<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Create Digital Music &#187; namm-09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/namm-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Vocoder Mega-Round-up: From its History to FL Studio Tutorial, Depeche Mode</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/02/03/vocoder-mega-round-up-from-its-history-to-fl-studio-tutorial-depeche-mode/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/02/03/vocoder-mega-round-up-from-its-history-to-fl-studio-tutorial-depeche-mode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ableton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ableton-Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electro-harmonix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fl-studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruity-Loops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microkorg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microkorg-xl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[namm-09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video-tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vocoders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=4905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doepfer Vocoder module, as photographed by our friend stretta (Matthew Davidson).

Sure, the vocoder may now be something of an electronic music clichÃ© now, but it got its beginnings as a mechanism of encoding speech. It was one of the first electronic instruments. It helped inspire the conceptual model for all digital communication. And, those lofty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/stretta/183324362/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/77/183324362_881fc145ac.jpg?v=0"></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Doepfer Vocoder module, as photographed by our friend <a href="http://flickr.com/people/stretta/">stretta</a> (Matthew Davidson).</div>
<p><object width="580" height="469"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KOTZk0fD6Qs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KOTZk0fD6Qs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="469"></embed></object></p>
<p>Sure, the vocoder may now be something of an electronic music clichÃ© now, but it got its beginnings as a mechanism of encoding speech. It was one of the first electronic instruments. It helped inspire the conceptual model for all digital communication. And, those lofty goals aside, it can still sound terrific when used creatively. (Hint: you don&#8217;t have to use your voice as a source.) </p>
<p>These are heady times for the vocoder. Hosts are getting better at accomplishing the routings necessary to produce vocoding effects. Software and hardware vocoders are appearing everywhere. And of course, the great moment has been Ableton releasing a Vocoder in its upcoming Live 8, not so much because of Live or that Vocoder, but because company co-founder Robert Henke was immortalized in a remix (video above) talking about how you wouldn&#8217;t need it. I expect one of the first unofficial Live 8 tutorials may use this clip. (Apologies to Robert &#8211; especially as that&#8217;s exactly the sort of thing I might say speaking to students, and I actually agree. You <em>don&#8217;t</em> need a vocoder. For one thing, if you know what you&#8217;re doing, you can patch your own. But I digress.)</p>
<h3>History and Vocoding without Autopilot</h3>
<p>For a different take on the vocoder, let&#8217;s first take a trip back in time. <span id="more-4905"></span></p>
<p><object width="580" height="469"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mSdFu1xdoZk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mSdFu1xdoZk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="469"></embed></object></p>
<p>The device in the video is the 1939 &#8220;Voder&#8221; (Voice Operating Demonstrator). To me, this really demonstrates how much potential is left in the process. The original Voder was played more as an instrument.</p>
<p>Via the always wonderful <a href="http://digitaltools.node3000.com/blog/353-one-of-the-first-vocoder-machines">Digital Tools</a>.</p>
<p>Wendy Carlos, whose use of the vocoder in Clockwork Orange may be as significant to the vocoder as Carlos&#8217; &#8220;Switched on Bach&#8221; was to the Moog, explains how the Voder functioned:</p>
<blockquote><p>Homer Dudley also invented the VODER  (Voice Operating DEmonstratoR), an electronic speaking instrument, which was unveiled (and demonstrated hourly) at the New York World&#8217;s Fair 1939-40. Inside the tall rack of sturdy electronic gear was a pitch controlled reedy oscillator, a white-noise source, and ten bandpass resonant filters. For a Voder to &#8220;speak&#8221; a talented, diligently trained operator &#8220;performed&#8221; at a special console connected to the rack, using touch-sensitive keys and a foot-pedal. These controlled the electronic generating components. The results, while far from perfect (it was damn difficult to operate!), were still entertaining and instructive of the principles involved.</p></blockquote>
<p>That whole article is a must-read, whether you&#8217;re a fan of Kubrick, Carlos, vocoders, or (most likely) all three:<br />
<a href="http://www.wendycarlos.com/vocoders.html">&#8220;Vocoder Questions&#8221;</a> by Kurt B. Reighley, Editor, CMJ New Music Monthly (interviewing Wendy Carlos) [wendycarlos.com]</p>
<p>People who love playable effects of any time ought to gain plenty of inspiration from that video. (And some of the basic ideas need not be limited to vocoders, either. By the way, anyone who doesn&#8217;t like keyboards &#8212; musical or qwerty &#8212; as input devices ought to have a good, long look at the dangly things attached to your palms. There are certain designs that make a lot of sense for biological reasons.)</p>
<h3>2008: Depeche Mode in the Studio</h3>
<p>I&#8217;m about to hear the new album shortly (and hopefully get to talk to the band), but it seems Depeche Mode are enjoying vocoders in the year 2008 &#8212; not bad for 1939 technology. Musical instruments may last that long, but electricity-powered inventions are often more short-lived. And it&#8217;s also comforting to know that playing with vocoders makes Depeche Mode get as goofy as the rest of us.</p>
<p><object width="580" height="356"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uIE7HKE8WsM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uIE7HKE8WsM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="356"></embed></object></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://depechemode.com/news.html">Depeche Mode News</a>.</p>
<p>The release of the new album isn&#8217;t due until April 2009, but I should get to hear it this week (via legal means, don&#8217;t worry).</p>
<h3>Vocoders in Your FL Studio</h3>
<p>&#8220;A vocoder? Big news,&#8221; say the loyal fans of FL Studio (&#8221;fruity loops&#8221;) to these Ableton Live newcomers. FL Studio has a lovely vocoder integrated in the host. Musician and Webizen Mark Mosher is happy to get you up and running in this tutorial:</p>
<p><object width="580" height="469"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7eDGVxwJWE0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7eDGVxwJWE0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="469"></embed></object></p>
<p>Using Sytrus as the synth carrier is fantastic, as that&#8217;s a really, really gorgeous synth (and one you Abletonites can use, too). </p>
<p>Found via Mark&#8217;s <a href="http://twitter.com/MarkMosher">Twitter account</a>, because the ongoing popularity of this tutorial means people are still watching and asking questions, even though this has been up for some time.</p>
<p>Of course, there are many, many other software solutions to vocoding, all a bit different &#8212; and it&#8217;s well worth exploring some of your options.</p>
<h3>Vocoders at 2009 NAMM</h3>
<p>Vocoders still make appearances in new product lines, making this arguably the most popular of the pre-synth vintage electronic instruments, beating out the Theremin.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gearwire.com/electroharmonix-voicebox-wnamm09.html">GearWire got an up-close demo</a> of the cute little <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/09/electro-harmonix-voice-box-200-fun-voice-and-instrument-effects-gender-vocoder/">Voice Box from Electro-Harmonic</a> we saw last month. I still love this little box, and if this particular application doesn&#8217;t turn you on, it still seems like there&#8217;s interesting potential for synths and the like.</p>
<div class="flashMediaPlayer">
        <script src="/flashplayer/flowplayer-3.0.2.min.js"></script><br />
        <a<br />
            href="http://www.gearwire.com/media/electroharmonix-voicebox-wnamm09.flv"<br />
            style="display:block;width:460px;height:284px;"<br />
            id="player2"><br />
        </a><br />
        <script>
            $f("player2", "/flashplayer/flowplayer.commercial-3.0.2.swf", {
                key: '$c1e7c15ee9a9fd54b4f'
            });
        </script>
    </div>
<p>Also a big crowd-pleaser at NAMM is the Roland VP-770. Now, when Roland debuted their first &#8220;vocal ensemble synth,&#8221; it got a pretty resounding &#8220;meh&#8221; from everyone who saw it &#8212; pricey, limited, and even the Roland rep at the time had a tough time wrapping her head around it. But the new VP has a new engine, phantom power input, and a USB key, and in the hands of the right person doing the demo can be a big hit. It&#8217;s not all really vocoder stuff, but it does all fit into the voice-controller or &#8220;vocoderesque&#8221; category.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d need to be pretty committed to these effects to go buy a VP-770 &#8212; I&#8217;m sure Roland is expecting they can leverage their huge prowess in the &#8220;worship&#8221; market. But I bring up this video for another reason: whether you&#8217;re a VP fan or not, you can&#8217;t argue with the power that someone using their voice to control a synth can command. I think we may discover new ways of doing that with unique effects and synths that are only loosely related to the original vocoder. As real-time effects processing on computers gets better (thanks to lower latency and more processing power), I think we could see new, never-before-heard effects.</p>
<p>SonicState got a <a href="http://www.sonicstate.com/news/2009/01/17/wnamm09-rolands-vp770/">decent demo video</a>, though this deserves sound that&#8217;s not on a show floor:</p>
<p><embed src="http://www.sonicstate.com/tv/flvplayer.swf" FlashVars="config=http://www.sonicstate.com/tv/?id=1379" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" width="400" height="330" name="flvplayer" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" allowFullScreen="true" /></p>
<p>And speaking of new products, don&#8217;t forget that Korg&#8217;s revised microKORG, the <a href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/01/19/namm-update-the-korg-microkorg-xl/">XL has a new 16-band vocoder</a> (Synthtopia write-up). Synthtopia notes that it&#8217;s a bit steep at US$750 &#8212; though, in fairness, that&#8217;s partly because of how cheap the original microKORG is. But for live performance, even as a huge computer advocate, I have to concede that you may prefer a hardware keyboard for vocoder effects, convenience, and reliability, and this is still cheaper than a lot of less-fun &#8220;workstations.&#8221; The only problem: you can get the similar Korg R3 with a full-sized keyboard and additional controls and features in the same price ballpark, or the simple-but-fun original microKORG for half the price. <strong>Updated: scratch that, because the XL has a $500 street</strong>, which is pretty damned good even in this economy. (Especially in this economy, I&#8217;d wager. That&#8217;s getting close to USB controller cheap.)</p>
<p>Synthtopia took this gorgeous shot that I have to reproduce here:</p>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/02/korg-microkorg-xl.jpg"></p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/bdu/148574382/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/51/148574382_19f5cf896d.jpg?v=0"></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Korg has a strong pedigree in keyboards with built-in vocoders. Image: <a href="http://flickr.com/people/bdu/">Brandon Daniel</a>.</div>
<h3>And you&#8230;</h3>
<p>What&#8217;s your favorite vocoder or vocoder technique? Got a demonstration that can prove my earlier point that vocoders don&#8217;t all have to sound the same? Send it our way&#8230;</p>
<h3>Previously</h3>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/20/albeton-lives-non-existent-secret-vocoder-no-one-needs-a-vocoder/">Ableton Live&rsquo;s &#8220;Secret&#8221; Vocoder; No One Needs a Vocoder</a></p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/09/25/ni-gets-komplete-upgrade-but-spektral-delay-vokator-no-more/">NI Gets KOMPLETE Upgrade, But Spektral Delay, Vokator No More</a></p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/09/12/tips-vocoders-ableton-live-vocoder-resources-free-universal-vocoder-plug-in/">Tips: Vocoders + Ableton Live; Vocoder Resources, Free Universal Vocoder Plug-in</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/02/03/vocoder-mega-round-up-from-its-history-to-fl-studio-tutorial-depeche-mode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automap 3 Pro: New Heads-Up Display, More Flexibility for Dynamic Controllers</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/19/automap-3-pro-new-heads-up-display-more-flexibility-for-dynamic-controllers/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/19/automap-3-pro-new-heads-up-display-more-flexibility-for-dynamic-controllers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ableton-Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control-surfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controllers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[namm-09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReMote-SL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/19/automap-3-pro-new-heads-up-display-more-flexibility-for-dynamic-controllers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Dynamic control is fantastic. The idea is this: when you switch to a new app or instrument or effect, the hardware controller automatically assigns parameters to controls. That means no messing around with templates, assignment editors, and configuration, and the ability to quickly gain control of your software when editing or performing. Novation&#8217;s MIDI-controlling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/automap.jpg" /> </p>
<p>Dynamic control is fantastic. The idea is this: when you switch to a new app or instrument or effect, the hardware controller automatically assigns parameters to controls. That means no messing around with templates, assignment editors, and configuration, and the ability to quickly gain control of your software when editing or performing. Novation&rsquo;s MIDI-controlling keyboards and control surfaces are likely the best example of this with their &ldquo;Automap&rdquo; feature, as found on the ReMOTE line and the cute, DJ-friendly Nocturn.</p>
<p>But doing dynamic assignment also creates some challenges. You have to sort out which parameters get controlled. And most importantly, you need to be able to see what you&rsquo;re actually controlling.</p>
<p>Automap was, frankly, pretty rocky when it first shipped &ndash; when I originally reviewed the ReMOTE SL, a lot of stuff didn&rsquo;t work at all in some of the hosts. (I remember struggling with Logic, specifically.) But Novation has done a fantastic job of working with all the software you use, from Live and Reason to Logic and Pro Tools, and each release has gotten steadily better. Automap &ldquo;Universal&rdquo; 2.0 works exceptionally well with hosts, and plug-in support was starting to come together. </p>
<p>Now, Automap 3 Pro seeks to address those two remaining areas: assign parameters more easily, and see what you&rsquo;re doing. And for the first time, you&rsquo;ll be able to use multiple Novations side by side, which means I&rsquo;m ready to pick up a Nocturn for myself. There&rsquo;s just one catch, which may win the &ldquo;Accountants Do the Darndest Things&rdquo; award of this NAMM show. (Spoiler alert: would you give away or charge for the feature that encourages people to buy more of your gear?)</p>
<p> <span id="more-4796"></span><br />
<h3>Heads-Up Display</h3>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/automap_screen.jpg" /> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">Having a display on your hardware: good. Having a display on your hardware <em>and</em> being able to use your computer screen, too &ndash; without squinting: better.</div>
<p>The biggest news to me is the new heads-up display, which Novation calls &ldquo;Autoview.&rdquo;</p>
<p>If you are dynamically assigning controls, you need some feedback to know what the heck you&rsquo;re actually controlling. That&rsquo;s why I&rsquo;m going to gripe endlessly about the lack of a screen on the new Akai APC40 for Ableton Live. Novation has always had lovely little screens built into their hardware. The problem is, an LED is a pretty small screen for people used to looking at 23&rdquo; desktop displays all day. (I&rsquo;m only 31 and I&rsquo;m squinting at it already.) </p>
<p>Oddly enough, if you play with a laptop, you have a huge, gorgeous screen sitting right next to you. You can hunch over it and try to tell what&rsquo;s happening, but that&rsquo;s obviously no go.</p>
<p>So Novation has what I think is the ideal solution: a big heads-up display that activates when you grab a controller. (&ldquo;Ah,&rdquo; you say, &ldquo;that <em>is</em> my grain length control,&rdquo; and go on confidently with your set.)</p>
<p>We saw this basic feature demoed with the Nocturn controller at last year&rsquo;s NAMM, but now it&rsquo;s standard on Automap 3 across the whole Novation line. Having <em>both</em> the screen on my device <em>and</em> on my computer screen seems fantastic to me.</p>
<h3>Assign Controllers Flexibly</h3>
<p>The other main shortcoming of Automap in the past is how to deal with plug-ins with lots of parameters. In Ableton Live, at least, you can throw instruments and effects into Live&rsquo;s Device Racks, which conveniently have eight macro knobs. That way, the eight encoders on your Novation gear map nicely. But invariably, even in Live I&rsquo;ll find some plug-in I didn&rsquo;t put into a rack, and this doesn&rsquo;t work in all other hosts.</p>
<p>With Automap 3, you can drag and drop parameters onto controls. If you don&rsquo;t like the arrangement, drag and drop again to swap parameters from one controller to another. (&ldquo;Yep, grain length really belongs on the <em>bottom right</em>,&rdquo; says you, and it is so.) That complements the &ldquo;learn mode&rdquo; added in Automap 2: click the on-screen parameter and then touch the hardware controller. (That&rsquo;s very similar to the way Kore&rsquo;s feature works, by the way.)</p>
<p>Finally, Automap supports assigning the X/Y pad control dynamically. That&rsquo;s huge for SL owners &ndash; and makes me almost wish I hadn&rsquo;t switch to the SL Compact.</p>
<h3>Multiple Devices, New Start-Up Screen</h3>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/automap_combi.jpg" /> </p>
<p>The other big feature is long-awaited support for multiple devices and integrated Mackie HUI support, and there&rsquo;s a new screen to organize all the new stuff.</p>
<p><strong>Multiple controllers: </strong>You can now use more than one Novation controller at once and have Automap working with <em>both of them at the same time</em>. This is really fantastic, especially given that the ReMOTE Zero and Nocturn are both quite compact.</p>
<p><strong>Mackie HUI:</strong> This means you get instant control over any DAW that supports Mackie HUI, without specific drivers.</p>
<p><strong>New screen: </strong>There&rsquo;s also a new startup screen for managing multiple devices and the plug-in assignment features. It also brings up links for updating your software and learning how to use all this functionality, with online guides for your software of choice, tutorials, and help.</p>
<p>Now, get ready for some cognitive dissonance:</p>
<h3>Pro Pricing that Makes No Sense</h3>
<p>I wondered why Automap was suddenly called &ldquo;Automap Pro.&rdquo; The answer seems to be that some jittery accountants (or someone else, in a weak moment) decided to charge $30 for Automap 3 Pro. That might be a logical decision if Automap worked on any hardware other than Novation&rsquo;s, but it doesn&rsquo;t. It&rsquo;s <strong>not much money &ndash; it just doesn&rsquo;t make much sense</strong>.</p>
<p>Here&rsquo;s where it gets really strange. You can get Automap &ldquo;Standard&rdquo; for free. So what did they take out to entice you to buy &ldquo;Pro&rdquo;? <em>Multiple device support</em>.</p>
<p>Yep, that&rsquo;s right. You can use <em>less</em> Novation hardware for free, but if you want to buy <em>more</em> Novation hardware, they&rsquo;ll charge you for the privilege of using it. (I&rsquo;m hoping it at least comes free with new Novation controllers, but haven&rsquo;t seen any announcement suggesting that.)</p>
<p>Also exclusive to the Pro mode:</p>
<ul>
<li>XY pad control </li>
<li>Autoview </li>
<li>Drag and drop </li>
</ul>
<p>So, in other words, Automap Standard doesn&rsquo;t really give you any of the significant new features, except for HUI control and the new startup screen. </p>
<p>I know I&rsquo;m naive and have terrible business sense, but wouldn&rsquo;t it make more sense to encourage people to buy more of your stuff? I think Automap Pro is probably worth thirty bucks. I think Novation&rsquo;s hardware is well worth buying &ndash; maybe even more than one unit. But I can&rsquo;t make this make any sense at all.</p>
<p>Good will from your users is more valuable, Novation &ndash; and in the long run, could have a bigger impact on your bottom line. Make Automap Pro free, and encourage users to snap up more of these terrific controllers instead.</p>
<p>I hope at the very least Novation has the sense to do a free bundle of Automap Pro 3 with new controllers. (How many of you would find a bundled copy of Pro enough to put you over the top on buying a new Nocturn, even if you already have something like the ReMOTE SL? I know it&rsquo;d convince me.)</p>
<h3>Still Want It</h3>
<p>That said, I still want this update &ndash; to me, it finally delivers on all the promise of the whole Automap concept.</p>
<p>And my message to Ableton: I&rsquo;d love to see a heads-up display integrated into Live, too, especially since the Akai APC lacks a screen of its own.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for an Automap 3 hands-on coming soon. As I write this, the downloads still cover only Automap Universal 2, and the <a href="http://www.novationmusic.com/store_locator/online/?product=automap">Buy Now page</a> is blank.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.novationmusic.com/products/software/automap/">Automap Product Page</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/19/automap-3-pro-new-heads-up-display-more-flexibility-for-dynamic-controllers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
