even route audio from both Traktor and Ableton Live to the Z2 outputs at the same time. (On Windows, this is trickier, so let’s not go there. If you know how to do it, we’ll leave you to it.)

Just remember, you’ll have to do your mixing in software, not with the Z2 – the Z2 just takes a stereo main output and cue output from your computer.

For now, MIDI is your option, but eventually, HID support – a USB control standard – could be an option, too. This is largely of interest to hackers at the moment, but it’d be nice to see Ableton with native HID controller support, too. HID is arguably more flexible and can offer higher resolution than MIDI can. (For the record, tools like Max for Live do allow you to hook into HID.)

Color-coding is in over at NI. Here are the cue point controls, designed for integration with Traktor. (They will work with other software, though, once you place the Z2 into MIDI Mode.)

What about other controllers?

So, Serato is not terribly-compelling competition when it comes to opening up MIDI control. They’ve finally added third-party MIDI mapping support in Serato DJ, but still require you to use compatible hardware – which, for now, means just one piece of Pioneer kit shipping on November, and existing ITCH gear early next year. That’s not a criticism, necessarily – it’s just a different strategy.

Why are users, then, complaining to NI that they’re not beefing up third-party MIDI mapping, if NI is comparatively more open? I think, put simply, the bar for NI is higher. Much of this is perception: while it’s a comparatively minor point that you can’t assign an arbitrary number of Remix Decks to your own controllers, it’s something users expect. That perception is amplified when users feel that NI instead is trying to sell them special, branded hardware.

Native Instruments promises updated mapping support that will improve mapping in general, including adding greater access to the Remix Decks. And my message to NI is simple: we’ll be glad to see it. And be glad your users are this passionate: they’re people willing to do the hacking and mapping work themselves, rather than wait for NI to do it for them. So please, to NI and the rest of the industry, keep working on the tools that allow those kinds of passionate users to shine.

(In fact, ironically enough, this video continues the “celebrity user” trend by showcasing DJ TechTools founder Ean Golden. Golden’s site has been, above all others, a consistent watchdog in complaining to NI about custom control. DJ TT even manufactures their own hardware that would benefit from tighter Remix Deck integration.)

Background on this story:
Traktor 2.5 Remix Decks + Custom Controllers: What You Need to Know, Why HID Matters

That artist video; more feedback?

Here you go: Ean Golden of DJTT takes the helm.

And product info:
www.native-instruments.com/z2-dj-mixer

Availability: November 1 (just like the Pioneer/Serato rival)
Pricing: US$899 / 799 € incl VAT / 83800 ¥

I’m curious: what sorts of DJ rigs would you want to see tested with the Z2, or other, competing hardware? There is a new generation of DJs exploring more live performance elements and getting away from just playing records – even though “just playing records” can sometimes make a satisfying night on the dancefloor. What would your criteria be for evaluating this and other gear? What would you want to know or see tested? Let us know, and we can try to make it happen.

  • Angelo Albertini

    so professional….that’s great….foam mattress

  • http://twitter.com/regend REGEND

    although i use Traktor for smaller gigs (ex: places that won’t let me setup turntables), i want a Rane 57SL which integrates ScratchLive. Rane does have new mixers that have a lot of buttons to trigger samples and cue points but i realized i like buttons off to the side on a controller. at gigs, having extra stuff on the faceplate of a mixer means accidents can and will happen and buttons will get accidentally pressed. i use a novation nocturn when using traktor sans analog mixer. i used to use a korg launchpad but there seemed to be a delay or lag when i launched clips in ableton or use it with Midi in ScratchLive. looking forward to the Craze and Shiftee videos of the Z2.

  • kent williams

    Can I just say that I’m really getting tired of the ‘DJ Tax’? It seems like any product aimed at a DJ costs about twice what a similar piece of pro audio gear.

    The classic case is comparing a current top-of-the-line DJ mixer from e.g. Pioneer, with a live/recording mixer from Allen & Heath or Mackie — or more to the point, an Allen & Heath studio mixer with an Allen & Heath DJ mixer.

    Sure they have different feature sets, but it’s hard to get past the fact that if you compare the component parts of a piece DJ equipment with the closest analog in non-DJ equipment, there’s a significantly higher markup in the DJ world.

    One can’t even compare economies of scale, since there are more DJs and DJ wannabes than there are producers setting up home studios. Perhaps manufacturers judge DJs as having more disposable income and less knowledge of hardware value vs price?

    Just a thought ;-)

    • http://pkirn.com/ Peter Kirn

      Hmmm, no idea why you got voted down here (maybe someone missed)

      I actually would be suspicious in this case that, even though the DJ market is exploding, number of units shipped for specialist hardware like this is almost certainly nowhere near something like a mixer. So, there’s scale.

      Remember, mixers aren’t only sold to home studio users. And not all casual DJs are buying these kinds of products (nowhere close, I imagine).

      I’m speculating here, but based partly on some actual numbers I’ve seen.

      So, that’s scale. There’s also the question of how much the hardware is worth; that’s tougher.

  • http://www.facebook.com/oliver.chambers Oliver Thomas Guy Chambers

    can anyone tell me whether the audio from the the decks in traktor are summed internally or externally? i.e. is the z2 just a controller with a stereo sound card in or a proper mixer?