<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Create Digital Music &#187; PCIe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/pcie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com</link>
	<description>Making music with technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Metablog: Universal Audio UAD-2 Updates Sound Platform; Why People Want It</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/metablog-universal-audio-uad-2-updates-sound-platform-why-people-want-it/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/metablog-universal-audio-uad-2-updates-sound-platform-why-people-want-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metablog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moog-music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCIe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plug-ins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal-Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual-analog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=3912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Universal Audio&#8217;s UAD-1, a sound processing platform built on DSP hardware add-ons for your computer, has gotten a much-anticipated sequel this week. The UAD-1 was always a favorite choice for sound production, delivering tasty analog-emulating sound tools on a PCI card platform. The UAD-2, on PCI-express cards, offer up to &#8220;ten times&#8221; the processing power &#8230; <a class="btn read-more" href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/metablog-universal-audio-uad-2-updates-sound-platform-why-people-want-it/">Continue &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2008/09/UAD2quad.jpg"></p>
<p>Universal Audio&#8217;s UAD-1, a sound processing platform built on DSP hardware add-ons for your computer, has gotten a much-anticipated sequel this week. The UAD-1 was always a favorite choice for sound production, delivering tasty analog-emulating sound tools on a PCI card platform. The UAD-2, on PCI-express cards, offer up to &#8220;ten times&#8221; the processing power of the original &#8212; supposedly even the single-processor model delivers a greater-than-twofold performance gain. The DSP hardware is just the platform, though, and Universal&#8217;s main push here is its plug-in developers. Sure, these days your CPU is a plenty-powerful sonic number cruncher, so I think it&#8217;d be a stretch to say anyone <em>needs</em> DSP cards. But what the platform can mean is plug-in goodies not available anywhere else, with a no-nonsense approach to sound that may not be as practical in native plug-ins. (And with support from software like Ableton Live, Apple Logic, and Cakewalk SONAR, you can then drop these into your host of choice.)</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2008/09/fairchild.jpg"></p>
<div class="imgcaption">The UAD-2 will mark the return of many existing plug-ins, like this Fairchild emulation. But you&#8217;ll be able to run more of them. And there&#8217;s new goodness on the way just for the UAD-2.</div>
<p>Here&#8217;s a look from around the Web at what people are saying about the UAD-2.</p>
<p>Oliver Chesler at Wire to the Ear notes what could be a real &#8220;killer app&#8221; / highlight of the UAD-2: a Moog multimode filter.<span id="more-3912"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2008/09/power_blue.jpg"></p>
<blockquote><p>Here&rsquo;s a pretty new plug-in for the new Universal Audio UAD-2! It seems to have all the right stuff too: self-oscillation, drive control, stereo tonal shifting, good modulation options and yay a wet/dry knob.</p></blockquote>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SxpB6mKXDn0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SxpB6mKXDn0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wiretotheear.com/2008/08/30/the-moog-multimode-filter-for-uad-2/">The Moog Multimode Filter for UAD-2</a> [wire to the ear]</p>
<p>Not to argue with the &#8220;classic design&#8221; or the genius of Bob Moog, but I do have to observe that the <a href="http://www.fabfilter.com/products/">Fabfilter Product Line</a> Oliver recommends, native plug-ins rather than Universal Audio, have more innovative interfaces that were actually designed for software. Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8212; I might still have a great time with the Moog emulation &#8212; but this illustrates that CPU-based plug-ins remain competitive, and I&#8217;m not sure that emulating analog <em>interfaces</em> always makes sense on a computer. Then again, if you don&#8217;t have a rack mount Voyager lying around, I can&#8217;t argue with the appeal of a UAD-2 plug-in.</p>
<p>For more on why the <em>sound</em> aspect is so appealing, check out <a href="http://www.uaudio.com/webzine/2008/september/power.html">UA&#8217;s &#8220;realism&#8221; explanation</a> (propaganda, yes, but worth a look).</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2008/09/Neve-88RS.jpg"></p>
<p>TRASH_AUDIO have been eagerly watching this one for some time:</p>
<blockquote><p>UA is promoting the fact that up to Four of the UAD-2 cards can run in one system, but just ONE Quad card will allow you to have 128 Neve 88RS channel strips open, which essentially gives you a 128 channel Neve console right in your DAW. I am upgrading my UAD-1 the second I find a place to buy the UAD-2.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://trashaudio.blogspot.com/2008/08/universal-audio-uad-2-out-now.html">Universal Audio: UAD-2, Out Now!</a> [TRASH_AUDIO]</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/2008/09/spaceecho.jpg"></p>
<p>Key of Grey notes that UA&#8217;s digital hardware (UAD-1/UAD-2) reflects some really fine-quality analog gear:</p>
<blockquote><p>Universal Audio makes some of the best hardware out there. I&rsquo;m especially a fan of their 610 and 6176. The warmth of the analog sound makes a big difference when most of your stuff has that digital edge.</p>
<p>&#8230; The UAD-2 continues this tradition. Depending on how many tracks you want it to handle, you can pay for increasingly powerful add-on cards, even up to supporting 128 tracks of Neve console. Unfortunately, I don&rsquo;t have a desktop to put these in but they present fantastic value for those who can&rsquo;t afford tonnes of analog gear.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.keyofgrey.com/?p=348">Univeral Audio UAD-2 : A much needed upgrade to the UAD-1</a> [Key of Grey]</p>
<h3>But Can You Lift It?</h3>
<p>Incidentally, those wondering about portability, a couple of options:</p>
<p>1. Get an SFF PC. I&#8217;m kind of curious to try putting a UAD into one of the two PCI slots available on my Shuttle, thus creating a &#8220;luggable&#8221; system with these sounds.</p>
<p>2. Get an Xpander/Xtenda. UA does make a product specifically for ExpressCard-equipped laptops like the MacBook Pro, so mobile is definitely an option (as it is with the rival TC|Electronics PowerCore). At the moment, I can only find the desktop/laptop bridge <a href="http://www.uaudio.com/products/accessories/xtenda/index.html">Xtenda product</a> on the UA site. <strong>Updated:</strong> as confirmed in comments, it seems a laptop-compatible UAD-2 project is in the works as a successor to the UAD-1 Xpander product; we&#8217;ll keep you posted.</p>
<h3>UAD-2 and Compatibility</h3>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to find more about whether the UAD-2 introduces any new compatibility issues with either plug-ins or hosts. A number of host developers only recently got all the issues with the UAD-1 ironed out. My uneducated guess would be that these should &#8220;just work&#8221; with the UAD-2, but I honestly don&#8217;t know, so it&#8217;s on the top of my list to go research. Host developers, feel free to chime in, off the record if you must.</p>
<p>So, readers, who&#8217;s getting a UAD-2? Budgets are tight for a lot of us at the moment, but then, the UAD compares favorably with a lot of the pricier Pro Tools plug-ins, for instance. US$500 gets you a ticket to ride, with generous plug-in vouchers as you upgrade so you can build your own bundle. (If you&#8217;re feeling poor, stay tuned for some Recession Special coverage coming your way soon &#8230; but UAD lovers, I&#8217;m sure, will sell their car before they miss a chance for a new UAD.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uaudio.com/">Universal Audio Site</a> with all the specs and whatnot</p>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/metablog-universal-audio-uad-2-updates-sound-platform-why-people-want-it/&via=cdmblogs&text=Metablog: Universal Audio UAD-2 Updates Sound Platform; Why People Want It&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/metablog-universal-audio-uad-2-updates-sound-platform-why-people-want-it/&via=cdmblogs&text=Metablog: Universal Audio UAD-2 Updates Sound Platform; Why People Want It&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/metablog-universal-audio-uad-2-updates-sound-platform-why-people-want-it/&amp;layout=default&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=400&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:400px;'></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/09/metablog-universal-audio-uad-2-updates-sound-platform-why-people-want-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac Pro Watch: Apogee Syphony Drivers with 2ms Latency; 64-Channel Surround Installation</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/08/mac-pro-watch-apogee-syphony-drivers-with-2ms-latency-64-channel-surround-installation/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/08/mac-pro-watch-apogee-syphony-drivers-with-2ms-latency-64-channel-surround-installation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apogee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mactel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCIe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound-art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surround]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/08/08/mac-pro-watch-apogee-syphony-drivers-with-2ms-latency-64-channel-surround-installation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don&#8217;t have to wait for press releases around here; an enthusiastic Apogee employee (not from the sales and marketing end, he says) writes in to brag about Apogee&#8217;s support for the new Apple Mac Pro. Not only are drivers available today for using the Apogee Symphony PCI-Express audio card, but Apogee says the combination &#8230; <a class="btn read-more" href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/08/mac-pro-watch-apogee-syphony-drivers-with-2ms-latency-64-channel-surround-installation/">Continue &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/stories/2006/august2006/symphonycard.jpg"></p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have to wait for press releases around here; an enthusiastic Apogee employee (<I>not</i> from the sales and marketing end, he says) writes in to brag about Apogee&#8217;s support for the new Apple Mac Pro. Not only are drivers available today for using the Apogee Symphony PCI-Express audio card, but Apogee says the combination of Apple and Apogee hardware acheives an unheard-of 2ms latency. From Apogee&#8217;s official statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>ApogeeÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬&trade;s new Universal PCI-Express driver, in combination with the powerful Intel processors in the Mac Pro, lowers the latency of the Symphony PCI-Express card by over 50% into the 2ms range. This achievement is a significant increase in performance beyond other native solutions on the market and compares favorably to the latency on other hardware-based systems.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.apogeedigital.com/products/symphony.php">Symphony PCI Express Product Page</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s impressively low latency for native-processed audio, and it makes native software solutions like Logic Pro, DP, and Live all the more appealing. I don&#8217;t want to get too overexcited based on marketing materials, though; anyone out there who&#8217;s lucky enough to get a Mac Pro and a Symphony card, I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll all be anxious to hear your real-world experiences.</p>
<p>Apogee&#8217;s Ensemble FireWire card also has drivers (in beta, but evidently useful) for all Intel Macs, in case you&#8217;re using that with a new Mac Pro.</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/stories/2006/august2006/news_ircam_02.jpg"></p>
<p>If you imagine these cards are only being used in studios, think again. Via Apogee&#8217;s <a href="http://www.apogeedigital.com/company/news.php#52">news page</a>, the 16:9 Art Installation at IRCAM/NIME 2006 let visitors spatialize sound on 144 speakers, all using a visual, painterly interface. [<a href="">Project page</a>] The resulting sounds, using two Symphony cards for 64 channels of audio, include lots of happy gurgles:</p>
<p><a href="http://netzspannung.org/cat/servlet/CatServlet/$files/331004/16%3A9_audio.mp3">happy gurgles</a></p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/files/stories/2006/august2006/news_ircam_08.jpg"></p>
<p><I>Ed. note: <a href="http://www.apogeedigital.com/">Apogee Digital</a> appear to have crashed their server; I&#8217;ll update once it&#8217;s back up. Guess those Mac Pro users don&#8217;t want to wait for Digidesign and HD? -PK</i></p>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/08/mac-pro-watch-apogee-syphony-drivers-with-2ms-latency-64-channel-surround-installation/&via=cdmblogs&text=Mac Pro Watch: Apogee Syphony Drivers with 2ms Latency; 64-Channel Surround Installation&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/08/mac-pro-watch-apogee-syphony-drivers-with-2ms-latency-64-channel-surround-installation/&via=cdmblogs&text=Mac Pro Watch: Apogee Syphony Drivers with 2ms Latency; 64-Channel Surround Installation&related=:&lang=en&count=horizontal" class="twitter-share-button">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div><div class='wpfblike' style='height: 40px;'><iframe src='http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/08/mac-pro-watch-apogee-syphony-drivers-with-2ms-latency-64-channel-surround-installation/&amp;layout=default&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=400&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' allowTransparency='true' style='border:none; overflow:hidden; width:400px;'></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/08/mac-pro-watch-apogee-syphony-drivers-with-2ms-latency-64-channel-surround-installation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

