<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Create Digital Music &#187; plagiarism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/plagiarism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Round-Up: Samples, Stealing, Fakery, the Law, and Lots of Sample Shenanigans</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/20/round-up-samples-stealing-fakery-the-law-and-lots-of-sample-shenanigans/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/20/round-up-samples-stealing-fakery-the-law-and-lots-of-sample-shenanigans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadmau5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual-property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop-performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live-performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oddities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[round-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sampling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/20/round-up-samples-stealing-fakery-the-law-and-lots-of-sample-shenanigans/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deadmau5, acting mousey. Photo (CC) iamdonte. 
Who&#8217;s sampling what? When is sampling stealing? Who&#8217;s stolen sampled samples, and was the sampling stolen stealing? Is anyone actually playing live? Does anyone know what the law is? Does anyone care?
Yes, it&#8217;s been a lively November so far for massive, complicated legal battles, PR battles, who-said-who-sampled-what battles, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/iamdonte/2936123937/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3227/2936123937_652fe90d52.jpg?v=0" /></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Deadmau5, acting mousey. Photo (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.en">CC</a>) <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/iamdonte/">iamdonte</a>. </div>
<p>Who&rsquo;s sampling what? When is sampling stealing? Who&rsquo;s stolen sampled samples, and was the sampling stolen stealing? Is anyone actually playing live? Does anyone know what the law is? Does anyone care?</p>
<p>Yes, it&rsquo;s been a lively November so far for massive, complicated legal battles, PR battles, who-said-who-sampled-what battles, and general sampling messiness. Here&rsquo;s a quick round-up for those of you who haven&rsquo;t been able to keep up (understandably).</p>
<p>And we&rsquo;re going to play a game. I&rsquo;m going to start talking, and you can see at what point your head starts to spin and you need to go lie down.</p>
<p>Ready?</p>
<p>Here&rsquo;s the executive summary:</p>
<ul>
<li>Justice steal samples and talk about it, because you can&rsquo;t recognize them. </li>
<li>US courts said long ago &ldquo;nowhere to run, nowhere to hide,&rdquo; to the dismay of even the RIAA. </li>
<li>German courts, disagreeing with the US and with other German courts, say it don&rsquo;t mean a thing if you can&rsquo;t hum along. </li>
<li>FL Studio turns &ldquo;Faxing Berlin&rdquo; Deadmau5 demo content into &ldquo;Berlin&rdquo; mostly-the-same demo content and a bunch of people start screaming obscenities at each other and most of us lose interest. </li>
<li>Justice can&rsquo;t keep their USB cables from falling out, may have to pirate samples of themselves. </li>
<li>The Killers (or MTV, more to the point) plagiarize an entire stage. </li>
<li>My head hurts already. </li>
</ul>
<p> <span id="more-4510"></span>
<p><strong><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/caesarsebastian/1536380092/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2364/1536380092_907773cfd1.jpg?v=0" /></a></strong></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Justice. Photo (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en">CC</a>) <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/caesarsebastian/">Caesar Sebastian</a>.</div>
<p><strong>1. Justice admits they steal samples. </strong>French duo Justice admitted to borrowing the likes of 50 Cent without clearance because &ldquo;they are such short samples no one can recognize them.&rdquo; (See <a href="http://www.beatportal.com/feed/item/justice-admit-to-theivery/">Beatportal</a> story.) </p>
<p>Of course, the fact that they&rsquo;re non-recognizable is kind of defeated if you <em>talk about them</em>. In a sane legal world, a completely unrecognizable sample warped until it might as well have come from a field recording of tree frogs wouldn&rsquo;t be litigation bait. But this is the United States. As I covered way back in early 2005 for <em>Keyboard Magazine</em>, the standing <a href="http://www.keyboardmag.com/article/step-away-from/Jan-05/2716">circuit court decision in the US says all sampling is illegal</a>, whether it&rsquo;s recognizable or not. The elimination of what lawyers call a <em>de minimis</em> (plain English: common sense minimum) standard actually got the RIAA and the plaintiffs concerned about over-litigation. (Yes, you read that right: the ruling was so stupid, the plaintiffs appealed a case they themselves had just won.)</p>
<p>Don&rsquo;t like it? Move to Germany. No, really.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1336/808253454_ea51859c79.jpg?v=0" /> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">Why is this man not smiling? Well, because it&rsquo;s a Kraftwerk performance. But now there&rsquo;s another reason &ndash; no legal love for Maestro Schneider and crew. Photo (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.en">CC</a>) <a href="http://flickr.com/people/ddalledo/">Daniele Dalledonne</a>.</div>
<p><strong>2. German court says sampling is fine, unless you can whistle the sample. </strong>Kraftwerk suffered a legal defeat that made it (via Associated Press) all the way to the <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Music/11/20/kraftwerk.copyright.ap/index.html">front page of CNN.com</a>. It seems a court in Hamburg said what US courts did &ndash; no matter how small, sampling is illegal. The highest civil court in Germany says the opposite, but then goes on to be explicit about what constitutes illegal sampling (if un-cleared):</p>
<blockquote><p>The civil court ruling, however, forbids sampling of a song melody and insists that the sample must be part of a completely new musical work bearing no resemblance to the original.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What&rsquo;s interesting about this: the length and nature of the sample of Kraftwerk (two seconds of rhythm from &ldquo;Metal on Metal,&rdquo; as used un-cleared by Sabrina Setlur) is the same as the sample in the US civil case (two seconds of Funkadelic&rsquo;s &ldquo;Get Off Your Ass and Jam&rdquo; as used in N.W.A.&rsquo;s &ldquo;100 Miles and Runnin.&rdquo;) That&rsquo;s neither here nor there, except to say if you sample anything in a recognized track, some court somewhere will probably make your life miserable, especially with no international framework to smooth out the difficulties. (Case in point: the US samples had been cleared by N.W.A. &ndash; the movie studio No Limit simply forgot to clear the samples in the song for sync rights when they used it in a film.)</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/vox_efx/2912195591/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2376/2912195591_5a4339b9b5.jpg?v=0" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">Fruity loops. Photo (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en">CC</a>) <a href="http://flickr.com/people/vox_efx/">Vox Efx</a>.</div>
<p><strong>3. FL Studio user uses demo loops, meets irate Deadmau5. </strong>Thanks to reader <a href="http://www.saturdaynightvillain.com/">Scott Metzger</a> for tipping us off on this one. FL Studio 8 ships, as do many programs, with included loops. It also comes with demo content. An FL 8 user released a track that uses some of that demo content almost wholesale. Now, some people are defending the FL user, because Image-Line says its loops are released royalty free. (They claim they never said that explicitly about demo content, causing confusion.) Image-Line clearly should have been more explicit about this, or this might not have happened. But royalty-free sampling is one thing &ndash; plagiarism is another. The user in this case released a track that basically <em>was</em> Deadmau5&rsquo;s Faxing Berlin. He even copied the name, calling his track &ldquo;Berlin.&rdquo; (Smooth.) It&rsquo;s almost not different enough to count as a remix. I could make some general criticism, except that he&rsquo;s already been roundly flamed in especially colorful terms by the FL forum users.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m still looking for ways of getting a laugh from fellow nerdsters by sneaking some of the roundly-despised Ableton demo track into a set. But, in case your eyes haven&rsquo;t already glazed over, here are more of the gruesome details of this story.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.musicradar.com/news/tech/fl-studio-user-faces-legal-action-for-using-built-in-samples-183577">FL Studio user faces legal action for using built-in samples</a> [MusicRadar, who have more patience for digging through this story than I do]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.futuremusic.co.uk/page/futuremusic/20081120">Don&#8217;t use FL Studio loops</a>! [FutureMusic, inadvertently giving users some good advice]</p>
<p>Lesson: software developers, label your loops. (And in all seriousness, it does sound as though Image-Line has lost some of their credibility on this one.) Users, don&rsquo;t &hellip; do this, okay? Just don&rsquo;t. We can hear you. We can hear those stupid Garage Band loops, too, for crying out loud. Or, alternative names, how about &ldquo;IMing Hamburg&rdquo; or &ldquo;Skyping Munich&rdquo; or &ldquo;Snail Mailing Frankfurt&rdquo;? Maybe change your name to L1v3M0us3 or Deadr4t. I&rsquo;ll stop. We&rsquo;re not even done with this damned round-up yet. There&rsquo;s more. </p>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2008/11/mpdunplugged.jpg" /> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">I&rsquo;m glad no one is watching my sets this closely. Maybe Justice were testing wireless USB? Photo: <a href="http://www.beatportal.com/feed/item/justice-faking-their-live-sets/">Beatportal</a>.</div>
<p><strong>4. Justice, the Milli Vanilli of Our Time? </strong>In case Justice weren&rsquo;t in trouble enough already telling MTV they&rsquo;re sampling illegally, they&rsquo;ve got MPDgate to contend with. <a href="http://www.beatportal.com/feed/item/justice-faking-their-live-sets/">Beatportal</a> showed an image of them grooving away with an MPD24 that was, rather inconveniently <em>unplugged</em>. (Their answer: <a href="http://www.beatportal.com/feed/item/justice-respond-the-usb-cable-fell-out/#When:09:56:00Z">the cable fell out</a>.) Don&rsquo;t worry, though, Justice fans &#8212; <a href="http://www.residentadvisor.net/news.aspx?id=9940">Resident Advisor</a> springs into action with a series of photos that would do Oliver Stone&rsquo;s JFK proud. (There it is &ndash; a loose USB cable on the grassy knoll! The screen gone blank, then on again in the Book Depository! Again! Change the angle!)</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m inclined to give Justice the benefit of the doubt, especially because I care less about this one gig than I do about this outrageous comment by Beatportal&rsquo;s Terry Church:</p>
<blockquote><p>Anyone with a shred of understanding of how the music is made knows that it&rsquo;s near impossible to play electronic music 100% live, unless you have the talent of somebody like The Bays.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course, if it were 100% live, it wouldn&rsquo;t be electronic music. (You could get really literal and claim that you have to be Bobby McFerrin and not even use instruments.) But taking this as I think Terry meant it, uh, Terry, the <em>entire readership of this site has something they&rsquo;d like to discuss with you</em>.</p>
<p>He also didn&rsquo;t say &ldquo;play electronic music 100% live well,&rdquo; which means for each time one of us has screwed up catastrophically onstage by getting overcomplicated with live sets, we&rsquo;ve done our bit to demonstrate that we&rsquo;re not faking it. Unless the USB jack fell out, in which case, no photos!</p>
<p>But yes, I think we can safely say Justice are performing clips they stole from 50 Cent completely live.</p>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2008/11/killercomparison.jpg" /> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">Sing along! &ldquo;One of these things is almost exactly like the others.&rdquo; <a href="http://blog.antivj.com/2008/exyzt-installation-ripped-off-by-the-killers">Comparison by Anti VJ</a>. (Alternatively, &quot;Somebody told me / you did a stage install / that looked like a stage install / that Etienne de Crecy / did at the end of last year&#8230;&quot;)</div>
<p><strong>5. Killers Plagiarize / Sample an Entire Stage. </strong>Okay, forget about two-second samples or even FL Studio demo songs. How about if you showed up in motorcycle helmets and a giant pyramid that looked exactly like Daft Punk? Erm, <em>not</em> in a tongue-in-cheek, parody sort of way.</p>
<p>Etienne de Crecy did a live stage show in France with giant projections mapped to a big cube, as produced by the talented <a href="http://www.exyzt.net/">Exyzt</a> crew in Paris. Then, US band The Killers does &hellip; exactly the same thing?</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.antivj.com/2008/exyzt-installation-ripped-off-by-the-killers">Exyzt installation Ripped off by &ldquo;the Killers&rdquo;</a></p>
<p>In fact, the two were so much alike that over at Create Digital Motion, we just assumed it was another Exyzt install job. (Apparently, that isn&rsquo;t so; even if it were, uh, novelty wears off a bit when you do <em>exactly the same thing with another artist</em>.)</p>
<p>Originality. Try it. It&rsquo;s <em>amazing</em>. </p>
<p>You know what, by contrast have at those two seconds of rhythm that no one can recognize anyway.</p>
<p><em>(In fairness, as Wallace points out, MTV is likely to blame here. The Killers were just playing in the cubes and, most likely, were not directly responsible for the stage design.) </em></p>
<p><strong>How&rsquo;d you score?</strong></p>
<p>How far did you get before you had to lie down, or strum an original tune on a ukulele? (Wait, damnit, that sounds just like &ldquo;All the Things You Are.&rdquo;) Let us know in comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/11/20/round-up-samples-stealing-fakery-the-law-and-lots-of-sample-shenanigans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
