<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Create Digital Music &#187; DAW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/daw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>DAW Day: Digital Performer 7 Adds Effects, Easier Access, PT8 Support</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backing-tracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel-strip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital-Performer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar-amps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-tools-hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=7480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DP&#8217;s clever channel strip integrates quite a lot of functionality in every view.
I&#8217;d be remiss if I didn&#8217;t note another significant DAW release: DP7 is shipping this week. The Mac-only Digital Performer still has a loyal following, especially among the scoring crowd, some of whom have stuck with DP since the Performer days &#8211; one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/dpchannelstrip.jpg" alt="dpchannelstrip" title="dpchannelstrip" width="580" height="376" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7489" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">DP&#8217;s clever channel strip integrates quite a lot of functionality in every view.</div>
<p>I&#8217;d be remiss if I didn&#8217;t note another significant DAW release: DP7 is shipping this week. The Mac-only Digital Performer still has a loyal following, especially among the scoring crowd, some of whom have stuck with DP since the Performer days &#8211; one of the Mac&#8217;s first sequencers. I have to say, this particular update seems to focus more on bundled effects than core functionality &#8211; and, in fairness, because it&#8217;s tough to change core features without upsetting the stuff that keeps your users loyal, this isn&#8217;t uncommon. But DP has uncommonly rich support for being a Pro Tools HD front end, it&#8217;s Mac-savvy and Snow Leopard compatible, and given its popularity in scoring, a little touch like the Marker Counter could be huge news for its major following.</p>
<p>Full disclosure: I haven&#8217;t found much reason to touch DP lately, with plenty of other tools to keep my attention, so if there is a loyal DP user who would like to send in their dispatch, I&#8217;d love to run it on CDM.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;ll keep this compact to give you a birds-eye view. First, the effects stuff:<span id="more-7480"></span><br />
<img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/dpliveroom.jpg" alt="dpliveroom" title="dpliveroom" width="580" height="413" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7490" /></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Stompboxes:</strong> For the first time, you get a suite of guitar pedal effects, including emulations of Ibanez, BOSS, RXT, and Electro-Harmonix.</li>
<li><strong>Modeled amps:</strong> Simulations of the Fender Bassman, Marshall JTM45, and Marshall JCM800. So, sure, other suites offer more options &#8211; but these are three top picks.</li>
<li><strong>Physically-modeled guitar miking:</strong> The Live Room | G simulates a speaker cabinet and mic placement. Unlike the Logic 9 take on the same idea, you get a built-in EQ and four channels &#8211; but also unlike Logic, you get close / near / far rather rather free-form mic placement. That&#8217;s too bad, given the clever top-down view, though I suspect the default placements are typically all you need.</li>
<li><strong>Smarter strips:</strong> Access channel strips from a floating window, and see EQ <em>and</em> dynamics in-line on the mixing board. (Usually you get EQ, but not dynamics.) Plus, finally &#8211; unlike most other programs &#8211; your virtual rack of synths appears right on the mixing board. Mixer controls are also available in any edit window, not just the usual arrangement view.</li>
<li><strong>Better counters:</strong> A Large Counter resizes the counter to an arbitrary size &#8211; ideal for when you&#8217;ve rented an orchestra and are projecting counts (literally). And a Marker Counter displays markers and jumps to specific spots, which could be fantastic for backing tracks, recording, and scoring. It&#8217;s a simple thing &#8211; obvious, really &#8211; and yet I haven&#8217;t seen it done before.</li>
<li><strong>Real-time crossfades</strong> promise to speed editing.</li>
<li><strong>Automation by range</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/dp7mixer.jpg" alt="dp7mixer" title="dp7mixer" width="579" height="333" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7493" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">The DP mixer. Look closer, and you&#8217;ll see virtual instrument racks and even compressor instances integrated with the view.</div>
<p>There are also various notation improvements, including lead sheet generation &#8211; though I still think it&#8217;s touch to beat a dedicated scoring tool, or the recent inclusion of Sibelius in Pro Tools. More interesting, you get full support for running Pro Tools 8 on the back end, which is ideal for people who prefer DP (and that Marker Counter) as their front end. And there are also tweaks under the hood, including Wave64 support for massive broadcast files, side-chaining AU plug-ins, and a new sample rate conversion engine.</p>
<p>Guitar effects in this tool have to go up against Apple&#8217;s Logic Studio. I&#8217;d have to generally give the edge there to Apple, though, because the range of tools remains wider, and Apple also includes MainStage for rigging their effects into a performance-ready setup.</p>
<p>Guitar effects are nice, but I think enhancing the Counter, cleverly integrating some of the mixing controls, and making cross-fade editing faster could actually be more important. If you&#8217;re a DP user, do let us know what you think of the update.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.motu.com/products/software/dp/new-70.html">New in DP7</a> [MOTU]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-digital-performer-7-adds-effects-easier-access-pt8-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Logic Studio 9 Review for Macworld; What Stands Out</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/31/apple-logic-studio-9-review-for-macworld-what-stands-out/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/31/apple-logic-studio-9-review-for-macworld-what-stands-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex-Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MainStage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=7224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flex Time is likely to be the feature that will have the biggest impact on users, by making audio more malleable.
Logic has been a big box of sound toys for some time, but I think what decides whether you really build a working relationship with software like Logic is whether you like editing in it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/flextime.jpg" alt="flextime" title="flextime" width="580" height="250" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7229" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Flex Time is likely to be the feature that will have the biggest impact on users, by making audio more malleable.</div>
<p>Logic has been a big box of sound toys for some time, but I think what decides whether you really build a working relationship with software like Logic is whether you <em>like editing in it</em>. And that makes Logic Studio 9 worth a new look &#8211; and a must-upgrade for fans of the tool. Its combination of subtle tweaks to the editing interface, the ability to edit inside takes, the incredible Flex Time for squishing around audio like Play-Doh, and easy conversion to sampler tracks makes it really fun to edit audio in Logic. You can read the full, detailed review I wrote for <em>Macworld</em>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/142321/logicstud09.html">Logic Studio: Music workstation suite adds flexible audio, improved editing and live performance, simulated amps and effects</a> [Macworld.com]</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/playbackmainstage.jpg" alt="playbackmainstage" title="playbackmainstage" width="580" height="532" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7230" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">MainStage adds backing track playback, looping, and ReWire hosting to make it more versatile for live performance.</div>
<p><span id="more-7224"></span></p>
<p>The amps and such are fun, but to me the other banner feature in Logic 9 is the vastly improved MainStage, which adds backing tracks, ReWire hosting, and other features that could make it more powerful for live performance. Apparently MainStage has crept into some big-name live shows; I&#8217;m going to work on getting more reports from the field. (Meanwhile, I&#8217;m trying to figure out how I can rework my own live set so it requires <em>less</em> software, but that&#8217;s me.)</p>
<p>Oh, and one little improvement I didn&#8217;t fit in the review: there are some amazing special effect convolution impulses Apple threw in with Space Designer, which should give you more fodder for sound design experimentation.</p>
<p>The record industry may be dying, the planetary economy failing, and music technology elusively complex to most average musicians,  yet competition in the DAW space just continues to heat up. I find it amusing that some claim Apple&#8217;s aggressive pricing is only possible because they sell hardware. I&#8217;d buy that, except for some of Apple&#8217;s own competitors. Digidesign will add a pretty powerful version of Pro Tools to a hardware bundle. Cakewalk&#8217;s SONAR, once a little more bare-bones in the extras department than Logic, now offers a lot of the same sorts of goodies to Windows users in its own (underrated, I think) DAW. And Reaper is a powerful, cross-platform option that costs just US$60, even for most commercial work (now that they&#8217;ve made the individual license more open). In fact, various tools are so good that I think it&#8217;s really hard to give people advice. Personal taste is more likely to dictate which you prefer, because the ineffable <em>feeling</em> of using these tools &#8211; as similar as they may look on paper &#8211; is very different. If I ever work out a good way to describe that in words &#8211; which does happen to be my job, whether I&#8217;m up to it or not &#8211; I&#8217;ll let you know.</p>
<p>Any tool you&#8217;re using is a tool that matters. And I know we have a number of readers using Logic. Later this week, I&#8217;m planning a Logic Q&#038;A to fit some of the technical revelations that didn&#8217;t fit in the review, so feel free to ask more questions or comment however you like on the Macworld review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/31/apple-logic-studio-9-review-for-macworld-what-stands-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record Beta: We&#8217;ve Got Invites, Thoughts from a Superfan</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/27/record-beta-weve-got-invites-thoughts-from-a-superfan/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/27/record-beta-weve-got-invites-thoughts-from-a-superfan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alt-DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propellerhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=6701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the passion of the debate, it&#8217;s easy to forget that Propellerheads&#8217; Record has been firing up discussion from many people who haven&#8217;t actually seen it. Record is to audio recording, mixing, and mastering what Reason is to synthesized sound, and for Reason lovers, it finally delivers that holy grail &#8211; multiple racks. Record is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/07/recordrack.jpg" alt="recordrack" title="recordrack" width="580" height="573" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6707" /></p>
<p>Given the passion of the debate, it&#8217;s easy to forget that Propellerheads&#8217; Record has been firing up discussion from many people who haven&#8217;t actually seen it. Record is to audio recording, mixing, and mastering what Reason is to synthesized sound, and for Reason lovers, it finally delivers that holy grail &#8211; multiple racks. Record is a bit like Reason Studio, taking those instruments and giving them a full production context. </p>
<p>Since its release, Propellerhead has amplified polarized opinions about this tool. It doesn&#8217;t support plug-ins (though you can use other ReWire clients), it doesn&#8217;t do things like film scoring, and thus its singular focus on recording means I think it&#8217;s fair for Propellerhead to say it&#8217;s not a DAW. Of course, going so far as tell blogs they can&#8217;t label it as such is going <a href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/05/11/propellerhead-record-is-not-a-daw/">a bit far</a>, and it only made some people protest more. And the focus on those features hasn&#8217;t pleased users who want everything and a kitchen sink on their feature list. Users were divided over the Ignition Key and online authorization scheme (see <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/12/how-propellerheads-new-ignition-key-authorization-for-record-works/">full explanation</a>), of course.</p>
<p>But it is something about which everyone seems to have an opinion, and for that alone, I love it. That&#8217;d be a little more fair if you&#8217;ve actually gotten to use it, however. So, now&#8217;s your chance to try Record for yourself:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.propellerheads.se/products/record/">http://www.propellerheads.se/products/record/</a></p>
<p>The beta is a full-featured, open-and-save-capable version, through its expiration date on September 9.</p>
<p><strong><del datetime="2009-07-30T03:49:36+00:00">If you&#8217;re impatient, we can get you the beta key right now. Just leave a comment, say something intelligent, say &#8220;+1 beta,&#8221; and be sure to leave your real email address. </strong>(Emails are not published on the site; I&#8217;ll just see them in my inbox.)</del> If you&#8217;d like to be on the CDM Notes mailing list (no other marketing or spam), say <strong>&#8220;+1 email.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><strong>All out!</strong> Thanks to everyone; hopefully we&#8217;ve gotten everyone a code who wanted one. Follow comments for some little glitches with their Website&#8230;</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve got a reply from me, <strong>download Record by entering your code at <a href="http://recordyou.com">http://recordyou.com</a>.</strong> You&#8217;ll also get two codes to pass along to friends.</p>
<p><strong>Update on registration:</strong> I talked to Propellerhead&#8217;s web developer &#8211; when you get the confirmation email for recordyou.com, go ahead and log in! You&#8217;ll be confirmed automatically. Some people saw this login page following the confirmation email and thought something was wrong. Don&#8217;t worry, log in, and everything will be fine.<span id="more-6701"></span></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll give out keys until we run out. Propellerhead shared some with us, but then composer Josh Mobley, whose work is featured in Record and has been an advocate of the software from the beginning, reached out. Josh gave us half his stash of keys to share with CDM readers, because he&#8217;s devoted to Propellerhead&#8217;s stuff. How devoted? He has a Reason tattoo. And it&#8217;s nice to hear that Record is pleasing a Reason fan, as that to me remains the big test. Josh has done some significant commercial work, ranging from NBC&#8217;s The Office to Ford Motors to the US Department of Defense, with scoring, music, sound design, remix, and environmental projects.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.joshmobley.com/">http://www.joshmobley.com/</a></p>
<p>And he&#8217;s a superfan in the best way. I asked him why Record matters in his work:</p>
<blockquote><p>I love me some Reason. In fact, I love it so much, I got a tattoo on my wrist of the Reason logo. Most people thought I was out of my mind but I love it. Why? Things really didn’t start taking off for me until I started using Reason. I took one look at the program and thought, they made this for me. I started busting out tunes faster than I ever had before. And people were snatching them right up. It dawned on me right then and there that this self-contained environment had freed me up and allowed me to be creative without scrolling through a bunch of plug-ins and whatnot. The distractions of making music were gone. A limited tool set that can be routed and combined in an infinite number of ways. One needs only to look at the patches and music that [Reason user] peff is making to see that reason is the most powerful music instrument in the world.</p>
<p>And now, we have Record: Audio+Reason+SSL Mixer. Having used it since the early alphas, I can honestly say that Record is every bit as musical and easy to use as Reason. The time stretching is, frankly, jaw-dropping. The new mixer sounds like the SSL at my old studio. You can easily do a whole song in Record without any other software. However, Record+Reason is a lethal Combination.</p>
<p>I could go on and on, but at the end of the day, you really need to spend some time with this program and see what’s possible. I can almost certainly guarantee that you will be making music faster than you ever did.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshmobley/573769049/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1329/573769049_15ad3b15f4.jpg?v=0"></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Photo: Josh Mobley.</div>
<p>Now, a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Swerski%27s_Superfans">superfan</a> is not a fanboy. Fanboys, as we know, are the folks who get defensive even in the face of some obvious shortcoming, who spend lots of their time talking down other people&#8217;s choices. The superfans I&#8217;m guessing are generally too busy actually using their software &#8211; in this case, making music.</p>
<p>And if you do find software you love enough to tattoo on your wrist (see also our friend <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/06/27/synth-tattoos-jo-arderlans-reaktor-branded-wrist/">Jo with Reaktor</a>), you don&#8217;t need any reviewer or forum commenter or expert or anyone else to tell you what to think. You&#8217;ll know.</p>
<p>Do tell us what you think of Record as you use it, and good luck snagging a code.</p>
<p><strong>Previously:</strong><br />
<a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/11/propellerhead-record-in-depth-preview-recording-reason-style/">Propellerhead Record In-Depth Preview: Recording, Reason-Style; Beta Test Now</a><br />
<a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/21/propellerhead-record-new-getting-started-video-tutorial-blog/">Propellerhead Record: New Getting Started Video Tutorial, Blog</a><br />
<a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/12/how-propellerheads-new-ignition-key-authorization-for-record-works/">How Propellerhead’s New “Ignition Key” Authorization for Record Works</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/27/record-beta-weve-got-invites-thoughts-from-a-superfan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>204</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s New in Apple&#8217;s Logic Studio 9: Flex Time, MainStage Gets More Road-Worthy</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/23/whats-new-in-apples-logic-studio-9-flex-time-mainstage-gets-more-road-worthy/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/23/whats-new-in-apples-logic-studio-9-flex-time-mainstage-gets-more-road-worthy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Highlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio-editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MainStage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soundtrack-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stompbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=6650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/featured/0709_logic9.jpg">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/07/logicstudiombp.jpg" alt="logicstudiombp" title="logicstudiombp" width="580" height="337" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6655" /></p>
<p>Apple has released Logic Studio 9 today. Banner features: &#8220;Flex Time&#8221; audio warping, new goodies for guitarists (plus integration with a new audio interface and pedalboard from Apogee), expanded support for working with video and outputting compression, and most interestingly, tools for making MainStage a feature you might actually take onstage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m meeting with Apple next week, so if you think of any smart questions, do pass them along. I should receive my testing copy then, too, so expect more details. In the meantime, here&#8217;s how it looks &#8220;on paper,&#8221; in a nutshell.</p>
<h3>Live Performance</h3>
<p>This to me is the interesting one. I loved the <em>idea</em> of MainStage when it came out, but I had a number of complaints in regards to what musicians would actually want to do for live performance. Specifically:</p>
<ul>
<li>MainStage needs a way of playing backing tracks, particularly for bands and acoustic players and soloists.</li>
<li>ReWire is a must, so people using tools like Ableton Live (or Reason, or the awesome tracker Renoise) can work with them in a MainStage rig.</li>
<li>Better control mapping was needed for real performance &#8211; including grouping.</li>
<li>Musicians need a way of recording their gigs.</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, guess what? Apple says they&#8217;ve added all of that to MainStage 2. ReWire support should make this particularly interesting, as solutions like a Logic-Live rig now become practical. And this is the first DAW to really try to do backing tracks in a way bands can use, even including Ableton Live.</p>
<p>Grouped controls allow you to drag and drop layouts of controls as macros. It&#8217;s a nice implementation, and different from what&#8217;s currently out there. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a live loop recorder, tape style. My first impression of this is that this doesn&#8217;t appear to match things like the new looper in Ableton Live 8, which can set an entire project tempo &#8211; it&#8217;s more like a basic stompbox effect, as we&#8217;ve seen previously in Native Instruments&#8217; Guitar Rig. Still, that matches the simplicity of some of the other tools here.</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/07/playback.jpg" alt="playback" title="playback" width="580" height="358" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6656" /></p>
<p>Augh&#8230; and yes, that is Apple&#8217;s now-ubiquitous album art view as the browser mechanism for templates, proving they really don&#8217;t know where to stop. At least it seems they haven&#8217;t used that for the entire UI.</p>
<p>Of course, performance is everything in these implementations, so it&#8217;ll be fun to torture test MainStage 2 and see how it stands up.</p>
<p>And for anyone who wanted Live clips and Sculpture in one session, this could be interesting.<span id="more-6650"></span></p>
<h3>Flex Time Audio Manipulation</h3>
<p>The music software market is already crowded with tools that promise to let you manipulate audio independent of its original tempo &#8211; but this implementation is more interesting than you might first think. You actually drag the mouse on the waveform itself, turning the sound into a Silly Putty-like, warpable view. Very much like Ableton Live, Logic also adds modes based on material (rhythmic, polyphonic, slicing), and an audio quantize mode that applies the feel of one track to another.<br />
<img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/07/flex.jpg" alt="flex" title="flex" width="580" height="360" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6658" /></p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a slightly gimmicky record start/stop effect, which I&#8217;m sure will be a boon to anyone doing editing for MTV.</p>
<p>But make no mistake about it: Flex Time could heat things up.</p>
<p><strong>Side note:</strong> Does Sibelius &#8211; now owned by industry titan and major Apple rival Avid &#8211; really not care that Apple lifted the name of its &#8220;FlexTime&#8221; technology, which I thought was trademarked? Did Apple pay off Avid to grab that name? (Especially funny after MainStage had a similarity to Plasq&#8217;s OnStage from Rax, a virtually identical feature.)</p>
<h3>For Guitarists</h3>
<ul>
<li>A new pedalboard full of effects</li>
<li>An &#8220;Amp Designer&#8221; for combining 25 amps, 25 speaker cabinets, and 3 mics, plus a library of new presets</li>
<li>Integration with Apogee&#8217;s new GiO interface in both Logic and MainStage</li>
</ul>
<p>Apple is obviously committed to providing a one box solution, so you never have to buy anything for music making that <em>doesn&#8217;t</em> have an Apple logo on it &#8211; something I&#8217;m sure doesn&#8217;t make Native Instruments, Waves, IK Multimedia, and other competitors exactly thrilled. Those solutions are already really good, but I have heard Apple&#8217;s implementation is quite nice, and I&#8217;ve heard it from people who are actual guitarists.</p>
<h3>Notation Enhancements</h3>
<p>Ornaments have been expanded with a broader notation library, and a set of some 4000 chord grids beef up tab capabilities for guitars.</p>
<p>I still think you&#8217;d be nuts to use Logic in place of something like Sibelius for major notation editing, just because I find the dedicated tool much quicker to use. On the other hand, Logic was born as &#8220;Notator,&#8221; so it has notation in its blood.</p>
<h3>Other Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Turn tracks into sampler tracks (again, the first time I&#8217;ve seen a good implementation like this outside Ableton Live)</li>
<li>Drum replacement</li>
<li>Improved editing inside take folders &#8211; so you can adjust recordings while keeping your takes</li>
<li>Better bouncing, track import</li>
<li>More bizarre warp effects for Space Designer (okay, I have to admit, I&#8217;ve gotten addicted to using convolution reverbs for special effects, so curious what they put in there)</li>
<li>A Vocal Jam Pack</li>
</ul>
<p>There&#8217;s also a new browser for instruments, it appears, apparently to make this more accessible to new users. On the other hand, that&#8217;s a bit like holding a toddler&#8217;s hand before putting him in the seat of your Ferrari, when it comes to interfaces like Ultrabeat. (See what I mean <a href="http://images.apple.com/logicstudio/plug-ins/images/instruments_ultrabeat20090721.png">on Apple&#8217;s site</a>.) But I suppose it can&#8217;t hurt &#8211; and meanwhile, the market for educational products remains.</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/07/soundtrack_mbp1.jpg" alt="soundtrack_mbp" title="soundtrack_mbp" width="580" height="351" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6663" /></p>
<h3>Soundtrack Pro 3</h3>
<p>Soundtrack Pro is the oft-overlooked audio editor bundled with Logic. Part of the promise of Soundtrack is working well with Final Cut, so it&#8217;s nice to see some new features that help distinguish this tool. (I have to say, on the Mac I do prefer working in Soundtrack to working in Peak &#8212; call me crazy.)</p>
<ul>
<li>Vocal Level Match applies a vocal level from one clip to another clip &#8211; fantastic for podcasting and production for video, if it works as advertised</li>
<li>Editing by frequency (&#8217;bout time &#8212; I&#8217;m hoping this means we can work directly in the frequency view, as you should be able to do)</li>
<li>Advanced Time Stretch</li>
<li>Compressor output workflows</li>
</ul>
<h3>Breakfast of Champions</h3>
<p>Apple has also added greater emphasis to artists, mirroring what they&#8217;re doing with GarageBand &#8212; though any hopes for Pro Artist Lessons with Logic are sadly thwarted so far. What they are doing is &#8220;Pro Sessions,&#8221; in which you can download actual session files. (I&#8217;m guessing that doesn&#8217;t include some third-party plug-ins they used, and it&#8217;s no match for, say, remix stems, but&#8230;)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/in-action/">Logic Studio in Action</h3>
<p> (Yep, people use Logic)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/artist-sessions/">Artist Sessions</a> (one nice gem in there &#8212; a Santigold remix&#8230; but was Santigold herself not a user of Logic?)</p>
<h3>What&#8217;s Not in this Upgrade</h3>
<p>As near as I can tell, Logic will not support 64-bit memory addressing or 64-bit mixing. The former is extremely unfortunate for users of big sample libraries, although third-party tools do fill some of that gap. (Even so, native 64-bit memory support would be welcome.) It&#8217;s possible we may see this in an update, however; if it&#8217;s &#8220;in the future,&#8221; we just won&#8217;t know because Apple makes a policy of commenting only once things are released.</p>
<p>Also, it appears that Logic&#8217;s increasingly long-in-the-tooth library of effects and synths &#8212; once part of the core appeal of the tool &#8212; are left as-is in this release, which would be unfortunate. On the other hand, with options like Native Instruments&#8217; Komplete to fill that need, and a price of US$499, it&#8217;ll be hard to fault Apple on this.</p>
<p>Many folks expected some sort of iPhone / iPod touch app, given that third parties have built them for control and the like. They were wrong, but I&#8217;m not surprised &#8212; Apple likes to keep its consumer and pro features fairly separate.</p>
<p>Any other omissions you notice, or things you&#8217;d like me to ask about? Let me know.</p>
<p>At least I have a fairly decent working list for what I&#8217;m likely to be hard at work testing when this arrives in the mail.</p>
<p>And Logic has some intense competition, too, with even a new entry on the scene this year (Propellerhead&#8217;s Record). </p>
<p>Let the games begin&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/">Apple Logic Studio</a></p>
<p>All images Courtesy of Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/23/whats-new-in-apples-logic-studio-9-flex-time-mainstage-gets-more-road-worthy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Shipping: Pro Tools 8, All Versions</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/12/17/now-shipping-pro-tools-8-all-versions/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/12/17/now-shipping-pro-tools-8-all-versions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digidesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m-powered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-tools-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sibelius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/12/17/now-shipping-pro-tools-8-all-versions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
I know some people were wondering about this &#8211; it&#8217;s now official. Digidesign reports Pro Tools 8 is actually shipping now, with the integrated MIDI edit window, score notation editor (via recently-acquired Sibelius) right in the DAW, bundled instruments and synths, some amp simulation, &#8220;Elastic Pitch,&#8221; and additional insert slots.
None of this is huge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2008/12/pt8.jpg" /> </p>
<p>I know some people were wondering about this &ndash; it&rsquo;s now official. Digidesign reports Pro Tools 8 is actually shipping now, with the integrated MIDI edit window, score notation editor (via recently-acquired Sibelius) right in the DAW, bundled instruments and synths, some amp simulation, &ldquo;Elastic Pitch,&rdquo; and additional insert slots.</p>
<p>None of this is huge news to users of competitive products, with the notable exception of Sibelius notation integration. I&rsquo;m very keen to hear how people actually use that, because the score facilities in tools like Logic aren&rsquo;t competitive with favored tools like Sibelius and Finale, in my experience. On the other hand, many people are perfectly happy keeping their scoring and audio editing workflows separate from one another &ndash; particularly if you&rsquo;re using Pro Tools for audio editing and Sibelius to write that new string quartet. So as this ships, do let us know how you&rsquo;re using it, or if it&rsquo;s a non-starter.</p>
<p>So, what does it cost to upgrade?</p>
<p>Pro Tools HD 8 Upgrade: $249 US   <br />Pro Tools LE/M-Powered Upgrade: $149 US    <br />Pro Tools M-Powered Full Version: $299 US (for use with M-Audio audio interfaces)</p>
<p>If you bought Pro Tools systems or upgrades since October 3, the new release is (rightfully) free.</p>
<p>Of course, that still means you might still be tempted to just go buy one of the cheaper Mbox products with Pro Tools LE included. There are also upgrades for the Music and DV bundles.</p>
<p>Note compatibility: Vista SP1 (32-bit only, still no 64-bit) is supported, as is Mac OS X 10.5.5. 10.5.6 isn&rsquo;t ready yet, and Vista requires Business or Ultimate, which as I said in the past I still find pretty odd given that Home Premium is basically identical from a support standpoint. (Digi&rsquo;s choosing to be a bit literal with that.) On the other hand, <em>only</em> Leopard support is available, whereas on Windows XP Home and Professional remain supported with XP SP3.</p>
<p>Once this arrives, I&rsquo;ll be curious to hear about you. I&rsquo;m happy doing my work in SONAR and Live at the moment, so I don&rsquo;t think I&rsquo;d be a fair judge, but someone who uses Pro Tools daily would be. Be in touch.</p>
<p><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=48&amp;langid=100&amp;itemid=36362" target="_blank">Pro Tools 8 Shipping</a> [News @ Digidesign.com]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/12/17/now-shipping-pro-tools-8-all-versions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro Tools 8 Announced: New UI, More MIDI, Elastic Pitch, Bundled Instruments and Effects, Integrated Sibelius Notation</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-announced-new-ui-more-midi-elastic-pitch-bundled-instruments-and-effects-integrated-sibelius-notation/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-announced-new-ui-more-midi-elastic-pitch-bundled-instruments-and-effects-integrated-sibelius-notation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AES08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digidesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sibelius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-announced-new-ui-more-midi-elastic-pitch-bundled-instruments-and-effects-integrated-sibelius-notation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Pro Tools 8 is up on Digidesign&#8217;s website. Rather than copy and paste their features, I&#8217;ll let you read. This may not shake you from your music making tool of choice, but it looks like it could be, at long last, the substantial refresh for Pro Tools users of that platform have been waiting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2008/10/pt8.jpg" /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=100&amp;navid=399&amp;itemid=35068&amp;ref=DN1008US&amp;elq=2D5D42166E114A8C9078A477D5619C21">Pro Tools 8</a> is up on Digidesign&rsquo;s website. Rather than copy and paste their features, I&rsquo;ll let you read. This may not shake you from your music making tool of choice, but it looks like it could be, at long last, the substantial refresh for Pro Tools users of that platform have been waiting for. I <em>can</em> quickly sum up the <em>strategy</em> (&ldquo;strategies&rdquo; and &ldquo;tactics&rdquo; being on the American political mind lately):</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Get all the instruments and effects in the box:</strong> Apple&rsquo;s Logic Studio set the bar for this by first bundling lots of soundmakers,then cutting the price. Digidesign has been busy with their talented AIR group designing some very nice stuff, so this is a no-brainer. <em>Updated: as readers note, you still don&rsquo;t get a sampler as with EXS24 in Logic and now Dimension Pro in SONAR. Then again, you could add on your on own; is that really a deal breaker for folks?</em></li>
<li><strong>Fix the UI (conservatively):</strong> Without rocking the boat, obviously Pro Tools was long overdue for a fresh coat of paint and some enhancement. </li>
<li><strong>Beef up MIDI: </strong>This was long Pro Tools&rsquo; weak spot, perhaps because of its lineage as an originally audio-only product (the opposite of most of its rivals); MIDI seems to be better integrated with existing paradigms for editing </li>
<li><strong>Edit pitch more fluidly: </strong>AutoTune and the magical note-editing Melodyne are probably safe, but more fluid editing of audio pitches is making its way into audio software in general </li>
<li><strong>Integrate scoring: </strong>The fruits of Digi&rsquo;s Sibelius acquisition, <em>real, modern</em> music notation is finally in a major DAW (not the dated, clunky implementations elsewhere). My only concern: I hope Sibelius continues to make progress as a dedicated notation tool, because having myself spent long hours over scores, a lot of composition happens outside software like Pro Tools for other reasons. </li>
</ul>
<p>The notation feature, to me, is probably the biggest story. As a long-time Sibelius user and with some interesting composer contacts, I expect to look at how this works in some depth. Congratulations to Sibelius and Digidesign for pulling this off; I&rsquo;ll be in touch.</p>
<p>Actually, let&rsquo;s do better. I&rsquo;m through really <em>reviewing</em> DAWs. You know why? If I used every DAW, I&rsquo;d never get any music made. And, oddly, the process of even trying to review something as broad as a tool like Pro Tools just about short circuits any music logic anyway. So I&rsquo;d rather build a network of gurus in each, and talk about actual music production rather than feature lists &ndash; the latter is the developer&rsquo;s job, anyway. If you&rsquo;re game and consider yourself an advanced user, <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/contact/">get in touch</a>. I&rsquo;ll have more on organizing this soon.</p>
<p>In the meantime, Digi has posted some videos; free registration on their site required.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=100&amp;navid=399&amp;itemid=35068&amp;ref=DN1008US&amp;elq=2D5D42166E114A8C9078A477D5619C21">Pro Tools 8 Announcement + Demo Videos</a></p>
<p><strong>Update: </strong>keep the comments coming. To me, the challenge all these tools face is that people are (naturally) entrenched in what they&rsquo;re using. So, yes, it&rsquo;s possible to say Pro Tools is playing &ldquo;catch up,&rdquo; but to play devil&rsquo;s advocate, you could easily say the same about its competition. My preference remains for &ldquo;native&rdquo; hosts with their more flexible hardware and software support, and because personally I&rsquo;m more creative in an Ableton Live or SONAR (or tracker!); that&rsquo;s me. Digidesign sent out an open letter about promising interoperability. I&rsquo;ll be interested to see what they mean, as I don&rsquo;t immediately see that addressed in any way here. But certainly, I respect the utility of each of these tools to someone. The loyalty of those user bases is part of why progress tends to be incremental, not revolutionary. You have to serve their needs first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-announced-new-ui-more-midi-elastic-pitch-bundled-instruments-and-effects-integrated-sibelius-notation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reaper, Elegant Mac/Windows DAW, Adds Gobs More Features</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/08/26/reaper-elegant-macwindows-daw-adds-gobs-more-features/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/08/26/reaper-elegant-macwindows-daw-adds-gobs-more-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straight-out-of-no-cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to Reaperworld. It&#8217;s an alternative universe, in which a &#8220;2.4.5&#8243; update is huge. Released yesterday, it&#8217;s a new build for what might best be described as an &#8220;indie&#8221; DAW from the original creator of Winamp.
Check out the full feature list, but here are some highlights:
&#8220;Solo in front&#8221; for easier soloing
Track folding for MIDI to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2008/08/reaper.jpg"></p>
<p>Welcome to Reaperworld. It&#8217;s an alternative universe, in which a &#8220;2.4.5&#8243; update is huge. Released yesterday, it&#8217;s a new build for what might best be described as an &#8220;indie&#8221; DAW from the original creator of Winamp.</p>
<p>Check out the <a href="http://cockos.com/reaper/download.php?l=1">full feature list</a>, but here are some highlights:</p>
<ul><LI>&#8220;Solo in front&#8221; for easier soloing</li>
<p><LI>Track folding for MIDI to hide unused / unnamed rows</li>
<p><LI>Multimedia keyboard support, so you can use those silly, useless buttons PCs have for something cool</li>
<p><LI>Mute fades, so you don&#8217;t get that annoying pop on muting</li>
<p><LI>A ridiculous number of MIDI workflow and technical improvements</li>
</ul>
<p>What&#8217;s really nice is I get an overwhelming sense that they&#8217;re improving the kinds of arcane MIDI and plug-in details that users would want improved. You know, there are all sorts of little annoyances you find when working that developers probably don&#8217;t think of. Those kinds of VST and MIDI improvements might not make big headlines at NAMM or in magazine copy, but then, that&#8217;s why so many users pour over release notes &#8212; these are the things they actually encounter working.</p>
<p><img src="http://kore.noisepages.com/files/2008/07/plugwin.gif"></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in using Reaper, now is the perfect time to point out the work Peter Dines has started trying to optimally combine Reaper and Native Instruments&#8217; Kore, with Kore providing various live performance, sound design, sound cataloging, and synth/effect features:</p>
<p><a href="http://kore.noisepages.com/2008/07/31/gettin-my-daw-on/">Kore Host How-Tos: Reaper, Affordable PC/Mac DAW</a> [Kore@CDM minisite]</p>
<h3>Mac Experience?</h3>
<p>I haven&#8217;t really had a chance to try the Mac beta; anyone on Mac had testing experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/08/26/reaper-elegant-macwindows-daw-adds-gobs-more-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CES: Free Transmission Audio Distro, Running on UMPC, Trinity, or Your PC</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/01/08/ces-free-transmission-audio-distro-running-on-umpc-trinity-or-your-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/01/08/ces-free-transmission-audio-distro-running-on-umpc-trinity-or-your-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft-synths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[umpc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/01/08/ces-free-transmission-audio-distro-running-on-umpc-trinity-or-your-pc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open-source music and audio is finally delivering the goods: useful and unique tools that make sense even alongside commercial/proprietary software. And as a sign that the mainstream could get a taste of these tools soon, Intel is exhibiting at the massive Las Vegas CES consumer electronics show with Transmission, says Trinity Audio&#8217;s Ronald Stewart.
Transmission is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images//2008/01/shot8.png"><img height="340" alt="shot8" src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images//2008/01/shot8-thumb.png" width="580" border="0"></a></p>
<p>Open-source music and audio is finally delivering the goods: useful and unique tools that make sense even alongside commercial/proprietary software. And as a sign that the mainstream could get a taste of these tools soon, Intel is exhibiting at the massive Las Vegas CES consumer electronics show with Transmission, says Trinity Audio&#8217;s Ronald Stewart.</p>
<p>Transmission is Trinity Audio&#8217;s open source software bundle and live Linux distribution. It&#8217;s built for Trinity&#8217;s Linux-powered <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/trinity/">Trinity mobile studio device</a>, which we&#8217;ll be seeing more of soon. At CES, it&#8217;s running at the Intel booth on the <a href="http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/type/type.do?group=computersperipherals&amp;type=ultramobilepc">Samsung Q1 Ultra Ultra Mobile PC (UMPC)</a>. (The advantage of the Trinity over the UMPC for audio folks: XLR jacks, among other things.) But you can also run this <strong>free software on your</strong>&nbsp;<strong>PC</strong> &#8212; try the live CD link below. Haven&#8217;t tried it on Intel Mac yet, but that should work, too, theoretically.</p>
<blockquote><p>Audacity [the open-source waveform editor]</p>
<p>Burn is a cd burn app
<p>DJ is IDJ for live podcasting ( i love this with a mic)
<p>Drum is Hydrogen [the simple but fun software drum machine]
<p>Mixer is the Gnome ALSA mixer [for mixing virtual channels of audio on your system -- something not nearly as functional on Mac or Windows]
<p>Mixxx 1.6 beta (rips with the touch screen grabbing the tracks and faders)
<p>Record is Ardourino (Ardour is so awesome) [the open-source DAW]
<p>Sequencer is Qtractor (another great app)
<p>Synth is amsynth
<p>Upload is an ftp app [so you can upload your tracks]
<p>Zynaddsubfx is another great synth</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For more description and links to the individual tools &#8212; an excellent selection of the creme de la creme on Linux &#8212; check the Transmission site. (warning: auto-plays audio!)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trinityaudiogroup.com/transmission.html">Transmission</a></p>
<p>But no need to have a UMPC or Trinity device to give this a spin. This live CD will do the trick. For Mac users, it even includes the native (non-Linux) Ardour for Mac, an excellent free and open source DAW for Mac users.</p>
<p><a href="http://cdd.64studio.com/releases/trinity/trinity-live_master_i386.iso">Trinity Live Master CD</a></p>
<p>Even as someone dedicated to proprietary software I really can&#8217;t live without (hello, Ableton!), I think there&#8217;s huge potential in using these applications for specific applications (like mobile devices), for collaboration, and file exchange. If we were really lucky, some of those major developers would start to build in support for, say, Ardour&#8217;s file format. But that&#8217;s the subject of another story.</p>
<p>Below: the Trinity mobile device getting celebrity treatment.</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images//2008/01/celebrity-trn3.jpg"><img height="435" alt="&lt;KENOX S630  / Samsung S630&gt;" src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images//2008/01/celebrity-trn3-thumb.jpg" width="580" border="0"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/01/08/ces-free-transmission-audio-distro-running-on-umpc-trinity-or-your-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Messe: Dexter, the DAW-Friendly, Surround Sound Follow-Up to Lemur Touchscreen</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/03/29/messe-dexter-the-daw-friendly-surround-sound-follow-up-to-lemur-touchscreen/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/03/29/messe-dexter-the-daw-friendly-surround-sound-follow-up-to-lemur-touchscreen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controllers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Messe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nueno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/03/29/messe-dexter-the-daw-friendly-surround-sound-follow-up-to-lemur-touchscreen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JazzMutant&#8217;s Lemur touchscreen turned a lot of heads, at least as a concept: precise, multi-touch tracking that could follow all ten of your fingers independently, and interactive, custom controller touch layouts looking like something out of Star Trek: The Next Generation. That was the good news. The bad news: difficult assignments for OpenSoundControl (OSC), extra [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.createdigitalmusic.com/images/2007/03/dexter.jpg"></p>
<p>JazzMutant&#8217;s Lemur touchscreen turned a lot of heads, at least as a concept: precise, multi-touch tracking that could follow all ten of your fingers independently, and interactive, custom controller touch layouts looking like something out of Star Trek: The Next Generation. That was the good news. The bad news: difficult assignments for OpenSoundControl (OSC), extra steps required for MIDI (especially in the early versions), controller layouts limited to pre-defined objects, no tactile feedback as with physical controllers, and a steep price (US$2500). Some dedicated electronic musicians loved it, and were willing to put in the time to use it. Many others just shrugged and stuck to far-cheaper, sometimes more-flexible hardware knobs and faders. Still, many at least acknowledged that the Lemur could be a first indication of the future of hardware, even despite its flaws.</p>
<p>Now, JazzMutant is back with something they call the Dexter? All-new hardware, right? Nope. The unit itself looks identical to the Lemur, which is too bad &#8212; part of what made the Lemur experience feel incomplete to me was its bulky and boxy case, which failed to reflect the innovation of the screen. A lower price? We just don&#8217;t know yet: pricing and availability is TBD. </p>
<p>What the Dexter <I>is</i> designed to do is to work more fluidly out of the box as a traditional DAW controller. There are pre-defined layouts for Cubase, Sonar, Logic Pro, Nuendo and Pyramix, and lots of new object features specifically designed to DAW editing.</p>
<p>Looking over what they&#8217;ve planned, I immediately see items that makes me say immediately say, &#8220;slick!&#8221; &#8212; and others that make me go, &#8220;huh?&#8221; <span id="more-1987"></span></p>
<p><B>Track navigation:</b> &#8220;The Track Edit mode offers a clear overview on all the parameters of an individual channel, including graphical EQ display, effects editing, bus sends, and surround panning.&#8221; Great, but mixing isn&#8217;t just about mixing &#8212; it&#8217;s about editing, too. And this gets back to the original limitation of the Lemur: because it&#8217;s an interface, not a screen, you wind up having to navigate your computer screen anyway. And physical control surfaces can still do editing.</p>
<p><B>Flexible layout:</b> One definite advantage of touch-screens is additional flexibility: &#8220;&#8230; press the Â«View SoloÂ» button to display only the soloed tracks on the screen. With Dexter, channels you don&rsquo;t need never get in your way.&#8221; That&#8217;s good, but track groups and a motorized control surface can do the same thing.</p>
<p><B>Multitouch EQ:</b> Now this is immediately cool. Using multi-touch, you can directly interact with EQ settings. The only issue is, most people are happy with conventional controls, and EQ workflows for engineering generally require the exact opposite of what Dexter does: normally, you&#8217;re fine-tuning individual bands in small increments, not because of the limitations of hardware, but because that&#8217;s the best way to get accurate results.</p>
<p><B>Multi-Touch Surround:</b> Surround applications are to me the single most intuitive application of the Lemur and Dexter, and the new surround applications don&#8217;t disappoint. &#8220;Sound sources can naturally be moved around using the tips of your fingers in the most intuitive manner. Dexter also introduces novel ways of reshaping the whole surround soundscape through simple finger gestures. Rotation of all your sources can be achieved by manipulating the panner just like a spinning vinyl ! Drag two fingers apart to spray all sources away from the center.&#8221; Here&#8217;s where both multi-touch interfaces make sense to me. Whether JazzMutant is the future of surround or not, I think a lot of the innovation you see in surround will have to do with interface (both on the hardware and software ends).</p>
<p><B>Zoomable Faders:</b> &#8220;You can now tweak in real time the resolution you want to acheive from one controller. Â«Zoom inÂ» on your faders when you need that extra bit of precision in a mix. Â«Zoom outÂ» when you&rsquo;re looking for the widest range achievable. Dexter brings matchless precision to your mix that top-of-the-range physical faders just can&rsquo;t compete with.&#8221; Fascinating &#8212; but do you really need this? Because volume changes are logarithmic and there are limits to human hearing in subtleties, I think I&#8217;d actually prefer a physical fader. Has anyone ever felt like volume faders on an analog mixing board, for instance, didn&#8217;t give them enough control?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all an interesting re-imagination of applications for the Lemur. But to me, the strengths remain doing things that <I>couldn&#8217;t</i> be done before. Surround is squarely in that category, and sounds like it&#8217;d be plain fun for performance. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see price. But as Apple unveils the iPhone, you have to wonder how much longer JazzMutant will be the only multi-touch game in town &#8212; and, for that matter, with new conventional and non-conventional tangible hardware and haptic technologies on the horizon, always whether multi-touch alone is really the final frontier for control.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jazzmutant.com">JazzMutant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/03/29/messe-dexter-the-daw-friendly-surround-sound-follow-up-to-lemur-touchscreen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
