Audiobus may have just gotten its killer app.

See if this scenario is familiar to you: you’ve got some instrument or effect on the iPad or iPhone, and you’re making some cool sounds. But you want to actually get to recording more than one track of that instrument, perhaps even as far as arranging it into something resembling an actual song. You could plug the audio jack of the iPad into your laptop, or go through the dance of trying to get files off your iPad. But there you are, comfortably reclining on the couch with a drum machine, and you don’t want to have to go back to your desk and turn on your computer and get distracted by Facebook, and…

Sorry, I was looking at another browser tab and lost my train of thought. Ah, yes – Audiobus.

We’ve followed Audiobus closely, with an in-depth feature around its release. And when Steinberg released Cubasis, a full-featured production tool for iPad, we talked to them about workflow.

Now, the two technologies meet. Cubasis is a traditional DAW (Digital Audio Workstation), that is, an all-in-one record / mix / arrange app. With the addition of Audiobus, it can now pipe audio from a growing number of compatible apps into the multitrack arranging window. That means you can use your iPad in a way familiar from a desktop computer, but in a much more portable environment.

Of course, at some point you may still want to brave your laptop. Cubase users are well sorted: Cubasis projects can be brought straight into Cubase on your Windows PC or Mac. For users of other tools, you can simply upload the whole project via Dropbox and get at its sounds that way. See the discussion on the Audiobus forum. (Readers, let us know if you try this or find your own workflow.)

All in all, though, this seems this could really be the tool that makes the Audiobus notion take off. And certainly other production tools won’t be far behind.

Cubasis is US$49.99; we’ll have a full review soon (just loaded onto my iPad 3).

http://www.steinberg.net/
Cubasis for iPad on iTunes App Store

Cubasis is I think closest to a traditional, full-featured DAW on the iPad – especially with Audiobus support – but it’s not the only option. See also, for instance, MultiTrack DAW by Harmonicdog. I’m not crazy about the look of the UI, but some users swear by it, it was out front with Audiobus support, and costs only US$9.99.

The best competition for Cubasis seems likely to be Auria. With 48-track support and a wealth of features and effects, it’s deeper than Cubasis in many respects, though Cubase users may appreciate the familiar interface and file exchange in Cubasis. And the big difference: Cubasis does MIDI, which Auria does not.

For more Audiobus apps:

http://audiob.us/apps/

  • http://twitter.com/shawnroos shawn roos

    It really does look amazing, but I wish they had a limited free version, just for people to see if it works for theme, before dropping $50.

  • http://twitter.com/natcl Nathanaël

    I’m surprised you did not mention Auria, as it was the first full-featured DAW on the iPad to support audiobus and also one of the first to support multiple inputs and outputs with professional soundcards

    • http://pkirn.com/ Peter Kirn

      Actually, I’m surprised, too. And heh, that may have been the mind-numbing one-two punch of NAMM and CTM Festival making me miss the Auria announcement. ;)

      Oh, and Steinberg sent me a note; Auria … forgot.

      Fixed this story — now it seems since I at last have an iPad capable of running them, a Cubasis – Auria head-to-head is a must (perhaps with A Desktop Computer as the third entry).

    • http://twitter.com/natcl Nathanaël

      Also a strength of Cubasis seems to be that it can record/playback midi, the other daws do only audio.

    • http://pkirn.com/ Peter Kirn

      Yeah, exactly. That’s what wins me over to Cubasis.

  • http://www.facebook.com/zenknee Dave Cross

    Title copy edit: “Edits” should be “Edit”

  • http://www.facebook.com/tom.fenn.54 Tom Fenn

    Cubasis certainly appears to have an excellent workflow, and audio recording is a great addition. But compared to Nanostudio, Cubasis plugins are really dull, and the lack of a decent synthesiser makes Cubasis an app I don’t really want to spend £35 on. I’m going to hold out and wait, see what happens.

  • http://dinside.no Øivind Idsø

    Cubasis looks good, but is A) expensive, and B) doesn’t offer automation curves for volume/pan etc. that can be drawn into audio tracks. I really need that.

  • hypersleep

    There’s going to be even more talk when BeatMaker 2 finally gets Audiobus support. It’s got a huge amount of features and unparalleled sampling abilities on iOS. It’s got MIDI support and audio tracks. It’s got automation for its effects, volume and panning, etc. There’s very little it doesn’t have. Its effects might not be as good as Auria’s, but neither are Cubasis’.

    BM2 isn’t perfect but I think it blows Auria and Cubasis out of the water.

  • http://www.facebook.com/chromatouch Leon Trimble

    nanostudio and beatmaker just missed out

  • Bianca

    If you’re doing a head to head don’t forget meteor from 4 pockets.

    Also has midi and was on the Bus before cubasis.

    And we know nano studio has a synth built in, but with audiobus and midi cubasis and meteor have every other audiobus synth built in.

  • D@rth T@ter

    Been playing with this combo for a few days…the only part of the puzzle missing is a way to sync (as in clock) apps properly…. If anyone has a solution, i’d like to hear it…Cubasis does not seem to send clock – so locking up your iMS20 or Animoog LFO’s or arps is a problem…

  • http://www.facebook.com/greg.s.vaughan Greg Vaughan

    For ANY external Audio recording and for mixdown it is Auria > Cubasis… for MIDI Cubasis obviously (and Audiobus if using iPad2)… For BOTH it is $100… expensive? LFMAO The quality of sound coming from these apps is AMAZING for the price…