My feature story for Keyboard Magazine on recording live laptop performance is now available online at keyboardmag.com (as well as in the July print issue). When I got the assignment, I think my editor imagined futuristic, sci-fi like network recording, in which audio was streamed entirely virtually from players to a recording server and musicians connected to one another over the ether. Instead, we got just the opposite: quick and dirty solutions for capturing improvisatory computer performance, and intentional efforts to make laptop performances sound more like conventional instrumental ensembles. The case studies:

• The Moscow Laptop Cyber Orchestra hosts laptop jam sessions at the conservatory that bears Leon Theremin’s name. Individual speakers, stereo mic — plus groovy visuals in the background.
• Princeton University’s PLOrk plays with hemispherical speakers so that sound radiates from near the laptop the way it would from a real instrument. Their recording configuration is a little more sophisticated, with not only a stereo pair for the audience but three mics above the stage.
• Share in New York has the toughest challenge of all: a club environment in which anyone can show up with any gear and play. They combine the tried-and-true (old-fashioned analog snakes on the floor) with software tools for standardization (a template in the open source Linux and Mac DAW Ardour).

Check out the full story for details:

Electronica Unplugged

One thing we didn’t broach was what to actually play (these ensembles all experiment with everything from alternative controllers to live coding). But the recording question alone turned out to reveal a lot about laptop performance, and how it’s gradually evolving into just music performance.

Also of interest, Craig Anderton talks about the basics of recording your sets live in Ableton Live. The basic idea: record not only the arrangement, but external audio, as well.

This story also turned out to be an interesting demonstration of what can happen when new online sites (like CDM) interface with a traditional outlet (Keyboard, bringing you music making information since 1976). That’s my ultimate hope: that these outlets will make each other better, and each will expand the knowledge of techniques and what (and who) is out there. Less lofty translation: if Keyboard hadn’t asked me to write this up, I might never have gotten around to it, and conversely, if I didn’t have CDM, I would never have hooked up with folks like the Moscow Laptop Cyber Orchestra.

Speaking of which, let us know how you record your sets and even laptop ensembles, and if I missed anything!

Previously:
Laptop Orchestras Proliferate, from Princeton to Moscow

At the 1985 Grammies, Thomas Dolby played alongside Stevie Wonder, Herbie Hancock, and Howard Jones. It was the golden age of synths and keyboard-driven pop. (Yeah, I know, some of us kinda miss those days.) But Thomas Dolby is significant, as well, as one of the pioneers of the computer-driven one-man band. Almost a decade into the age of soft synths, at a time when Logic Pro’s most punishing physical-modeling synths and convolution reverbs run just fine on a $1000 laptop and Ableton Live is becoming commonplace, musicians still struggle with some of the technical details of how to actually make the one-man band work onstage.

Here’s the comforting news: it’s not easy for Thomas Dolby, either. Normally when you write a print interview, invariably there’s a point where you get way off talking about technicalities and they don’t all fit. But because this is online, I’ve decided to reprint most of what Thomas had to say about making the tech work in its original form. These are just the technical details — gear stuff rather than art — but the important thing is that they have to support his performance. Part of why he’s able to bring such great presence to the stage is the gear in back is largely working — and he’s the one in control, rather than backstage techs. Here are all the gritty details:

On Choosing Apple Logic

One technique Dolby uses is to build up loops live in performance, by recording them directly into his sequencer and then triggering them later in the song.

I work in [Apple] Logic, and I actually find I can record layers into a loop and … have a strip that basically aliases them for the appropriate part in the song. If I put it in the main section, the B section … as soon as those bars are filled up, it will alias them everywhere else I need them in the song. So I have the structure pre-determined, but I have a two- or four bar-cycle that I’m feeding stuff into live. It’s in there, it’s in a spawned form in the rest of the song.

I asked, given the emphasis on loop recording and lots of live elements and interactive arrangements, why he chose Logic over a perhaps more obvious choice like Ableton Live.

I probably would have been more successful to have started that in Ableton Live. But it took me actually a couple of months to pick a new sequencer to begin with, because I was a Studio Vision user. [Studio Vision Pro is the audio workstation/sequencer formerly made for the Mac by Opcode, before its demise in the late 1990s. -Ed.] And of course that was no longer an option, and so I looked at Live, and Logic, and various other sequencers when I needed a new axe, and even some relatively unknown ones like Tracktion and so on. I really wanted to like something other than Logic, but it just ended up being the only choice recently.

And I think now that it’s owned by Apple, it’s very hard to bet against the incumbent. You just sort of assume they’ll be a lot closer to the iron as it were, and then they have been working with Apogee on the Ensemble. You know, all audio interfaces are not created equal. There’s quite a lot of difference in what the converters are and how tightly the drivers integrate… So what with all of that, I decided to make Logic my axe, and unlike some other people, I’m quite monogamous with sequencer. I find it hard to switch between Logic and Ableton, although BT is running both onstage and does a lot of his looping and stuff in Ableton. But I mean that sort of loop-based approach — building blocks — never really appealed to me because that’s not how I visualize most of my songs. I see them in a more linear kind of framework, so I can’t really see Live as a recording device. But given that it was built relatively recently from the ground up, it probably would have been better-suited to the real-time stuff that I’m doing.

Live Performance, with Logic and Max/MSP, And Fixing Problems

Logic’s got some things that are very annoying about it, given what I’m doing. One, for example, is that a soft synth in Logic — if it hasn’t been input to for a while — goes to sleep. That means the first time you hit a note, there’s a pause of maybe 20 milliseconds, and then a bit of a glitch and it comes in. And that’s on top of the latency that exists anyway. So it’s very bad for my playing.

I work with a [Cycling '74] Max/MSP programmer named Peter Nyboer. We designed and built a Max app called ZoneOut that basically enables me to map all of my keyboards and input devices to different zones, going into Logic. You could do that in Logic Environment, but there isn’t a graphic interface for just drawing a keyboard and so on. I have a visual representation of all my keyboards and pads [in ZoneOut]. I just draw in the zones that I want and assign the MIDI channel. I can filter velocities; I can turn pitch bend on and off on a per zone basis. And then I save that as a patch, which is opened from the sequence.

Just a few days ago, I got the new version from Pete with a thing called “ping” in it. “Ping” basically sends a false controller message to Logic all the time to keep those soft synths awake. It’s fantastic, actually, it makes a huge amount of difference, but my muscle memory is now set on how to anticipate [the latency], so I still tend to do it. So now I’m coming in early with a lot of the stuff, which is very weird. So I just sort of lunge into it and play a bit early and hope that it’ll go out. I have to re-teach myself to play in time again.

Awaiting an Intel Mac Brain Transplant

And the other thing is the latency itself. It’s just for a lot of my parts it’s no big deal — the string pads or brassy parts, you kind of make a mental adjustment to play them. But on the more funky parts, pianos and things, it’s very distracting. I have a MacBook Pro, which I can run at a buffer rate of 64 instead of 256 which is what I have to run on my G5. But the problem is, not all the stuff I need is available yet on Intel. There are a few plug-ins and things, you know, some little company, two guys in Sweden or something, and they haven’t gotten around to porting it yet. So I’m stuck with a G5.

When I am able to get onto the laptop, it’ll be a big breakthrough. One of the things about this tour is that if I want to change something to night, I’ve got to wait until we set up, we’re sound checking, the bar staff are coming in, the DJ is warming up and everything. And now I’m expected to make edits and hit save, and the next time I open the thing is going to be in performance. Logic does something very annoying, where it borrows memory resources — if you have multiple songs open, and it runs out of memory, it steals something from a song that’s in the background. So if I’m working with one of the songs, and then I save them all, and quit, then I may have actually stolen the drums from the oldest song I had open, and there’s now no drums in there. I’ve saved it and I open it in the middle of a performance and there’s no drums. So this tour has been like a process of two steps forward and two steps back. I’m looking forward to being able to do it on my laptop, when I can just sit on the tour bus or in a hotel room and be working calmly, and when I’m done with it I just take it down and plug it in, and there’s my show.

Working with a Live Visualist

To have a VJ up there of Johnny [DeKam]‘s stature, mixing live feeds with footage of his own, is definitely exciting. Of course, I’ve never seen the full experience myself, you know. [The visuals are projected behind Thomas. -Ed.] But he does a really good job, and he’s very spontaneous. He’s got a lot of different tricks and toys that he tries out on a nightly basis. Other video guys and VJs who’ve come have sort of been in awe of him because he writes his own software that everybody else would like to get there hands on.

More Coverage of Dolby/DeKam Tour Rig

More gory details:
Tech Talk, at Thomas Dolby’s blog (which, thank you very much, is actually written by him, unlike some of the nonsense PR stunts we’ve seen lately!)
Tom Brislin’s Interview/Feature for Keyboard Magazine (interestingly, the setup sounds as though it had been considerably improved by the time I saw it six months later)
Vintage Knob Madness: Thomas Dolby’s Custom-Built MIDI Controller [Create Digital Music]
Thomas Dolby’s Blog, Road Rig, Build Your Rig Cheap

And on the visuals side:
Visualist Johnny DeKam’s Website
Johnny DeKam’s Live Visuals Rig on Thomas Dolby Tour [Create Digital Motion]
Johnny DeKam Profile [M-Audio]

More Dolby

Thomas Dolby, on Music Making Past and Future: The CDM Interview

We’re pleased to announce a new series on CDM, in which we get the chance to talk — and learn from — some of the people who inspire us. CDM Gurus features artists who push the envelope of technology and expression.

Song writer. Synth builder. Amateur meteorologist? Thomas Dolby’s uncanny ability to reinvent technology and predict the direction of the music business makes this equally talented songwriter one to watch, as much in 2007 as 1996 and 1982.

Want a glimpse at how the business of being a creative musician is evolving? Ask Thomas Dolby. He’s the master of Music Industry 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 … you name it. He certainly danced with the pre-Internet industry hitmaking machine. The cheeky, warm-hearted “She Blinded Me With Science” exploded to mega-popularity — and could easily blind the uninitiated to a string of other terrific songs that somehow failed to make it on MTV’s hit parade. In the early days of the dot-com boom, Dolby’s surprise second act was shaping the cellphone as a market for music. His start-up Beatnik introduced technologies for polyphonic MIDI ringtones, and odds are, each time you hear a modern ringtone, you’re either hearing Beatnik tech or technology impacted by it.

Now, the test for Thomas Dolby is what can happen to a gifted songwriter and music technologist when he guides his own destiny, without the mechanisms of the industry behind his back. The new Dolby plan started about a year ago, with a tour co-headlining with dance music idol BT. “I could play these gigs and fill it with die-hard fans and I could sort of sneeze and they would be happy,” Dolby says. “I felt the need to expand.” The new tour and album reintroduce the best of Dolby’s songwriting to a new audience — and yes, audiences cheer for “Science” just as passionately as ever. (The difference: many weren’t born in 1982, and they shout along with the enthusiasm of a generation originally deprived of this kind of music.) But as the crowd is equally rapt from tune to tune, it’s clear something new is happening. “It definitely doesn’t feel like a sort of eighties nostalgia trip,” says Dolby. “If anything, the frame of reference is more late 70s underground electronic, which is where I started out.” And Dolby himself is still a one-man band, but he’s got the tools of the Web behind him: forums, blogs, YouTube, MySpace. Unlike many successful artists, who talk about the empowering effect of these tools for other, less-fortunate artists, Dolby is actually re-making his own career using the new technology.

But enough about 2007. What’s really remarkable is the promo bio from The Golden Age of Wireless In May 1982, it reads like a manifesto for where live performance with computers could go today:

DOLBY’S ONE-MAN STAGESHOW IS A BIZARRE HYBRID OF COMPUTER-GENERATED MUSIC. VIDEO MONTAGE AND SLIDE AND FILM PROJECTIONS, BORDERING ON PERFORMANCE ART THEATER. WILL TOUR MAJOR CITIES AROUND THE WORLD. CONCENTRATING ON ALTERNATIVE VENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES.

When I met up with Thomas Dolby on Christmas Eve of last year, I was struck by how elegantly this vision of technologically-aided performance was coming to fruition. The promise glimpsed in 1982 — the digital one-man band — seemed to just now be having its real moment.

Now comes the interesting part. Next week, Thomas will release a new EP, backed by brass (and, if we’re really lucky, heralding a new renaissance of computers-with-live-brass combos). Thomas Dolby and the Jazz Mafia Horns Live is the latest of a string of releases converting the vibrant stage shows into commercial products, from albums to EPs to DVDs to blog entries and videos. It’s also intended to be the end of an era. Thomas writes on his blog:

I expect these to be the last ‘legacy’ releases before I transition into my new musical era. With them out of the way I’ll be focusing 100% on new material. I’m very excited about several songs I’m working on already, and I’ll be going to England this summer to start recording them. One day they may show up in the form of an all-new studio album. When will that be ready you ask? WHEN IT’S READY!

This is not your father’s Thomas Dolby. We got to chat about the technology of music performance, the technology of music business, and how to make sure all of that disappears and the songs re-emerge.

Hits, Reimagined: Making Live Computer Performance Work

Thomas Dolby isn’t just covering old tunes and capitalizing on 80s nostalgia. The new tour has evolved these songs into a new, modern guise seamlessly — so the performance manages to feel somehow futuristic, without taking away the satisfying qualities of the originals. Most importantly, the new tour harnesses modern computer tech to allow Thomas to perform much of the songs live. Here’s how he pulled it off:

I allowed myself to be flexible with the arrangements and to be influenced by sounds and flavors and technologies and styles that have happened in the interim. I didn’t deliberately go out of my way to rewrite them as 21st Century songs; the songs are pretty much still intact. But the arrangements of them — somewhat dictated by necessity of how much I can do with just two hands and my voice — I try to do as much as possible live versus sequencing everything. And several of the songs I start out with nothing. I’m just in the loop cycle mode, and I’ll just lay down a percussion part, drum, bass, a few keyboard parts, sort of get a groove going.

“Non-musicians saw songs created before their eyes. It’s like seeing someone pull a rabbit out of a hat.”

There are several steps [to adding a new song]. The first is getting an arrangement that I like, which I do as a sequence. And the second step is sort of figuring out ergonomically how to play the maximum [number of parts] of that live. And it’s not always possible … so I have to figure out the right aspects of the song to make live versus parts that I have sequenced. There’s often the temptation to sort of over-produce things or keep adding things. But in a way I think the most effective [arrangements] I do have very few elements, and they’re all very big, and you can see exactly what’s coming from where. Each time I hit a button and play a sound, you know exactly what you’re hearing. That’s more effective than when there’s lots of stuff piled up and there’s this big production going on and there’s just one guy at the keyboard. That just doesn’t make sense.

By layering things and introducing things one at a time, especially given that I’ve got a head-mounted camera and I’m projecting behind me on a big screen what I’m doing, people can see, oh, well, he’s programming that drum part. And they see me do it, and they hear it and it loops through the song. And then [I] go over here to a bass and they see me plug that in. And if there’s four or five elements, each they can identify where it came from. They remember the moment when I first input it, and that’s what they’re hearing, but it’s turned into a song.

That’s very effective for people. The first time I ever did that, I thought it wouldn’t be interesting to regular people. I thought, well, this is like the NAMM [musical instrument trade] show or something … In fact, non-geeks, non-musicians were the ones most impressed by this, because they didn’t really know how this is done, and they saw it created before their eyes — often a song they’ve lived with for 25 years. It’s like seeing someone pull a rabbit out of a hat.

If you push the envelope, then you’re upping your risk factor, no question. So obviously, if something new comes out that is the latest and greatest, and it opens up a new creative possibility, of course I’m going to jump. But that’s giving me a lot of new ways to trip up. And you know, especially out on the road with different voltages, temperatures, moisture, the actual movement of the stuff when it’s loaded and unloaded — there’s just a lot of ways for it go wrong. On top of that, the software bugs … But I wouldn’t trade it for going back to something really dependable and reliable. I suppose the most dependable and reliable thing would be a rock band, backing the song. But that’s just not me.

“I suppose the most dependable and reliable thing would be a rock band, backing the song. But that’s just not me.”

Now Versus Then: A Web of Instant Feedback

The most exciting area to me is self-publishing. If you want to get yourself out there, there’s just a kit that makes it so easy … from start to finish, recording and getting stuff pressed and getting sold online and digital downloads. I think it means musicians are required to be a little more business logistics-oriented, unless you have a trusted management company that can take care of that for you. And I just think that piece of it is great, you know, to then put stuff out and keep it close to home in terms of knowing who your audience is, giving them the benefit of being the first and closest to the source and making sure they’re not all over the place when you’re coming through.

The feedback to the artist — my blog, my forum, knowing on a day-to-day basis, reading the temperature — it’s so much better to me than when I started out. Everything was so very insulated for the artist. It took months to basically get royalty statements and radio playlists. Yet in reality, on a day to day basis, there was stuff going on. You just didn’t know about it until after the fact. In reality, there was a window of ten days when your song was either going to get on the radio or not. And you probably weren’t privy to that at all.

Basically, if the answer is not, it’s back to the drawing board, back to the beginning of a 12- or 18- month cycle of write and record it and tour. And it could be, you know, one day all the ducks are in a row, and you hit pay dirt. And another day with just a good song, but things didn’t fall into place — through no fault of your own — and nobody heard the song. And it was very frustrating to me that it took months for that to really come out in the wash. Sometimes I probably never heard about it. I just like the fact now that I’m my own boss, that I have … only myself to blame if something doesn’t go right.

“The feedback to the artist — my blog, my forum, knowing on a day-to-day basis, reading the temperature — it’s so much better to me than when I started out.”

It’s a huge change. It’s very liberating, really, for an artist. The next song that I write will be specifically for me and my audience, not for anybody else. It used to be that the first guy that’s going to hear it is going to be my manager, and then the A&R guy, and then the marketing department, and the radio programmers, and the program directors at the radio station, and the retail guy is going to have to buy in, and the journalist, and so on, and only then do the public get to hear my song and judge it for themselves. So you’re conscious of that. Every time I sat down at the piano, I’m conscious of this whole obstacle course that I have to get through before the public gets to hear it. And these days it’s just not like that. It’s just so much more instantaneous. That’s a very helpful thing, and it’s going to have a very good effect on my music.

“The next song that I write will be specifically for me and my audience, not for anybody else.”

I Love the 80s … Or Something Deeper?

There’s a sense with the public nowadays of tracing something back to its roots. So, for me, for somebody like BT, from a different generation to say this is a guy you need to listen to because he influenced me starting out, is a real stamp of approval. It’s leading people back to it. But they don’t want some sort of artifice of 80s nostalgia. They want to know that it’s still relevant today.

[In the 1980s], the rainbow of sounds that we had at our disposal, and the sounds that taste dictated that we were using back then, was very different from music of today. There’s been a movement in the last few years to either the very organic, stripped down guy and his guitar, or Norah [Jones] and her piano … or the kind of wall of sound, electric guitar band thing. When you listen to stuff in the 80s, it’s kind of wild. It’s this real smorgasbord of different sounds and styles and groups. It’s rather fascinating to people that it sounds sort of different.

But I do think also that there’s been a tendency to want to know the stories behind [these songs] … I think it’s partly the audience getting a little more sophisticated and getting a little older, that they have a desire to know what’s behind it. There’s definitely a move in that direction. All of this stuff is just completely in my favor. The timing is really great for this. Even if I’d waited five years less, I don’t know if it would’ve been as good.

At the beginning of the 90s, when the term electronica got coined, and there was electronica as a genre, and people like Madonna and U2 incorporating electronica… a few journalists have said to me now, I would’ve thought the middle 90s would have been a better time to do this … I’m not so sure, really. In the middle of the 90s, I could only have done that with a major label, and I was just fed up with them at that point. It didn’t feel like the right place for me.

“It’s clear there are still hits. The hit effect is just this explosion, this ripple effect. But the difference there is that it’s like the voice of the people, and not some executive being a kingmaker.”

It was a relief to be in the Valley, in the dot-com world. Yes, there were still some big institutional companies that you had to work around. But in many ways, the dot-com scene back then was very fast-moving, very open-minded. People were willing to get behind really wacky ideas. It just felt more conducive to the kind of experimentation and innovation that I wanted to do than the music business was.

But that was then. And now I think the music business is just wide open. All the barriers to entry have gone. It’s sort of back to a meritocracy again, which I think is great. And the good news is, there are still hits. All we worried about back then was, if all the barriers were gone, would there be megastars any more? Would there still be hits? But if you look at popular things on YouTube or MySpace, yeah, it’s clear there are still hits. The hit effect is just this explosion, this ripple effect. But the difference there is that it’s like the voice of the people, and not some executive being a kingmaker.

I was actually thinking for my next music video, I should just have the kids make the video and put it on YouTube.

Musical Revelations

I think if there was a single moment of a light bulb going on, it was probably when Eno and Bowie went to Berlin. Bowie, who I’d grown up with — my generation in the UK — along with Mark Bolan, T.Rex, and Roxy Music, and people like that. [Bowie] was a giant stadium rockstar. And he went to Berlin to come and play in the studio with Brian Eno, and pulled the Oberheims and so on. [He] just made an album with less than a dozen electronic masterworks, some of which were ambient … and some were pure pop songs — which got to the top of the charts, with all electronic sounds. That was just incredibly inspiring to me, the seminal moment for me that put me on a course. And then, of course, they had their influences, as well. Kraftwerk came to the fore and had such a purist approach to making pop music with synthesizers, including the drums, and it wasn’t all sequenced. It was pop songs with hooks and drums and so on. And that was very inspiring.

But while all this was going on … I would work on [building] my first synthesizer during the day. Then, at night, I would go to punk clubs and see The Clash and The Pistols and Police and Elvis Costello, and later Joy Division and Siouxsie and the Banshees and XTC and Talking Heads and Television came over, and so this sort of New Wave energy was also very exciting. But I didn’t relate to the sort of guitar and drums sound the way I did to the electronic sound. So that was very much roots for me.

“I would work on my first synthesizer during the day. Then, at night, I would to punk clubs and see The Clash.”

One Blinding Hit

I could very easily have remained a very obscure, marginal artist, on an indie label or something, were it not for the fact that I had hits with other people, stuff that I had written, or session work I had done for Foreigner or Def Leppard or whatever. So the record label people knew that I had the ability to make them some money, basically.

When music videos happened, I had always fancied being a film director. So I said, well, give me a budget and I’ll make my own music video. So they said, okay, you can have a day and ten thousand quid. When they told me that, I wrote She Blinded Me with Science to be my first video. And then I went and did the video and recorded the song. But it was never really what I set out to do. It was kind of a tongue-in-cheek thing, and I was aware that if it ever caught on it might be hugely successful commercially, but it came out initially in the UK and nobody cared less.

I was actually in Brussels working on my second album when Science hit in the States. Every time I opened my letterbox, there’d be a fax saying “Great News! … added to this, this, and this station.” Clearly, something was exploding. Finally, it said, you’ve gotta get on the next plane and come over here and make hay while the sun shines. And that was sort of an interesting experience, but it never felt like, okay, now I’ve arrived, this is where I deserve to be, in the limelight, and the window of Tower Records floor to ceiling and on TV every five minutes — that was never what I set out to do, or never what I expected. I sort of thought well it’s an interesting experience, but it’s not going to last forever.

“I said, give me a budget and I’ll make my own music video. So they said, okay, you have a day and ten thousand quid. And I wrote She Blinded Me With Science.”

Electronica, Blips, and Songs

Dolby’s music now, as when it first came out, stands on the edge of electronic sounds — it’s electronic, but in a traditional pop/rock idiom. At the same time, Dolby’s adept use of electronics in the early 80s would make him a hero to the generation of electronica artists to follow. As he revisits his earlier work and adapts them to the sound world available today, I asked what he makes of the arc of electronic history.

“For me, it was always about the songs. I didn’t want machines to sound like machines.”

I think that electronica has always referred to a kind of music that lets machines be machines, and actually rather applauds the fact that machines have their own personalities. And when I think about Kraftwerk and Gary Newman and stuff that was around when I started out, I think that was the case. And people jumped on the robotic thing, and the alienation.

For me, it was always about the songs. I was a songwriter. I could have been doing it with piano and then adding guitars and drums and things, like another type of singer-songwriter, but instead I had this power of electronic sound at my disposal. But I didn’t want machines to sound like machines, you know? I wanted them to sound organic and human and orchestral and so I, if anything, sounded blippy, it was in my trash. And at the end of the 90s, it was like somebody had been going through my trash, taking all those blips and making entire songs out of them.

I can’t help but sound like a corny, old bastard, without saying it, but I think that a good song, a good hook never loses its value. And I hate to belittle a lot of the instrumental music, ambient music, and so on, stuff with great grooves and all these genres and sub-genres, and everything, but I can’t really see it stand the test of time. And it’s sort of astonishing to me that a little ditty I wrote twenty-five years ago is still getting played, but I mean, it’s because it’s a good song, and it tells a story, and it has a personality, and it has a voice to it.

“There’s no reason why the best music can’t still be ahead of me.”

And the production choices I made were arbitrary; they weren’t based on the sound of the day, or what was happening in the Clubs, or what radio wanted to hear, or whatever. They were just sort of abstract choices. So I think that’s a formula that will carry on working. I think a big difference is that if I do something that takes off, I’m not going to jump up there in the limelight and be prancing around. But I think that other than that there’s no reason why the best music can’t still be ahead of me.

CDM: Needless to say, when we’ll be there for the music ahead. Thanks to Thomas for all this insight; stay tuned for more details of his live performance, and links to more of his work.

More Dolby

Thomas Dolby Extras: Live Performance Technical Details, Logic + Max/MSP

theremin.org.uk

Thanks to Andrew Cordani for the tip! Doodle is “Therry”, from Wilco Botermans. About time the Theremin had a lovable mascot.

It really does work nicely in action, in terms of expressing to the audience what the performer is doing, and making nice eye candy, to boot.

More details on Bjork’s futuristic touring rig:
multitouched bjork [Byron Scullin blog]

And, of course, a big report from Boing Boing celebrity Xeni Jardin, which I’m way behind on linking as it posted 4/28:
Coachella: Björk’s wild sound machines, and report from the turf [Boing Boing]

It’s funny, but despite endless blog coverage of devices like the reacTable, some dating back before the creation of CDM, it sometimes takes a celebrity like Bjork for other people to notice the instrument. Then again, many electronic instruments have been popularized over the years by big names (Moog gear by Keith Emerson and Wendy Carlos, Fairlight CMI by Peter Gabriel, etc., etc., in a list too long to recount). So, perhaps this is something big for tangible interfaces. I noticed blocks were big at ITP last night. I think these devices just have a long way to go in terms of general accessibility and expressiveness, at least for mass music making; most importantly, they have to work on those two points in ways that can be reproduced by lots of people, if not in a commercial product, in a DIY implementation. But it’ll be interesting to watch, as always. And Bjork certainly demonstrates how to rock the instrument.

Cassette-tape DJ battles are just one of TradeMark G.’s retro, regressive, subversive musical creations. He also likes to put on glasses, a white lab coat, and interactive sewing thimble gloves, in order to produce illegal, copyright-crushing musical performances.

Many of the techno-gimmicks seen here on CDM are one-offs and prototypes. The Evolution Control Committee, by contrast, has been producing “illegal art”, often with the aid of technology, for some 20 years. They’ve been “culture jamming”, dropping Napster bombs (remember Napster?), infamously attracting the ire of CBS, and dressing up as giant pairs of trousers and cans of Parmesan cheese ever since. (I’m especially fond of the giant pants costumes.)

For the last few years, they’ve been perfecting the Thimbletron, a glove with sewing thimbles attached to a hacked M-Audio Oxygen8. (I always knew those Oxygen keyboards would be good for something.) The interface gives them newly-expanded powers of sample triggering. Happily, unlike Wired Magazine, they don’t overuse the term “mash-ups” to describe what they’re doing. Try, instead, “plagiarhythm” or “plunderphonics”: “In the world of The ECC’s music, Public Enemy duke it out with Herb Alpert while TV news anchor Dan Rather is the new frontman for AC/DC.”

Thimbletronic Energy Technology Page (video link at the top)

TradeMark will be performing with the Thimbletron at the Maker Faire, as well as running the cassette tape DJ battle we saw earlier:

Call for Cassette Jockeys @ Maker Faire, Cassette Tech Roundup

CDM (meaning me) will be at Maker Faire all week, sending as much coverage and causing as much havoc as possible. I’m hoping Dan Rather shows up.

More glove music controllers:

Controlling Music with DIY Interactive Gloves

Ableton Live: Draggers vs. Set-freaks

… between those who drag-and-drop on the fly in their sets, and those who configure everything in advance in a superset. To that, I’d add a third category, though I don’t necessarily advise it: the Multiple Setters, who switch between set files for each song. (It’s dangerous because of load times, particularly with samplers. I’ve recently become a Set-freak instead. Though I suppose you could argue a Multiple Setter is really a subset of Set-freaks. Okay, now I’ve complicated things again.)

Dragger or freak? Choose your side. (Yes, some of you code live in ChucK — I’m sticking with Live, thanks.)

Previously: CDM Asks: How Do You Set Up Your Ableton Live Sets for Performance / DJing?

Getting good gigs is a challenge for all genres, and it touches even more issues when computers are involved. So, as we’d hoped, Liz’s tips for getting booked has generated a lot of discussion. In addition to comments here on CDM:

The wonderful community at EM411 has some discussion, including a great tip: bring VHS tapes or books to prop your computer atop the booth turntable.

LivePA, a great blog dedicated to these topics, takes issue with the “no dead air” advice. I’ll defend it, though: “dead air” might not mean the same thing if you’re not doing dance music, but it’s still essential to keep some connection with the audience. (And silence, I think, is not the same thing as dead air. I’ve had performances where I created each. Greatly prefer the former to the latter.)

I somehow missed it in the chaos of my RSS reader, but LivePA also has a beginner guide of its own. Whereas Liz focused on the practical, LivePA covers some of the questions to ask yourself about what music you’re making. It’s an ideal complement to Liz’s take:
My personal “Getting Started” for LivePA

There’s far too much for one comment thread or article, so I’ve also set up a new sticky discussion in the Create Digital Noise “Share Your Work” thread:

Getting good music/visual gigs — let’s share advice

Take the poll to let us know how you’re feeling, and let’s start sharing tips on (and challenges with) breaking into the scene, from Canberra to Arkansas City.