<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Create Digital Music &#187; DAW-Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/daw-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com</link>
	<description>Making music with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DAW Day: Propellerhead Record is Here, with Lots of Free Training</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-propellerhead-record-is-here-with-lots-of-free-training/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-propellerhead-record-is-here-with-lots-of-free-training/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how-to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propellerhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=7497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Record is now shipping, and the beta closed &#8211; and now is a perfect time to talk about learning. Okay, let me explain something. Propellerhead doesn&#8217;t want Record to be called a &#8220;DAW,&#8221; for Digital Audio Workstation. I personally overcame my own distaste for the strange acronym today because, well, there&#8217;s not another good name &#8230; <a class="btn read-more" href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-propellerhead-record-is-here-with-lots-of-free-training/">Continue &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/record_comp.jpg" alt="record_comp" title="record_comp" width="580" height="399" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7504" /></p>
<p>Record is now shipping, and the beta closed &#8211; and now is a perfect time to talk about learning.</p>
<p>Okay, let me explain something. Propellerhead doesn&#8217;t want Record to be called a &#8220;DAW,&#8221; for Digital Audio Workstation. I personally overcame my own distaste for the strange acronym today because, well, there&#8217;s not another good name for a related set of tools.</p>
<p>But I do think Record is different. Workstations are usually defined by being all-in-one environments, for hosting other third-party instruments and effects, and adding in additional features like notation and video scoring. Record is none of those things. You can even treat it like a virtual mixer or rack of processing tools and load it into your existing &#8220;DAW&#8221; of choice, or take something like Ableton Live and load it into Record for mastering. </p>
<p>But then, Record is the exception that proves the rule, isn&#8217;t it? Aggressively geared to be the anti-DAW, to avoid trying to be all things to all people, Record illustrates the variety of ways you can get your music making done.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had a good, healthy debate on this topic, so no reason to resurrect that. Instead, I have two pieces of news: one, Record is now actually shipping. Two, if you&#8217;re interested to learn how to use it, or just to see what they&#8217;ve done, the Props have assembled a terrific set of learning resources. For beginners, &#8220;Record U&#8221; promises to cover the basics of recording tasks as well as the software.  (So far, the first episode, &#8220;Recording Guitar,&#8221; is available.) You can add that to lovely ReWire tutorials from the folks who developed the technology, and mini-tips on how to use the tools. Whatever you think of the software, it&#8217;s an exemplary learning site, just the kind of thing you&#8217;d hope developers would do.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ItujcTMOXo&#038;feature=player_embedded">Basics video</a><br />
<a href="http://www.propellerheads.se/substance/record-u/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_main">Record U</a><br />
<a href="http://www.propellerheads.se/substance/index.cfm?fuseaction=get_article&#038;article=tutorials">Tutorials Page</a><br />
<a href="http://www.propellerheads.se/products/record/index.cfm?fuseaction=get_article&#038;article=micro_tutorials">Micro Tutorials</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=329153703">iTunes podcast link</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve chosen my favorite so far. Love it or hate it, I think this illustrates some of the vision of Record. It makes moving tracks and devices as easy as racking up instruments and effects in Reason, and makes mixing and matching audio uncommonly easy. That could make Record a nice tool to have around for trying to take your pile of recordings and productions and turn them into finished tracks and albums. (A lot of this &#8220;love it or hate it&#8221; phenomenon seems to depend on your feelings about Reason, so Reason fans will also want to take a look at the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGXPOryWpME&#038;feature=player_embedded">Reason &#8211; Record integration video</a>.)</p>
<p><object width="580" height="469"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qs09qX6mwwQ&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qs09qX6mwwQ&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="580" height="469"></embed></object></p>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-propellerhead-record-is-here-with-lots-of-free-training/&via=cdmblogs&text=DAW Day: Propellerhead Record is Here, with Lots of Free Training&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-propellerhead-record-is-here-with-lots-of-free-training/&via=cdmblogs&text=DAW Day: Propellerhead Record is Here, with Lots of Free Training&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-propellerhead-record-is-here-with-lots-of-free-training/&amp;layout=default&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=400&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:400px;'></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-propellerhead-record-is-here-with-lots-of-free-training/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DAW Day: Digital Performer 7 Adds Effects, Easier Access, PT8 Support</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backing-tracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel-strip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital-Performer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar-amps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-tools-hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=7480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DP&#8217;s clever channel strip integrates quite a lot of functionality in every view. I&#8217;d be remiss if I didn&#8217;t note another significant DAW release: DP7 is shipping this week. The Mac-only Digital Performer still has a loyal following, especially among the scoring crowd, some of whom have stuck with DP since the Performer days &#8211; &#8230; <a class="btn read-more" href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/">Continue &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/dpchannelstrip.jpg" alt="dpchannelstrip" title="dpchannelstrip" width="580" height="376" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7489" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">DP&#8217;s clever channel strip integrates quite a lot of functionality in every view.</div>
<p>I&#8217;d be remiss if I didn&#8217;t note another significant DAW release: DP7 is shipping this week. The Mac-only Digital Performer still has a loyal following, especially among the scoring crowd, some of whom have stuck with DP since the Performer days &#8211; one of the Mac&#8217;s first sequencers. I have to say, this particular update seems to focus more on bundled effects than core functionality &#8211; and, in fairness, because it&#8217;s tough to change core features without upsetting the stuff that keeps your users loyal, this isn&#8217;t uncommon. But DP has uncommonly rich support for being a Pro Tools HD front end, it&#8217;s Mac-savvy and Snow Leopard compatible, and given its popularity in scoring, a little touch like the Marker Counter could be huge news for its major following.</p>
<p>Full disclosure: I haven&#8217;t found much reason to touch DP lately, with plenty of other tools to keep my attention, so if there is a loyal DP user who would like to send in their dispatch, I&#8217;d love to run it on CDM.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;ll keep this compact to give you a birds-eye view. First, the effects stuff:<span id="more-7480"></span><br />
<img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/dpliveroom.jpg" alt="dpliveroom" title="dpliveroom" width="580" height="413" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7490" /></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Stompboxes:</strong> For the first time, you get a suite of guitar pedal effects, including emulations of Ibanez, BOSS, RXT, and Electro-Harmonix.</li>
<li><strong>Modeled amps:</strong> Simulations of the Fender Bassman, Marshall JTM45, and Marshall JCM800. So, sure, other suites offer more options &#8211; but these are three top picks.</li>
<li><strong>Physically-modeled guitar miking:</strong> The Live Room | G simulates a speaker cabinet and mic placement. Unlike the Logic 9 take on the same idea, you get a built-in EQ and four channels &#8211; but also unlike Logic, you get close / near / far rather rather free-form mic placement. That&#8217;s too bad, given the clever top-down view, though I suspect the default placements are typically all you need.</li>
<li><strong>Smarter strips:</strong> Access channel strips from a floating window, and see EQ <em>and</em> dynamics in-line on the mixing board. (Usually you get EQ, but not dynamics.) Plus, finally &#8211; unlike most other programs &#8211; your virtual rack of synths appears right on the mixing board. Mixer controls are also available in any edit window, not just the usual arrangement view.</li>
<li><strong>Better counters:</strong> A Large Counter resizes the counter to an arbitrary size &#8211; ideal for when you&#8217;ve rented an orchestra and are projecting counts (literally). And a Marker Counter displays markers and jumps to specific spots, which could be fantastic for backing tracks, recording, and scoring. It&#8217;s a simple thing &#8211; obvious, really &#8211; and yet I haven&#8217;t seen it done before.</li>
<li><strong>Real-time crossfades</strong> promise to speed editing.</li>
<li><strong>Automation by range</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/dp7mixer.jpg" alt="dp7mixer" title="dp7mixer" width="579" height="333" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7493" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">The DP mixer. Look closer, and you&#8217;ll see virtual instrument racks and even compressor instances integrated with the view.</div>
<p>There are also various notation improvements, including lead sheet generation &#8211; though I still think it&#8217;s touch to beat a dedicated scoring tool, or the recent inclusion of Sibelius in Pro Tools. More interesting, you get full support for running Pro Tools 8 on the back end, which is ideal for people who prefer DP (and that Marker Counter) as their front end. And there are also tweaks under the hood, including Wave64 support for massive broadcast files, side-chaining AU plug-ins, and a new sample rate conversion engine.</p>
<p>Guitar effects in this tool have to go up against Apple&#8217;s Logic Studio. I&#8217;d have to generally give the edge there to Apple, though, because the range of tools remains wider, and Apple also includes MainStage for rigging their effects into a performance-ready setup.</p>
<p>Guitar effects are nice, but I think enhancing the Counter, cleverly integrating some of the mixing controls, and making cross-fade editing faster could actually be more important. If you&#8217;re a DP user, do let us know what you think of the update.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.motu.com/products/software/dp/new-70.html">New in DP7</a> [MOTU]</p>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/&via=cdmblogs&text=DAW Day: Digital Performer 7 Adds Effects, Easier Access, PT8 Support&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/&via=cdmblogs&text=DAW Day: Digital Performer 7 Adds Effects, Easier Access, PT8 Support&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/&amp;layout=default&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=400&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:400px;'></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DAW Day &#8211; SONAR 8.5 Production Tastiness, and the Smooth 64-bit Transition</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arpeggiator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio-editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cakewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drum-machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger-linn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SONAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonar-8.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[step-sequencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SONAR&#8217;s AudioSnap now has cleaner markers, and an understandable interface &#8211; and does quite a few things Logic 9&#8242;s new Flex Time does not. SONAR 8.5, I’m sure at some point, was to be SONAR 9. There’s an enormous amount of functionality in this release. But I think the surprise is some of the stuff &#8230; <a class="btn read-more" href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/">Continue &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/sonar85_as.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="sonar85_as" border="0" alt="sonar85_as" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/sonar85_as_thumb.jpg" width="580" height="450" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">SONAR&#8217;s AudioSnap now has cleaner markers, and an understandable interface &#8211; and does quite a few things Logic 9&#8242;s new Flex Time does not.</div>
<p>SONAR 8.5, I’m sure at some point, was to be SONAR 9. There’s an enormous amount of functionality in this release. But I think the surprise is some of the stuff that <em>won’t</em> necessarily appeal to the widest audio production audience. Here’s a DAW that’s adding unusual new features for arranging tracks, putting an integrated arpeggiator on every track, beefing up its step sequencer (really), and dumping a bunch of class LinnDrum samples into the package. Those are the kind of treats we like in these parts.</p>
<p>SONAR is really a “DAW” in the traditional sense. It does everything. It doesn’t hide features. Given a choice between taking something out and putting something in, it puts the thing in. It has a lot of knobs and buttons. There are positives and negatives to the approach – it’s the reason some readers of this site return to software on game machines that has more in common with early Amiga software. But if you like the feeling of a packed studio, a tool like SONAR can be terrific. As much as I love Ableton Live for sound design and live performance, I find myself returning to something like SONAR for arrangement. </p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/stepsequencer.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="stepsequencer" border="0" alt="stepsequencer" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/stepsequencer_thumb.jpg" width="580" height="348" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">SONAR had recently added a step sequencer, but improvements make this version the one to try.</div>
<p>Even with its competitors packing in features, SONAR 8.5 is a tool that really <em>loves</em> MIDI, just as other software focuses on audio. And it’s one of the best-performing tools around. Because it’s so well-tuned for Windows, that means you can drop it onto a wide variety of PC hardware without spending a lot of cash. Most importantly, it could be the first software on any platform that convinces you to try a 64-bit OS – just at about the time you may be doing a fresh install of Windows 7. </p>
<p>Here’s a first run-down of what’s new in 8.5 that I’m personally most interested in:</p>
<p> <span id="more-7479"></span>
<p><strong><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/stepsequencer_closeup.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="stepsequencer_closeup" border="0" alt="stepsequencer_closeup" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/stepsequencer_closeup_thumb.jpg" width="526" height="404" /></a>&#160;</strong></p>
<div class="imgcaption">It&#8217;s once you start step sequencing controllers and getting deeper into per-step settings &#8211; and randomization &#8211; that things start to get compelling.</div>
<p><strong>MIDI lovers, step sequence and arpeggiate away. </strong>Every single instrument loaded in SONAR now has a step sequencer, and every track an arpeggiator. The new step sequencer has a lovely pane for controllers, deep control over each step, and probability controls. It could be reason enough to give SONAR 8.5 a try on its own. And yes, this does indeed take SONAR into FL Studio territory – but with a more conventional DAW bringing those kind of features together. FL users probably won’t be impressed, but if you longed for FL-style pattern sequencing but wanted to maintain an existing DAW, this could be for you.</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/arpeggiator.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="arpeggiator" border="0" alt="arpeggiator" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/arpeggiator_thumb.jpg" width="371" height="239" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">You might have to squint to see it, but there&#8217;s a powerful arpeggiator on every track. Add that to existing powerful MIDI editing features.</div>
<p><strong>Drum sound goodies. </strong>Session Drummer 3 has long been a nice virtual drum tool, and now improves routing and mixing to come closer to what it feels like miking a new drum. But let’s skip the acoustic kits and get straight to the electronic ones: yes, there’s an 808 and 909, as you’d hope given Cakewalk is now “Cakewalk by Roland” but there’s also a 707, a <em>727</em>, and a <strong>Sequential Circuits Drumtraks and Linn Electronics LinnDrum</strong>. Oddly, you still have to look at a picture of a photorealistic drum kit – I’d like to see a visual representation of that LinnDrum, please. But it’s nice to have these sounds, unless you have a <em>really</em> big budget for eBay. There’s 2.5 GB of content, but I’ll skip to these files if I can.</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/sonar85_as_closeup.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="sonar85_as_closeup" border="0" alt="sonar85_as_closeup" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/sonar85_as_closeup_thumb.jpg" width="580" height="156" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">It&#8217;s this clean dialog that makes working with AudioSnap 2 lovely.</div>
<p><strong>Easier-to-edit audio. </strong>I gave Apple deserved props, I think, for making Flex Time’s implementation in Logic 9 elegant and allowing squishing of audio materials around. But what frustrated me about their tool was that you couldn’t take your warped audio and do other stuff with it. <strong>AudioSnap 2 could blow it out of the water. </strong>SONAR had this going before, but I frankly found some of the selection tools and interface a little off-putting. The UI has now been cleaned up, the Transient Tool makes it easier to grab trasients in your audio, and selection looks better. You can do tempo detection, mapping, and syncing, so that this is useful not only for smooshing around your recorded audio but also mapping it to a tempo. And most interestingly, the transients you find in Audio Snap can be integrated with the new Step Sequencer. There are also audio fidelity improvements for working with vocal, reed, and brass instruments. </p>
<p><strong>A Media Browser brings files together. </strong>MIDI patterns, audio loops, grooves, and such can now be dragged-and-dropped into one place. That’s not a new idea, of course, but having <strong>custom presets</strong> for different locations is a welcome improvement (and why is it so hard to get other browsers to do that)?</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/matrixview.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="matrixview" border="0" alt="matrixview" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2009/09/matrixview_thumb.jpg" width="580" height="280" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">Okay, Matrix View does look a lot like Session View in Ableton Live. Also, unlike Live, it doesn&#8217;t stream from disk, so loading up lots of clips probably isn&#8217;t practical. I&#8217;ll give it a try and see if, in practice, it feels like SONAR or Live, but I&#8217;m still waiting for a really fresh take on this idea.</div>
<p><strong>A new way of improvising arrangements, “Matrix View.” </strong>A cell-based interface for non-linear triggering of audio and MIDI clips <em>sounds</em> like Ableton Live. But think of this more as an alternative way of trying out arrangement ideas. Because it loads from <strong>RAM only</strong> and not from the hard disk, and because SONAR is built more as a studio tool than a live tool, I don’t expect it to be a Live killer. But if you’re happy with the SONAR workflow and want to try out ideas in its environment, it could still be useful. (Cakewalk’s Project5 went a similar route, with similar results.) It’s just about the only copy I’ve seen of Ableton’s Session View, and it really <em>does</em> feel like a copy, so for that reason it’s probably the change I’m least interested in in SONAR. I do think there are other features here that are far more original, though.</p>
<p><strong>You get strips for working with vocals and drums. </strong>For vocals, the VX-64 is a combination tube-emulation mic pre + de-esser + compressor/expander + tube EQ + doubler + delay + output strip, which I already loved after seeing it bundled with the VS-100 hardware. For drums, the PX-64 is a combination pre + transient shaper + compressor + expander + contour EQ + delay + output strip – so, roughly the same thing, with some drum-specific tweaks. Cakewalk has done a lovely job with these strips, and they could be the sort of thing that justifies SONAR’s investment. I can’t imagine <em>not</em> liking the PX-64 having enjoyed the VX-64, both for its audio quality and the ease of drag-and-drop routings.</p>
<p><strong>Why you may finally go 64-bit. </strong>The BitBridge XR plug-in not only lets your 32-bit plug-ins work on the 64-bit operating system, but gives <em>each</em> of them 4 GB of RAM for up to 128 GB of RAM. That’s possible on the Mac side with Apple’s Logic – but only with its sampler, not with third-party plug-ins. And SONAR ships with a lot of 64-bit plug-ins in the box, not to mention that major vendors like Native Instruments are providing support.</p>
<p><strong>Improved performance, Windows 7 ready. </strong>You can now hotswap audio and MIDI interfaces without restarting, and audio and stability are improved. And when you do get the Windows 7 upgrade – which, based on my research so far, you <em>will </em>want to do from either XP or Vista – SONAR has been rigorously tested. I don’t want to just repeat that without supporting evidence, though, so stay tuned for a separate story.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/eduardo_inflames/3852432518/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2633/3852432518_d5f97e8311.jpg" /></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Adding LinnDrum sounds is never a bad thing. Photo (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.en">CC</a>) <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/eduardo_inflames/">Eduardo Carrasco</a>. </div>
<p>I still don’t think SONAR is for everyone – though, of course, I don’t really think <em>anything</em> is for everyone. (That’s the marketing people’s job, to claim that one product solves everyone’s problems.) Sitting in front of SONAR’s interface can still feel like getting into a jumbo jet cockpit. The Matrix View is not – and is apparently not intended to be – a replacement for Ableton Live’s live performance features. Open as SONAR is, I think it has new competition from the extensible architecture of Reaper. And, of course, all of this is meaningless to Mac users – though I hasten to add, while the Mac faces a tough 64-bit transition ahead, Windows users can grab SONAR, clean install 64-bit Windows 7, and possibly <em>barely notice anything at all </em>aside from a whole bunch of gobs of memory.</p>
<p>But I’ll say this: it’s funny how a few subtle changes can change how you think, but the combination of brilliant effects, this ridiculously-powerful step sequencer, and the possibility that AudioSnap really nails audio manipulation has me taking a second look at SONAR. Expect more details later this fall. (I’ll be writing this up for CDM and not <em>Macworld</em> for obvious reasons.)</p>
<p>Upgrades for existing SONAR 8 users are US$79 (Studio) &#8211; US$99 (Producer). If you purchased SONAR after July 1, the upgrade is free. For new users, SONAR is $499 for the Producer edition with the extra effects and instruments, or $299 for Studio without them. (But, really, I think you want the Z3TA+ synth; you’ll just have to trust me on that.)</p>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/&via=cdmblogs&text=DAW Day - SONAR 8.5 Production Tastiness, and the Smooth 64-bit Transition&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/&via=cdmblogs&text=DAW Day - SONAR 8.5 Production Tastiness, and the Smooth 64-bit Transition&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/&amp;layout=default&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=400&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:400px;'></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DAW Day &#8211; Pro Tools 8.0.1: No Windows 7 or 10.6 Support, End of the Road for Legacy</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8.0.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digidesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m-powered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mactel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-tools-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow-leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows-7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pro Tools got an update at the end of August. A number of readers have pointed out that this is a milestone for what it includes, what it doesn’t include, and what it represents. What’s in 8.0.1 If you’re an existing Pro Tools 8 owner, you’ll want 8.0.1: Improved interface performance (“snappiness”!) Improved selection drawing &#8230; <a class="btn read-more" href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/">Continue &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pro Tools got an update at the end of August. A number of readers have pointed out that this is a milestone for what it includes, what it doesn’t include, and what it represents.</p>
<p><strong>What’s in 8.0.1</strong></p>
<p>If you’re an existing Pro Tools 8 owner, you’ll want 8.0.1:</p>
<ul>
<li>Improved interface performance (“snappiness”!)</li>
<li>Improved selection drawing in audio</li>
<li>Workflow improvements, fixes</li>
</ul>
<p>Those of you who grabbed the update in the last week or two, I’ll be curious to hear what you’ve found in some of those subtler improvements. Avid, to their credit, does do a lot of work on these point releases, not only in bugfixes but in other improvements, as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=48&amp;langid=100&amp;itemid=39491">Software update for 8.0.1</a> (LE + HD + M-Powered)</p>
<p><strong>End of the Line</strong></p>
<p>Pro Tools 8.0.1 is the end of the road for quite a range of &quot;legacy&quot; hardware. 8.0.1 (in one or several of its LE, HD, and M-Powered flavors) will be the last version to support:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=1&amp;navid=54&amp;itemid=39671">Original Mbox</a></li>
<li><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=1&amp;navid=54&amp;itemid=39672">Expansion|HD Chassis</a></li>
<li><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=1&amp;navid=54&amp;itemid=39673">Macintosh PowerPC Computers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=1&amp;navid=54&amp;itemid=39674">Pro Tools MIX-era Peripherals</a></li>
</ul>
<p> <span id="more-7466"></span>
<p>See last week’s <a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=54&amp;itemid=39675&amp;langid=1">End of Software Support</a> announcement. Now, I suppose you can look at this as glass-half-empty or glass-half-full; it means if you have a studio with that gear in it and a PowerPC-based Mac at its center, you have a stable, modern, brisk version of Pro Tools that could last you a while. </p>
<p>PowerPC support is generally waning; Apple also dumped PowerPC for its own Logic. But there’s still a surprising amount of life in the processor. MOTU’s Digital Performer 7, released this week (news story on that coming) will actually run on a 1 GHz G4; see their <a href="http://www.motu.com/techsupport/technotes/what-are-the-system-requirements-for-digital-performer-7">System Requirements</a>. I wouldn’t recommend that system, necessarily, but if you’ve got a fast Mac tower with a PowerPC, it could still make a fine studio machine. And DP7 is also <a href="http://www.motu.com/products/software/dp/pro-tools.html">compatible with Pro Tools HD</a>, including Pro Tools 8. Ableton Live, also popular around these parts, also <a href="http://www.ableton.com/pages/faq/general_questions">still runs</a> on a PowerPC. </p>
<p><strong>New OSes? Not Yet.</strong></p>
<p>Absent from the 8.0.1 update is support for either Snow Leopard (Leopard only is supported) on the Mac side or Windows 7. Now, in fairness, Windows 7 isn’t even shipping yet, though in stark contrast to Vista’s RTM version, developers I’ve talked to have found their software runs without modification – and can run better without intervention than under the previous Vista release, which is something that almost never happens.</p>
<p>Ordinarily this wouldn’t be a problem, but it does mean that studios with “legacy” gear could wind up with a version that doesn’t support Mac OS X 10.6 or Windows 7, if 8.0.1 is in fact the last version of that gear. It obviously won’t matter for the PowerPC Macs, since they run neither Windows nor Snow Leopard, but I can imagine some folks with the HD chassis or MIX peripherals who won’t be thrilled. It’s a small handful of people, but – well, before you complain in comments, yep, I’ve figured it out, too.</p>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/&via=cdmblogs&text=DAW Day - Pro Tools 8.0.1: No Windows 7 or 10.6 Support, End of the Road for Legacy&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/&via=cdmblogs&text=DAW Day - Pro Tools 8.0.1: No Windows 7 or 10.6 Support, End of the Road for Legacy&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/&amp;layout=default&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=400&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:400px;'></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

