<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Create Digital Music &#187; aac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/aac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com</link>
	<description>Making music with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Radiohead King of Limbs in 24-bit FLAC; How to Listen Lossless on Any OS, Device</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2011/03/radiohead-king-of-limbs-in-24-bit-flac-how-to-listen-lossless-on-any-os-device/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2011/03/radiohead-king-of-limbs-in-24-bit-flac-how-to-listen-lossless-on-any-os-device/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple-lossless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audiofile-engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fidelia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[king-of-limbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lossless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiohead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.noisepages.com/?p=17834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why shouldn&#8217;t a digital download be better, not worse, than a CD release? Sit in a studio as most of your favorite albums are recorded, mixed, and mastered, and odds are the digital material is being recorded at higher bit depths and sample rates. And while the perceptual record is more mixed, there&#8217;s also no &#8230; <a class="btn read-more" href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2011/03/radiohead-king-of-limbs-in-24-bit-flac-how-to-listen-lossless-on-any-os-device/">Continue &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2011/03/the-king-of-limbs.jpg" alt="" title="the-king-of-limbs" width="640" height="640" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-17848" /></p>
<p>Why shouldn&#8217;t a digital download be <em>better</em>, not worse, than a CD release? </p>
<p>Sit in a studio as most of your favorite albums are recorded, mixed, and mastered, and odds are the digital material is being recorded at higher bit depths and sample rates. And while the perceptual record is more mixed, there&#8217;s also no question that, in terms of data, lossy compression schemes like MP3 do demand some loss in audio information. (Lossless schemes like FLAC, by contrast, use less data but do so without sacrificing sound information.)</p>
<p>All of this means that it&#8217;s news that you can get Radiohead&#8217;s &#8220;The King of Limbs&#8221; album in 24-bit, lossless FLAC. It&#8217;s the first time there&#8217;s been a major artist doing this kind of release online, say 7Digital &#8211; and, in turn, the first step back toward greater fidelity after the step backward from 16-bit, 44.1kHz <em>lossless</em> audio CDs to the lossy versions available now. By &#8220;first,&#8221; I can only imagine they mean on 7Digital; if you like this sort of release, it&#8217;s worth checking out HDtracks, an online store with content all going this direction (and lots of FLAC):<br />
<a href="https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php">https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s also the latest case that demonstrates that iTunes need not be your only online store for music. UK rival 7digital is the first and only digital store to offer up the band&#8217;s brilliant &#8220;The King of Kimbs&#8221; in 24-bit FLAC.</p>
<p><a href="http://7digital.com">http://7digital.com</a><br />
<a href="http://us.7digital.com/artists/radiohead/the-king-of-limbs/">Deluxe release @ 7digital [US link]</a></p>
<p>Whether their listeners can really hear the difference or not, it&#8217;s likely stores will begin to move to greater audio fidelity. For their part, 7digital says that the 24-bit FLAC codec for Radiohead &#8220;is the first step in 7digital’s move towards higher quality digital music downloads.&#8221; The reasoning is pretty simple. Bandwidth and storage costs are getting smaller for online stores as those stores grow and better leverage server infrastructure. Storage is generally cheaper now than it had been, too, though somewhat mitigated by the increasing popularity of solid state flash memory over larger, cheaper hard disk drives. But most of all, stores are likely to respond to artist and listener demand, particularly as resellers try to differentiate themselves from streaming sound and justify your purchase. It&#8217;s likely labels may also look to formats like FLAC to squeeze more revenue out of the enthusiasts who are most likely to buy full albums. The deluxe FLAC edition &#8211; bundled with 16-bit FLAC and 320kbps AAC for compatibility &#8211; costs US$11.99 instead of the technically-inferior US$7.92 320kbps MP3 version. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m skipping over the most important issue, though &#8211; how do you listen to this?<span id="more-17834"></span></p>
<p>FLAC isn&#8217;t the only compressed lossless codec, but it is the only format that&#8217;s fully free and open source. It&#8217;s really an ideal tradeoff &#8211; you maintain smaller file sizes, but the quality of a 24-bit FLAC file is the same as a much bigger 24-bit WAV or AIFF. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hardly a household name, but FLAC support is surprisingly widespread. Streaming players like the Logitech Squeezebox and Sonos products support it. </p>
<p>Many <a href="http://flac.sourceforge.net/download.html#extras">desktop software players will play FLAC, too</a>: once codec support is installed on your OS of choice, in fact, most players will do it. Linux these days does it out of the box with most players. <a href="http://www.videolan.org/vlc/">VLC</a> is probably the easiest, sure-fire way to get FLAC support on Windows and Mac. On Windows, the excellent <a href="http://www.mediamonkey.com/">MediaMonkey</a>, Winamp, and foobar2000 all play FLAC natively. On the Mac, the open source <a href="http://cogx.org/">Cog</a> is also an option (though it appears it hasn&#8217;t been updated recently, sadly). Aside from VLC, cross-platform, open source players like <a href="http://getsongbird.com/product/">Songbird</a> (Mac, Windows) and <a href="http://banshee.fm">Banshee</a> (gradually being ported from Linux to Mac and Windows) are promising, too.</p>
<p>Of course, part of the reason the situation is spotty is that iTunes has gained a certain hegemony. Nothing against iTunes per se, but I believe having choice is a good thing. Indeed, the predecessor of iTunes itself &#8211; the long-forgotten <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoundJam_MP/">SoundJam MP</a> by Casady &#038; Greene on which Apple&#8217;s product was based &#8211; was the product of a period of heated Mac and Windows player rivalries. If you love music, you&#8217;ll want some options.</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2011/03/fideliakelpe.jpg" alt="" title="fideliakelpe" width="620" height="180" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-17844" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Finally, you again have real choices in how you listen to music &#8211; even on the Mac. Pictured: Fidelia.</div>
<p>And the tide is turning. One of the most encouraging audio player initiatives I&#8217;ve seen yet is from Audiofile Engineering. I&#8217;m already a fan of AE because of their excellent wave editing and loop products (working on a new review &#8211; stay tuned). Now, they&#8217;re reviving the spirit of SoundJam&#8217;s principle rival, and my own player of choice in another life, <a href="http://www.panic.com/audion/">Audion</a>. Fidelia is a perfect choice of commercial player for Radiohead; it can play FLAC natively and even dither the 24-bit audio stream for a 16-bit output. I haven&#8217;t reviewed Fidelia yet as I&#8217;d like to see it mature a bit; minimalism is good, but some basic functionality is still emerging. But I do hope to talk about it soon. And while Windows users have had lots of terrific choices, it&#8217;s nice to see choice returning to the Mac, too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.audiofile-engineering.com/fidelia/">http://www.audiofile-engineering.com/fidelia/</a></p>
<p>Speaking of hegemony, mobile players have tended to lag in FLAC support, but that&#8217;s improving, too. The free and open source <a href="http://code.google.com/p/andless/">andless</a> for Android supports FLAC, and I expect more as the Android music player market continues to heat up.</p>
<p>Many of these players do actually also support Apple&#8217;s Apple Lossless format &#8211; even including many of the free Linux options &#8211; so I expect future iTunes lossless exclusives wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be a dealbreaker. (That&#8217;s true even of andless, so you could, say, rip to Apple Lossless with iTunes and load Apple Lossless and purchased FLAC files onto an Android music player when on the go. Maybe someday we&#8217;ll even see DIY devices based on Android that offer high-fidelity audio outputs.)</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2011/03/andless.jpg" alt="" title="andless" width="320" height="480" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-17847" /></p>
<p>An obviously-essential part of this equation is whether you can actually hear the results. I won&#8217;t start on music consumers who listen regularly on internal laptop speakers and generic Apple white earbuds. But I&#8217;d be interested in what you can detect, comparing different music content, using better listening environments. With &#8220;deluxe&#8221; editions bundling the MP3 and FLAC together, we&#8217;ll have lots of raw material for double-blind tests. Anyone with some experience in administering such tests &#8211; or who wants to get involved in a research project?</p>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2011/03/radiohead-king-of-limbs-in-24-bit-flac-how-to-listen-lossless-on-any-os-device/&via=cdmblogs&text=Radiohead King of Limbs in 24-bit FLAC; How to Listen Lossless on Any OS, Device&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2011/03/radiohead-king-of-limbs-in-24-bit-flac-how-to-listen-lossless-on-any-os-device/&via=cdmblogs&text=Radiohead King of Limbs in 24-bit FLAC; How to Listen Lossless on Any OS, Device&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2011/03/radiohead-king-of-limbs-in-24-bit-flac-how-to-listen-lossless-on-any-os-device/&amp;layout=default&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=400&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:400px;'></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2011/03/radiohead-king-of-limbs-in-24-bit-flac-how-to-listen-lossless-on-any-os-device/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listeners Test New 256kbps iTunes Plus Tracks &#8212; Can You Taste Test the Difference?</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/06/listeners-test-new-256kbps-itunes-plus-tracks-can-you-taste-test-the-difference/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/06/listeners-test-new-256kbps-itunes-plus-tracks-can-you-taste-test-the-difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/06/01/listeners-test-new-256kbps-itunes-plus-tracks-can-you-taste-test-the-difference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s iTunes Plus is here, featuring higher-res files and no DRM. CDM reader Ryan Pollack points us to Slashdot, where readers are abuzz about a Maximum PC taste test shootout: &#8220;Maximum PC did double-blind testing with ten listeners in order to determine whether or not normal people could discern the quality difference between the new &#8230; <a class="btn read-more" href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/06/listeners-test-new-256kbps-itunes-plus-tracks-can-you-taste-test-the-difference/">Continue &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s iTunes Plus is here, featuring higher-res files and no DRM. CDM reader Ryan Pollack points us to <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/07/05/31/2243206.shtml">Slashdot, where readers are abuzz about a Maximum PC taste test shootout</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Maximum PC did double-blind testing with ten listeners in order to determine whether or not normal people could discern the quality difference between the new 256kbps iTunes Plus files and the old, DRM-laden 128kbps tracks.</p>
<p>But wait, there&#8217;s more! To add an extra twist, they also tested Apple&#8217;s default iPod earbuds vs. an expensive pair of Shure buds to see how much of an impact earbud quality had on the detection rate.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The result is, not surprisingly, better headphones are better than poorer headphones, more bits are better than fewer, and both is better than one or the other, but bits are more noticeable if the headphones are worse. If you want to spoil the results of the Maximum PC shootout, read that sentence nine or ten times until it makes sense.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/itunes_256_vs_128_bit">Apple Takes a Bite out of DRM</a> [256 kbps versus 128 kbps bitrate, at Maximum PC]</p>
<p>So, who here has given the iTunes Plus store a try? (Old news to many of you; see our previous stories, <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/05/08/as-other-music-others-embrace-downloads-is-big-drm-laden-online-music-out/#more-2083">As Other Music, Others Embrace Downloads, is Big, DRM-Laden Online Music Out?</a> and <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/04/05/where-do-you-get-your-drm-free-music/">Where Do You Get Your DRM-Free Music?</a>)</p>
<p>I expect you are truly discerning listeners, of course. Get someone to help you with the blindfold. Slapping your forehead against an Apple Cinema Display <I>hurts bad</i>.</p>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/06/listeners-test-new-256kbps-itunes-plus-tracks-can-you-taste-test-the-difference/&via=cdmblogs&text=Listeners Test New 256kbps iTunes Plus Tracks -- Can You Taste Test the Difference?&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/06/listeners-test-new-256kbps-itunes-plus-tracks-can-you-taste-test-the-difference/&via=cdmblogs&text=Listeners Test New 256kbps iTunes Plus Tracks -- Can You Taste Test the Difference?&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/06/listeners-test-new-256kbps-itunes-plus-tracks-can-you-taste-test-the-difference/&amp;layout=default&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=400&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:400px;'></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/06/listeners-test-new-256kbps-itunes-plus-tracks-can-you-taste-test-the-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fission: Lossless at Last</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/09/fission-lossless-at-last/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/09/fission-lossless-at-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 05:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leesherman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lossless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogue-Amoeba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soundtrack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/09/23/fission-lossless-at-last/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, between applications as full-featured as Bias Peak and AppleÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&#8482;s own Soundtrack not to mention freeware like Audacity, Mac users are a bit spoilt for choice when it comes to audio editors. But for those like myself who long for the simplicity and elegance of the long gone SoundEdit, Rogue Amoeba may just have the &#8230; <a class="btn read-more" href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/09/fission-lossless-at-last/">Continue &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, between applications as full-featured as Bias Peak and AppleÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&trade;s own Soundtrack not to mention freeware like Audacity, Mac users are a bit spoilt for choice when it comes to audio editors. But for those like myself who long for the simplicity and elegance of the long gone SoundEdit, Rogue Amoeba may just have the answer.</p>
<p>Fission is the first (and currently only) OS X audio editor to support lossless editing of MP3 and AAC audio. The software has a super simple interface which provides an accurate dual-waveform view and a handful of editing commands that let you split, cut, crop, and fade audio. While still clearly a 1.0 version, it does have some slick features including audible audio scrubbing.</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/stories/2006/sept2006/fissionscreen.jpg" title="" width="580" height="481" border="0" /></p>
<p>FissionÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&trade;s streamlined interface is a joy to look at and use. Its only flaw may be that it is too stripped down for some. With a few more features, particularly support for VST and AU plug-ins, Fission could become my go-to audio editor for those times when bringing up Peak is just overkill.</p>
<p>Fission works with mono and stereo MP3s, AAC, Apple Lossless and AIFF audio files and is <a href="http://www.rogueamoeba.com/fission/download.php">available now as a Universal Binary</a> that runs natively on PowerPC and Intel Mac for US$32.</p>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/09/fission-lossless-at-last/&via=cdmblogs&text=Fission: Lossless at Last&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/09/fission-lossless-at-last/&via=cdmblogs&text=Fission: Lossless at Last&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/09/fission-lossless-at-last/&amp;layout=default&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=400&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:400px;'></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/09/fission-lossless-at-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

