<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Create Digital Music &#187; laptops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/laptops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ableton Live Touch with Free Usine; Why Touch, Multitouch Works for Music</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/06/23/ableton-live-multitouch-with-free-usine-why-multitouch-works-for-music/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/06/23/ableton-live-multitouch-with-free-usine-why-multitouch-works-for-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ableton-Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative-controllers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controllers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max/MSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensomusic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=6252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s plenty of rightful skepticism about the use of mainstream displays for multitouch in general purpose computing. And why not? As a full-time replacement for other input, multitouch probably doesn&#8217;t make sense. But for music, the equation is changing. Multitouch capabilities are showing up on commodity-priced PC computers like the multi-touch enabled HP laptop models [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="580" height="352"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sVITjbH1Rp4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sVITjbH1Rp4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="352"></embed></object></p>
<p>There&#8217;s plenty of rightful skepticism about the use of mainstream displays for multitouch in general purpose computing. And why not? As a full-time replacement for other input, multitouch probably doesn&#8217;t make sense. But for music, the equation is changing. Multitouch capabilities are showing up on commodity-priced PC computers like the multi-touch enabled HP laptop models &#8211; the <a href="http://www.shopping.hp.com/series/category/notebooks/tx2z_series/3/computer_store">tx2z </a>seen here starts, incredibly, at US$850. And because computer musicians are looking for more control, having a touch-enabled display (even single-touch) just makes sense. </p>
<p>The screen for a laptop musician is a huge piece of real estate. Finally, instead of sitting dumbly in front of you glowing, it can become an X/Y controller or give you shortcuts for controls or provide additional parameters. Yes, using a touchscreen exclusively can result in the dreaded &#8220;gorilla arm.&#8221; The ergonomics of using a vertically-oriented screen are extremely poor &#8211; <em>if</em> you use it exclusively for an extended period of time. But if you look at the way people are using these touchscreens, for incidental control in combination with other things &#8211; and the ability of convertible laptops to transform into a horizontal orientation &#8211; I think this is no longer the deal killer it once was.</p>
<p>At top, an HP laptop ($850) plus the free version of <a href="http://www.sensomusic.com/usine/">Sensomusic&#8217;s Usine</a> is all you need to create a multitouch interface for Ableton Live. <strong>Correction: right now this is limited to single touch only</strong>, but multitouch is supported in the hardware, in drivers, soon in Windows 7, and support is promised for a future version of Usine. The point still stands &#8212; as does the ability to optimize controls for your fingers. Being able to use more than one at once will, of course, be that much better.</p>
<p> Fractal (see <a href="http://www.myspace.com/fractaldeath">Myspace</a>) uses the combination to play Ableton Live with some simple controls. If you get hooked on Usine, you can get the full &#8220;Pro&#8221; version for EUR70 with additional patches and objects.</p>
<p>The one major remaining obstacle to multitouch, at least, is cost. If you don&#8217;t especially fancy buying a new HP laptop, add-on kits still run in the range of US$800-900 (meaning, ironically, you might as well just buy the HP instead). Laptop vendors are still slow to adopt the technology, though that could change when Windows 7 ships later this year. (On the other hand, tablet PCs, even when they were shipping in relative quantity, often were constrained in available configurations and either skimped on specs or demanded a significant premium.)</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s not complain too much. The simple reality is you can add an HP laptop now to a live rig as a performance instrument for under a grand.<span id="more-6252"></span></p>
<p><object width="580" height="469"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7ais9x254zY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7ais9x254zY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="469"></embed></object></p>
<p>To see something else with Ableton Live, here&#8217;s a video by Andrew Coenen from earlier this year of Pance Party&#8217;s Bartelby playing Live with the open source <a href="http://nuigroup.com/forums/viewthread/4750/">Max Multitouch Framework</a>. This is a more sophisticated setup &#8211; it requires a table-style setup using the <a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/">Frustrated Total Internal Reflection tracking method</a>. But the idea is basically the same. (By the way, Max 5 is an optimal choice because of its excellent widgets, and it&#8217;s great having this choice, but it&#8217;s a little odd having an &#8220;open source&#8221; framework in proprietary software. If you want a fully open source solution, there are options like PyMT, which we recently saw on <a href="http://createdigitalmotion.com/2009/06/19/multitouch-evolution-free-pymt-framework-in-action/">Create Digital Motion</a>. And that said, there&#8217;s no reason you can&#8217;t try out both.)</p>
<p>And yes, someone has done Reason, too (poor-quality video, but gives you an idea).</p>
<p><object width="580" height="469"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XnmOTc1dVM0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XnmOTc1dVM0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="469"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>Updated:</strong> As I&#8217;m posting this, I see that Oliver Chesler is writing about how effective touch interfaces can be for synthesizers &#8211; just using iPhone as the example (but the idea still holds). And, in fact, you don&#8217;t necessarily even need multitouch to make this work; single touch would be effective.</p>
<p>The example: an upcoming iPhone/iPod touch synth from the folks who gave us the Curtis granular synth, <a href="http://thestrangeagency.com/">The Strange Agency</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wiretotheear.com/2009/06/23/sound-scope-space-for-the-iphone/">Sound Scope Space for the iPhone</a> [Wire to the Ear]</p>
<p><object width="579" height="434"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5283331&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=CC0000&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5283331&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=CC0000&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="579" height="434"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/5283331">Sound Scope Space demo</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/tsa">strange agency</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p>Of course, I have to point out at this point, this is another reason that OSC (OpenSoundControl) support becomes essential. Whether or not conventional gear vendors adopt OSC, it&#8217;s a logical way to deal with the growing number of touch-enabled devices, from your own display to your iPhone.</p>
<p>I expect this could all accelerate as we near Windows 7&#8217;s release. (You don&#8217;t need Windows 7 &#8211; HP is doing just fine without it &#8211; but the presence of in-box APIs for paging through photo galleries and the like is almost certain to encourage Microsoft&#8217;s hardware partners.) Stay tuned.</p>
<h3>More Examples</h3>
<p><object width="580" height="465"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lkT4uyvXIW4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lkT4uyvXIW4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="465"></embed></object></p>
<p><object width="580" height="465"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HnQHoCDxiRw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HnQHoCDxiRw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="465"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/24/200-makes-your-laptop-touch-enabled-usine-music-demo/">$200 Makes Your Laptop Touch-Enabled; Usine Music Demo</a></p>
<p><object width="580" height="469"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wzdufv7TwZo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wzdufv7TwZo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="469"></embed></object> </p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/23/sensomusic-usine-ableton-live-modular-touchscreen-interface/">Sensomusic Usine + Ableton Live = Modular Touchscreen Interface</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/06/23/ableton-live-multitouch-with-free-usine-why-multitouch-works-for-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple MacBooks: Reappearing FireWire, Disappearing ExpressCard</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/06/08/apple-macbooks-reappearing-firewire-disappearing-expresscard/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/06/08/apple-macbooks-reappearing-firewire-disappearing-expresscard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExpressCard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FireWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwdc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/06/08/apple-macbooks-reappearing-firewire-disappearing-expresscard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
As you no doubt heard, Apple today refreshed their MacBook lineup with across-the-board adjustments to pricing. I’ll let other sites comment on the news more generally, as this is a music site, not a notebook site. But the big news for audio in terms of I/O, just so you don’t miss that:

FireWire on more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/06/macbookfamily.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="macbookfamily" border="0" alt="macbookfamily" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/06/macbookfamily-thumb.jpg" width="580" height="155" /></a> </p>
<p>As you no doubt heard, Apple today refreshed their MacBook lineup with across-the-board adjustments to pricing. I’ll let other sites comment on the news more generally, as this is a music site, not a notebook site. But the big news for audio in terms of I/O, just so you don’t miss that:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>FireWire on more models:</strong> Finally, you can again get a 13” MacBook (now called MacBook Pro) with onboard FireWire – a FW800 connector. That’ll restore the use of audio interfaces and certain high-speed storage, and means the MacBook is again a good choice as an audio machine at the US$1199 base price point.</li>
<li><strong>ExpressCard on fewer models: </strong>Oddly, the addition of a lowly SD card slot (nice for photography and mobile recorders) has supplanted the ExpressCard slot on the 15” MacBook Pro. If you want ExpressCard, you have to buy the 17” – which, in turn, loses the SD card slot.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, generally the news here is pretty good. For music, you probably aren’t too concerned about the GPU, so the 15” MacBook Pro at US$1699 is looking like a nice deal. But PC users are no doubt puzzled, given that all of these connections are standard equipment on the vast majority of PC notebooks, including ones that cost less than a grand. And there still aren’t as many USB ports as you’d like – you get two ports on all but the 17” model, which has three, and very often only one of those may actually be usable because of <a href="http://createdigitalmotion.com/2009/06/08/apple-restores-firewire-but-expresscard-now-only-on-17/">power issues</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a> [Apple]</p>
<p>The battery life is also greatly improved, but unfortunately is no longer user-upgradeable. See further comments on <a href="http://createdigitalmotion.com/2009/06/08/apple-restores-firewire-but-expresscard-now-only-on-17/">CDMotion</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/06/08/apple-macbooks-reappearing-firewire-disappearing-expresscard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$200 Makes Your Laptop Touch-Enabled; Usine Music Demo</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/24/200-makes-your-laptop-touch-enabled-usine-music-demo/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/24/200-makes-your-laptop-touch-enabled-usine-music-demo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 01:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jazzmutant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lemur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensomusic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=6017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No doubt about it: touch is coming to more screens near you. But there&#8217;s no need to disappoint your current beloved laptop. $200 kits can turn your laptop into a functioning touchscreen.
Now, as I&#8217;m working with JazzMutant&#8217;s Lemur this week, before you get excited, this is no Lemur &#8211; or even anything like your iPhone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="580" height="465"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lkT4uyvXIW4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lkT4uyvXIW4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="465"></embed></object></p>
<p>No doubt about it: touch is coming to more screens near you. But there&#8217;s no need to disappoint your current beloved laptop. $200 kits can turn your laptop into a functioning touchscreen.</p>
<p>Now, as I&#8217;m working with JazzMutant&#8217;s Lemur this week, before you get excited, this is no Lemur &#8211; or even anything like your iPhone or iPod touch. Sensitivity and accuracy are workable, but not exceptional, the overlay is pretty simple (as you can see in the video) rather than integrated with the display, and this is single-touch only &#8212; not multi-touch. Lastly, on a conventional laptop that isn&#8217;t convertible, you may miss the ability to fully extend your laptop perpindicular to your body. (Having the screen be parallel can put your arms in a fatiguing position.)</p>
<p>But that said, there&#8217;s a lot of potential once you have the ability to reach over and make quick gestures on a laptop screen that control a set. You might make your own instruments and effects or controller dashboards in a tool like Processing or Reaktor. And at $200, this could be a brilliant way to retrofit a machine and breathe new life into it. There&#8217;s support for Mac, Windows, and Linux; you just plug in via USB.<span id="more-6017"></span></p>
<p>In this case, <a href="http://www.sensomusic.com/usine/">Sensomusic Usine</a> is perfectly suited to the job, with an interface built just for this purpose. Their Touch Screen Edition earns major kudos for being a full desktop computer music environment built around touch, <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/10/08/modular-sound-by-touch-usine/">as covered here previously</a>.</p>
<p>Of course, all of this potential is likely to make you want more sophisticated, multi-touch solutions even more. The outlook is improving. Windows 7 will bring native support for multi-touch gestures &#8211; not so much important news in itself so much as a sign that more hardware vendors could add support, ramp up volume and lower prices. HP is already shipping computers (including laptops) with multi-touch.</p>
<p>Also interestingly, the creators of the JazzMutant Lemur multi-touch hardware &#8211; specifically designed for music and visuals &#8211; have now expanded their mission to targeting general-purpose devices. The new company, <a href="http://www.stantum.com/">Stantum</a>, is showing off fantastic, unique technologies for multi-touch, as seen recently in an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/stantums-mind-blowing-multitouch-interface-on-video/">Engadget preview</a>. Beautifully designed as the iPhone is, these offer some unique features like intensive accuracy and support for input from objects (like styluses) and not just fingertips. That could mean the Lemur is just the tip of a much bigger iceberg. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a tantalizing look at the Santum SMK screen working with Max/MSP. Unlike the Lemur, that means direct controlling Max&#8217;s widgets, rather than treating the screen like an independent controller.</p>
<p><object width="4580" height="465"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HnQHoCDxiRw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HnQHoCDxiRw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="465"></embed></object></p>
<p>Of course, that doesn&#8217;t mean the simpler, single-touch, cheap solution couldn&#8217;t be a great project right now, and a chance to get a leg up on The Future. If anyone tries one, let us know what it&#8217;s like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/24/200-makes-your-laptop-touch-enabled-usine-music-demo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mobile Music Netbook: Linux-Powered Indamixx OS + Laptop Looking Slicker</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/05/the-mobile-music-netbook-linux-powered-indamixx-os-laptop-looking-slicker/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/05/the-mobile-music-netbook-linux-powered-indamixx-os-laptop-looking-slicker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 10:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energyxt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indamixx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop-music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu-9.04]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/05/the-mobile-music-netbook-linux-powered-indamixx-os-laptop-looking-slicker/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Going ultra-mobile: Korg’s nanoKEY controller plus a svelte, two-and-a-half-pound netbook running Linux and energyXT.
Laptops for music are nothing new. But better versions of Linux make no-hassle music production easier and more powerful – and new netbooks make it cheap and ultra-portable, too, for times when even that 15” laptop feels clunky. Netbooks aren’t for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/05/indamixx-model2.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="" border="0" alt="" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/05/indamixx-model2-thumb.jpg" width="580" height="621" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">Going ultra-mobile: Korg’s nanoKEY controller plus a svelte, two-and-a-half-pound netbook running Linux and energyXT.</div>
<p>Laptops for music are nothing new. But better versions of Linux make no-hassle music production easier and more powerful – and new netbooks make it cheap and ultra-portable, too, for times when even that 15” laptop feels clunky. Netbooks aren’t for everyone, and I imagine some people will miss Windows and Mac OS, even with better compatibility and powerful features on Linux. But if you are looking for an additional, more mobile machine, the combination is definitely worth a look.</p>
<p>A significant revision to the one netbook customized for Linux music has just become available today – you read about it here first.</p>
<p> <span id="more-5818"></span>
<p>The elements of Linux-based music making have reached a nice convergence with the release of Ubuntu 9.04 – the combination of a polished, mature Linux distribution with a newly-updated real-time kernel for low-latency audio is looking especially potent. At the same time, the increasingly-popular netbook has also improved in the latest generation. Ronald Stewart of Indamixx, a custom Linux mobile computer builder and OS packager, writes to brag about his latest generation. And he’s even found a way to do mobile music in his vehicle. (Let’s hope traffic in the LA area isn’t so bad that you’re actually adjusting beats in a tracker on the road, however.)</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/05/aster-34w.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="" border="0" alt="" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/05/aster-34w-thumb.jpg" width="580" height="418" /></a></p>
<p>Indamixx has three products here, one software and two hardware:</p>
<ul>
<li>The original Indamixx portable studio is built on Samsung’s OLPC platform. I <a href="http://www.keyboardmag.com/article/trinity-audio-indamixx/nov-08/89531">reviewed it for Keyboard Magazine</a>. It’s really, really ultra-portable, and is something of a technological achievement. But most of us would prefer something more like a laptop, with a little more power and a conventional keyboard/mouse. Good news: </li>
<li>The Indamixx Laptop is a netbook, with more power and more conventional uses – but still pre-tuned to run Linux audio, and still ultra-portable. </li>
<li>Transmission is Indamixx’s custom Linux distribution, built on Studio64 and Ubuntu 9.04, but with extra tools to make hosting Windows VSTs and importing your existing projects easier. </li>
</ul>
<p>Transmission should be available soon for people who already own a netbook. You get more than you get with a stock Ubuntu install. For instance, the included commercial product <a href="http://www.creativepost.co.uk/">ardourXchange</a> allows you to import AAF files from Pro Tools, Logic, and the like into the open source Ardour DAW. </p>
<p>It also ships with the commercial app <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/02/20/energyxt-25-is-here-is-awesome-european-offices-have-lots-of-sunlight/">energyXT</a>. I think it’d worth buying a copy of the superb, modern tracker <a href="http://www.renoise.com/">Renoise</a>, which has excellent Linux support. Renoise also got a significant update, now in beta, which I’ll talk about by next week. Ardour 3.0 is expected to be a major update, as well, with support for MIDI and VSTs – that could be a game-changer when it happens, so stay tuned.</p>
<p>The laptop is what especially intrigues me. Linux is great, but it is nice having a configuration that’s static, because it helps navigate around potential compatibility issues with specific hardware specs. (That’s a problem we see regularly on Windows, too, and even occasionally – as with a specific wifi bug on an early build of Leopard – on the Mac.)</p>
<p>Indamixx has a special version of the MSI Wind that comes pre-optimized for Indamixx. Ronald describes the newly-updated Indamixx Laptop specs. (We saw the laptop here on CDM first in November, but this is a significant upgrade from that model):</p>
<ul>
<li>Transmission OS 3.0, which thanks to the new kernel and Ubuntu 9.04 has various enhancements and does a much better job of handling network 3G / HDSPA cards for mobile connectivity </li>
<li>A 2.0 GHz CPU – the only overclocking-capable netbook </li>
<li>2 GB pre-installed RAM from the factory, which (sadly) is rarity in netbooks </li>
<li>160 GB HDD (doubled from the previous model) </li>
<li>10.2” widescreen display, up from the somewhat-cramped 8.9” on the previous model </li>
<li>Large-style keyboard layout, roughly 95% of the size of a regular keyboard </li>
<li>2.6 pounds, up to 4 hours battery life </li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/05/s6301143.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="" border="0" alt="" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/05/s6301143-thumb.jpg" width="580" height="435" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">The Transmission OS will soon be available for other machines, too. Here it is running on Ronald’s mom’s BestBuy-bought model. (No, the Indamixx Laptop is not available in pink.)</div>
<p>The 2.6.29.1 kernel is new to Ubuntu 9.04. Combined with the real-time JACK, you get excellent low-latency performance. (Incidentally, I’ve found that also applies to Windows software running in Linux under the Windows compatibility environment <a href="http://www.winehq.org/">WINE</a> – I’ve had success with NI’s Reaktor. Not officially supported, but quite a lot of fun. Ronald reports at least one user running Guitar Rig 2, as well.)</p>
<p>Indamixx also throws in a carrying case and free FedEx shipping.</p>
<p>I’ll be installing Ubuntu 9.04 on my main PC laptop soon, and possibly also my MacBook. Stay tuned for more on the latest Linux OS and what you can do with it for creative music making.</p>
<p>More info:</p>
<p><a title="http://www.indamixx.com/" href="http://www.indamixx.com/">http://www.indamixx.com/</a></p>
<p>Indamixx Laptop @ Amazon: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0028LPGVW?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=createdigital-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B0028LPGVW">Indamixx Portable Studio Netbook Edition Model 2</a><img style="border-bottom-style: none !important; border-right-style: none !important; margin: 0px; border-top-style: none !important; border-left-style: none !important" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=createdigital-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B0028LPGVW" width="1" height="1" /> </p>
<p>(also available from <a href="http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Indamixx-Indamixx-Laptop?sku=580122">Musicians’ Friend</a>)</p>
<p> <iframe style="width: 120px; height: 240px" marginheight="0" src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=createdigital-20&amp;o=1&amp;p=8&amp;l=as1&amp;asins=B0028LPGVW&amp;fc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;lt1=_blank&amp;m=amazon&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;bc1=000000&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;f=ifr" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/05/05/the-mobile-music-netbook-linux-powered-indamixx-os-laptop-looking-slicker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Depeche Mode: Inside the Studio, Identify the Gear at Keyboard Mag</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/20/depeche-mode-inside-the-studio-identify-the-gear-at-keyboard-mag/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/20/depeche-mode-inside-the-studio-identify-the-gear-at-keyboard-mag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behind-the-scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depeche-mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear-lust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard-magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=5446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depeche Mode&#8217;s latest album, &#8220;Sounds of the Universe,&#8221; is due April 20 internationally. I got the chance to cover the band for Keyboard Magazine, speaking with Martin Gore and Andrew Fletcher as well as returning producer Ben Hillier, who was a big part of the signature sound of 2005&#8217;s &#8220;Playing the Angel.&#8221; Martin developed eBay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/03/depechemodestudio.jpg"></p>
<p>Depeche Mode&#8217;s latest album, &#8220;Sounds of the Universe,&#8221; is due April 20 internationally. I got the chance to cover the band for Keyboard Magazine, speaking with Martin Gore and Andrew Fletcher as well as returning producer Ben Hillier, who was a big part of the signature sound of 2005&#8217;s &#8220;Playing the Angel.&#8221; Martin developed eBay and KVR Audio addictions during the making of the album, so you can imagine just how much gear love was part of the process &#8211; with the talent of the musicians and Hillier&#8217;s vision as a producer managing to keep the resulting sound open and polished.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll get to read the finished story in the May issue of Keyboard &#8211; meaning there&#8217;s still time to subscribe if (ahem) your subscription may have lapsed. But my editor at Keyboard got a great brainstorm. Ben Hillier and <a href="http://www.140db.co.uk/">140 dB</a> sent us some spy photos from inside the studio, so Keyboard has posted those shots and challenge their readers to identify just what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.keyboardmag.com/article/depeche-mode-behind/mar-09/94029">Depeche Mode Behind the Scenes &#8211; Part I</a><br />
<a href="http://www.keyboardmag.com/article/depeche-mode-behind/mar-09/94105">Part II (with contest)</a><br />
<a href="http://www.keyboardmag.com/article/depeche-mode-behind/mar-09/94169">Part III</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing this for entirely selfish reasons. One, I&#8217;d find it hilarious if a CDM reader won the contest. Two, I&#8217;m quite curious about the gear that isn&#8217;t identified with numbers or labeled in the captions. Now, I know what some of it is, but consider it a bonus challenge to those who find the first five too easy. (Well, some are very blurry shots, so that should help keep the difficulty amped up&#8230;) For those extras, feel free to comment here. (Well, obviously not the contest entries, or you&#8217;ll spoil the contest.)</p>
<p>As a thank-you, the winner gets the new album and a free subscription to the magazine.</p>
<p>This is not the contest image at top &#8211; it&#8217;s Martin Gore with the very gifted recording engineer Ferg Peterkin (whose name I also find strangely comforting).</p>
<p>Good luck. I&#8217;ll keep my mouth shut. We&#8217;ll have more available online, including some words from Ben Hillier on the techniques used in production, when the issue ships &#8211; stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/20/depeche-mode-inside-the-studio-identify-the-gear-at-keyboard-mag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roll Your Own Multitouch Screens, Tables: Max Multitouch Framework, PyMT</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/20/roll-your-own-multitouch-screens-tables-max-multitouch-framework-pymt/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/20/roll-your-own-multitouch-screens-tables-max-multitouch-framework-pymt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative-interfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awesomeness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[max]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max/MSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=5441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[c
Ever feel like you&#8217;ve found the seam dividing past and future?
The past: restrictive UI frameworks requiring pages and pages of code to produce dated-look 2D displays. Proprietary software with rigid interfaces. Input bottlenecked through the x and y coordinates of a single mouse pointer. 
The future: UIs whipped together graphically or with a few lines [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="580" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EEkj85GU_is&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EEkj85GU_is&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="355"></embed></object>c</p>
<p>Ever feel like you&#8217;ve found the seam dividing past and future?</p>
<p>The past: restrictive UI frameworks requiring pages and pages of code to produce dated-look 2D displays. Proprietary software with rigid interfaces. Input bottlenecked through the x and y coordinates of a single mouse pointer. </p>
<p>The future: UIs whipped together graphically or with a few lines of code. 3D mixed with 2D. Open-source, friendly frameworks. Creating your own interface or drawing upon a community of creative software makers. Input that uses multitouch for gestures, collaborative input, manipulation of 2D and 3D space, and &#8230; well, just a lot more fun.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no need to wait around for the future. Creative software inventors are building it for themselves. Here are two of the most promising multitouch interface projects I&#8217;ve seen in my inbox.</p>
<p>In no time at all, you&#8217;ll be painting a cow! (Okay, more on that in a moment&#8230;)<span id="more-5441"></span></p>
<h3>Make Max Multitouch</h3>
<p>Max Multitouch Framework by composer Mathieu Chamagne makes turning your Max patch into a multitouch interface a breeze. When I first reviewed the Lemur, I was frustrated by the hardware-style abstraction between your software and the interface. Why was I having to go through Max patches painstakingly assigning Lemur controls to Max controls &#8211; why not just make the Max controls appear on the multitouch screen? Well, that&#8217;s exactly what you get with MMF. Using a set of Max abstractions, all you have to do is build your Presentation Mode style UI and add in the MMF ingredients &#8211; it automagically becomes touchable on a variety of displays. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not hard to imagine how great this could be for musicians, especially those who have already been building original sonic creations in Max/MSP. Best of all, you don&#8217;t need an expensive, non-portable table with a projector inside, either &#8211; commodity hardware works just fine right now.</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>Requirements :</strong></em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">- <a href="http://www.cycling74.com/" target='_blank'>cycling&#8217;74</a> <a href="http://www.cycling74.com/downloads/max5" target="_blank">Max5</a> (version 5.0.6 required)<br />
- any multitouch interface that sends <a href="http://tuio.lfsaw.de/" target="_blank">TUIO</a> messages.</p>
<p>MMF has been tested and works fine with : <a href="http://www.stantum.com" target="_blank">Stantum</a> SMK-15.4 multitouch screen, HP XT2 tablet pc (windows7 + <a href="http://nuigroup.com/forums/viewthread/4087/P15/" target="_blank">W2TUIO</a>), <a href="http://www.demandevolution.com/">Demand Evolution</a> + home made multitouch screen + <a href="http://mtg.upf.edu/reactable/?software" target="_blank">Reactivision</a> /  <a href="http://tbeta.nuigroup.com/" target="_blank">Tbeta</a> , &#8230;</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.mathieuchamagne.com/mmf/">MMF (Max Multitouch Framework) @ Mathieu Chamagne&#8217;s Site</a></p>
<p><em>Hmmm&#8230; apps that send (cough) TUIO, eh? Ah, yes, but that&#8217;s why you need companies like Apple to tell you what qualifies as useful in an iPhone app. You see, without Apple&#8217;s app review team and their <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/16/apple-rejects-free-iphone-tool-for-artists-because-of-minimal-user-functionality/">superior wisdom</a>, I might wrongfully assume this sort of app would be something I&#8217;d want. Now I know better &#8211; thanks! (Sorry, couldn&#8217;t resist.)</em></p>
<p>Back to the on-topic discussion, this does demonstrate a real advantage of Max: it has its UI absolutely nailed, and the open-source alternative Pd is woefully behind. It also demonstrates that the beauty of Presentation Mode is, by abstracting the UI from the underlying guts, you can consider alternative interfaces. We should see that in Max for Live, as well.</p>
<p>Pd is fantastic in other ways, but if there&#8217;s anyone out there who fancies writing a lightweight new front-end, it could use it &#8211; perhaps in Python. Which brings us to the next item.</p>
<p><object width="579" height="434"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3548811&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=CC0000&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3548811&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=CC0000&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="579" height="434"></embed></object><br /><a href="http://vimeo.com/3548811">pymt demo reel</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1410649">Thomas Hansen</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<h3>PyMT: Juicy Multitouch, Just a Few Lines o&#8217; Code</h3>
<p>PyMT is a glimpse of what future development could look like. While Microsoft putzes around with their Windows-only Surface, PyMT makes multitouch platform agnostic, open, and easy. That frees up artists to dream up creative new ways of applying this interface to expressive musical and visual creations (among others). Instead of reinventing the wheel as far as plumbing, you can focus on the reason for using devices in the first place &#8211; your art.</p>
<p>PyMT is profoundly portable, using Python and OpenGL to deliver windowing and multimedia features across platforms. Documentation and code are both under heavy development, but there are already some friendly-looking resources. This is almost enough to shake me from my loyalty to Java, though, in fairness, you can do some of the same things with Java and other tools. What&#8217;s most important is that there are libraries that are providing standards, like TUIO, and implementations in cross-platform languages that can be easily developed.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s good reason to be bullish on the future of this tech. And if you want to see it happen, don&#8217;t wait &#8211; you can get involved in the project directly.</p>
<p><a href="http://code.google.com/p/pymt/">PyMT at Google Code</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pymt.txzone.net/">PyMT Project Page</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/20/roll-your-own-multitouch-screens-tables-max-multitouch-framework-pymt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rain Diablo Audio Quad Laptop: Powerful Enough to Be Kind of Ridiculous</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/02/02/rain-diablo-audio-quad-laptop-powerful-enough-to-be-kind-of-ridiculous/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/02/02/rain-diablo-audio-quad-laptop-powerful-enough-to-be-kind-of-ridiculous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core-duo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad-core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rain-recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rain Recording make audio-ready notebooks &#8211; that is, they&#8217;re pre-tested to function well with audio software, with Windows tweaks, driver selection, and configuration all chosen and tested for music and visual production, and no crapware installed. They&#8217;re one of a handful of music-friendly vendors that does that (see also: PCAudioLabs, etc.). Given that the PC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/02/diablo1.jpg"></p>
<p>Rain Recording make audio-ready notebooks &#8211; that is, they&#8217;re pre-tested to function well with audio software, with Windows tweaks, driver selection, and configuration all chosen and tested for music and visual production, and no crapware installed. They&#8217;re one of a handful of music-friendly vendors that does that (see also: PCAudioLabs, etc.). Given that the PC music making experience can range from awesome to awful depending on which hardware and (particularly) drivers you&#8217;re on, that&#8217;s no small matter.</p>
<p>Rain has always styled themselves a premium brand. But the latest Diablo really does go to extremes spec-wise. It&#8217;ll cost you &#8211; base price starts at US$4000, though that&#8217;s not as high-end as these sort of desktop specs commanded more recently. Intel and AMD/ATI really are economizing, even at the high end. But cost aside, this machine really maxes out components. You have to admire the results:</p>
<ul>
<li>Quad CPUs: up to 2.53GHz Intel Core 2 Quad 12MB/1066 MHz &#8220;Montevina&#8221; Centrino 2 &#8212; the most powerful brain you can put in a laptop right now</li>
<p><LI>Up to 8 GB DDR3 RAM (and if you boot a 64-bit operating system like Vista x64 or &#8211; cough &#8211; Linux, you can use all of it)</li>
<p><LI>ATI Radeon MR HD3870/512M DDR3 RAM &#8212; just about the most powerful GPU (and some people do prefer ATI to NVIDIA), giving you up to two discrete GPUs</li>
<p><LI>17&#8243; display at 1920&#215;1200</li>
<p><LI>Optional dual 320GB 7200RPM SATA drives with 16MB cache</li>
<p><LI>1x eSATA, 3X USB2, 3xFireWire (yeah, you read that right &#8211; one onboard FireWire, plus two more using a bundled, TI chipset PCI ExpressCard that pops into that slot, also standard on the lower-cost LiveBook)</li>
<p><LI>1 x HDMI, 1 x VGA, card reader, headphone out, mic in, gigabit RJ45 Ethernet, fingerprint scanner</li>
</ul>
<p>The key specs, of course, are the quad CPU, that ATI GPU, and the maxed-out-res 17&#8243; display. Given those specs, the weight actually isn&#8217;t all that bad &#8211; 8 lbs. with the 12-cell battery (which you&#8217;re going to want, as this machine is likely to suck up electricity in a hurry).<span id="more-4897"></span></p>
<p>You can put audio on a dedicated chipset (the TI, which isn&#8217;t currently available from Apple). You can run two drives in RAID-0, or opt for solid-state drives (which have been improving in performance and value at a pretty impressive rate). And the ATI chipset means this is a pretty powerful visualist / visual production workstation &#8211; that also happens to be faster than a lot of high-end gaming laptops, for your off-hour enjoyment..</p>
<p>This is usually the point where someone says, &#8220;but do I need all that power to &#8211;&#8221;</p>
<p>No. You don&#8217;t. This is a bit like buying a souped-up supercar &#8212; and likely to be about as fuel-efficient. You <em>might</em> &#8220;need&#8221; this if you want to play Crysis between Pro Tools sessions. (I&#8217;ll let you bend the definition of &#8220;need&#8221; there.) That&#8217;s not to say you won&#8217;t get a lot of performance out of this, though, and it&#8217;s nice to know you have this option if you <em>want</em> it. The GPU only really impacts visuals at the moment, but with the push to do more processing on the GPU, that could change soon even for audio.</p>
<p>Actually, maybe the reason Rain keeps misspelling the GPU as &#8220;discreet&#8221; is that you can &#8220;discreetly&#8221; buy one of these and hope your significant other / the IRS / your conscience doesn&#8217;t notice you just bought a killer gaming rig as your (ahem) pro audio machine.</p>
<p>For mere mortals, I like the $1999-base-price <a href="http://rainrecording.com/products/livebook/">LiveBook</a> from Rain. It actually gives you a fair amount of this performance, all of the same I/O specs, and compares favorably on specs against Apple&#8217;s rival (including offering some serious FireWire and expansion the Apple lacks). And, incidentally, it isn&#8217;t a bad gaming machine, either, in case you want to join some of the CDMers the next time they fire up Left 4 Dead.</p>
<p>I do find all of this interesting, though, on two points. One, if any had doubts that you could buy a pre-configured PC and know that it&#8217;ll work reliably on audio tasks, Rain ought to put those doubts to rest. I&#8217;ve tested the previous Diablo and LiveBook, and out of the box they were ideal audio machines &#8211; no tweaks required. It&#8217;s absolutely possible to build or buy a mainstream PC that does that, but the luxury of knowing someone at the other end has actually tried running Ableton Live and SONAR sure is nice. (Heck, that&#8217;s not necessarily true of Apple &#8211; as people found out the hard way during some buggy early releases of Leopard, happily since fixed.)</p>
<p>This also demonstrates that said PC vendors don&#8217;t have to fall behind the &#8220;enthusiast&#8221; custom builders who cater to gamers &#8211; if you want to push the envelope on your laptop for audio and visuals and not just games, you can do that, too. </p>
<p>I certainly know not everyone can &#8212; or should &#8212; spend $4 grand and up on this particular machine. But just like that supercar, it&#8217;s sort of nice to know it&#8217;s there. And hopefully it can start to serve as a wake-up all that there are communities pushing their PC to the bleeding edge who <em>aren&#8217;t</em> primarily gamers.</p>
<p><a href="http://rainrecording.com/products/diablo/">Diablo Product Page</a> [Rain Recording]</p>
<p>Diablos don&#8217;t hang around long, but I do hope to get my hands on a current-generation Rain soon; stay tuned.</p>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/02/diablo2.jpg"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/02/02/rain-diablo-audio-quad-laptop-powerful-enough-to-be-kind-of-ridiculous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want a FireWire, Non-Pro MacBook? The $999 MacBook is Looking Better</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/21/want-a-firewire-non-pro-macbook-the-999-macbook-is-looking-better/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/21/want-a-firewire-non-pro-macbook-the-999-macbook-is-looking-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying-advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FireWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/21/want-a-firewire-non-pro-macbook-the-999-macbook-is-looking-better/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Apple has updated the US$999, white MacBook to some of the specs of the new &#8220;unibody&#8221; models &#8211; but retaining the one thing we like about it, namely, an actual FireWire port. (The only other option has been upgrading to the Pro for significantly more cash.)
Now for US$999:

NVIDIA 9400M graphics (meaning this is mainly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="display: inline; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px" src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/whitemacbook.jpg" align="right" /> Apple has updated the US$999, white MacBook to some of the specs of the new &ldquo;unibody&rdquo; models &ndash; but retaining the one thing we like about it, namely, an actual FireWire port. (The only other option has been upgrading to the Pro for significantly more cash.)</p>
<p>Now for US$999:</p>
<ul>
<li>NVIDIA 9400M graphics (meaning this is mainly a story for visualists, so see our <a href="http://createdigitalmotion.com/2009/01/21/updated-999-white-macbook-becomes-good-budget-choice-9400m-tv-out-capable/">take on Create Digital Motion</a> &ndash; but the rest of you can more easily enjoy World of Warcraft, if so inclined) </li>
<li>Newer Core 2 Duo, still 2.0 GHz but now with a faster 1066 MHz frontside bus for a marginal performance improvement </li>
<li>2 GB instead of the ridiculous 1 GB RAM, meaning you don&rsquo;t necessarily have to buy a RAM upgrade to use it </li>
<li>Bluetooth 2.1 </li>
</ul>
<p>More important is what didn&rsquo;t change: it still has FireWire. And it&rsquo;s still the cheapest new mobile Mac you can buy. It also still has the older-style Mini-DVI video connector, but it does <strong><a href="http://createdigitalmotion.com/2009/01/22/white-macbook-snubs-adapter-i-want-my-tv-out/">not support the old adapters or TV out</a></strong>.</p>
<p>If you&rsquo;re looking to run Windows or cross-platform software, of course, the PCs in the same price range remain competitive. But then, if you want Mac OS, Logic, and various Mac-only tools, that isn&rsquo;t really an option, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/21/want-a-firewire-non-pro-macbook-the-999-macbook-is-looking-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Universal Audio UAD-2 SOLO Will Add DSP Power to Your Laptop for $499</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/20/universal-audio-uad-2-solo-will-add-dsp-power-to-your-laptop-for-499/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/20/universal-audio-uad-2-solo-will-add-dsp-power-to-your-laptop-for-499/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExpressCard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mastering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[namm09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plug-ins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal-Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/20/universal-audio-uad-2-solo-will-add-dsp-power-to-your-laptop-for-499/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
I&#8217;ve been waiting for the near-ubiquitous ExpressCard slot on laptops to see some audio goodness, so one of the more welcome announcements of NAMM is that there&#8217;s now finally an ExpressCard-enabled version of the Universal Audio platform. The UAD is a DSP platform for computers, with an emphasis on high-quality, boutique mastering and effects [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/uad2laptop.jpg" /> </p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve been waiting for the near-ubiquitous ExpressCard slot on laptops to see some audio goodness, so one of the more welcome announcements of NAMM is that there&rsquo;s now finally an ExpressCard-enabled version of the Universal Audio platform. The UAD is a DSP platform for computers, with an emphasis on high-quality, boutique mastering and effects plug-ins, including some recent, familiar emulations of classic Roland and Moog gear. UA&rsquo;s stuff really does sound great, and host support has been improving (look for the key words &ldquo;latency compensation&rdquo; in your host of choice). So it&rsquo;s about time that laptop users get in on some of the fun the desktop users have had.</p>
<p>The surprise is, the UAD-2 SOLO doesn&rsquo;t cost that much &#8211; $500 includes the card plus the &ldquo;1176SE Compressor/Limiter, Pultec EQP-1A Equalizer, RealVerb Pro Room Modeler, and CS-1 Channel Strip.&rdquo; That&rsquo;s a premium over native plug-ins, but then you have access to other UA plugs later on. In other news, Antares and Manley Labs signed onto UA&rsquo;s platform, so more stuff is coming.</p>
<p>And by the way, while the forums rip into the choice of DAW, this stuff will work everywhere &ndash; even, via RTAS, Pro Tools.</p>
<p>Universal&rsquo;s stuff isn&rsquo;t for everyone, but I&rsquo;m pleased that laptop users are getting something more out of a slot on their machine. (You&rsquo;ll find ExpressCard on most PCs and the MacBook Pro, as well.) I hope this is the first of more hardware to come.</p>
<p><a title="http://www.uaudio.com/" href="http://www.uaudio.com/">http://www.uaudio.com/</a></p>
<p><strong>Mastering &ndash; spoiled for choice? </strong>This means in mastering choices, you&rsquo;ve got the UAD, IK&rsquo;s T-RackS 3 announced at the end of last year, and iZotope&rsquo;s Ozone 4 announced at NAMM. I&rsquo;ll be talking to some folks in New York who know something about mastering (i.e., are <em>not</em> me). (One of them is a big Cubase fan, so I expect he&rsquo;ll also be all over Cubase 5 &ndash; and he makes records that make real money, whereas I make records that go nicely with experimental modern dance.) </p>
<p>Each of these products goes a different direction, but the honest truth is almost any DAW will start you out with a pretty great selection of effects tools, and for a small chunk of change, you can add on with something like the UAD, T-RackS, and iZotope. None of this changes your actual skill level or the quality of your ears, but it does help keep your wallet from being the major barrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/20/universal-audio-uad-2-solo-will-add-dsp-power-to-your-laptop-for-499/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gig Rigs: Girl Talk &#8211; PC, Plastic Wrap, and AudioMulch</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/12/19/gig-rigs-girl-talk-pc-plastic-wrap-and-audiomulch/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/12/19/gig-rigs-girl-talk-pc-plastic-wrap-and-audiomulch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audiomulch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gig-rigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girl-Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop-performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live-performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/12/19/gig-rigs-girl-talk-pc-plastic-wrap-and-audiomulch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo: Jordan Harris. Used on CDM by permission.
Yes, for the record, that is a young woman screaming to the sounds of AudioMulch. Believe. 
Jordan Harris was able to snag some screenshots of Girl Talk&#8217;s rig. There&#8217;s not much to tell: a laptop, a mouse, and in a sign of the growing stature of Girl Talk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2008/12/girltalk1.jpg" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Photo: Jordan Harris. Used on CDM by permission.</div>
<p>Yes, for the record, that is a young woman screaming to the sounds of AudioMulch. Believe. </p>
<p>Jordan Harris was able to snag some screenshots of <strong>Girl Talk&rsquo;s rig</strong>. There&rsquo;s not much to tell: a laptop, a mouse, and in a sign of the growing stature of Girl Talk (Gregg Gillis), some very practical plastic wrap to protect the machine. What&rsquo;s unique about Gregg&rsquo;s work is that this computer doesn&rsquo;t clear out the room: it attracts screaming throngs of fans. Especially lady fans, proof that this does not have to be a sport for boys. (As it happens, I find they also like watching American NFL football. Poor girls; everyone is convinced they know what they want but don&rsquo;t ask.)</p>
<p>Every music tool is supposed to have celebrity users, right? Well, <strong>AudioMulch</strong> definitely can claim Girl Talk. This $89, currently Windows-only tool (yes, <a href="http://www.audiomulch.com/faq.htm#VistaCompatibility" target="_blank">Vista-compatible</a>) has long had an underground following. It&rsquo;s a real-time modular synthesis, composition, and performance tool, which you might suppose would put it in the same category as the likes of Reaktor and Max/MSP. Unlike those tools, though, its modules are laser-focused on certain sonic capabilities. There are ready-made objects for live performance control, and unique, handy tools for setting up envelopes and sequences. It&rsquo;s got fantastic pre-built effects like a delay line granulator and live looper. And because AudioMulch is also a VST host, it could be your one and only environment. </p>
<p>AudioMulch is the software equivalent of that deceptively cute little rally car that blows more impressive-looking cars off the road.</p>
<p>Version 2.0 is due early next year with new features and Mac compatibility. </p>
<p>GearWire did a fantastic <a href="http://www.gearwire.com/audiomulch.html" target="_blank">video tutorial series on AudioMulch</a> last year.</p>
<p><strong>PCs</strong> are computers that look ugly and don&rsquo;t have slick ads with popular songs playing in the background. People believe they&rsquo;re not used for music, but they are, often by musicians who actually play stuff life (yes, even with a mouse as a controller) rather than playing backing tracks from inside space-alien props.</p>
<p><strong>Plastic wrap</strong>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic_wrap" target="_blank">according to Wikipedia</a>,&ldquo;is a thin plastic film typically used for sealing food items in containers to keep them fresh.&rdquo; Going by the popular brand name Saran, the 1953 invention was not originally designed to protect computers from beer. But if you play music that people like to dance to and you typically see beer bottles around (note the unprotected shot below), it may be an important music technology accessory. <strong>Update: </strong>According to an interview, the Saran Wrap is there to protect Gregg&rsquo;s laptop from .. Gregg? So, either he&rsquo;s lying about the sweaty hands to sound extra awesome, or he really does have some sweat issues. I can&rsquo;t say I&rsquo;ve ever worried about my hands the way I&rsquo;ve worried about beer. (And I tend not to have those screaming, drunken fans, even.) Hot venues? Hot laptop, powered up to full crunching audio signal? Gregg, if you&rsquo;re out there, inquiring minds&hellip;</p>
<p>Two more photos of AudioMulch after the jump&hellip;</p>
<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/101/277622303_445dd40b97.jpg?v=0" /> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">People who are not, as we are, fans of computer music might wonder why this chap in the tie has picked this particular spot to look for wi-fi access. Photo (CC) Tom Purves [<a href="http://thomaspurves.com/" target="_blank">website</a>].</div>
<p> <span id="more-4630"></span>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2008/12/girltalk2.jpg" /> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">Photo: Jordan Harris. Used on CDM by permission.</div>
<p><strong>Updated: </strong>more details from Jordan:</p>
<blockquote><p>He did have one more spare latop on the table next to him, although it stayed closed the entire show.&#160; No idea if it was the Toshiba in the other pics.&#160; Also, the laptop in pics is a toughbook I believe.&#160; The show was at the abercrombie holiday party at the lifestyles community pavilion here in columbus.&#160; This is a pretty large venue with an indoor capacity of 2200.&#160; The guy tore the place up with just a laptop and sheer force of character.&#160; I believe there are a few videos and some pictures posted here: <a href="http://thegrip.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/girl-talk-abercrombie-fitch-2008-holiday-party-at-promowest-pavilion-in-columbus-ohio/#more-3776">http://thegrip.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/girl-talk-abercrombie-fitch-2008-holiday-party-at-promowest-pavilion-in-columbus-ohio/#more-3776</a></p>
<p>There are some good shots there showing just the size of the crowd who came out to see this guy use his laptop on a cheap folding plastic table.&#160; This was a private invite only party, but his show at the Newport Music Hall in January is already sold out.&#160; </p>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/130/356252103_2a1905b74e.jpg?v=0" /> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">Live in San Francisco. Photo (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en" target="_blank">CC</a>) Matthew Hickey. Now, did this Toshiba laptop (as opposed to what I think is a Dell in the shots above) die an untimely, beer-induced death, prompting the adoption of Saran Wrap technology? Something to consider. <strong>Update: </strong>Apparently, sweaty hands were the culprit. Perhaps this is from a cool-handed evening.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/12/19/gig-rigs-girl-talk-pc-plastic-wrap-and-audiomulch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
