<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Create Digital Music &#187; Waldorf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/tag/waldorf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com</link>
	<description>The latest gear, software, and techniques for electronic music production and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Soft Synths of NAMM: Round Up, with Trilogy&#8217;s Successor and the new D.CAM</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/19/the-soft-synths-of-namm-round-up-with-trilogys-successor-and-the-new-dcam/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/19/the-soft-synths-of-namm-round-up-with-trilogys-successor-and-the-new-dcam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming and Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[303]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arturia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.CAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimoog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[namm09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical-modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft-synths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waldorf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/19/the-soft-synths-of-namm-round-up-with-trilogys-successor-and-the-new-dcam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/featured/0109_softs2.jpg">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/cypher.jpg" /></p>
<p>The NAMM show brought a cluster of new soft synths from some beloved synth makers. The interfaces are noticeably conventional, but there are some tasty sonic features in store. Most of these are promised as &ldquo;coming soon,&rdquo; not available now, but here&rsquo;s a quick look at what to expect.</p>
<p>By the way, if you&rsquo;re one the people complaining that you&rsquo;re sick of everyone talking about Ableton and want something else to be excited about, I have one word for you:</p>
<p>D.CAM.</p>
<p>Let me sum it up in one line first:</p>
<p><strong>minimoog V 2.0</strong>: Rewired circuitry, automation recording vocal filtering, and weird 3D preset browsing mean if you like minimoog, you&rsquo;ll like it more.</p>
<p><strong>Brass 2.0</strong>: physically-modeled brass stuff you can play more easily with controllers, now with a sax model and fully spatialized and harmonized.</p>
<p><strong>Trilian: </strong>Even more of the synth that gives you more bass than you need &ndash; and now your Intel Mac can run it in place of Trilogy, for free.</p>
<p><strong>Largo:</strong> It&rsquo;s a Waldorf synthesizer, but it&rsquo;s software. You can&rsquo;t afford a Blofeld, but you can afford this, and then use it in a coffee shop.</p>
<p><strong>D.CAM: </strong>Synth wishes granted: thick parallel-waveform performance synth <em>plus</em> vintage-style string synth <em>plus</em> big, modern FM <em>plus </em>and environment to put them all together.</p>
<p><strong>(added!) impOSCar 2: </strong>Features aren&rsquo;t confirmed yet, but an early look at the OSCar emulation suggest a very big sequel indeed.</p>
<p> <span id="more-4809"></span>
<p>And you can add that to the coming Operator 2 and Collision in Ableton Live (either a la carte or the suite). In fairness, these are exactly the sort of synths that make people wonder why they should pay for Operator &ndash; but one look at the clean interface in Operator, and how much it can do in that compact interface, and I think it fits in just perfectly. Collision, meanwhile, gives us physically-modeled percussion, which I really want to see more of.</p>
<p>By the way, in comparison most of the hardware announcements (microKORG XL, new V-Synth OS) at this show were, to my mind, more incremental than the goodness that shows up in the software stuff. True, D.CAM is the one new entry here, but, well, technically it&rsquo;s <em>four</em> entries on its own, and there&rsquo;s quite a lot in the upgrades, some of which you get for free.</p>
<p>Certainly, what we have is a ton of sequels to some of the biggest soft synth hits (Arturia minimoog V, Trilogy, and impOSCar in particular).</p>
</p>
<p> <!--more-->
</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<h3>Arturia minimoog V 2.0</h3>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/minimoogV2.jpg" /></p>
<p><strike>It&rsquo;s an odd version number &ndash; five two?</strike> Okay, that&#8217;s &#8220;two&#8221; as in the number, &#8220;V&#8221; as in virtual, not the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DzfPcSysAg">Roman Numeral</a>. But for fans of Arturia&rsquo;s flagship Moog emulation synth, 2.0 brings some interesting new features. Sound MAP is an odd, graphical way of exploring presets, although it strikes me a bit like what would happen if you took a preset browser and dumped all the presets on the floor. (For me, this brings back flashbacks to Apple&rsquo;s HotSauce, an experimental 3D interface for metadata on the Web. Thanks, Mattbot. Everyone else, don&rsquo;t ask.)</p>
<p>All of this would be gimmicky and useless, except that you can use this strange, 3D interface to morph between preset ideas. If you could also use it to select interpolate between random parameters, I&rsquo;d go nuts &ndash; I&rsquo;ll leave that to someone else to implement.</p>
<p>The other features are more likely to please everyone:</p>
<ul>
<li>A vocal filter feature with an X/Y morphing interface with different formants (not new to synths, but certainly new to Minimoogs, real or emulated) </li>
<li>Circuitry and modulation destination improvements </li>
<li>Automation with real-time recording </li>
</ul>
<p>Together, it looks like a worthy upgrade for fans, some of whom I know just live inside this synth.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.arturia.com/evolution/en/products/minimoogv/minimoogv-2.0.html">Arturia minimoog V 2.0</a> [Product Page]</p>
<p><strong>Elsewhere: </strong>The folks at Future Music were <a href="http://namm09.musicradar.com/blog/future-music-unearth-amazing-new-synth-feature/">especially excited about the new features</a>, particularly that browser and the way the Vocal Filter sounds. (I didn&rsquo;t follow, though, was the uberfeature the Sound Map or the Vocal Filter? We really have seen these sorts of things before, which is not to take away from Arturia&rsquo;s cool implementation here.)</p>
<p>And it&rsquo;ll cost $299/EUR229 to upgrade from the current &ndash; wait? What&rsquo;s that?</p>
<p>No, it&rsquo;ll be <strong>completely free for existing users</strong>. Now there&rsquo;s a reason for some customer loyalty.</p>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/minimoog_new.jpg" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Look closely: some nice new goodies.</div>
<h3>Arturia Brass 2.0</h3>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/brass2.jpg" /></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Must &hellip; resist &hellip; stupid &hellip; sax &hellip; puns &hellip; even &hellip; if &hellip; sax &hellip; sells.</div>
<p>Arturia also refreshed their physically-modeled brass synth, which now has a saxophone model &ndash; the tenor Buffet-Crampon. (Nice choice! And I&rsquo;m partial to tenors, as I grew up with my father playing tenor in his college pep band.)</p>
<p>Also new: harmonization features, spatialization, MIDI integration features (ideal for, say, the newly-shipping Akai EWI USB wind controller). There are also pre-composed riffs by genre, if you&rsquo;re feeling lazy, though I heartily recommend doing things the hard way.</p>
<p>The minimoog is slick, but I actually think Brass may be a bigger upgrade &ndash; and while you&rsquo;ll find other moog-y sounds, Brass is a really unique sound source. IRCAM, Paris&rsquo; legendary sound research center, is responsible for the sounds inside, meaning you can imagine slightly unshaven, French students in white lab coats every time you use it, which has to be worth something. (I actually wear a lab coat when I&rsquo;m designing sounds, I know that.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.arturia.com/evolution/en/products/brass/brass-2.0.html">Brass 2.0</a></p>
<p><strong>Elsewhere: </strong>Sonic State grabbed a <a href="http://www.sonicstate.com/news/2009/01/18/wnamm09-arturia-brass-expander-demo/">video demo</a> of Brass 2.</p>
<p>And it&rsquo;s also free to upgrade.</p>
<h3>Spectrasonics&rsquo; All-Bass Trilian</h3>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/trillian.jpg" /></p>
<p>How is it that some readers are more excited about Trilian than any other soft synths when all it does is bass sounds?</p>
<p>Well, perhaps because this is successor to Spectrasonics&rsquo; Trilogy is the uber-bass plug-in. Upright ? Check. 5-string? Yep. Roland 303? Why not?</p>
<p>Now, normally instruments based on lots of sampling leave me pretty cold, but the STEAM engine &ndash; used in Spectrasonics&rsquo; Omnisphere &ndash; gives you synth-like controls. And I think Trilian&rsquo;s narrower focus on just basses might earn it more attention than Omnisphere got. (The latter was hyped like crazy on announcement, only to be oddly forgotten, relatively speaking, by the time it came out &ndash; maybe because it&rsquo;s so huge, none of us can fit it on our hard drives.)</p>
<p>And by the way, talk about earning good will: if you own Trilogy and have an Intel Mac, Spectrasonics will give you Trilian for free (shipping only, in place of the usual US$99 upgrade price). So, sure, Apple burned you by switching CPUs, and Spectrasonics could profit &ndash; but they&rsquo;re not.</p>
<p>This means even as I chide Novation, Spectrasonics earns the &ldquo;Good Sense Wins Over Accounting&rdquo; award.</p>
<p>Other specs:</p>
<ul>
<li>Big, new library of acoustic, electric, and synth basses </li>
<li>Arpeggiator </li>
<li>All the original patches, refreshed </li>
<li>Gobs of articulations in the design, for live performance or scoring </li>
<li>Modulation with FM, timbre shifting, and some unique modulation deliciousness </li>
<li>64-bit support </li>
<li>A name that subtly references the <em>Hitchhiker&rsquo;s Guide to the Galaxy</em> </li>
</ul>
<p>Too many other things to list, so just check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spectrasonics.net/news/namm2009-trilian.php">Trilian Announcement</a></p>
<p>Spectrasonics does some really incredible stuff. It&rsquo;s mind-boggling overkill in some ways (ridiculous sampling <em>plus</em> ridiculous synth design), but there&rsquo;s nothing wrong with that &ndash; especially when it serves nothing but bass. And there&rsquo;s just <em>so much control</em> in there, it really is a sound design dream, not just a big pack of sample files.</p>
<p>US$299, due in May.</p>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/trillian2.jpg" /></p>
<h3>Waldorf Largo</h3>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/largo.jpg" /></p>
<p>It&rsquo;s a Waldorf synthesizer, but it&rsquo;s software.</p>
<p>I don&rsquo;t really have to say much else, but suffice to say, it runs on Windows, it runs on Mac (VST and AU), and it&rsquo;s all that lovely Waldorf-ness in a virtual rack. The software interface gives me deja vu relative to a number of Logic synths, among others, but then I think there&rsquo;s just one guy who designs all UIs for all software. (Okay, maybe there are &hellip; two guys.)</p>
<ul>
<li>Voice architecture from the Q / Blofeld </li>
<li>Three oscillators, two with sub-oscillators, modeling analog waveforms plus PPG, Waldorf Wave </li>
<li>Ring mod </li>
<li>Multi-mode Waldorf filter (&ldquo;Taste the difference&rdquo; seems to be Waldorf&rsquo;s message, if you believe them) </li>
<li>Modulation matrix, fast, syncable LFOs </li>
<li>One arpeggiator per layer </li>
<li>Effects </li>
</ul>
<p>If you&rsquo;re in synth overload, I&rsquo;d say move along, but I know there are some folks who have been coveting Waldorf in software, and now you&rsquo;ve got it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.waldorfmusic.de/en/products/largo">Largo</a> [Product Page]</p>
<p>I just wish they hadn&rsquo;t given it a name that makes it sound like a notation product, but I guess that&rsquo;s forgiveable. Pricing? Availability? No word yet.</p>
<h3>Fxpansion D.CAM Synth Squad</h3>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/strobe.jpg" /></p>
<p>D.CAM is a bunch of modeled-analog goodness. Now, the FXpansion boys want you to believe this is all about emulating the goodness of analog, but to me the real story is that you get loads of digital synthesis power that bring together some of the best old stuff with the best new stuff. The products read a bit like a wish list for synths, and then the Fusor product lets you put them all together in semi-modular fashion.</p>
<p>The marketing is a little muddled, and seems to feature evil dystopian overlords with giant red eyes. But who cares? The synths look fantastic. I, for one, welcome our new dystopian overlords.</p>
<p><strong>Strobe </strong>is a &ldquo;super-oscillator&rdquo; performance synth with parallel waveforms, sub-oscillators, a filter with drive, voice stack/detune &ndash; think thick.</p>
<p><strong>Amber</strong> is a vintage string synth, which takes classic divide-down string synths and adds new absurd modulation. Delicious!</p>
<p><strong>Cypher </strong>has lots of knobs <em>and</em> lots of arrows! Okay, basically the idea here is audio-rate FM with lots of shaping and filtering and still more modulation. FM is back, for sure.</p>
<p><strong>Fusor </strong>is an environment in which you can layer your D-CAM synths and modulate them. There&rsquo;s an arpeggiator and step sequencer. This might seem like overkill given the number of environments out there that do this stuff, but in this case you get a consistent interface and semi-modular capabilities. It&rsquo;s no Reaktor, but it&rsquo;s a bit like what I&rsquo;d imagine a set of one really brilliant person&rsquo;s Reaktor ensembles might look like.</p>
<p><a title="http://www.synthsquad.com/" href="http://www.synthsquad.com/">http://www.synthsquad.com/</a></p>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/fusion.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong>Elsewhere: </strong>Gearwire has a <a href="http://www.gearwire.com/fxpansion-dcamsynthsquad.html">nice write-up that sums this up</a> with one line: &ldquo;This trio combines the most sought after features in classic synthesizers with the synthesizers of tomorrow . . . today!&rdquo;</p>
<h3>In other news&hellip;</h3>
<p>Zebra is now <a href="http://www.zebrasynth.com/index.php?item=version">up to 2.3</a>, which I believe is also NAMM news (or announced at the same time). &ldquo;Point 3&rdquo; in the crazy, synthtastic world of Urs Heckmann means things like a skinnable UI, sideband modules, MIDI program changes, Mac RTAS, a resizable editor, compressor modes, comb filter, and &hellip; okay, I can&rsquo;t actually list it all. The sideband alone sounds fantastic. Whoever out there has time to program Zebra <em>and</em> reskin it, I salute you.</p>
<p>Other soft synth news I&rsquo;ve missed? Let us know.</p>
<p>And what has you most psyched?</p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>impOSCar 2</h3>
<p><img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/2009/01/imposcar2.jpg" /></p>
<p>I missed this important preview, as it wasn&rsquo;t really an official release at NAMM &ndash; the features shown aren&rsquo;t even fully confirmed. But one of the best vintage emulations out there, impOSCar 2, is up for getting some improvements. Interestingly, some of the directions GForce&rsquo;s Dave Spiers is taking (like more modulation routing, ring modulation, and more particular synth controls) parallels some of the other stuff we&rsquo;re seeing added to modern soft synths. I do like the sound of chord mode, polyphonic aftertouch, and portamento spread &ndash; this could be a very playable synth.</p>
<p>My usual caveat on this sort of thing is, I tend to personally shy away from synths that focus primarily on emulation of a previous model, just because that sort of thing doesn&rsquo;t hold as much appeal for me. But GForce &ndash; not unlike Way Out Ware&rsquo;s emulations, also distributed by M-Audio &ndash; certainly manage to be the better in this category.</p>
<p>If you are interested in impOSCar 2, this is the one case in which the folks on the NAMM floor have the definite advantage. Check out SonicState&rsquo;s video below, and further details from the gang at Computer Music (via MusicRadar):</p>
<p><a href="http://namm09.musicradar.com/blog/computer-music-gforce-imposcar-2-see-it-hear-it-pull-funny-faces/">Computer Music: GForce impOSCar 2! See it, hear it, pull funny faces!</a></p>
<p>SonicState with the instrument&rsquo;s creator:</p>
<p> <embed src="http://www.sonicstate.com/tv/flvplayer.swf" FlashVars="config=http://www.sonicstate.com/tv/?id=1389" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" width="400" height="330" name="flvplayer" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" allowFullScreen="true" /> </embed>
<p>Thanks, michel / bliss! (I had wanted to cover this and &hellip; yep, forgot.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/01/19/the-soft-synths-of-namm-round-up-with-trilogys-successor-and-the-new-dcam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAMM: Up Close with Waldorf&#8217;s Zarenbourg Electric Piano &#8211; Real or Cyborg?</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/21/namm-up-close-with-waldorfs-zarenbourg-electric-piano-real-or-cyborg/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/21/namm-up-close-with-waldorfs-zarenbourg-electric-piano-real-or-cyborg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Jancourtz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric-pianos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waldorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zarenbourg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/21/namm-up-close-with-waldorfs-zarenbourg-electric-piano-real-or-cyborg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Waldorf&#8217;s Zarenbourg electric piano was on display at their NAMM booth. Beholding its grand, future-retro design, you&#8217;ll immediately wonder: are there tines and pickups under the Zarenbourg&#8217;s hood, or a digital sound engine? 
The answer, alas, is the latter, which will be appreciated by keyboardists who value the ability to use multiple built-in sounds and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.createdigitalmusic.com/images/2007/jan/zarenbourg1.jpg"></p>
<p>Waldorf&#8217;s Zarenbourg electric piano was on display at their NAMM booth. Beholding its grand, future-retro design, you&#8217;ll immediately wonder: are there tines and pickups under the Zarenbourg&#8217;s hood, or a digital sound engine? </p>
<p>The answer, alas, is the latter, which will be appreciated by keyboardists who value the ability to use multiple built-in sounds and effects along with an editor librarian in VST and Audio Units.</p>
<p>There are also several bold color schemes for the Zarenbourg&#8217;s shell, including a huge Union Jack flag, so you can keep your Zarenbourg coordinated with your Mini. The large, flat top also lends itself nicely to holding another keyboard and/or computer setup.</p>
<p>The Zarenbourg is scheduled to ship in May for around $5k MSRP.</p>
<p><a href="http://waldorfmusic.de/en/home">Waldorf Music (en)</a></p>
<p><I>Ed.: It&#8217;s a tough NAMM show for the Zarenbourg: Waldorf&#8217;s electric piano has to face up to the <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/19/namm-gallery-the-rhodes-is-back-in-all-its-retro-glory/">real Rhodes moniker</a>. Odds are, I think, the <a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/namm-new-waldorf-keyboards-synths-confirmed/">new Waldorf synths</a> may fare better buzz-wise. I see an electromechanical vs. simulated electric piano smackdown in the future. The winners: lovers of electric pianos. The losers: anyone wanting an electric piano with the Canadian flag will need to get a custom paint job. Though I betcha you&#8217;ll be one-of-a-kind. -PK</I> <span id="more-1833"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://www.createdigitalmusic.com/images/2007/jan/zarenbourg2.jpg"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/21/namm-up-close-with-waldorfs-zarenbourg-electric-piano-real-or-cyborg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAMM: New Waldorf Keyboards, Synths Confirmed</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/namm-new-waldorf-keyboards-synths-confirmed/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/namm-new-waldorf-keyboards-synths-confirmed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual-analog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waldorf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/namm-new-waldorf-keyboards-synths-confirmed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Physical-modeled electric piano, now a little more physical
The NAMM of the DJ? Don&#8217;t worry, synth lovers: beloved, long-lost synth maker Waldorf are back in a big way with a lineup of new synth hardware products. Drool over them in a gorgeous PDF brochure filled with mock-ups, but here&#8217;s the full lineup. (As reported by Sequencer.de [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.createdigitalmusic.com/images/2007/jan/unionjack.jpg"></p>
<div class="imgcaption">Physical-modeled electric piano, now a little more physical</div>
<p>The NAMM of the DJ? Don&#8217;t worry, synth lovers: beloved, long-lost synth maker Waldorf are back in a big way with a lineup of new synth hardware products. Drool over them in a <a href="http://www.waldorfmusic.de/assets/media/flyer_namm07_engl_v2.pdf">gorgeous PDF brochure filled with mock-ups</a>, but here&#8217;s the full lineup. (As reported by <a href="http://www.sequencer.de/">Sequencer.de</a> and <a href="http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2007/01/namm-hot-new-synths-and-piano-from.html">Music thing</a>, but now publicly confirmed by Waldorf; we should have live photos from the show if they&#8217;re on display.)</p>
<p>The limited-edition exterior visuals are the work of Axel Hartmann, the talented designer of the (unfortunately failed) <a href="http://www.hartmann-music.com/home/us/basics/">Neuron Synth</a>, and Waldorf promises the new products are &#8220;handcrafted in Germany.&#8221; Here&#8217;s the lineup:<span id="more-1809"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://www.createdigitalmusic.com/images/2007/jan/Q.jpg"></p>
<p><B>Q and Q+ keyboard synths:</b> Virtual analog synths with 58 onboard encoders, up to five oscillators and two multimode filters per voice, and (on the Plus) 16 real analog filters (i.e., not modeled).</p>
<p><b>micro Q:</b> Rack-mount version of the Q, with the same sound engine.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.createdigitalmusic.com/images/2007/jan/blofeld.jpg"></p>
<p><B>blofeld:</b> USB 2.0-connected synth module with 1,000 editable sounds; this unit appears to be a smaller take on the more advanced virtual analog synths, but still with some editing.</p>
<p><b>zarenbourg:</b> Here&#8217;s where things start to get really interesting: the Zarenbourg is a modeled electric piano with five EP simulations and effects, built into a 76-key, traditional case, with wooden keys. Optional internal speakers complete the effect. I love the optional &#8220;rockstar&#8221; paint jobs.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.createdigitalmusic.com/images/2007/jan/stromberg.jpg"></p>
<p><b>stromberg:</b> Wavetable oscillators, two-way multimode filters, multiple filter types, 100-voice polyphony, and Waldorf Wave, Microwave, and Q sounds &#8212; this is the flagship keyboard synth. I had an electronic musician friend named Dirk Stromberg who went off to Europe, but I&#8217;m guessing this is not his design / celebrity endorsement.</p>
<p><B>Waldorf Edition PPG Wave 2.V:</b> For software lovers, a plug-in that emulates 80s PPG synths.</p>
<p>Looks like really good stuff; now we just have to learn pricing and see what they&#8217;re like in person. In this competitive age of great soft synths, I especially like anything with something unique &#8212; electric pianos with awesome paint jobs, wooden keys, and built-in speakers, and great virtual analog synths with real analog filters are certainly in the running.</p>
<p><B>Updated:</b> <a href="http://matrixsynth.blogspot.com/2007/01/walorf-on-novamusik.html">Matrixsynth notes pricing</a> via Novamusik: Q Phoenix US$2299; Micro Q Phoenix $699 &#8212; both bundled (nicely enough) with Waldorf Edition plug-ins. That makes a decent deal, though you&#8217;ll find more speculation in comments &#8212; like the fact that you can get used predecessors of these models for less on a budget. (So what else is new?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/01/17/namm-new-waldorf-keyboards-synths-confirmed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Messe: Adrian Picks &#8211; KOMPLEXER Super Soft Synth</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/03/29/messe-adrian-picks-komplexer-super-soft-synth/</link>
		<comments>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/03/29/messe-adrian-picks-komplexer-super-soft-synth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Messe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft-synths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waldorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmusic.com/?p=1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adrian Anders sends along his top picks from the Messe show in Frankfurt that might be under everyone else&#8217;s radar. First up: the long-awaited Terratec Producer Komplexer is now finally on its way. This monster soft synth combines virtual analog and wavetable synthesis in a monster of a plug-in. Vocoder? Check. Tons of modulation? Yup. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian Anders sends along his top picks from the Messe show in Frankfurt that might be under everyone else&#8217;s radar. First up: the long-awaited <a href="http://audioen.terratec.net/modules.php?op=modload&#038;name=Sections&#038;file=index&#038;req=viewarticle&#038;artid=89">Terratec Producer Komplexer</a> is now finally on its way. This monster soft synth combines virtual analog and wavetable synthesis in a monster of a plug-in. Vocoder? Check. Tons of modulation? Yup. Arpeggiator? You got it. And to top it all off, you can control this beast with some eight &#8220;macro controllers&#8221; that are supposed to appeal to newcomers and advanced users alike. (Because you know there&#8217;s no better way to appeal to newbies than to call something &#8220;Komplexer.&#8221;) Waldorf fans will recognize features from the now-defunct but beloved MicroQ synth, and sure enough the Terratec software will import your MicroQ presets. I&#8217;m pretty sure it also makes espresso. The one thing it doesn&#8217;t do: run on Mac.<P><br />
<B>Compatibility:</b> Windows 2000/XP, VST<P><br />
<B>Pricing/Availability:</b> EUR199; released<P><br />
<B>CDM Messe Outlook:</b> Superb, if this thing is as good in use as it is on paper. I just hope it&#8217;s not too &#8220;Komplexer.&#8221;<P><br />
<img src="http://media.createdigitalmedia.net/cdmu/images/storiespre2k6/komplexer.jpg"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2006/03/29/messe-adrian-picks-komplexer-super-soft-synth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
