<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Create Digital Music &#187; upgrades</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/upgrades/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Able10 Discounts, Artist Packs, Ableton Live Intro Now US$99</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/11/04/able10-discounts-artist-packs-ableton-live-intro-now-us99/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/11/04/able10-discounts-artist-packs-ableton-live-intro-now-us99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ableton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ableton-Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beginners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entry-level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live-intro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=8241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ableton is 10. Does that make anyone feel old? Live in action; photo: Marco Raaphorst.
As the company turns 10, Ableton has introduced a set of discounts and giveaways, the most notable of which is a new entry-level edition of Live. Live Intro smooths out a lot of the wrinkles between different starter versions of Live, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/raaphorst/2403126058/sizes/m/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2195/2403126058_47264dc50f.jpg"></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption"><em>Ableton</em> is 10. Does that make anyone feel old? Live in action; photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/raaphorst/">Marco Raaphorst</a>.</div>
<p>As the company turns 10, Ableton has introduced a set of discounts and giveaways, the most notable of which is a new entry-level edition of Live. Live Intro smooths out a lot of the wrinkles between different starter versions of Live, from LE to hardware bundles. At $99, &#8220;Intro&#8221; finally gets a logical feature set:</p>
<ul>
<li>Full ReWire support, both as host and client (or &#8220;Slave&#8221; and &#8220;Master,&#8221; if you want to be all kinky about it)</li>
<li>Full MIDI support, including remote control, output, MIDI clock (though none of the nifty &#8220;external device&#8221; support for outboard gear)</li>
<li>Warping and time stretching, minus the &#8220;Complex&#8221; and &#8220;Complex Pro&#8221; modes</li>
<li>4 VST/AU instruments, 4 VST/AU effects per project</li>
<li>Missing Vocoder, Looper, Multiband Dynamics, Overdrive, Frequency Shifter &#8211; but you do get SImpler and Impulse</li>
<li>2 in, 2 out audio, though you can have up to 64 tracks and unlimited MIDI tracks</li>
<li>No track grouping</li>
<li>Full WAV, AIFF, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC support</li>
<li>New extras: 7 GB of audio content in the boxed version, 1 GB in the download version</li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-8241"></span></p>
<p>In other words, you get a more-than-capable version of Live for a hundred bucks. It&#8217;s certainly enough for anyone who just wants to inject some Live functionality into their ReWire host of choice, and allows people interested in experimenting with Live a non-crippled version they can use. Mercifully, Ableton is offering a free upgrade to Intro from Live LE users &#8212; a good thing, because Intro includes some features and content LE lacks. (Okay, it&#8217;s still probably not great news if you spent $200 on LE, but at least you don&#8217;t miss out on the features.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ableton.com/live-intro">Live Intro product page</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ableton.com/pages/live_8/comparison_chart/live_intro">Live Intro comparison</a></p>
<p><strong>Sound Packs, Discounts</strong></p>
<p>Already a Live owner? Through January 10, Ableton has a number of deals for existing Live users:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ableton.com/able10">http://www.ableton.com/able10</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ableton.com/able10-discounts">Discounts on Live upgrades, up to 20%</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ableton.com/able10-artist-packs">Free artist packs</a> &#8212; from some wonderful artists, too, including Apparat, Mum, Thavias Beck, and our friends at Covert Operators, among others.</p>
<p>The artist packs are especially nice. And Novation is shipping the Launchpad. Of course, the big news today is really Max for Live, so I&#8217;d better &#8230; keep typing. (Damn you, fingers!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/11/04/able10-discounts-artist-packs-ableton-live-intro-now-us99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maschine 1.1 Beta: Software Drum Machine Gets Proper MIDI, Slicing</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/17/maschine-1-1-beta-software-drum-machine-gets-proper-midi-slicing/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/17/maschine-1-1-beta-software-drum-machine-gets-proper-midi-slicing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drum-machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maschine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native-Instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slicing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=7547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo (CC) our friends over at Synthtopia.
I was one of the first people outside Native Instruments to lay eyes on Maschine, and immediately I saw something with real potential. Here was a software drum machine that was different: it was a real attempt to fuse some of the advantages of a software interface with some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/synthesizers/3201491458/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3508/3201491458_aeaf9a5b55.jpg"></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Photo (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.en">CC</a>) our <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/synthesizers/">friends</a> over at <a href="http://www.synthtopia.com/">Synthtopia</a>.</div>
<p>I was one of the first people outside Native Instruments to lay eyes on Maschine, and immediately I saw something with real potential. Here was a software drum machine that was different: it was a real attempt to fuse some of the advantages of a software interface with some of the working methods of hardware. Software and hardware had really grown up together, instead of the latter simply being fitted to the former. And, of course, it had NI-style effects and UI look-and-feel, for fans of the software house&#8217;s style.</p>
<p>But 1.0 releases are a funny thing. As someone who spends a bit of my life developing tools, you always wind up with a choice of delaying the release, implementing something partway, or choosing not to implement it so it can be done properly later. And Maschine 1.0 lacked for me the one thing that was really essential to workflow &#8211; proper MIDI input and output support. Without that, I felt it was difficult to even give it a fair test. You&#8217;d wind up getting hung up on what was missing.</p>
<p>Well, good news: Maschine 1.1 gets all the little features I feel are essential to making it a viable and valuable part of the production workflow. It&#8217;s in public beta now, and I&#8217;m giving it a proper test. But here are the current changes in the present build, which includes all of the major items on my must-have list:<span id="more-7547"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>MIDI Out Mode for sounds<br />
MIDI In for sounds and groups<br />
Drag-and-Drop audio export for scenes and patterns in host<br />
Record and trigger scenes switches via MIDI notes in host<br />
Scene retrigger option in plugin mode<br />
Loading groups without patterns<br />
Additional slicing sizes (1/8th etc.)<br />
REX file import<br />
Scene naming<br />
Adjustable metronome volume<br />
Record Count-In option<br />
Quick adjustment of group and sound volumes on controller</p></blockquote>
<p>MIDI capabilities mean, for instance, you can throw Maschine into your host of choice (including the popular Ableton Live) and make really use of it. And you can drag and drop audio with the host, as well. The ability to have more slicing sizes is absolutely fundamental, as well.</p>
<p>Stay tuned, as this is just a first look at what&#8217;s in the beta. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.native-instruments.com/index.php?id=publicbeta">http://www.native-instruments.com/index.php?id=publicbeta</a> [Public beta signup]</p>
<p>The usual disclaimers apply: you need Maschine 1.0.3, backup projects made with 1.0.3 before opening in the beta, once you save a project with the beta, it can&#8217;t be opened in earlier releases (though it sounds like it can be opened in the final 1.1.0), and don&#8217;t expect technical support &#8211; expect to fill out bug reports! That&#8217;s what makes it a beta!</p>
<p>Also on the NI front, there are some excellent new Ableton Live templates for the KORE controller &#8211; yes, KORE, not Maschine &#8211; recently added to the KORE build, so I hope to cover that, as well. What I want is a Native Instruments Timepak(R). Add it to your existing KOMPLETE(R) or KORE(TM) setup, and instantly have more time for sound programming and less need for sleep &#8211; aka SCHLAFEN(TM) and &#8211; what I often get &#8211; SCHLAFEN LE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/17/maschine-1-1-beta-software-drum-machine-gets-proper-midi-slicing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DAW Day &#8211; SONAR 8.5 Production Tastiness, and the Smooth 64-bit Transition</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arpeggiator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio-editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cakewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drum-machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger-linn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SONAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonar-8.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[step-sequencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
SONAR&#8217;s AudioSnap now has cleaner markers, and an understandable interface &#8211; and does quite a few things Logic 9&#8217;s new Flex Time does not.
SONAR 8.5, I’m sure at some point, was to be SONAR 9. There’s an enormous amount of functionality in this release. But I think the surprise is some of the stuff [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/sonar85_as.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="sonar85_as" border="0" alt="sonar85_as" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/sonar85_as_thumb.jpg" width="580" height="450" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">SONAR&#8217;s AudioSnap now has cleaner markers, and an understandable interface &#8211; and does quite a few things Logic 9&#8217;s new Flex Time does not.</div>
<p>SONAR 8.5, I’m sure at some point, was to be SONAR 9. There’s an enormous amount of functionality in this release. But I think the surprise is some of the stuff that <em>won’t</em> necessarily appeal to the widest audio production audience. Here’s a DAW that’s adding unusual new features for arranging tracks, putting an integrated arpeggiator on every track, beefing up its step sequencer (really), and dumping a bunch of class LinnDrum samples into the package. Those are the kind of treats we like in these parts.</p>
<p>SONAR is really a “DAW” in the traditional sense. It does everything. It doesn’t hide features. Given a choice between taking something out and putting something in, it puts the thing in. It has a lot of knobs and buttons. There are positives and negatives to the approach – it’s the reason some readers of this site return to software on game machines that has more in common with early Amiga software. But if you like the feeling of a packed studio, a tool like SONAR can be terrific. As much as I love Ableton Live for sound design and live performance, I find myself returning to something like SONAR for arrangement. </p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/stepsequencer.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="stepsequencer" border="0" alt="stepsequencer" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/stepsequencer_thumb.jpg" width="580" height="348" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">SONAR had recently added a step sequencer, but improvements make this version the one to try.</div>
<p>Even with its competitors packing in features, SONAR 8.5 is a tool that really <em>loves</em> MIDI, just as other software focuses on audio. And it’s one of the best-performing tools around. Because it’s so well-tuned for Windows, that means you can drop it onto a wide variety of PC hardware without spending a lot of cash. Most importantly, it could be the first software on any platform that convinces you to try a 64-bit OS – just at about the time you may be doing a fresh install of Windows 7. </p>
<p>Here’s a first run-down of what’s new in 8.5 that I’m personally most interested in:</p>
<p> <span id="more-7479"></span>
<p><strong><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/stepsequencer_closeup.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="stepsequencer_closeup" border="0" alt="stepsequencer_closeup" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/stepsequencer_closeup_thumb.jpg" width="526" height="404" /></a>&#160;</strong></p>
<div class="imgcaption">It&#8217;s once you start step sequencing controllers and getting deeper into per-step settings &#8211; and randomization &#8211; that things start to get compelling.</div>
<p><strong>MIDI lovers, step sequence and arpeggiate away. </strong>Every single instrument loaded in SONAR now has a step sequencer, and every track an arpeggiator. The new step sequencer has a lovely pane for controllers, deep control over each step, and probability controls. It could be reason enough to give SONAR 8.5 a try on its own. And yes, this does indeed take SONAR into FL Studio territory – but with a more conventional DAW bringing those kind of features together. FL users probably won’t be impressed, but if you longed for FL-style pattern sequencing but wanted to maintain an existing DAW, this could be for you.</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/arpeggiator.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="arpeggiator" border="0" alt="arpeggiator" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/arpeggiator_thumb.jpg" width="371" height="239" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">You might have to squint to see it, but there&#8217;s a powerful arpeggiator on every track. Add that to existing powerful MIDI editing features.</div>
<p><strong>Drum sound goodies. </strong>Session Drummer 3 has long been a nice virtual drum tool, and now improves routing and mixing to come closer to what it feels like miking a new drum. But let’s skip the acoustic kits and get straight to the electronic ones: yes, there’s an 808 and 909, as you’d hope given Cakewalk is now “Cakewalk by Roland” but there’s also a 707, a <em>727</em>, and a <strong>Sequential Circuits Drumtraks and Linn Electronics LinnDrum</strong>. Oddly, you still have to look at a picture of a photorealistic drum kit – I’d like to see a visual representation of that LinnDrum, please. But it’s nice to have these sounds, unless you have a <em>really</em> big budget for eBay. There’s 2.5 GB of content, but I’ll skip to these files if I can.</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/sonar85_as_closeup.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="sonar85_as_closeup" border="0" alt="sonar85_as_closeup" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/sonar85_as_closeup_thumb.jpg" width="580" height="156" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">It&#8217;s this clean dialog that makes working with AudioSnap 2 lovely.</div>
<p><strong>Easier-to-edit audio. </strong>I gave Apple deserved props, I think, for making Flex Time’s implementation in Logic 9 elegant and allowing squishing of audio materials around. But what frustrated me about their tool was that you couldn’t take your warped audio and do other stuff with it. <strong>AudioSnap 2 could blow it out of the water. </strong>SONAR had this going before, but I frankly found some of the selection tools and interface a little off-putting. The UI has now been cleaned up, the Transient Tool makes it easier to grab trasients in your audio, and selection looks better. You can do tempo detection, mapping, and syncing, so that this is useful not only for smooshing around your recorded audio but also mapping it to a tempo. And most interestingly, the transients you find in Audio Snap can be integrated with the new Step Sequencer. There are also audio fidelity improvements for working with vocal, reed, and brass instruments. </p>
<p><strong>A Media Browser brings files together. </strong>MIDI patterns, audio loops, grooves, and such can now be dragged-and-dropped into one place. That’s not a new idea, of course, but having <strong>custom presets</strong> for different locations is a welcome improvement (and why is it so hard to get other browsers to do that)?</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/matrixview.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="matrixview" border="0" alt="matrixview" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/matrixview_thumb.jpg" width="580" height="280" /></a> </p>
<div class="imgcaption">Okay, Matrix View does look a lot like Session View in Ableton Live. Also, unlike Live, it doesn&#8217;t stream from disk, so loading up lots of clips probably isn&#8217;t practical. I&#8217;ll give it a try and see if, in practice, it feels like SONAR or Live, but I&#8217;m still waiting for a really fresh take on this idea.</div>
<p><strong>A new way of improvising arrangements, “Matrix View.” </strong>A cell-based interface for non-linear triggering of audio and MIDI clips <em>sounds</em> like Ableton Live. But think of this more as an alternative way of trying out arrangement ideas. Because it loads from <strong>RAM only</strong> and not from the hard disk, and because SONAR is built more as a studio tool than a live tool, I don’t expect it to be a Live killer. But if you’re happy with the SONAR workflow and want to try out ideas in its environment, it could still be useful. (Cakewalk’s Project5 went a similar route, with similar results.) It’s just about the only copy I’ve seen of Ableton’s Session View, and it really <em>does</em> feel like a copy, so for that reason it’s probably the change I’m least interested in in SONAR. I do think there are other features here that are far more original, though.</p>
<p><strong>You get strips for working with vocals and drums. </strong>For vocals, the VX-64 is a combination tube-emulation mic pre + de-esser + compressor/expander + tube EQ + doubler + delay + output strip, which I already loved after seeing it bundled with the VS-100 hardware. For drums, the PX-64 is a combination pre + transient shaper + compressor + expander + contour EQ + delay + output strip – so, roughly the same thing, with some drum-specific tweaks. Cakewalk has done a lovely job with these strips, and they could be the sort of thing that justifies SONAR’s investment. I can’t imagine <em>not</em> liking the PX-64 having enjoyed the VX-64, both for its audio quality and the ease of drag-and-drop routings.</p>
<p><strong>Why you may finally go 64-bit. </strong>The BitBridge XR plug-in not only lets your 32-bit plug-ins work on the 64-bit operating system, but gives <em>each</em> of them 4 GB of RAM for up to 128 GB of RAM. That’s possible on the Mac side with Apple’s Logic – but only with its sampler, not with third-party plug-ins. And SONAR ships with a lot of 64-bit plug-ins in the box, not to mention that major vendors like Native Instruments are providing support.</p>
<p><strong>Improved performance, Windows 7 ready. </strong>You can now hotswap audio and MIDI interfaces without restarting, and audio and stability are improved. And when you do get the Windows 7 upgrade – which, based on my research so far, you <em>will </em>want to do from either XP or Vista – SONAR has been rigorously tested. I don’t want to just repeat that without supporting evidence, though, so stay tuned for a separate story.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/eduardo_inflames/3852432518/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2633/3852432518_d5f97e8311.jpg" /></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Adding LinnDrum sounds is never a bad thing. Photo (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.en">CC</a>) <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/eduardo_inflames/">Eduardo Carrasco</a>. </div>
<p>I still don’t think SONAR is for everyone – though, of course, I don’t really think <em>anything</em> is for everyone. (That’s the marketing people’s job, to claim that one product solves everyone’s problems.) Sitting in front of SONAR’s interface can still feel like getting into a jumbo jet cockpit. The Matrix View is not – and is apparently not intended to be – a replacement for Ableton Live’s live performance features. Open as SONAR is, I think it has new competition from the extensible architecture of Reaper. And, of course, all of this is meaningless to Mac users – though I hasten to add, while the Mac faces a tough 64-bit transition ahead, Windows users can grab SONAR, clean install 64-bit Windows 7, and possibly <em>barely notice anything at all </em>aside from a whole bunch of gobs of memory.</p>
<p>But I’ll say this: it’s funny how a few subtle changes can change how you think, but the combination of brilliant effects, this ridiculously-powerful step sequencer, and the possibility that AudioSnap really nails audio manipulation has me taking a second look at SONAR. Expect more details later this fall. (I’ll be writing this up for CDM and not <em>Macworld</em> for obvious reasons.)</p>
<p>Upgrades for existing SONAR 8 users are US$79 (Studio) &#8211; US$99 (Producer). If you purchased SONAR after July 1, the upgrade is free. For new users, SONAR is $499 for the Producer edition with the extra effects and instruments, or $299 for Studio without them. (But, really, I think you want the Z3TA+ synth; you’ll just have to trust me on that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-sonar-8-5-production-tastiness-and-the-smooth-64-bit-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DAW Day &#8211; Pro Tools 8.0.1: No Windows 7 or 10.6 Support, End of the Road for Legacy</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8.0.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digidesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m-powered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mactel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-tools-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow-leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows-7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pro Tools got an update at the end of August. A number of readers have pointed out that this is a milestone for what it includes, what it doesn’t include, and what it represents.
What’s in 8.0.1
If you’re an existing Pro Tools 8 owner, you’ll want 8.0.1:

Improved interface performance (“snappiness”!)
Improved selection drawing in audio
Workflow improvements, fixes

Those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pro Tools got an update at the end of August. A number of readers have pointed out that this is a milestone for what it includes, what it doesn’t include, and what it represents.</p>
<p><strong>What’s in 8.0.1</strong></p>
<p>If you’re an existing Pro Tools 8 owner, you’ll want 8.0.1:</p>
<ul>
<li>Improved interface performance (“snappiness”!)</li>
<li>Improved selection drawing in audio</li>
<li>Workflow improvements, fixes</li>
</ul>
<p>Those of you who grabbed the update in the last week or two, I’ll be curious to hear what you’ve found in some of those subtler improvements. Avid, to their credit, does do a lot of work on these point releases, not only in bugfixes but in other improvements, as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=48&amp;langid=100&amp;itemid=39491">Software update for 8.0.1</a> (LE + HD + M-Powered)</p>
<p><strong>End of the Line</strong></p>
<p>Pro Tools 8.0.1 is the end of the road for quite a range of &quot;legacy&quot; hardware. 8.0.1 (in one or several of its LE, HD, and M-Powered flavors) will be the last version to support:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=1&amp;navid=54&amp;itemid=39671">Original Mbox</a></li>
<li><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=1&amp;navid=54&amp;itemid=39672">Expansion|HD Chassis</a></li>
<li><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=1&amp;navid=54&amp;itemid=39673">Macintosh PowerPC Computers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=1&amp;navid=54&amp;itemid=39674">Pro Tools MIX-era Peripherals</a></li>
</ul>
<p> <span id="more-7466"></span>
<p>See last week’s <a href="http://digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=54&amp;itemid=39675&amp;langid=1">End of Software Support</a> announcement. Now, I suppose you can look at this as glass-half-empty or glass-half-full; it means if you have a studio with that gear in it and a PowerPC-based Mac at its center, you have a stable, modern, brisk version of Pro Tools that could last you a while. </p>
<p>PowerPC support is generally waning; Apple also dumped PowerPC for its own Logic. But there’s still a surprising amount of life in the processor. MOTU’s Digital Performer 7, released this week (news story on that coming) will actually run on a 1 GHz G4; see their <a href="http://www.motu.com/techsupport/technotes/what-are-the-system-requirements-for-digital-performer-7">System Requirements</a>. I wouldn’t recommend that system, necessarily, but if you’ve got a fast Mac tower with a PowerPC, it could still make a fine studio machine. And DP7 is also <a href="http://www.motu.com/products/software/dp/pro-tools.html">compatible with Pro Tools HD</a>, including Pro Tools 8. Ableton Live, also popular around these parts, also <a href="http://www.ableton.com/pages/faq/general_questions">still runs</a> on a PowerPC. </p>
<p><strong>New OSes? Not Yet.</strong></p>
<p>Absent from the 8.0.1 update is support for either Snow Leopard (Leopard only is supported) on the Mac side or Windows 7. Now, in fairness, Windows 7 isn’t even shipping yet, though in stark contrast to Vista’s RTM version, developers I’ve talked to have found their software runs without modification – and can run better without intervention than under the previous Vista release, which is something that almost never happens.</p>
<p>Ordinarily this wouldn’t be a problem, but it does mean that studios with “legacy” gear could wind up with a version that doesn’t support Mac OS X 10.6 or Windows 7, if 8.0.1 is in fact the last version of that gear. It obviously won’t matter for the PowerPC Macs, since they run neither Windows nor Snow Leopard, but I can imagine some folks with the HD chassis or MIX peripherals who won’t be thrilled. It’s a small handful of people, but – well, before you complain in comments, yep, I’ve figured it out, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/15/daw-day-pro-tools-8-0-1-no-windows-7-or-10-6-support-end-of-the-road-for-legacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FL Studio 9 Arrives: Better Performance, More Toys, More Editing</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/09/fl-studio-9-arrives-better-performance-more-toys-more-editing/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/09/fl-studio-9-arrives-better-performance-more-toys-more-editing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fl-studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruity-Loops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plug-ins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vocoder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workstations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=7403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click through for FL&#8217;s infamous Giant Screenshot of FL 9. See, it&#8217;ll look perfect on your 40&#8243; flat screen. Update: Despite discussion in comments, Image-Line assures us this is an image of FL9. We&#8217;ll have more shots once we try out the software, of course!
&#8220;Fruity Loops&#8221; has long proven that not all music making apps [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/fl9giant.jpg"><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/09/fl9_thumb.jpg" alt="fl9_thumb" title="fl9_thumb" width="580" height="430" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7409" /></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Click through for FL&#8217;s infamous Giant Screenshot of FL 9. See, it&#8217;ll look perfect on your 40&#8243; flat screen. <strong>Update:</strong> Despite discussion in comments, Image-Line assures us this <em>is</em> an image of FL9. We&#8217;ll have more shots once we try out the software, of course!</div>
<p>&#8220;Fruity Loops&#8221; has long proven that not all music making apps have to look the same way. FL is quirky and different. Its editing interface is built as much around step sequencers and pattern sequencing as the conventional, mixer and audio-tape-derived views. But perhaps some of its real draw is that it packs, in its mid-level-and-higher packages, it&#8217;s packed with fascinating and unusual sonic toys. FL 9 looks to continue that tradition.</p>
<p>And because it&#8217;s FL, if you&#8217;ve <em>ever</em> bought FL, you get a free lifetime upgrade to this version. (Seriously, if you&#8217;re pirating FL, stop. You have absolutely no excuse.)</p>
<p>New toys in this version:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Autogun</strong> Derived from the excellent sounds of the Ogun synth, this instrument has &#8220;more than four billion presets.&#8221; (Wait&#8230; what?) I do agree with Image-Line&#8217;s description of &#8220;rich metallic and shimmering timbres&#8221; in Ogun; that&#8217;s exactly what it sounds like.</li>
<li><strong>Vocodex vocoder</strong>, the &#8220;last word in Vocoders.&#8221; (I thought the last word was, <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2008/04/20/albeton-lives-non-existent-secret-vocoder-no-one-needs-a-vocoder/">&#8220;No one needs a vocoder,&#8221;</a> but I could be wrong.) Automatic speech enhancement plus up to 100 &#8220;variable-width, multi-parameter&#8221; bands does give this some interesting twists.</li>
<li><strong>Stereo Shaper</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>I think that improved performance and editing may be bigger news, however:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Multi-core CPU support, multithreaded generator, and multithreaded effects processing</strong>. This is the one that I expect most excites you crazy, synth-and-effects-routing mad scientists who have been pegging your CPU.</li>
<li><strong>Improved effects:</strong> sidechaining in the limiter, mid-side processing in the reverb, export and noise reduction in the awesome Edison and Slicex audio-editing instruments.</li>
<li>Improved Playlists with &#8220;Clip Track&#8221; features</li>
<li>A &#8220;Riff Machine&#8221; for automatically generating sequences in the Piano Roll</li>
<li>Multiple controller support for defining different instrument channels. (Okay, FL experts &#8211; did I miss something? That wasn&#8217;t present before?)</li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-7403"></span></p>
<p>What comes in the box has been expanded, too. In all the editions, you get the new stereo shaper and Autogun. In &#8220;Fruity Edition&#8221; and higher, you get SimSynth Live, DrumSynth Live, the DX-10 FM synth, and cool-sounding WASP and WASP-XT. In Producer Edition, you get the Vocodex vocoder.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Image-Line still continues some confusing a la carte options, and actually eliminates its XXL edition that gave you everything. So, there&#8217;s a new <strong>Gross Beat</strong> that manipulates pitch, position, and volume in real-time, but you only get the demo with FL 9. I can&#8217;t <em>really</em> complain about this because FL has so much in it, but it can all get a little hard to follow sometimes.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you&#8217;re an FL fan, I think you could do some serious damage with the vocoder and new sequence generating features. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always wanted to do a better job of covering FL on this site, so FL users, get in touch!</p>
<p><a href="http://flstudio.image-line.com/documents/what.html">FL Studio product page</a><br />
<a href="http://flstudio.image-line.com/documents/download.html">Download the demo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/09/09/fl-studio-9-arrives-better-performance-more-toys-more-editing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Logic Studio 9 Review for Macworld; What Stands Out</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/31/apple-logic-studio-9-review-for-macworld-what-stands-out/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/31/apple-logic-studio-9-review-for-macworld-what-stands-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex-Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MainStage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=7224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flex Time is likely to be the feature that will have the biggest impact on users, by making audio more malleable.
Logic has been a big box of sound toys for some time, but I think what decides whether you really build a working relationship with software like Logic is whether you like editing in it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/flextime.jpg" alt="flextime" title="flextime" width="580" height="250" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7229" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Flex Time is likely to be the feature that will have the biggest impact on users, by making audio more malleable.</div>
<p>Logic has been a big box of sound toys for some time, but I think what decides whether you really build a working relationship with software like Logic is whether you <em>like editing in it</em>. And that makes Logic Studio 9 worth a new look &#8211; and a must-upgrade for fans of the tool. Its combination of subtle tweaks to the editing interface, the ability to edit inside takes, the incredible Flex Time for squishing around audio like Play-Doh, and easy conversion to sampler tracks makes it really fun to edit audio in Logic. You can read the full, detailed review I wrote for <em>Macworld</em>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/142321/logicstud09.html">Logic Studio: Music workstation suite adds flexible audio, improved editing and live performance, simulated amps and effects</a> [Macworld.com]</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/playbackmainstage.jpg" alt="playbackmainstage" title="playbackmainstage" width="580" height="532" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7230" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">MainStage adds backing track playback, looping, and ReWire hosting to make it more versatile for live performance.</div>
<p><span id="more-7224"></span></p>
<p>The amps and such are fun, but to me the other banner feature in Logic 9 is the vastly improved MainStage, which adds backing tracks, ReWire hosting, and other features that could make it more powerful for live performance. Apparently MainStage has crept into some big-name live shows; I&#8217;m going to work on getting more reports from the field. (Meanwhile, I&#8217;m trying to figure out how I can rework my own live set so it requires <em>less</em> software, but that&#8217;s me.)</p>
<p>Oh, and one little improvement I didn&#8217;t fit in the review: there are some amazing special effect convolution impulses Apple threw in with Space Designer, which should give you more fodder for sound design experimentation.</p>
<p>The record industry may be dying, the planetary economy failing, and music technology elusively complex to most average musicians,  yet competition in the DAW space just continues to heat up. I find it amusing that some claim Apple&#8217;s aggressive pricing is only possible because they sell hardware. I&#8217;d buy that, except for some of Apple&#8217;s own competitors. Digidesign will add a pretty powerful version of Pro Tools to a hardware bundle. Cakewalk&#8217;s SONAR, once a little more bare-bones in the extras department than Logic, now offers a lot of the same sorts of goodies to Windows users in its own (underrated, I think) DAW. And Reaper is a powerful, cross-platform option that costs just US$60, even for most commercial work (now that they&#8217;ve made the individual license more open). In fact, various tools are so good that I think it&#8217;s really hard to give people advice. Personal taste is more likely to dictate which you prefer, because the ineffable <em>feeling</em> of using these tools &#8211; as similar as they may look on paper &#8211; is very different. If I ever work out a good way to describe that in words &#8211; which does happen to be my job, whether I&#8217;m up to it or not &#8211; I&#8217;ll let you know.</p>
<p>Any tool you&#8217;re using is a tool that matters. And I know we have a number of readers using Logic. Later this week, I&#8217;m planning a Logic Q&#038;A to fit some of the technical revelations that didn&#8217;t fit in the review, so feel free to ask more questions or comment however you like on the Macworld review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/31/apple-logic-studio-9-review-for-macworld-what-stands-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Leopard: MOTU Confirms 10.6 Drivers; Working on 64-bit Support?</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-motu-confirms-10-6-drivers-working-on-64-bit-support/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-motu-confirms-10-6-drivers-working-on-64-bit-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital-Performer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOTU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating-systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow-leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=7197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MOTU did not respond to CDM&#8217;s inquiry regarding Mac OS X 10.6 &#8211; but they have just posted the most interesting update I&#8217;ve seen yet. They have drivers ready for their hardware today, and (nearly) full compatibility for their entire product line. They also suggest that 64-bit support is in the works for their applications, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/snow-leopard-box.jpg"><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/snow-leopard-box.jpg" alt="snow-leopard-box" title="snow-leopard-box" width="175" height="174" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7202" align="right" /></a>MOTU did not respond to CDM&#8217;s inquiry regarding Mac OS X 10.6 &#8211; but they have just posted the most interesting update I&#8217;ve seen yet. They have drivers ready for their hardware today, and (nearly) full compatibility for their entire product line. They also suggest that 64-bit support is in the works for their applications, which would make MOTU the first audio <em>software</em> developer I&#8217;ve heard even breathe a word of discussion of 64-bit. I couldn&#8217;t even get a solid commitment to 64-bit from Apple&#8217;s Pro Apps folks (though Apple tends not to talk about things until they&#8217;re done). The appeal would be clear &#8211; MOTU could give their sampling apps access to greater memory.</p>
<p>MOTU has a <a href="http://www.motu.com/newsitems/are-you-ready-to-tame-snow-leopard">comprehensive update page</a>, and I&#8217;ve added the news to the <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/snowleopard"> http://createdigitalmusic.com/snowleopard</a> round-up page.</p>
<p>That said, while MOTU has the greatest level of out-of-the-gate support I&#8217;ve seen from any vendor for 10.6, even they have run into a showstopper issue. Their Ethno Instrument isn&#8217;t yet compatible; an update is expected. Sure, that&#8217;s just one instrument. But the lesson here? If you don&#8217;t mind the occasional wrinkle, you can live on the bleeding edge. But if you want to keep your software up and running, your best bet is to <em>be patient and wait to upgrade</em>. That&#8217;s not to discourage you from testing the latest-and-greatest, it just means you need to have the expectations to match. </p>
<p>The news remains, though: MOTU does have updated drivers for those of you with MOTU hardware or software who want to get a head start on setting up Snow Leopard.</p>
<p>That does not seem to be the case with other hardware vendors (Pro Tools, M-Audio, Tascam, and PreSonus all suggest waiting), and even some of the drivers that will initially become available should be considered &#8220;beta.&#8221; That is, they may even be designed to work with 10.6, but could use additional testing. I think that could probably generally be said of this update for musicians &#8211; just as with any significant operating system update on any platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/28/snow-leopard-motu-confirms-10-6-drivers-working-on-64-bit-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Leopard Watch: Changes, Compatibility, Caution, Native Instruments, Plogue</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/26/snow-leopard-watch-changes-compatibility-caution-native-instruments-plogue/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/26/snow-leopard-watch-changes-compatibility-caution-native-instruments-plogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXS24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garritan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kontakt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native-Instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating-systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plogue-bidule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samplers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow-leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/26/snow-leopard-watch-changes-compatibility-caution-native-instruments-plogue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rawr! A real snow leopard at age eight weeks at the Eichberg Zoo. Now, should you let the (operating system) snow leopard mature a little before you try to play with it? Photo (CC) Tamby Tamboko.
Updated: See http://createdigitalmusic.com/snowleopard for a running report.
Apple’s “Snow Leopard” 10.6 ships Friday, which means it’s time to start compiling information [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tambako/494128348/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/197/494128348_a3e86735d8.jpg" /></a></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Rawr! A real snow leopard at age eight weeks at the Eichberg Zoo. Now, should you let the (operating system) snow leopard mature a little before you try to play with it? Photo (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/deed.en">CC</a>) <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/tambako/">Tamby Tamboko</a>.</div>
<p><strong>Updated: See <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/snowleopard">http://createdigitalmusic.com/snowleopard</a> for a running report.</strong></p>
<p>Apple’s “Snow Leopard” 10.6 ships Friday, which means it’s time to start compiling information about the new OS flavor. Just don’t upgrade too fast, as always.</p>
<p>Want to push an operating system to the breaking point? Ask a musician. Between the demands of real-time performance and the complex ecosystem of mix-and-match hardware, software, and plug-ins, odds are your local audio geek will break an OS faster than anyone else. Not every operating system upgrade is going to have a big impact on music software, but keep in mind that even subtle changes can cause issues that may interfere with your work.</p>
<p>Of course, all of this means music users should treat any OS update with caution. :</p>
<ul>
<li>If you’ve got a critical, primary production machine, your best bet is often simply to<em> wait</em>. Confirm that software works before you upgrade rather than after. </li>
<li>If you’ve got some time to invest in an upgrade or have more than one machine, be sure to do a full backup and system image so you can revert to the previous, known working OS. </li>
<li><strong>Best solution:</strong> Boot off an external hard drive. Don&#8217;t commit to installing internally until you&#8217;re sure everything is working. Once you are, go enjoy. (as noted in comments, and yes, I should have said this initially&#8230; still, the latest 10.5 build is still the preferred OS for now.) </li>
</ul>
<p>So, sit back. Enjoy life. Go for a walk on a beach. Recline in your favorite chair with your MacBook running Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard. Isn’t it great? Need to waste time? <a href="http://www.popcap.com/games/pvz">Plants vs. Zombies</a> is out for Mac.</p>
<p>What? Still want to upgrade?</p>
<p>Fair enough. We’ll be tracking changes to Snow Leopard and which of them may impact audio.</p>
<p>The short version: <strong>Snow Leopard introduces only small changes</strong>, but if a developer hasn’t been on top of those changes, you could see issues. And as for the <strong>64-bit mode that’s attracting most of the attention</strong>, the short answer is, you can’t use it for music yet.</p>
<p>Native Instruments and Plogue have each responded to CDM with information on their software.</p>
</p>
<p> <span id="more-7124"></span>
</p>
<h3>Executive Summary</h3>
<ul>
<li>NI and Plogue have tested their software as functioning on 10.6 </li>
<li>Neither NI nor Plogue recommends you upgrade your OS yet – Plogue uses stronger language to discourage you </li>
<li>64-bit support, expanded in Mac OS 10.6, is not yet relevant to music use because nothing (not even from Apple) supports it yet, but don’t worry – you can get more RAM through other methods </li>
<li>Audio MIDI Setup gets a tune-up, and built-in audio support appears to be improved </li>
</ul>
<h3>Native Instruments</h3>
<p>If you’re a Mac user who uses NI products on <em>any</em> version of the operating system, you should stay tuned to this URL:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.native-instruments.com/en/support/compatibility/mac-os-x-compatibility/">http://www.native-instruments.com/en/support/compatibility/mac-os-x-compatibility/</a></p>
<p>NI tells CDM they’ve just updated it today with Snow Leopard information:</p>
<blockquote><p>Native Instruments has conducted initial compatibility tests with Mac OS X 10.6, which have shown all current NI products to work without any specific issues under standard installations of this operating system.</p>
<p>However, users involved in professional audio production or live performance should be cautious about upgrading to Mac OS X 10.6 until compatibility with third-party audio software and hardware has been widely confirmed by the relevant manufacturers.</p>
<p>Native Instruments is currently conducting further systematic compatibility and performance tests with Snow Leopard, and will provide additional information on this page as it becomes available.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The second paragraph sounds like what I just wrote, huh?</p>
<h3>Plogue</h3>
<p>Plogue, an independent developer of a variety of software ranging from the awesome modular environment <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/03/17/plogue-bidule-modular-music-app-get-started-meet-the-creators/">Bidule</a> to sampling engines for Garritan’s orchestra and piano products and an upcoming library of <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/16/authentic-chiptune-soft-synth-emulation-plogue-chipsounds-scoop-from-namm/">vintage chip sounds</a> have been doing their own work. Privately, I talked with them about some of the work they had to do after Apple rewrote underlying operating system plumbing with Objective-C (from C and Carbon). Here’s their official statement to CDM on Snow Leopard and, in the parallel Windows dimension, Windows 7:</p>
<blockquote><p>10.6 and W7 each caused only <em>minor</em> modifications to our code base, however these mods are necessary for proper functioning of our products on those platforms. Most of our transition efforts as a company will be of a user support nature.</p>
<p><strong>Any musician foolish enough to jump on new OSes without a hint of caution, inevitably makes me wish for a new kind of Darwin Award prize.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>(Emphasis mine. Consider yourself warned.)</p>
<h3>Ableton (Unofficial) and a Plug-in Warning</h3>
<p>From the Ableton forums, via comments:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s currently being tested internally over here, so the current version is not officially compatible yet &#8211; on the other hand this does not mean that it doesn&#8217;t run.</p>
<p>We will release an update after the tests during the next weeks that will be officially compatible, but we don&#8217;t recommend upgrading yet if stability is your main concern.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s likely that a few new third party plugin problems will show up due to the changes under the hood in 10.6 and experiences show that the latest 10.5 versions now are the way to go after the gfx performance problems with earlier 10.5 and 10.4 versions.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, in other words, now is a great time to upgrade to 10.5!</p>
<p>More in the thread here:</p>
<p><a href="http://forum.ableton.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&amp;t=122803&amp;hilit=snow+leopard&amp;sid=deab797d396a35c2c517573cb5326ecf&amp;start=30">Ableton Forums</a></p>
<p>Now, note, mostly what this extensive discussion reveals is that Snow Leopard is poorly understood, partly thanks to a very successful hype campaign on Apple’s part. (Ahem.)</p>
<p>There are <em>not</em> magical performance and speed improvements found by installing Snow Leopard – or, most likely, any OS. (Would that such things were true.) The presence of a set of multithreading tools, for instance, is specific only to developers for whom that set of tools is useful. Audio software already has finely-tuned multithreading implementations specific to real-time applications, and in the case of something like Ableton Live, it really needs to work across platforms.</p>
<p>If you install a new OS with the expectation that it’ll be “faster,” you’ll almost certainly be disappointed. If you install a new OS hoping you’ll “break things,” then you probably won’t be disappointed. I don’t mean to suggest don’t ever upgrade or live in fear of all software, just that you should imagine that, like redoing the plumbing in your basement, long-term advantages will come, but with significant effort and time.</p>
<h3>PreSonus Hardware</h3>
<p>See a separate post: at Snow Leopard launch, PreSonus audio interfaces are likely to be <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/26/presonus-hardware-first-show-stopper-mac-os-10-6-problem/">entirely incompatible</a>.</p>
<h3>About 64-bit (Nothing to see here…)</h3>
<p>NI notes that the 10.6 offers significant changes to 64-bit support, including a new 64-bit kernel mode – this being the rough equivalent of the “x64” 64-bit versions of Windows (and Linux) that have been available for some time.</p>
<p>Here’s the bottom line: 64-bit support on Mac OS isn’t yet relevant to audio users, period. It’s not supported by Apple’s own Logic Studio, or any other major host at this time. This is a situation we’ll be watching, as it is something developers appear to be investigating.</p>
<p>But before we get too far into that issue, you should consider why you’re asking about 64-bit in the first place. 64-bit computing offers two potential advantage. First, running processor computation natively at 64 bits offers a marginal improvement. Second – the issue most people care about for music – 64-bit <em>memory addressing</em> offers access to massive amounts of memory, beyond the approximate 4 GB barrier that applies to 32-bit applications.</p>
<p>More memory is a very good thing. But you probably don’t want to sacrifice compatibility just to get it. Fortunately, you don’t need the 64-bit OS to get beyond that 4 GB barrier. On the Mac, some workarounds have extended the practical life of 32-bit memory addressing for music applications – thus avoiding the need to get a 64-bit native version of every driver and every piece of software you want to use.</p>
<p>On Windows and Linux, you can indeed get a number of audio applications (like SONAR on Windows, for instance) that have excellent 64-bit support, and a number of the drivers have followed suit. Even, then, though, many users choose to stick with 32-bit versions in order to have superior compatibility.</p>
<p>Note that processing “64-bit audio” – that is, digital audio represented using 64-bit data – is a completely different issues. A 32-bit processor and 32-bit operating system and 32-bit software can all do 64-bit audio processing. Whether you really need 64 bits for audio production is a whole other can of worms I won’t open here.</p>
<h3>Getting More Memory – Without Any 64-bit Snow Leopards</h3>
<p>When I spoke to Apple earlier this month, they downplayed the 64-bit issue and pointed out that their own EXS24 sampler in Logic Studio can access additional installed memory just fine with 32-bit – that means if you have Logic 8 or later, Pro or Express, Tiger or Leopard or Snow Leopard, you can use additional RAM. Each EXS24 sampler instance has its own memory space, so you can use as much memory as you want.</p>
<p>Apple even has a support doc on the subject:</p>
<p><a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1041">Logic Pro/Express 8: How the EXS24 sampler addresses RAM in Logic 8</a></p>
<p>Last month, we looked at the situation for Native Instruments’ Kontakt. Again, using some of the flexibility of the memory architecture unique to the Mac, they’ve managed to access bigger amounts of RAM even on 32-bit OS.</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/16/kontakt-battery-enhanced-more-compatible-64-bit-memory/">Kontakt, Battery: Enhanced, More Compatible, 64-bit Memory</a></p>
<p>Kontakt is able to get up to a whopping 32 GB thanks to something called the Kontakt Memory Server. Again, you can get still more than 32 GB using 64-bit Windows, but for most users, that’s overkill.</p>
<p>All of this is to say, 64-bit is <em>not a reason to upgrade to Snow Leopard</em> for audio work – at least, not yet. Some of the built-in applications (like the Finder and Safari) get performance boosts from 64-bit optimization on 10.6, but none of that is critical to audio and music – and it’s certainly not worth upgrading too soon only to find some compatibility wrinkle we haven’t yet found.</p>
<h3>Updates to Audio MIDI Setup</h3>
<p>A reader tips us off to some small changes to Apple’s centralized Core Audio settings panel, Audio MIDI Setup. Audio and MIDI are now separated into separate windows, and Audio gets some nice improvements.</p>
<p>Note the per-app settings and adjustments for sample rate, bit depth, and Format. As in previous recent versions of Mac OS, you can also aggregate multiple physical audio interfaces into one – one of a number of reasons we really love Core Audio as a sound system.</p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/snowdevices.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="snowdevices" border="0" alt="snowdevices" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/snowdevices_thumb.jpg" width="555" height="404" /></a></p>
<p>The reader also notes that the update seems to improve support for his built-in hardware:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s now possible to choose a higher sample rate and resolution for all inputs/outputs on the built-in sound card of my MacBook Pro early &#8216;08, which is pretty cool. Before there was clearly hearable, annoying digital fragments when playing back any sounds, especially on low volume &#8211; all magically gone, i don&#8217;t hear anymore noise.</p>
</blockquote>
<h3>Got More Information?</h3>
<p>Help us continue our “More Than You Wanted to Know,” obsessive series of coverage on CDM and tip us off!</p>
<p>Corrections and clarifications are welcome, too – that’s why I enjoy the maleable nature of the Web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/26/snow-leopard-watch-changes-compatibility-caution-native-instruments-plogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logic Express Packs Most of Logic for Less; Apple Adds PDF Manual to Logic 9</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/21/logic-express-packs-most-of-logic-for-less-apple-adds-pdf-manual-to-logic-9/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/21/logic-express-packs-most-of-logic-for-less-apple-adds-pdf-manual-to-logic-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/21/logic-express-packs-most-of-logic-for-less-apple-adds-pdf-manual-to-logic-9/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
I have to say I think Express is a model of what a more entry-level edition of a product could be. (I know Apple competitors reading this are shaking their heads and pointing out that Apple is in the comfortable position of selling pricey computers with big margins, but I think Apple still provides [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/logicexpressmontage.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="logicexpressmontage" border="0" alt="logicexpressmontage" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/logicexpressmontage_thumb.jpg" width="580" height="308" /></a> </p>
<p>I have to say I think Express is a model of what a more entry-level edition of a product could be. (I know Apple competitors reading this are shaking their heads and pointing out that Apple is in the comfortable position of selling pricey computers with big margins, but I think Apple still provides incentive to buy the Studio version without feeling the need to cripple Express.)</p>
<p>Nearly everything new in Logic Studio 9 is also in Logic Express 9, which Apple began shipping yesterday.</p>
<p>Apple Logic 9’s audio editing have been transformed, via a new means of squishing audio around in time (FlexTime) and new editing tools (Bounce in Place, one-step conversion to sliced sampler instruments, drum replacement, the ability to edit in takes, and reorganized contextual menus for regions). All of those features are in Express, as is the new Amp Designer and Pedalboard.</p>
<p><strong>What Express gives you: </strong>Express is basically all of Logic Pro, with all the major effects and instruments, mixing, notation, and stereo output. You ven get things like the UltraBeat drum machine.</p>
<p><strong>What Express doesn’t give you: </strong>The big ommissions from Logic Express are, naturally, the additional apps in the suite – MainStage for live performance, Soundtrack Pro for editing, and the lot. You also don’t get surround sound (no biggie). Most importantly, you miss out on some of my favorite sound design tools – the insane Sculpture physical modeling instrument and Space Designer convolution reverb and not to be found.</p>
<p>Logic still isn’t for everyone – well, anyway, I don’t really believe in “one size fits all” for music tech, generally. But if you do like Logic’s workflow and aren’t quite ready for the whole Studio suite, Express is a good choice, priced at US$199. That <em>almost</em> makes it the best bargain DAW available on the Mac – except that for non-commercial use, <a href="http://www.reaper.fm/download.php">Reaper</a>, now available on Mac, is cheaper (and for commercial use, roughly ties).</p>
<p><a title="http://www.apple.com/logicexpress/" href="http://www.apple.com/logicexpress/">http://www.apple.com/logicexpress/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/logicpdf.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="logicpdf" border="0" alt="logicpdf" src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/08/logicpdf_thumb.jpg" width="556" height="214" /></a> </p>
<p><strong>In other Logic news</strong>, those of you wondering what happened to the PDF manual for Logic Studio 9, it’s back! Apparently there was a production delay that held up its release; Apple says it was never their intention to eliminate the PDF version. Also, if you do choose to use the default Mac help viewer, that incorporates the full text of the documentation available in previous versions as PDF and print, along with all the expanded documentation for Logic Studio 9. I still find the help viewer annoying, because it insists on staying the topmost window, but both it and the PDF version work. (For window management on the Mac, check out my new best friend <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5159586/twoup-makes-better-use-of-your-screen-real-estate">TwoUp</a>, which could help solve this problem if you’ve got a big display. It finally makes my Mac manages windows as well as, well, Windows.)</p>
<p><a href="http://documentation.apple.com/en/logicpro/usermanual/Logic%20Pro%209%20User%20Manual%20(en).pdf">Direct PDF documentation link from Apple</a> (thanks, dead_red_eyes on comments!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/08/21/logic-express-packs-most-of-logic-for-less-apple-adds-pdf-manual-to-logic-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s New in Apple&#8217;s Logic Studio 9: Flex Time, MainStage Gets More Road-Worthy</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/23/whats-new-in-apples-logic-studio-9-flex-time-mainstage-gets-more-road-worthy/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/23/whats-new-in-apples-logic-studio-9-flex-time-mainstage-gets-more-road-worthy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Highlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio-editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic-studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MainStage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soundtrack-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stompbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=6650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/featured/0709_logic9.jpg">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/07/logicstudiombp.jpg" alt="logicstudiombp" title="logicstudiombp" width="580" height="337" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6655" /></p>
<p>Apple has released Logic Studio 9 today. Banner features: &#8220;Flex Time&#8221; audio warping, new goodies for guitarists (plus integration with a new audio interface and pedalboard from Apogee), expanded support for working with video and outputting compression, and most interestingly, tools for making MainStage a feature you might actually take onstage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m meeting with Apple next week, so if you think of any smart questions, do pass them along. I should receive my testing copy then, too, so expect more details. In the meantime, here&#8217;s how it looks &#8220;on paper,&#8221; in a nutshell.</p>
<h3>Live Performance</h3>
<p>This to me is the interesting one. I loved the <em>idea</em> of MainStage when it came out, but I had a number of complaints in regards to what musicians would actually want to do for live performance. Specifically:</p>
<ul>
<li>MainStage needs a way of playing backing tracks, particularly for bands and acoustic players and soloists.</li>
<li>ReWire is a must, so people using tools like Ableton Live (or Reason, or the awesome tracker Renoise) can work with them in a MainStage rig.</li>
<li>Better control mapping was needed for real performance &#8211; including grouping.</li>
<li>Musicians need a way of recording their gigs.</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, guess what? Apple says they&#8217;ve added all of that to MainStage 2. ReWire support should make this particularly interesting, as solutions like a Logic-Live rig now become practical. And this is the first DAW to really try to do backing tracks in a way bands can use, even including Ableton Live.</p>
<p>Grouped controls allow you to drag and drop layouts of controls as macros. It&#8217;s a nice implementation, and different from what&#8217;s currently out there. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a live loop recorder, tape style. My first impression of this is that this doesn&#8217;t appear to match things like the new looper in Ableton Live 8, which can set an entire project tempo &#8211; it&#8217;s more like a basic stompbox effect, as we&#8217;ve seen previously in Native Instruments&#8217; Guitar Rig. Still, that matches the simplicity of some of the other tools here.</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/07/playback.jpg" alt="playback" title="playback" width="580" height="358" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6656" /></p>
<p>Augh&#8230; and yes, that is Apple&#8217;s now-ubiquitous album art view as the browser mechanism for templates, proving they really don&#8217;t know where to stop. At least it seems they haven&#8217;t used that for the entire UI.</p>
<p>Of course, performance is everything in these implementations, so it&#8217;ll be fun to torture test MainStage 2 and see how it stands up.</p>
<p>And for anyone who wanted Live clips and Sculpture in one session, this could be interesting.<span id="more-6650"></span></p>
<h3>Flex Time Audio Manipulation</h3>
<p>The music software market is already crowded with tools that promise to let you manipulate audio independent of its original tempo &#8211; but this implementation is more interesting than you might first think. You actually drag the mouse on the waveform itself, turning the sound into a Silly Putty-like, warpable view. Very much like Ableton Live, Logic also adds modes based on material (rhythmic, polyphonic, slicing), and an audio quantize mode that applies the feel of one track to another.<br />
<img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/07/flex.jpg" alt="flex" title="flex" width="580" height="360" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6658" /></p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a slightly gimmicky record start/stop effect, which I&#8217;m sure will be a boon to anyone doing editing for MTV.</p>
<p>But make no mistake about it: Flex Time could heat things up.</p>
<p><strong>Side note:</strong> Does Sibelius &#8211; now owned by industry titan and major Apple rival Avid &#8211; really not care that Apple lifted the name of its &#8220;FlexTime&#8221; technology, which I thought was trademarked? Did Apple pay off Avid to grab that name? (Especially funny after MainStage had a similarity to Plasq&#8217;s OnStage from Rax, a virtually identical feature.)</p>
<h3>For Guitarists</h3>
<ul>
<li>A new pedalboard full of effects</li>
<li>An &#8220;Amp Designer&#8221; for combining 25 amps, 25 speaker cabinets, and 3 mics, plus a library of new presets</li>
<li>Integration with Apogee&#8217;s new GiO interface in both Logic and MainStage</li>
</ul>
<p>Apple is obviously committed to providing a one box solution, so you never have to buy anything for music making that <em>doesn&#8217;t</em> have an Apple logo on it &#8211; something I&#8217;m sure doesn&#8217;t make Native Instruments, Waves, IK Multimedia, and other competitors exactly thrilled. Those solutions are already really good, but I have heard Apple&#8217;s implementation is quite nice, and I&#8217;ve heard it from people who are actual guitarists.</p>
<h3>Notation Enhancements</h3>
<p>Ornaments have been expanded with a broader notation library, and a set of some 4000 chord grids beef up tab capabilities for guitars.</p>
<p>I still think you&#8217;d be nuts to use Logic in place of something like Sibelius for major notation editing, just because I find the dedicated tool much quicker to use. On the other hand, Logic was born as &#8220;Notator,&#8221; so it has notation in its blood.</p>
<h3>Other Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Turn tracks into sampler tracks (again, the first time I&#8217;ve seen a good implementation like this outside Ableton Live)</li>
<li>Drum replacement</li>
<li>Improved editing inside take folders &#8211; so you can adjust recordings while keeping your takes</li>
<li>Better bouncing, track import</li>
<li>More bizarre warp effects for Space Designer (okay, I have to admit, I&#8217;ve gotten addicted to using convolution reverbs for special effects, so curious what they put in there)</li>
<li>A Vocal Jam Pack</li>
</ul>
<p>There&#8217;s also a new browser for instruments, it appears, apparently to make this more accessible to new users. On the other hand, that&#8217;s a bit like holding a toddler&#8217;s hand before putting him in the seat of your Ferrari, when it comes to interfaces like Ultrabeat. (See what I mean <a href="http://images.apple.com/logicstudio/plug-ins/images/instruments_ultrabeat20090721.png">on Apple&#8217;s site</a>.) But I suppose it can&#8217;t hurt &#8211; and meanwhile, the market for educational products remains.</p>
<p><img src="http://createdigitalmusic.com/images/2009/07/soundtrack_mbp1.jpg" alt="soundtrack_mbp" title="soundtrack_mbp" width="580" height="351" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6663" /></p>
<h3>Soundtrack Pro 3</h3>
<p>Soundtrack Pro is the oft-overlooked audio editor bundled with Logic. Part of the promise of Soundtrack is working well with Final Cut, so it&#8217;s nice to see some new features that help distinguish this tool. (I have to say, on the Mac I do prefer working in Soundtrack to working in Peak &#8212; call me crazy.)</p>
<ul>
<li>Vocal Level Match applies a vocal level from one clip to another clip &#8211; fantastic for podcasting and production for video, if it works as advertised</li>
<li>Editing by frequency (&#8217;bout time &#8212; I&#8217;m hoping this means we can work directly in the frequency view, as you should be able to do)</li>
<li>Advanced Time Stretch</li>
<li>Compressor output workflows</li>
</ul>
<h3>Breakfast of Champions</h3>
<p>Apple has also added greater emphasis to artists, mirroring what they&#8217;re doing with GarageBand &#8212; though any hopes for Pro Artist Lessons with Logic are sadly thwarted so far. What they are doing is &#8220;Pro Sessions,&#8221; in which you can download actual session files. (I&#8217;m guessing that doesn&#8217;t include some third-party plug-ins they used, and it&#8217;s no match for, say, remix stems, but&#8230;)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/in-action/">Logic Studio in Action</h3>
<p> (Yep, people use Logic)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/artist-sessions/">Artist Sessions</a> (one nice gem in there &#8212; a Santigold remix&#8230; but was Santigold herself not a user of Logic?)</p>
<h3>What&#8217;s Not in this Upgrade</h3>
<p>As near as I can tell, Logic will not support 64-bit memory addressing or 64-bit mixing. The former is extremely unfortunate for users of big sample libraries, although third-party tools do fill some of that gap. (Even so, native 64-bit memory support would be welcome.) It&#8217;s possible we may see this in an update, however; if it&#8217;s &#8220;in the future,&#8221; we just won&#8217;t know because Apple makes a policy of commenting only once things are released.</p>
<p>Also, it appears that Logic&#8217;s increasingly long-in-the-tooth library of effects and synths &#8212; once part of the core appeal of the tool &#8212; are left as-is in this release, which would be unfortunate. On the other hand, with options like Native Instruments&#8217; Komplete to fill that need, and a price of US$499, it&#8217;ll be hard to fault Apple on this.</p>
<p>Many folks expected some sort of iPhone / iPod touch app, given that third parties have built them for control and the like. They were wrong, but I&#8217;m not surprised &#8212; Apple likes to keep its consumer and pro features fairly separate.</p>
<p>Any other omissions you notice, or things you&#8217;d like me to ask about? Let me know.</p>
<p>At least I have a fairly decent working list for what I&#8217;m likely to be hard at work testing when this arrives in the mail.</p>
<p>And Logic has some intense competition, too, with even a new entry on the scene this year (Propellerhead&#8217;s Record). </p>
<p>Let the games begin&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/">Apple Logic Studio</a></p>
<p>All images Courtesy of Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/07/23/whats-new-in-apples-logic-studio-9-flex-time-mainstage-gets-more-road-worthy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
